Re: Weird behaviour, require js doesn't refresh changed js file immediately
thanks a lot Felix :)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Felix Scheffer <
fschef...@felix-scheffer.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for AMD modules, caching should be disabled by default.
>
> The default value for the Cache-Control header in this case is:
> "max-age=60,must-revalidate". You can customize that by setting
> SymbolConstants.OMIT_EXPIRATION_CACHE_CONTROL_HEADER.
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> Felix
>
>
> 2015-03-19 10:46 GMT+01:00 abangkis :
>
> > Sorry to brought up old thread. Does anyone know where I can set up the
> > expiration time for require js module? Can I set it to zero or 1 second?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For modules, which can't be fingerprinted with a checksum in the URL,
> > > Tapestry applies a short expiration time in development, and a much
> > longer
> > > one in production. I suspect you are hitting that. A hard refresh,
> > > clearing the local cache, should force the browser to request the
> updated
> > > resource.
> > >
> > > Sometimes the browser just refuses to get the resource; you can see
> this
> > > when it looks one way in the browser, and differently and correctly via
> > > curl or httpie.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:49 PM, abangkis wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, my workaround is to add some kind of index number to log to
> > > javascript
> > > > console such as : console.log("29. Google map is ready"); I keep
> > > refreshing
> > > > until the number is changed. For now it's good enough but hopefully
> > > there's
> > > > a better solution in the future.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:24 AM, abangkis
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi guys, another question about require js. So i experiment with
> > > creating
> > > > > a new source folder in eclipse by the name of requiresrc. Under
> that
> > > > folder
> > > > > will reside the META-INF/modules/my_javascript.js file. This way
> > > eclipse
> > > > > will deploy the META-INF/modules folder to the classes module
> > > > > automatically. It worked.
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is when i change my_javascript.js file content. The
> > content
> > > > > doesn't get refreshed automatically. Hitting F5 and Shift-F5
> doesn't
> > > > change
> > > > > it too. But after a while (5-10 second) then the content will be
> > > changed
> > > > > automatically.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking around i found this related thread
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.wenda.io/questions/4211439/force-refresh-doesnt-work-for-head-js.html
> > > > > basically it says that F5 wouldn't work because of the dynamic
> script
> > > > > loading. So, does anyone have a trick with this kind of thing?
> > Because
> > > > I'm
> > > > > used of putting my js folder under WebApp folder and hitting
> refresh,
> > > > > tapestry would pick up the new content. Restarting the app every
> > time
> > > i
> > > > > change the js file would be a big pain.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks :)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://www.mreunionlabs.net/
Re: JS conflict
Found another article showing it is possible to use jQuery in addition to Prototype. I will try. http://tapestry.apache.org/legacy-javascript.html On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Cheng Zhang wrote: > I am not sure. I even did not realize Tapestry use Prototype as its > default JS library. > I do not want to change existing code with built-in prototype. > I just made some research and found the Tapestry is tightly coupling with > Prototype, probably I can only use the Foundation components that do not > require JS. > > > https://tapestry.apache.org/javascript-rewrite.html#JavaScriptRewrite-DependenceonPrototype/Scriptaculous > > Thank you so much Thiago. > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are you sure Foundation Framework is compatible with Prototype.js? If >> not, and if it's compatible with jQuery, you can make Tapestry 5.4 use >> jQuery instead. Not exactly a Tapestry problem. >> >> >> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:38:02 -0300, Cheng Zhang < >> charlesdenverj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> More information from dev tool Console: >>> >>> Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function prototype.js:2284 >>> Element.Methods.writeAttribute >>> prototype.js:2284 >>> global.Element >>> prototype.js:1898 >>> Tapestry.waitForPage >>> tapestry.js:120 >>> >>> onclick >>> (index):7 >>> a.sendClick >>> all.js:34 >>> a.onTouchEnd >>> all.js:34 >>> >>> d >>> all.js:34 >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Cheng Zhang < >>> charlesdenverj...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, I am trying to apply Foundation framework to an existing Tapestry project. But the JavaScript usded by Foundation seems like conflict with Tapestry JS. Once I added the Foundataion JS file to my tml file, the eventlink does no longer work, there is no any response after cliking, and Eclipse console has no output. I believe the http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/assets/js/all.js makes some negative effect on the existing JS function Tapestry.waitForPage. The tml file eventlink code: >>> t:update=*"show"* href=*"#"*>Forgot Password In browser the generated html code: >>> update="show" href="/portal/signin:resetpassword">Forgot Password Thanks for your help! Charles >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer >> http://machina.com.br >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> >
Re: JS conflict
I am not sure. I even did not realize Tapestry use Prototype as its default JS library. I do not want to change existing code with built-in prototype. I just made some research and found the Tapestry is tightly coupling with Prototype, probably I can only use the Foundation components that do not require JS. https://tapestry.apache.org/javascript-rewrite.html#JavaScriptRewrite-DependenceonPrototype/Scriptaculous Thank you so much Thiago. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you sure Foundation Framework is compatible with Prototype.js? If not, > and if it's compatible with jQuery, you can make Tapestry 5.4 use jQuery > instead. Not exactly a Tapestry problem. > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:38:02 -0300, Cheng Zhang < > charlesdenverj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > More information from dev tool Console: >> >> Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function prototype.js:2284 >> Element.Methods.writeAttribute >> prototype.js:2284 >> global.Element >> prototype.js:1898 >> Tapestry.waitForPage >> tapestry.js:120 >> >> onclick >> (index):7 >> a.sendClick >> all.js:34 >> a.onTouchEnd >> all.js:34 >> >> d >> all.js:34 >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Cheng Zhang > > >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> I am trying to apply Foundation framework to an existing Tapestry >>> project. >>> But the JavaScript usded by Foundation seems like conflict with Tapestry >>> JS. >>> >>> Once I added the Foundataion JS file to my tml file, the eventlink does >>> no >>> longer work, there is no any response after cliking, and Eclipse console >>> has no output. >>> >>> I believe the http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/assets/js/all.js makes >>> some >>> negative effect on the existing JS function Tapestry.waitForPage. >>> >>> The tml file eventlink code: >>> >>> >> t:update=*"show"* href=*"#"*>Forgot Password >>> In browser the generated html code: >>> >>> >> update="show" href="/portal/signin:resetpassword">Forgot Password >>> >>> Thanks for your help! >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer > http://machina.com.br > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
Design / Best Practice on Multinational App
What's the best approach for a single build of an app with global presence? I'm not asking for localisation, but subtle functional differences. Some examples are Address entity bean, which requires a state for some countries, but not for the others. Do I build separate Address bean for each region and deploy it based on execution mode? Or do I build a single bean that encapsulates the functionality of all regions and provide if-then logic based on deployment? Or is there a better, more Tapestrized solution? Note, that Address entity bean is the simplest example that comes off the top of my hat. There will be plenty of others. In some corporate environments I've seen inheritance based code base deployments where a generic code base would be built, and each region would be a sort of a fork of generic codebase. Perhaps that? Adam
Re: JS conflict
Are you sure Foundation Framework is compatible with Prototype.js? If not, and if it's compatible with jQuery, you can make Tapestry 5.4 use jQuery instead. Not exactly a Tapestry problem. On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:38:02 -0300, Cheng Zhang wrote: More information from dev tool Console: Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function prototype.js:2284 Element.Methods.writeAttribute prototype.js:2284 global.Element prototype.js:1898 Tapestry.waitForPage tapestry.js:120 onclick (index):7 a.sendClick all.js:34 a.onTouchEnd all.js:34 d all.js:34 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Cheng Zhang wrote: Hi all, I am trying to apply Foundation framework to an existing Tapestry project. But the JavaScript usded by Foundation seems like conflict with Tapestry JS. Once I added the Foundataion JS file to my tml file, the eventlink does no longer work, there is no any response after cliking, and Eclipse console has no output. I believe the http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/assets/js/all.js makes some negative effect on the existing JS function Tapestry.waitForPage. The tml file eventlink code: Forgot Password In browser the generated html code: update="show" href="/portal/signin:resetpassword">Forgot Password Thanks for your help! Charles -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
DateTimePicker Component
Hi, I'm using tapestry 5.3.7 with tapsetry-jquery. I'm looking for a DateTimePicker component. Tapestry have only a datepicker Chenille Kit used to have one (ck.DateTimeField), but this project seems to be dead Thanks for your help, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [5.4] Where to put the require.config?
In a javascript stack? On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Rural Hunter wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testing tapestry 5.4. I'm wondering where to put the requirejs.config > code for my own modules and third-party modules? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
