Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Answering the queston in the subject: no, it's not possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration id. Why do you want that? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
I started with wanting to create a Chain of service instances using an ordered contribution point. Unlike usual though, the implementation isn't custom each time. Instead, there's multiple repeat uses of an implementation which does different work based on a String supplied it. This String also happens to be unique to it and can be its ServiceId. I was thinking I'd end up able to do something like this: orderedConfiguration.addInstance(SomeService, PremadeRepeatUseImpl.class, before:SomeOtherService,after:DiffService); a different module... orderedConfiguration.addInstance(AnotherService, PremadeRepeatUseImpl.class, before:SomeService); What the PremadeServiceImpl class needs to know is the string: SomeService. I was hoping it could receive the ID because otherwise I must create the instance manually and feed it the String. My goal is to make it simple for a new Module to addin and contribute more instances. One contrib method with one line and TapIoC autobuilds all the instances and injects the desired params. Then the root Module uses the contribs to build the chain with ChainBuilder. Without it being able to learn it through some automatic means I ended up with the below. It uses a builder method which uses its method name to assign the service ID and constructs the instance directly. Then, inject the built instance into the contrib method via InjectService and use add() instead of addInstance(): public static PremadeInterface buildSomeService(..inject the constructor needs...) return new PremadeServiceImpl(SomeService, provide needs...); It works, but, use of the ID is repetitive and has some unsafe uses, like, the method name, which can't use a constant value. And it looks a little odd. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com wrote: Answering the queston in the subject: no, it's not possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration id. Why do you want that? -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Nothing specific that I know of... ...you could iterate over the ServiceActivities in the ServiceActivityScoreboard service looking for a matching service interface and take the ID from there. It's not nice, but as long as you know the type of the service, it should work. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a RuntimeException stating No service implements the interface java.lang.String. It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will receive the ServiceId as a Resource, but, I'm causing this exception instead. For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service implementation constructor prototype. serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId); serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId2); public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId) Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId method? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk wrote: No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols Steve. On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID. Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's constructor? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Also, it seems the fourth example in this sectionhttp://tapestry.apache.org/defining-tapestry-ioc-services.html#DefiningTapestryIOCServices-InjectingResources doesn't work with Tapestry-IoC-5.3.6 (service builder method in the module accepting 'String serviceId' parameter). Has this behavior changed in recent updates and the documentation is behind? On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a RuntimeException stating No service implements the interface java.lang.String. It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will receive the ServiceId as a Resource, but, I'm causing this exception instead. For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service implementation constructor prototype. serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId); serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId2); public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId) Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId method? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk wrote: No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols Steve. On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID. Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's constructor? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Also, in this sectionhttp://tapestry.apache.org/injection-in-detail.html#InjectioninDetail-Checkforserviceresourcesit doesn't list String and service ID as a resource. As a side note, if you look at the list item for ServiceResources it looks like the last part should actually be a new list item. Anyone agree? On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Also, it seems the fourth example in this sectionhttp://tapestry.apache.org/defining-tapestry-ioc-services.html#DefiningTapestryIOCServices-InjectingResources doesn't work with Tapestry-IoC-5.3.6 (service builder method in the module accepting 'String serviceId' parameter). Has this behavior changed in recent updates and the documentation is behind? On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a RuntimeException stating No service implements the interface java.lang.String. It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will receive the ServiceId as a Resource, but, I'm causing this exception instead. For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service implementation constructor prototype. serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId); serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId2); public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId) Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId method? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk wrote: No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols Steve. On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID. Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's constructor? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
Found this Git changehttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tapestry-5.git;a=commit;h=7a521c1185fef67bf24a69ec248164f33d4ae136which removed the automatic injection of service id from the AbstractServiceCreator.java source file. There are corresponding changes which remove the Inject annotation (as it's no longer necessary to override the resource injection). Is there a *new* way to cause the ServiceId injection? On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Also, in this sectionhttp://tapestry.apache.org/injection-in-detail.html#InjectioninDetail-Checkforserviceresourcesit doesn't list String and service ID as a resource. As a side note, if you look at the list item for ServiceResources it looks like the last part should actually be a new list item. Anyone agree? On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Also, it seems the fourth example in this sectionhttp://tapestry.apache.org/defining-tapestry-ioc-services.html#DefiningTapestryIOCServices-InjectingResources doesn't work with Tapestry-IoC-5.3.6 (service builder method in the module accepting 'String serviceId' parameter). Has this behavior changed in recent updates and the documentation is behind? On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a RuntimeException stating No service implements the interface java.lang.String. It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will receive the ServiceId as a Resource, but, I'm causing this exception instead. For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service implementation constructor prototype. serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId); serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId(TestId2); public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId) Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId method? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk wrote: No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols Steve. On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID. Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's constructor? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: TapestryIoC: Is it possible to receive an OrderedConfiguration's ID?
No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols Steve. On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran e...@elidoran.com wrote: When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID. Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's constructor? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
