Script component locality of definition
Folks, I have ParentTemplate.html and ChildTemplate.html ChildTemplate is a tapestry Component ChildTemplate happens to exercise tapestry script and has a respective ChildTemplate.script QUES: Where should I place the @Script definition... in ParentTemplate or ChildTemplate ? I realize this could depend on what formal/informal parameters/bindings are available or unavailable from either context... maybe not... Best regards Ken in nashua _ Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today. http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline
RE: Script component locality of definition
The reason why I am asking this... is because then I specify the @Script definition in the parent, the javascript code gets rendered properly in the initialization of the body and just near the actual widget markup. If I specify the @script definition in the child, no scripting gets rendered at all... and this is with both the java/jwc specifying body=true. So what is happening to the javascript? Is this a bug? If there is a preferred or limited fashion in usage, please advise. Thank YouBest regards Ken in nashua From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Script component locality of definitionDate: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:54:57 -0500 Folks, I have ParentTemplate.html and ChildTemplate.html ChildTemplate is a tapestry Component ChildTemplate happens to exercise tapestry script and has a respective ChildTemplate.script QUES: Where should I place the @Script definition... in ParentTemplate or ChildTemplate ? I realize this could depend on what formal/informal parameters/bindings are available or unavailable from either context... maybe not... Best regards Ken in nashua Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today! _ Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today. http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline
RE: Script component locality of definition
Just another tidbit... The parent is actually Home.html I guess I am wondering why the Script component is not rendering when specified deeper beyond Home.html Are there limitations?Best regards Ken in nashua From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: Script component locality of definitionDate: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:30:38 -0500 The reason why I am asking this... is because then I specify the @Script definition in the parent, the javascript code gets rendered properly in the initialization of the body and just near the actual widget markup. If I specify the @script definition in the child, no scripting gets rendered at all... and this is with both the java/jwc specifying body=true. So what is happening to the javascript? Is this a bug? If there is a preferred or limited fashion in usage, please advise. Thank YouBest regards Ken in nashua From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Script component locality of definitionDate: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:54:57 -0500 Folks, I have ParentTemplate.html and ChildTemplate.html ChildTemplate is a tapestry Component ChildTemplate happens to exercise tapestry script and has a respective ChildTemplate.script QUES: Where should I place the @Script definition... in ParentTemplate or ChildTemplate ? I realize this could depend on what formal/informal parameters/bindings are available or unavailable from either context... maybe not... Best regards Ken in nashua Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today! Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today! _ Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook – together at last. Get it now. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102225181033.aspx?pid=CL100626971033
