any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
Hi list, I found that's quite troublesome using dreamweaver to edito tml pages, any better solution? Thanks John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
Using invisible instrumentation its very easy. For example replace: t:pagelink page=myPageFoo/t:pagelink by a t:type=pagelink page=myPageFoo/a On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, onj888-tapes...@yahoo.com.hk wrote: Hi list, I found that's quite troublesome using dreamweaver to edito tml pages, any better solution? Thanks John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
But what is the reason why invisible instrumentation is not the only option. I have always thought that for a presentation framework having clean html files as tamplates is a major advantage. Il 11/02/2011 10.25, Igor Drobiazko ha scritto: Using invisible instrumentation its very easy. For example replace: t:pagelink page=myPageFoo/t:pagelink by a t:type=pagelink page=myPageFoo/a On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, onj888-tapes...@yahoo.com.hk wrote: Hi list, I found that's quite troublesome using dreamweaver to edito tml pages, any better solution? Thanks John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- == dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it == - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:35:32 -0200, Ivano Luberti lube...@archicoop.it wrote: But what is the reason why invisible instrumentation is not the only option. I don't know. I have always thought that for a presentation framework having clean html files as tamplates is a major advantage. Tapestry does have the advantage of clean HTML files as templates. Just use invisible instrumentation always. Tapestry just doesn't force us to do that. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
Il 11/02/2011 11.15, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo ha scritto: I have always thought that for a presentation framework having clean html files as tamplates is a major advantage. Tapestry does have the advantage of clean HTML files as templates. Just use invisible instrumentation always. Tapestry just doesn't force us to do that. This is exactly what I have always done -- == dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it == - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Ivano Luberti lube...@archicoop.it wrote:
But what is the reason why invisible instrumentation is not the only option.
I have always thought that for a presentation framework having clean
html files as tamplates is a major advantage.
Because if you aren't working with a designer writing:
${user.firstName}
is much faster than writing:
span t:type=output t:id=firstNameOutput
t:value=user.firstNameFirst Name Here/span
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: any good wyswyg web editor recommend?
Maybe, but as you try to write java code as clean as possible, I cannot
see why you shouldn't do the same thing with your html code.
Even because usually you want to show your html static pages to the
customer before starting to implement something else.
Il 11/02/2011 14.51, Mark ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Ivano Luberti lube...@archicoop.it wrote:
But what is the reason why invisible instrumentation is not the only option.
I have always thought that for a presentation framework having clean
html files as tamplates is a major advantage.
Because if you aren't working with a designer writing:
${user.firstName}
is much faster than writing:
span t:type=output t:id=firstNameOutput
t:value=user.firstNameFirst Name Here/span
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
==
dott. Ivano Mario Luberti
Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l.
Sede Operativa
Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa
tel.: +39-050- 580959
tel/fax: +39-050-9711344
web: www.archicoop.it
==
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
