RE: I can't access my webapplication from another computer
Dear Antonio, Yes I think the machine which tomcat has been installled has firewall enabled Windows firewall.. Do you think that is the problem? Thank you for replying on short notice. GodBless, Ryan Webb - Philippines Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:47:14 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: I can't access my webapplication from another computer 2008/2/29, Ryan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://192.168.1.2/webapplication/login.jspIs the machine behind a firewall (even software firewall)? Is your client computer in the same subnet of your server? Antonio _ Get your free suite of Windows Live services today! http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
RE: I can't access my webapplication from another computer
Dear Partha, My OS is windows XP professional SP2 and I configured Tomacat port to 80 Thanks for your quick reply.. GodBless, Ryan Webb -- Philippines Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:16:56 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: I can't access my webapplication from another computer what's the tomcat port? ur OS ? On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ryan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am new to Tomcat and i wish you would lend a hand. Here's the situation: I installed Tomcat 6.0.14 full install and I copied my .war file into /webapps I checked if my webapplication is running by typing http://localhost/webapplication/login.jsp and it worked ok.. Problem: Unfortunately, when I tried to access my webapplication from another computer, I tried to type from url: http://192.168.1.2/webapplication/login.jsp, the browser always gives the Page cannot be displayed page. (where the IP address is the address which Tomcat 6 was installed). Are there futher configurations needed to be done? You may give me links / websites that relates to my problem (if you're not in the mood for explaining ha.ha!) Thank you for reading my e-mail. Godbless, Ryan Webb -- from Philippines _ Get your free suite of Windows Live services today! http://www.get.live.com/wl/all -- Regards Partha Goswami Solaris/Open solaris User Group www.solaris-user-group.org _ Help Splitzo Sally Before It’s Too Late! http://www.thegirlwhosplitinto5.com/
Re: I can't access my webapplication from another computer
humm, Go the other computer, from where, u want to see, Go, its, command mode, type, ping 192.168.1.2 send, me the output. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ryan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Partha, My OS is windows XP professional SP2 and I configured Tomacat port to 80 Thanks for your quick reply.. GodBless, Ryan Webb -- Philippines Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:16:56 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: I can't access my webapplication from another computer what's the tomcat port? ur OS ? On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ryan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello, I am new to Tomcat and i wish you would lend a hand. Here's the situation: I installed Tomcat 6.0.14 full install and I copied my .war file into /webapps I checked if my webapplication is running by typing http://localhost/webapplication/login.jsp and it worked ok.. Problem: Unfortunately, when I tried to access my webapplication from another computer, I tried to type from url: http://192.168.1.2/webapplication/login.jsp, the browser always gives the Page cannot be displayed page. (where the IP address is the address which Tomcat 6 was installed). Are there futher configurations needed to be done? You may give me links / websites that relates to my problem (if you're not in the mood for explaining ha.ha!) Thank you for reading my e-mail. Godbless, Ryan Webb -- from Philippines _ Get your free suite of Windows Live services today! http://www.get.live.com/wl/all -- Regards Partha Goswami Solaris/Open solaris User Group www.solaris-user-group.org _ Help Splitzo Sally Before It's Too Late! http://www.thegirlwhosplitinto5.com/ -- Regards Partha Goswami Solaris/Open solaris User Group www.solaris-user-group.org
Re: I can't access my webapplication from another computer
2008/2/29, Ryan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes I think the machine which tomcat has been installled has firewall enabled Windows firewall.. Do you think that is the problem? Probably. Configure Windows Firewall to open the port on which Tomcat runs. Antonio
I cant access my webapplication issue is now Solved!
Dear fellow users, I would like to thank all people who helped me solved my problem.. Problem is windows firewall I did not notice it was running. I will configure windows firewall. most reply was related to network, port and firewall.. God bless all of you. Warmest regards, Ryan Webb - Philippines _ Help Splitzo Sally Before It’s Too Late! http://www.thegirlwhosplitinto5.com/
Re: JkRequestLogFormat Options
Hallo Fred,
A - you're right - the missing Letter was the fault - i checked this
command so many times -but don't see this.
Thanks a lot
best
ahmed
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Von: fredk2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: JkRequestLogFormat Options
Hi,
btw, in your log format line you have %{JK_REQUEST_DURATON}n instead of
%{JK_REQUEST_DURATION}n see the missing I.
I am using 1.2.25 and i get times alike 0.0275 when using Apache 2.2
Rgds, Fred
Ahmed Musa wrote:
Hallo,
I am logging the mod_jk Output through the Apache access_log - as
written
in the reference found under
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/apache.html
Because i want to get clearness about what exactly is going on in our
system i use the following LogFormat:
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{Referer}i\ \%{User-Agent}i\
\%{Cookie}i\ \%{Set-Cookie}o\ %{pid}P %{tid}P%T
%{JK_WORKER_NAME}n %{JK_REQUEST_DURATON}n %{JK_WORKER_ROUTE}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_NAME}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_BUSY}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_VALUE}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_ACCESSED}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_READ}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_TRANSFERRED}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_ERRORS}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_ACTIVATION}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_STATE}n %{JK_LB_LAST_NAME}n mod_jk_log
...everthing works fine except the Options responsible for the Request
Duration.
Mostly neither %T nor %{JK_REQUEST_DURATON}n have a Value (%T mostly is
0
an the other Parameter is -).
At some Requests i found the %T has a value like for example 2 or 3.. -
and JK_REQUEST DURATION has -
or %T is 0 and JK_REQUEST_DURATION has an value like 2 or 3 ...
First - why are there not values at each request ?
Second -i think both Options are measuring the same Value - why they are
not the same ?
Third - why they are not showing seconds.microseconds as written in the
reference but only (I think so) rounded seconds.
We use mod_jk 1.2.26
Thanks for help
Best
ahmed
--
Psst! Geheimtipp: Online Games kostenlos spielen bei den GMX Free Games!
http://games.entertainment.web.de/de/entertainment/games/free
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JkRequestLogFormat-Options-tp15736214p15745192.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat load balanced with Apache HTTP Server and mod_jk
Hi Frannack, No, not at the moment. A partial workaround: add all balamncer members you are assuming to become valid in the future and put those, which don't yet exist into activation=Stopped Then you can put them into active without restart, once you build them up. BTW: apachectl graceful is not *that* bad any more (but it destroys non-persistent JK activation). Regards, Rainer frannack Guimard wrote: Hello, Is there a way to add a Balancer Member to Apache HTTP Server on the fly? I'm using Apache 2.2, Tomcat 5.5 and mod_jk. I have a Apache HTTP Server load balance request on the pool of workers (tomcat instances). When I add a new worker, I would like Apache HTTP Server to be notify so it can add it on its balancer member list. I don't care if it's not persistent after reboot of the Apache HTTP Server. Thank you, Frannack - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JkRequestLogFormat Options
Hallo Rainer,
thanks for your Input
- of course i have to change my FIRST and LAST variant (the FIRST_NAME i will
use to check if the worker has changed) - but you're right - i am more
interested in the LAST values.
Changed %T to %D - works fine, thanks
We upgraded to 1.2.26 last week - but the Values for ROUTE and DURATION are the
same than before (1.2.25) - and we haven't set JkRequestLogFormat
explicitly.(of course i wrote DURATION without I - now it's ok).
thanks
best ahmed
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:52:40 +0100
Von: Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: JkRequestLogFormat Options
In addition to Freds remark:
Usually you want the LAST variant, instead of the FIRST variant. The
two are the same, if a loab balancer only tries one worker, but in case
of an error and failover, FIRST will be the first worker tried (so the
failed one) and LAST the last one, so usually the successful one (unless
all workers fail).
%T: response time in seconds, and I think it always gets rounded down.
So usually not very useful
Instead you could use the httpd standard %D, which is response time in
microseconds.
Last remark: until JK 1.2.25 the variables JK_WORKER_ROUTE and
JK_REQUEST_DURATION where only filled, if some JkRequestLogFormat was
set. In your version 1.2.26 both of them should get set even with a
JkRequestLogFormat (but only, if the request gets handled by mod_jk, so
not for static content, that is returned by the web server without any
Tomcat interaction).
Regards,
Rainer
Ahmed Musa schrieb:
Hallo,
I am logging the mod_jk Output through the Apache access_log - as
written in the reference found under
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/apache.html
Because i want to get clearness about what exactly is going on in our
system i use the following LogFormat:
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{Referer}i\ \%{User-Agent}i\
\%{Cookie}i\ \%{Set-Cookie}o\ %{pid}P %{tid}P%T
%{JK_WORKER_NAME}n %{JK_REQUEST_DURATON}n %{JK_WORKER_ROUTE}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_NAME}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_BUSY}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_VALUE}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_ACCESSED}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_READ}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_TRANSFERRED}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_ERRORS}n %{JK_LB_FIRST_ACTIVATION}n
%{JK_LB_FIRST_STATE}n %{JK_LB_LAST_NAME}n mod_jk_log
...everthing works fine except the Options responsible for the Request
Duration.
Mostly neither %T nor %{JK_REQUEST_DURATON}n have a Value (%T mostly is
0 an the other Parameter is -).
At some Requests i found the %T has a value like for example 2 or 3.. -
and JK_REQUEST DURATION has -
or %T is 0 and JK_REQUEST_DURATION has an value like 2 or 3 ...
First - why are there not values at each request ?
Second -i think both Options are measuring the same Value - why they are
not the same ?
Third - why they are not showing seconds.microseconds as written in the
reference but only (I think so) rounded seconds.
We use mod_jk 1.2.26
Thanks for help
Best
ahmed
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Questions to some mod_jk Options
Ahmed Musa wrote: .) retries (for LB workers) - At the Apache we use he prefork MPM. So how big is the connection_pool ? Connection pool is per process. Unless you set a different pool size per in the configuration, the following is true: For Apache httpd we ask httpd How many threads do you use for request handling per process and set the maximum pool size to this number. The pool might be smaller is not all members are needed (depending on configuration). For prefork MPM there is only one thtread per process, so we set the pool size to 1, because more connections will never be used (per process). because a retry of a lb-worker happens if the loadbalancer can not get a free connection for a member worker from the pool (Info from the doku). That means: for httpd it should never happen. If it happens, we either made a mistake in the code, or in our brain, or you are nut using httpd, or you overwrite the pool size setting. Does it depends on the Apache prefork Parameters MaxClients and MaxRequestsPerChild ? No, MaxClients for prefork is the maximum number of httpd processes handling requests. For prefork MPM that means, you should not observe more than MaxClients (+1) httpd processes, and each will have a connection pool of size one, so you should never observe more than MaxClients AJP13 connections going from this httpd to one of your backends. MaxRequestsPerChild: is totally unrelated. It says: if a single httpd child already answered this many requests, then stop it (and of course the connection pool of size 1 belonging to this child will be closed). If a new child gets spawned instead is determined depending on the httpd spares/idle settings and the load. Why stop an httpd child: think about a module with a memory leak. Then you want to throw away the httpd processes every now and then and use new ones instead. It's not that expensive, if you don't do it every second. If it is so - we have MaxClients 500 and MaxRequestsPerChild 1 = this means the webserver can send/handle 500 requests ? No, 500 *parallel* requests. - is this the size of our connection_pool? - i don't think so. Size of pool: prefork = 1. Nummber of connections: = 1 * Number of httpd child processes = MaxClients = 500 On the other side we have 36 Tomcat instances - each Tomcat has - maxThreads=300 on the AJP connector. = ?this doesn't fit, or? (And 3 Apache as frontend - all configured the same) Doesn't fit. For one httpd in front, maxThreads=500 would be fine. For more than one httpd on front, you don't want to increase the number of threads in proportion, because most likely once you reach the 1.500 threads (for 3 httpd), something is wrong and your system won't really be able to handle all those parallel requests (more likely: it wasn't able to handle fewer requests, got slow and that's why you now have that many requests waiting in parallel). You could: - use AJP connector, which will detach the connection on the backend side from the thread, whenever the connection doesn't actually have a request on it (waiting for the next request). - use connectionTimeout on the Tomcat side and a connection poool timeout on the JK side, s.t. idle connections get closed down and thus Tomcat threads are freed. - Use preferences between the httpd and Tomcat (36/3=12, so each httpd gets 12 Tomcats with distance 0, and the other 24 with distance 1). details depend on your availability concept (how you want to work with redundancy and so on). In the worker model i think the number of threads must correspond to the max threads of the Tomcat - but how does it work in our prefork model? Number of threads per httpd process = default connection pool size Total number of connections = Maximum Number of httpd processes * Number of threads per httpd process Relation etween Tomcat threads and connections: see above .) Why does a load-balancer retries to get a free connection for a member worker from the pool ? Why doesn't he use another member worker ? Why LB retries: because we also support IIS and NSAPI, where we can't determine the number of threads used per web server process with an official web server API Why dowsn't it use another member worker: it does, we call it failover. The situations are different: retry: we can't get a free connection. Should *never* happen on httpd failover: we ran into a communication problem with the backend (network problem, no response etc.) .) reply_timeout - does it only work between the request and the first response packet or between each two response packets. Is a response packet an AJP-packet with 8k default size ? Last question: yes, here a response packet is one from the JK point of view (AJP packet). The size could be smaller though, e.g. if you flush() in a servlet. And: yes, the reply_timeout is checked between sending the request to the backend and the fir4st response packet, but also between
Re: tomcat ldap authentication problem
I think that better is for userID and passwords don't use national characters. In Latvia we time after time have similar problems ... Andris Eiduks On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/2/20, Christian Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: all our html pages uses the utf-8 encoding, using slapcat and looking at the content the data inside openldap seems to be using utf-8 (the output from slapcat is at least utf-8,but I don't know if slapcat converts anything) This might be a shot in the dark, but what client browser are you using? I've had some problems with IE7: though I tell him to use UTF-8, it posts the form in UTF-8 charset, but telling that it is using ISO-8859-1! Try it with Firefox, if you already didn't do it. Antonio - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does tomcat support multicores
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan, Alan Chaney wrote: | XP Home only supports one core - however, that would hardly be an OS for | a production web server (grin) Unless XP sees an Intel ht processor as something other than two cored, this is BS. I have XP home on one of my laptops, and it happily recognized and utilizes both ht'd processors. | I would suspect that the OPs factors were related to IO Bandwidth or | running out of threads as suggested earlier. I've found that a modern | multicore machine doesn't actually spend very much time processing the | Tomcat stuff at all. That's because CPUs are ridiculously fast these days compared to the hardware with which they are coupled. Bus and memory speeds are disappointingly low, which is where the real time is wasted. :( - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfIElkACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCyxwCfYpAN76N8SYAerozE5gaHWcfG xuAAn1DObFinHiVdIeqpubawAFgaxoHc =YO97 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat ldap authentication problem
we have tried it with the following.. IE6 and 7 on windows IE6 on linux (using ie4linux and wine) Firefox 2.0.12 on windows and on linux all behave the same.. all the tools we have to get information out from the ldap gives us the username out in utf-8 correctly so for me it looks like it is stored in utf-8 in ldap.. and since now all our system is configured for utf-8 it is strange that this 1 part (the jndirealm) looks like it is using iso-8859-1 .-( Antonio Petrelli skrev: 2008/2/20, Christian Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: all our html pages uses the utf-8 encoding, using slapcat and looking at the content the data inside openldap seems to be using utf-8 (the output from slapcat is at least utf-8,but I don't know if slapcat converts anything) This might be a shot in the dark, but what client browser are you using? I've had some problems with IE7: though I tell him to use UTF-8, it posts the form in UTF-8 charset, but telling that it is using ISO-8859-1! Try it with Firefox, if you already didn't do it. Antonio - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat ldap authentication problem
ofcourse, it would be better, but unfourtunally it is not up to me to enforce this policy, and we already have a lot of users with those character in both username and/or password.. we had the system up and running before but after switching the website over from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8 it i sno longer working, the strange part is though that with every tool I canuse to check what is in the ldap, it say it is in utf-8 and we cannot go back o ISO-8859-1 either.. Andris Eiduks skrev: I think that better is for userID and passwords don't use national characters. In Latvia we time after time have similar problems ... Andris Eiduks On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/2/20, Christian Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: all our html pages uses the utf-8 encoding, using slapcat and looking at the content the data inside openldap seems to be using utf-8 (the output from slapcat is at least utf-8,but I don't know if slapcat converts anything) This might be a shot in the dark, but what client browser are you using? I've had some problems with IE7: though I tell him to use UTF-8, it posts the form in UTF-8 charset, but telling that it is using ISO-8859-1! Try it with Firefox, if you already didn't do it. Antonio - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does tomcat support multicores
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Len, Len Popp wrote: | (Please excuse the boring licensing details, but I've seen a lot of | misinformation on this topic.) Thanks for setting the record straight. I didn't want to call Alan a liar, but I knew that his assertions were in conflict with my experience. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfIEqUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCjHACgmRq4HB0DAf+NX9X0WNsbtCib nAsAoIOHPPctspaQb6Uxh32cC+T/az7/ =cFgv -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtual-Host issues on Apache-Tomcat
However it is usually linked, I'm obviously not an expert on this subject. Perhaps you know a concise summary of how Tomcat and Apahce HTTPD work? thanks On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jonathan Mast wrote: sorry Tomcat 5.5.1 Apache 1.3.33 Java 1.4.2 And you are linking httpd and Tomcat how? Mark - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtual-Host issues on Apache-Tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, Jonathan Mast wrote: | However it is usually linked, I'm obviously not an expert on this subject. | Perhaps you know a concise summary of how Tomcat and Apahce HTTPD work? Apache can be linked to Tomcat using either HTTP or AJP protocols. You have some options for each: HTTP: mod_proxy_http, provided by Apache httpd since many versions ago AJP: mod_proxy_ajp, included in Apache httpd since 2.2.x ~ mod_jk, a separate package that has existed for a long time ~ mod_jk2, a separate package that has been abandoned (I've included that last one since it looks like you have a relatively old setup... Apache 1.3, etc.) All options are equally well supported (except mod_jk2), and each has their champions and complainants. You should be able to find out which modules have been enabled and which are configured to do something with your application. If you see ProxyPass keywords near your app configuration in httpd.conf (or one of its friends), you're using mod_proxy_http (since mod_proxy_ajp wasn't available until a later version of Apache httpd than the one you are running). Instead, if you see Jk[Something], then you are more likely running mod_jk (or the ghastly mod_jk2). A few notes: * Your JDK version is quite old relative to your Tomcat version. ~ If you don't have the compatibility package installed, you'll have ~ problems. Consider upgrading to Java 1.5 or 1.6. * I didn't see anywhere in your configuration where you mentioned ~ index.jsp, so I'm guessing that Tomcat's welcome-file setting is ~ being used. Can you tell us if you are getting the 404 from Apache ~ httpd or Tomcat? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEUEARECAAYFAkfIK3UACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDb6QCglxwruPhm4Urouty/gstcz8l4 scoAlR9dPoOyRwvnm8DmxXYoMa6AchI= =iNNg -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leap-year problem with commons-net
I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtual-Host issues on Apache-Tomcat
Thanks for the notes. It is a Tomcat 404 error. So I take it that I can specify a file name (index.jsp) in the configuration and it will default to that file? On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, Jonathan Mast wrote: | However it is usually linked, I'm obviously not an expert on this subject. | Perhaps you know a concise summary of how Tomcat and Apahce HTTPD work? Apache can be linked to Tomcat using either HTTP or AJP protocols. You have some options for each: HTTP: mod_proxy_http, provided by Apache httpd since many versions ago AJP: mod_proxy_ajp, included in Apache httpd since 2.2.x ~ mod_jk, a separate package that has existed for a long time ~ mod_jk2, a separate package that has been abandoned (I've included that last one since it looks like you have a relatively old setup... Apache 1.3, etc.) All options are equally well supported (except mod_jk2), and each has their champions and complainants. You should be able to find out which modules have been enabled and which are configured to do something with your application. If you see ProxyPass keywords near your app configuration in httpd.conf (or one of its friends), you're using mod_proxy_http (since mod_proxy_ajp wasn't available until a later version of Apache httpd than the one you are running). Instead, if you see Jk[Something], then you are more likely running mod_jk (or the ghastly mod_jk2). A few notes: * Your JDK version is quite old relative to your Tomcat version. ~ If you don't have the compatibility package installed, you'll have ~ problems. Consider upgrading to Java 1.5 or 1.6. * I didn't see anywhere in your configuration where you mentioned ~ index.jsp, so I'm guessing that Tomcat's welcome-file setting is ~ being used. Can you tell us if you are getting the 404 from Apache ~ httpd or Tomcat? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEUEARECAAYFAkfIK3UACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDb6QCglxwruPhm4Urouty/gstcz8l4 scoAlR9dPoOyRwvnm8DmxXYoMa6AchI= =iNNg -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomcat proxy trouble
Regard Here is the scenario Internet proxy server : 10.0.0.1 Tomcat server : 10.0.0.5 Internet explorer/ firefox proxy settings : 10.0.0.1 (as i mentioned 10.0.0.1 is my internet proxy server) now the trouble is that every time user need to connect to local hosted website (tomcat server running) could not be accessed until or unless internet explorer/firefox proxy is not changed to 10.0.0.5 which stops internet servces on the client side but tomcat starts working (my website contains only simple html pages no java servlets or jsp is used at all) Problem statement: I want both internet proxy server and tomcat server running simultaneously with out interrupting each other services please help me to configure with above mentioned scenario thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/tomcat-proxy-trouble-tp15766268p15766268.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
Yeah, that's what I've done so far today, but the files come in continuously throughout the day for a total of 1000 or so, and we need to process them as they come in, so I've been letting them build up and doing it every hour or so. It's a pain, and I hope they get this fixed sometime before the next leap year (and enough before it that I have time to implement and test it!!!) D Adam Gordon wrote: Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
Dave- Just set a cron job to do it every minute or (some other interval) and then you don't have to worry about it - just don't forget to remove the job tonight. --adam David kerber wrote: Yeah, that's what I've done so far today, but the files come in continuously throughout the day for a total of 1000 or so, and we need to process them as they come in, so I've been letting them build up and doing it every hour or so. It's a pain, and I hope they get this fixed sometime before the next leap year (and enough before it that I have time to implement and test it!!!) D Adam Gordon wrote: Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
The problem is that ftp.getfiles won't even retrieve the files from the server! It sees them as invalid because of the date issue. So I have to retrieve them manually. Yeah, I could script up that part as well, but I don't think it's worth it for now. Adam Gordon wrote: Dave- Just set a cron job to do it every minute or (some other interval) and then you don't have to worry about it - just don't forget to remove the job tonight. --adam David kerber wrote: Yeah, that's what I've done so far today, but the files come in continuously throughout the day for a total of 1000 or so, and we need to process them as they come in, so I've been letting them build up and doing it every hour or so. It's a pain, and I hope they get this fixed sometime before the next leap year (and enough before it that I have time to implement and test it!!!) D Adam Gordon wrote: Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-190 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-188 - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virtual-Host issues on Apache-Tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, Jonathan Mast wrote: | It is a Tomcat 404 error. Okay, good. That means that Tomcat is handling the request (rather than Apache handling it) so we are probably not talking about fixing httpd configuration or your connector (mod_whatever). | So I take it that I can specify a file name (index.jsp) in the configuration | and it will default to that file? Yes, you can. You do it using the welcome-file-list element (and sub-elements) in web.xml. The default welcome-file-list is (at least in TC 5.5): ~welcome-file-list ~welcome-fileindex.html/welcome-file ~welcome-fileindex.htm/welcome-file ~welcome-fileindex.jsp/welcome-file ~/welcome-file-list ...where order is relevant (the top file will be used first if it exists, and so on). You only have to customize this if you want it to use some other file (or URI, really) when you specify http://host/ (with no additional path). - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfIhmYACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PApMQCfaxinrhV4e2shvbF45qTb6xZ5 iJwAn0i71zoyEC44ulKpkr8MKXJ3KBEF =MY3q -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
I mean a cron job to touch the files and change the date David kerber wrote: The problem is that ftp.getfiles won't even retrieve the files from the server! It sees them as invalid because of the date issue. So I have to retrieve them manually. Yeah, I could script up that part as well, but I don't think it's worth it for now. Adam Gordon wrote: Dave- Just set a cron job to do it every minute or (some other interval) and then you don't have to worry about it - just don't forget to remove the job tonight. --adam David kerber wrote: Yeah, that's what I've done so far today, but the files come in continuously throughout the day for a total of 1000 or so, and we need to process them as they come in, so I've been letting them build up and doing it every hour or so. It's a pain, and I hope they get this fixed sometime before the next leap year (and enough before it that I have time to implement and test it!!!) D Adam Gordon wrote: Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leap-year problem with commons-net
Yes, I understood what you meant, but that is only 1 part of what I need to do: I need to retrieve the files from the ftp server before I can touch them, and that won't work either because of the leap year bug. So I retrieve them with a manual ftp client, and then use a gui file date/time changer on them. D Adam Gordon wrote: I mean a cron job to touch the files and change the date David kerber wrote: The problem is that ftp.getfiles won't even retrieve the files from the server! It sees them as invalid because of the date issue. So I have to retrieve them manually. Yeah, I could script up that part as well, but I don't think it's worth it for now. Adam Gordon wrote: Dave- Just set a cron job to do it every minute or (some other interval) and then you don't have to worry about it - just don't forget to remove the job tonight. --adam David kerber wrote: Yeah, that's what I've done so far today, but the files come in continuously throughout the day for a total of 1000 or so, and we need to process them as they come in, so I've been letting them build up and doing it every hour or so. It's a pain, and I hope they get this fixed sometime before the next leap year (and enough before it that I have time to implement and test it!!!) D Adam Gordon wrote: Short of downloading/patching the source code and redeploying, just a stab in the dark here, but maybe just execute touch -d date in the offending directory/directories. There's no recursive flag though, bummer. At least it'll only be a problem for 12 more hours (MST). HTH, --adam David kerber wrote: I have found that the commons-net ftp.listfiles() fails to get files whose date on the server is on feb 29. Googling indicates that this a known problem (at least since this morning), but I haven't found a quick fix. Does anybody know of one? D - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessing tomcat folder
Hello I currently have Tomcat and Apache installed and can't access my Tomcat folders. I can access my tomcat folders if i directly put in the address in my browser, ie http://localhost/[myTomcatFolder] but i can't access them if i try http://www.myDomain.com/[myTomcatFolder]. I can however view my static HTML pages stored in my Apache directory both ways, ie. www.myDomain.com http://localhost/ both go to my index.html page stored in my Apache directory. Please help on how i can access my tomcat folder. I know Apache and Tomcat are connected view my JK connector because i can run JSP pages, as i mentioned above, if i use http://localhost/[myTomcatFolder] without specifying the tomcat port. Thanks, D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Accessing-tomcat-folder-tp15773052p15773052.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
