Re: Cannot Validate Signature for apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill, On 1/20/12 3:39 PM, Bill Rutledge wrote: > For apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip, I used Kleopatra to > import the KEYS Do you mean this file? http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/KEYS > and check the validity of the signatures in > apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip.asc and got the following. > Does this look like I’ve made some mistake in this process? WFM: $ gpg --verify apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip.asc apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip gpg: Signature made Sun Nov 20 15:36:27 2011 EST using RSA key ID 2F6059E7 gpg: Good signature from "Mark E D Thomas " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: A9C5 DF4D 22E9 9998 D987 5A51 10C0 1C5A 2F60 59E7 So, if you trust the key with the above fingerprint, you should be fine. Don't forget that you'll need to sign Mark's key if you want to actually trust it. Then the warning you see above will go away. (I don't trust Mark's key, yet, because he hasn't actually participated in a key signing event that I've attended. No offense, Mark.) - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Z17oACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAo9wCfcn/ToHHqZS5ecn/zKeFF6MRj Mz0AnRfah7kilUPvTXLOJR3wWA4eMuv9 =Hcsn -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot Validate Signature for apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip
On 20/01/2012 20:39, Bill Rutledge wrote: > > > For apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip, I used Kleopatra to import the > KEYS and check the validity of the signatures in > apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip.asc and got the following. Does > this look like I’ve made some mistake in this process? > > > > > > cid:image001.png@01CCD788.1E255930 > The list strips attachments and embedded images. You'll need to post it online somewhere. p -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Cannot Validate Signature for apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip
For apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip, I used Kleopatra to import the KEYS and check the validity of the signatures in apache-tomcat-7.0.23-windows-i64.zip.asc and got the following. Does this look like I've made some mistake in this process? [cid:image001.png@01CCD788.1E255930]
Re: Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts
Egor Samarkhanov wrote: André, Thanks for your notes! Please see my comments inline. AW> Personal opinion: AW> By putting some considerable effort into it, it is certainly possible to do something like AW> that, by rewriting URLs and/or proxying and/or making all your pages refer to the context AW> etc.. AW> But the question is : why ? AW> If AW> - you have many, many "clients" Yes, I do have really many clients, and hope to get even more. And in future I'd like to implement a failover solution with Tomcat cluster. If i have these many applications deployed, then they will be deployed on all nodes. I guess it would be much better if one node contains a single application which can serve any client (plus session replication). This way the cluster would be more effective. AW> - or you application is so big that having multiple copies of it totally fills your disk It's pretty big, but the disk space is not the real concern, but the memory. Many deployments of the same application consume lots of PermGen. AW> - or your application for "client1" needs to share data with the application for "client2" No, it doesn't. AW> then it may be worth thinking about this. AW> But otherwise, you probably would immensely simplify your life by using a separate virtual AW> host for each client, and have for each virtual host a separate appBase, in which you just AW> deploy a copy of your application. By the way, I was thinking about virtual hosts, but I didn't find any solution yet to add new virtual hosts at runtime (to tomcat, or to apache httpd). AW> Think of the security issues otherwise, to avoid one client being ever able to access the AW> data of another; Good point. AW> or think of what happens when one of these clients in the future asks you AW> for that little change just for him.. etc.. Yes, thinking about it all the time. But we didn't have such cases for 2 years, and if it happens - we would deploy the customized version to some other, separate environment. So, where do I start if I decide to go with the single virtual application? Did someone try doing such things? In that case, I would start with an Apache httpd front-end, connected to Tomcat via mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp, or via mod_jk. You could then easily proxy any request to your single webapp running under Tomcat. E.g. http://front-end.company.com/client1/webapp -> tomcat:/single_webapp http://front-end.company.com/client2/webapp -> tomcat:/single_webapp ... http://front-end.company.com/clientn/webapp -> tomcat:/single_webapp and use combinations of Proxy rules, Rewrite rules, SetHeaders rules etc.. to make sure that when your webapp returns pages, they correctly continue to refer to "client1", "client2" etc.. You just have to make sure then that your webapp always has enough information available, to know for which client it is being called. You can also do this with virtual hosts at the Apache level, all proxying to the same back-end tomcat. And there are tricks at the Apache level to handle "dynamic virtual hosts". - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Per-user management rights
Then my conclusion was premature. I stand corrected! Tim On 1/20/2012 5:50 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim, On 1/20/12 11:30 AM, Tim De Pauw wrote: Not sure; a quick test seemed to suggest this, but I may have been doing something wrong. If I have two hosts X and Y that resolve to the same IP, can I still use AJP to forward requests to the respective Tomcat host? Absolutely. AJP forwards everything from the web server to Tomcat. Tomcat can determine which virtual host should service the request just like the web server can. Regardless, I came across an old discussion [1], which suggests implementing a servlet filter to check the authenticated user against an ACL, and throwing a 403 if necessary. I hacked a filter together, placed the class file under /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes, mapped it to /text/* in /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/web.xml, and I was good to go! That will definitely work. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Zm3AACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDwsACfaY5OJYMt5jPms9Y3vxB3YcYe sNsAni3yxlXvaSwkZYBJ0THRN0DubbKU =E9d/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Tim De Pauw Vakgroep Informatica Geassocieerde faculteit Toegepaste Ingenieurswetenschappen Hogeschool Gent http://tiwi.be/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Apache mod_jk proxy for Tomcat v6.0.29
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ruiyuan, On 1/20/12 1:25 PM, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: > We have an Apache (v2.0.59) mod_jk on HPUX 11.23 and Tomcat > v6.0.29 (Java 6). When we tried to access the home page, it shows > the source code of the home page. Sounds like your DocumentRoot points to your webapp's appbase. Is your home page a JSP? If so, does it show the JSP source, or does it show the HTML source? > Does anyone know what is the difference between Tomcat 5.5.27 and > Tomcat 6.0.29? You could try reading both the ChangeLog and the migration guide. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8ZvHgACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA2PQCfZx0Z56gTNz6qkVu7Ego25Y4g a+UAnjeELkcBUcTSCyj0KShgHcfKyFll =MItK -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Caching of protected static content with Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 03:00:00 EET?
And if I want to cache a protected resource only locally what I should do? Thanks 2012/1/20 > Violeta Georgieva wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and > >the > >corresponding headers are set - see screenshot1 & screenshot2. > >but when I put it as protected content the following headers are set: > >Cache-control:private and Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 > >03:00:00 > >EET - see screenshot3 & screenshot4 > >My question is why the expires header is set with this value? Doesn't > >this > >prevent caching? > > Yes. That is the point. > > Mark > > > > > >I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23 > > > >Thanks in advance > >Regards > >Violeta > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
Re: BonCode AJP Connector 1.0rc ready - AJP from IIS to Tomcat
Sweet! Is there a changelog between the 0.91 release to the 1.0rc release? Thanks Bilal! -Jordan - Original Message - From: "Bilal S" To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:13:00 PM Subject: BonCode AJP Connector 1.0rc ready - AJP from IIS to Tomcat After close to a year of development and help of countless volunteers version 1.0rc is finally available. Many thanks to all the people that helped. This was done despite the discouragement from the Apache foundation how nuts we were to even try to improve this old horse. We simply needed a better way to connect IIS and Tomcat, that addressed issues that have emerged over the years. Just to name a few: easier setup, better management, more throughput, etc. http://tomcatiis.riaforge.org/ As usual feedback is appreciated. Cheers, Bilal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Apache mod_jk proxy for Tomcat v6.0.29
Hi, all We have an Apache (v2.0.59) mod_jk on HPUX 11.23 and Tomcat v6.0.29 (Java 6). When we tried to access the home page, it shows the source code of the home page. On the same HPUX host, the same Apache server serves many virtual hosts that use mod_jk and the Tomcat 5.5.27 (Java 1.5) no problem. We tried to upgrade Apache from 2.0.59 to 2.2.15 but no luck. We also tried to point to the same application with Tomcat v5.5.27 and Apache 2.2.15 and then the home page shows correctly. Does anyone know what is the difference between Tomcat 5.5.27 and Tomcat 6.0.29? Thanks. Ryan Jiang This message (including any attachments) is intended solely for the specific individual(s) or entity(ies) named above, and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, by other than the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited.
Re: Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts
André, Thanks for your notes! Please see my comments inline. AW> Personal opinion: AW> By putting some considerable effort into it, it is certainly possible to do something like AW> that, by rewriting URLs and/or proxying and/or making all your pages refer to the context AW> etc.. AW> But the question is : why ? AW> If AW> - you have many, many "clients" Yes, I do have really many clients, and hope to get even more. And in future I'd like to implement a failover solution with Tomcat cluster. If i have these many applications deployed, then they will be deployed on all nodes. I guess it would be much better if one node contains a single application which can serve any client (plus session replication). This way the cluster would be more effective. AW> - or you application is so big that having multiple copies of it totally fills your disk It's pretty big, but the disk space is not the real concern, but the memory. Many deployments of the same application consume lots of PermGen. AW> - or your application for "client1" needs to share data with the application for "client2" No, it doesn't. AW> then it may be worth thinking about this. AW> But otherwise, you probably would immensely simplify your life by using a separate virtual AW> host for each client, and have for each virtual host a separate appBase, in which you just AW> deploy a copy of your application. By the way, I was thinking about virtual hosts, but I didn't find any solution yet to add new virtual hosts at runtime (to tomcat, or to apache httpd). AW> Think of the security issues otherwise, to avoid one client being ever able to access the AW> data of another; Good point. AW> or think of what happens when one of these clients in the future asks you AW> for that little change just for him.. etc.. Yes, thinking about it all the time. But we didn't have such cases for 2 years, and if it happens - we would deploy the customized version to some other, separate environment. So, where do I start if I decide to go with the single virtual application? Did someone try doing such things? -- Best regards, Egor Samarkhanov (ego...@actimind.com) Actimind, Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Per-user management rights
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim, On 1/20/12 11:30 AM, Tim De Pauw wrote: > Not sure; a quick test seemed to suggest this, but I may have been > doing something wrong. If I have two hosts X and Y that resolve to > the same IP, can I still use AJP to forward requests to the > respective Tomcat host? Absolutely. AJP forwards everything from the web server to Tomcat. Tomcat can determine which virtual host should service the request just like the web server can. > Regardless, I came across an old discussion [1], which suggests > implementing a servlet filter to check the authenticated user > against an ACL, and throwing a 403 if necessary. I hacked a filter > together, placed the class file under > /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes, mapped it to /text/* in > /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/web.xml, and I was good to go! That will definitely work. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Zm3AACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDwsACfaY5OJYMt5jPms9Y3vxB3YcYe sNsAni3yxlXvaSwkZYBJ0THRN0DubbKU =E9d/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Per-user management rights
Not sure; a quick test seemed to suggest this, but I may have been doing something wrong. If I have two hosts X and Y that resolve to the same IP, can I still use AJP to forward requests to the respective Tomcat host? Regardless, I came across an old discussion [1], which suggests implementing a servlet filter to check the authenticated user against an ACL, and throwing a 403 if necessary. I hacked a filter together, placed the class file under /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes, mapped it to /text/* in /webapps/manager/WEB-INF/web.xml, and I was good to go! Tim [1] http://grokbase.com/t/tomcat.apache.org/users/2003/04/mananger-roles/10m2nulzpoufgawoj6xp2bfyxcr4 On 1/20/2012 5:00 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim, On 1/20/12 10:35 AM, Tim De Pauw wrote: Multiple hosts probably won't solve this problem either. I'm using AJP, which doesn't seem to play well with vhosts. Wait, what? In what way does AJP not play well with vhosts? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Zj6YACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBPYwCfbfYEdMGVGcSYcem+7PKmqZFB VTkAn3P1JIFjt/shlOxlneGmnRz8wbst =Zail -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org -- Tim De Pauw Vakgroep Informatica Geassocieerde faculteit Toegepaste Ingenieurswetenschappen Hogeschool Gent http://tiwi.be/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts
Egor Samarkhanov wrote: Hello ! I have multiple clients: client 1 - 40 users client 2 - 50 users client 3 - 60 users And I have a web application that is supposed to serve the clients. The application is deployed into Tomcat. Each client has it's own database. What I want to implement is the single web application instance which servers all the clients. The client (and the database to connect to) is identified by the context path from the URL. I.e. I imply the following scenario: 1. Some user requestes the http://mydomain.com/client1/ 2. Tomcat invokes a single instance of my application (no matter which context is requested) 3. My application processes the rest of the request thinking that it's deployed to /client1 context path, i.e. all redirect or relative URLs should be resolved against http://mydomain.com/client1/ When the client 2 requests the http://mydomain.com/client2/, I want my application (the same instance) now process it just like if it was deployed to /client2 context path. Is this possible in Tomcat? Personal opinion: By putting some considerable effort into it, it is certainly possible to do something like that, by rewriting URLs and/or proxying and/or making all your pages refer to the context etc.. But the question is : why ? If - you have many, many "clients" - or you application is so big that having multiple copies of it totally fills your disk - or your application for "client1" needs to share data with the application for "client2" then it may be worth thinking about this. But otherwise, you probably would immensely simplify your life by using a separate virtual host for each client, and have for each virtual host a separate appBase, in which you just deploy a copy of your application. Think of the security issues otherwise, to avoid one client being ever able to access the data of another; or think of what happens when one of these clients in the future asks you for that little change just for him.. etc.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts
On 20/01/2012 15:56, Egor Samarkhanov wrote: > Hello ! > > I have multiple clients: > client 1 - 40 users > client 2 - 50 users > client 3 - 60 users > > And I have a web application that is supposed to serve the clients. > The application is deployed into Tomcat. Each client has it's own database. > > What I want to implement is the single web application instance which > servers all the clients. The client (and the database to connect to) > is identified by the context path from the URL. > > I.e. I imply the following scenario: > > 1. Some user requestes the http://mydomain.com/client1/ > 2. Tomcat invokes a single instance of my application (no matter >which context is requested) > 3. My application processes the rest of the request thinking that it's >deployed to /client1 context path, i.e. all redirect or relative URLs >should be resolved against http://mydomain.com/client1/ > > When the client 2 requests the http://mydomain.com/client2/, I want my > application (the same instance) now process it just like if it was > deployed to /client2 context path. > > Is this possible in Tomcat? No, it's not. If you want to build a multi-tenant application, you should: 1. Make your application the ROOT application. 2. Then use the first part of the path to determine which tenant. 3. Use the path data to select a configuration as required. What is the benefit in making it one application? p -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Per-user management rights
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim, On 1/20/12 10:35 AM, Tim De Pauw wrote: > Multiple hosts probably won't solve this problem either. I'm using > AJP, which doesn't seem to play well with vhosts. Wait, what? In what way does AJP not play well with vhosts? - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8Zj6YACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBPYwCfbfYEdMGVGcSYcem+7PKmqZFB VTkAn3P1JIFjt/shlOxlneGmnRz8wbst =Zail -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Single virtual tomcat application which serves multiple contexts
Hello ! I have multiple clients: client 1 - 40 users client 2 - 50 users client 3 - 60 users And I have a web application that is supposed to serve the clients. The application is deployed into Tomcat. Each client has it's own database. What I want to implement is the single web application instance which servers all the clients. The client (and the database to connect to) is identified by the context path from the URL. I.e. I imply the following scenario: 1. Some user requestes the http://mydomain.com/client1/ 2. Tomcat invokes a single instance of my application (no matter which context is requested) 3. My application processes the rest of the request thinking that it's deployed to /client1 context path, i.e. all redirect or relative URLs should be resolved against http://mydomain.com/client1/ When the client 2 requests the http://mydomain.com/client2/, I want my application (the same instance) now process it just like if it was deployed to /client2 context path. Is this possible in Tomcat? thanks in advance -- Best regards, Egor Samarkhanov (ego...@actimind.com) Actimind, Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Per-user management rights
Thanks for your reply. I don't suppose there's an alternative to the Manager app floating around that would allow this? I came across a commercial solution at some point (which I forgot to bookmark, apparently), but that's not really an option. Multiple hosts probably won't solve this problem either. I'm using AJP, which doesn't seem to play well with vhosts. I guess I'll either have to trust my users (actually, students), or cook up something filesystem-based. Pity, but oh well. Tim On 1/20/2012 4:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/01/2012 15:19, Tim De Pauw wrote: I assume I'm doing something fundamentally wrong here, but the docs don't seem to cover this sort of thing explicitly. I guess I could create separate hosts for each app and user, but that seems tedious and unnecessary. Any pointers? Thanks. You can't do what you want to do with the Manager app. It doesn't support that granularity of security. You can control individual operations but not the combination of operation *and* context. Multiple hosts would give you more control but a user would still be able to deploy any context on the host on which they had deploy permission. Mark -- Tim De Pauw Vakgroep Informatica Geassocieerde faculteit Toegepaste Ingenieurswetenschappen Hogeschool Gent http://tiwi.be/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Per-user management rights
On 20/01/2012 15:19, Tim De Pauw wrote: > I assume I'm doing something fundamentally wrong here, but the docs > don't seem to cover this sort of thing explicitly. I guess I could > create separate hosts for each app and user, but that seems tedious and > unnecessary. > > Any pointers? Thanks. You can't do what you want to do with the Manager app. It doesn't support that granularity of security. You can control individual operations but not the combination of operation *and* context. Multiple hosts would give you more control but a user would still be able to deploy any context on the host on which they had deploy permission. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Per-user management rights
Hi all, I'm trying to configure Tomcat so that a separate login is required to deploy certain apps. Let's say I have a '/someapp' context, which I would like 'someuser' to deploy remotely. However, 'someuser' cannot deploy apps to '/someotherapp', and conversely, 'someotheruser' cannot touch '/someapp'. So far, I tried to add a Context to server.xml (I know it's discouraged) for the app, containing a memory realm that has its own user list: The file realm.someapp.xml simply contains: But now, I'm mostly stuck. I'm guessing 'someuser' would also have to have access to the manager app in order to deploy, but that would mean that this user would also have management access to other people's apps. I assume I'm doing something fundamentally wrong here, but the docs don't seem to cover this sort of thing explicitly. I guess I could create separate hosts for each app and user, but that seems tedious and unnecessary. Any pointers? Thanks. Kind regards, -- Tim De Pauw Vakgroep Informatica Geassocieerde faculteit Toegepaste Ingenieurswetenschappen Hogeschool Gent http://tiwi.be/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Unable to sendViaPost to url...... .... java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bert, On 1/18/12 4:22 PM, Bert Verhees wrote: > I have done my testing, and at this moment, it seems that I found > the problem, I forgot to close a databaseconnection in a function > which is called a zillion times. Just one line of code, and the > problem was solved. Consider doing the following: In your development environment, set maxActive in your connection pool to "1". Also set the "logAbandoned" and similar settings to catch resources that you don't properly close. With maxActive="1", your webapp will stop dead for several minutes while the connection pool starves waiting for the one missing connection to (never) be returned to the pool before killing it and creating a new one. Trust me: you'll notice when that happens. We have the logAbandoned stuff even set in production just in case we don't notice something in development. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8ZhQoACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAd9ACfXiOQju6eLIMpB14bZhbkip/B WjoAoJYJLf+vpYqh3IGYumI7zizO6Ggp =cCmq -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: [SOLVED] Cannot inherit from final class
I'm aware of that. The reason I went with such an old version of Spring is that Axis2 POJO Spring example uses that version of Spring (1.2.8). The applicationContext.xml uses the DOCROOT element, not XML name spaces, not XML namespaces, so I did not want to vary too many things at the same time. -a -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:33 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Cannot inherit from final class On 19/01/2012 22:36, aaron.stro...@rsa.com wrote: > Ugm. Axis2 sample uses it, so did I So Spring 3.1 is now out and the internetz says that Spring 1.2.8 was released 8 May 2006. Is this a production system, might I ask? p > -Original Message- > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:32 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Cannot inherit from final class > > On 19/01/2012 21:38, aaron.stro...@rsa.com wrote: >> deployed in it a web service using Spring v1.2.8 > > Are you really using Spring 1.2.8? > > > p > -- [key:62590808] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Caching of protected static content with Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 03:00:00 EET?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 15:05, wrote: > Violeta Georgieva wrote: > [...] >>My question is why the expires header is set with this value? Doesn't >>this >>prevent caching? > > Yes. That is the point. > But there is no need for an expires header if you don't want caching. It is enough to "Cache-control: no-cache" (or "no-store", though the latter wreaks havoc on IE and downloads) or, if you are _still_ using HTTP/1.0, "Pragma: no-cache". The "Expires" is not needed at all. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
As suggested, the problem was the security manager:
Most of our login related classes are the CATALINA_BASE/lib folder. So
uncommenting this lines in the catalina.policy files fix the problem:
// If using a per instance lib directory, i.e. ${catalina.base}/lib,
// then the following permission will need to be uncommented
grant codeBase "file:${catalina.base}/lib/-" {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
Thanks to Konstantin Kolinko for the quick hint!
PS: Why the exception is not clear enough??
-Original Message-
From: Guillermo GARCIA OCHOA [mailto:guillermo.garcia-oc...@inova-software.com]
Sent: vendredi 20 janvier 2012 13:11
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize
class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
Answers inline ...
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: vendredi 20 janvier 2012 13:06
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize
class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
2012/1/20 Guillermo GARCIA OCHOA :
> I have an application that use j_security for a form-based authentication.
> When the application is deployed for the first time (or the tomcat is
> restarted) user gets this exception when trying access a protected content
> directly (without login).
>
> GRAVE: Servlet.service() for servlet [default] in context with path
> [/mycontext] threw exception [Could not initialize class
> javax.servlet.http.Cookie] with root cause
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
> javax.servlet.http.Cookie
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.createSessionC
> ookie(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.java:127)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.doGetSession(Request.java:2875)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getSession(Request.java:2307)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction
> .run(RequestFacade.java:216)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction
> .run(RequestFacade.java:205)
>
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.j
> ava:894)
>
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.j
> ava:909)
>
> at
> javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletReq
> uestWrapper.java:238)
>
> at
> com.mycompany.myfilter.SaasComponentImpl.getTenantId(SaasComponentImpl
> .java:284)
>
> The excepted behaviour is to redirect the user to the login form and when the
> user logs in redirect him to the requested protected resource.
>
> But the weird thing is this works correctly if the first request send to the
> rebooted server ask for the login form!!! It seems that after this tomcat
> find and load correctly the cookie class and then all the request are handled
> as expected.
>
> Why tomcat cannot find the Cookie class that is for sure in the
> lib/servlet-api.jar? IMHO, no mmetter when this class is asked to be load for
> the first time ... it should be there for any valve, servlet, filter, etc ...
> I'm right?
>
> PS: This was working fine before the app was migrated from tomcat 6.
>
1. Your exact version of Tomcat x.y.z =?
*** Tomcat 7.0.23
2. Your OS
* Windows server 2008
3. Do you think that you are running with Java's SecurityManager enabled? [1]
*** Is enabled whit the same configurations that we used to use with
tomcat 6
4. Is there anything else in the logs?
* Nothing else
I thing that the "Could not initialize class" message means that the class is
found, but its initialization failed.
I wonder though why it is not an instance of ExceptionInInitializerError.
[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-manager-howto.html
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Caching of protected static content with Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 03:00:00 EET?
Violeta Georgieva wrote: >Hi, > >If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and >the >corresponding headers are set - see screenshot1 & screenshot2. >but when I put it as protected content the following headers are set: >Cache-control:private and Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 >03:00:00 >EET - see screenshot3 & screenshot4 >My question is why the expires header is set with this value? Doesn't >this >prevent caching? Yes. That is the point. Mark > >I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23 > >Thanks in advance >Regards >Violeta > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Caching of protected static content with Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 03:00:00 EET?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:03, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and the > corresponding headers are set - see screenshot1 & screenshot2. > but when I put it as protected content the following headers are set: > Cache-control:private and Expires header: Expires Thu, 01 Jan 1970 03:00:00 > EET - see screenshot3 & screenshot4 > My question is why the expires header is set with this value? Doesn't this > prevent caching? > > I'm running Tomcat 7.0.23 > I take it you are using Tomcat's caching directives, so... Show us the relevant portions of the configuration file. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
> From: Andrew Erskine > To: Tomcat Users List > Date: 01/20/2012 06:05 AM > Subject: RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... > > -Original Message- > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Sent: 20 January 2012 11:00 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... > On 20/01/2012 10:52, Andrew Erskine wrote: > > So how do I do that .. I'm only replying to questions .. > S0, scroll down a bit... > > On 20 Jan 2012, at 10:51, "André Warnier" wrote: > ... and reply below > >> "Top post" is like this : when I reply to a message, at the top > of the message. > >> It makes it much harder to follow the logic flow of a conversation. > >> > >> Andrew Erskine wrote: > >>> Top post ? > ... each point. > > p > > >>> Win2003svr > >>> > >>> Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and > clear the cache on firefox will try ie > >>> > >> > >> Answering below the question is much clearer. > >> > >> like this ? .. aha > >> > >> Andrew, When you hit the reply button use the option that says "Reply with Internet-Style history". That will add the ">"'s to all the previous comments and then you comment under each relevant one. =) - Justin ** This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or agency to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the Navy Exchange Service Command e-mail administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. Thank You! **
RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
On Jan 20, 2012 6:47 AM, "Brooke Hedrick" wrote: > > H > > On Jan 20, 2012 4:23 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: > > > > Top post ? > > > > Win2003svr > > > > Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the cache on firefox will try ie > > > > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > > Sent: 20 January 2012 09:51 > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... > > > > On 20/01/2012 02:28, Brooke Hedrick wrote: > > > Are you sure you updated the correct keystore? Which o/s are you running? > > > > (Please don't top post.) > > > > It's worth noting that some browsers appear to cache certs and sometimes changes are not immediately apparent. > > > > > > p > > > > > On Jan 19, 2012 2:54 PM, "Darryl Lewis" wrote: > > > > > >> Did you restart tomcat? > > >> > > >> On 20/01/12 5:00 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: > > >> > > >>> I have a self certificate that expired today. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I removed the certificate from the keystore which the server.xml is > > >>> pointin= g at and generated a new one with the same alias and I can > > >>> see that cert in= the keystore. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I've been through all my certificate locations on firefox and > > >>> removed any i= nstance > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On restarting tomcat and starting a new browser the website is still > > >>> saying= I have an expired certificate - so where is this being > > >>> picked up > > >> >from ? an= d is there a step I'm missing ? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Thanks. > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [key:62590808] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > Where is your keystore located? When running on with Tomcat poviding the cert, as I recall, there were 2 options of keystore placement. If you are using APR you can specify the location. If not, it assumes it has to look under your 'profile' home. So, c:/documents ands settings/... or c:/users/... Are you using APR? Another question... To rule out the browser, have you tried using openssl to retrieve tthe certificate?
RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
H On Jan 20, 2012 4:23 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: > > Top post ? > > Win2003svr > > Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the cache on firefox will try ie > > Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Sent: 20 January 2012 09:51 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... > > On 20/01/2012 02:28, Brooke Hedrick wrote: > > Are you sure you updated the correct keystore? Which o/s are you running? > > (Please don't top post.) > > It's worth noting that some browsers appear to cache certs and sometimes changes are not immediately apparent. > > > p > > > On Jan 19, 2012 2:54 PM, "Darryl Lewis" wrote: > > > >> Did you restart tomcat? > >> > >> On 20/01/12 5:00 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: > >> > >>> I have a self certificate that expired today. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I removed the certificate from the keystore which the server.xml is > >>> pointin= g at and generated a new one with the same alias and I can > >>> see that cert in= the keystore. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I've been through all my certificate locations on firefox and > >>> removed any i= nstance > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On restarting tomcat and starting a new browser the website is still > >>> saying= I have an expired certificate - so where is this being > >>> picked up > >> >from ? an= d is there a step I'm missing ? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > -- > > [key:62590808] > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > Where is your keystore located? When running on with Tomcat poviding the cert, as I recall, there were 2 options of keystore placement. If you are using APR you can specify the location. If not, it assumes it has to look under your 'profile' home. So, c:/documents ands settings/... or c:/users/... Are you using APR?
RE: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
Answers inline ... -Original Message- From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com] Sent: vendredi 20 janvier 2012 13:06 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie 2012/1/20 Guillermo GARCIA OCHOA : > I have an application that use j_security for a form-based authentication. > When the application is deployed for the first time (or the tomcat is > restarted) user gets this exception when trying access a protected content > directly (without login). > > GRAVE: Servlet.service() for servlet [default] in context with path > [/mycontext] threw exception [Could not initialize class > javax.servlet.http.Cookie] with root cause > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class > javax.servlet.http.Cookie > > at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.createSessionC > ookie(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.java:127) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.doGetSession(Request.java:2875) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getSession(Request.java:2307) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction > .run(RequestFacade.java:216) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction > .run(RequestFacade.java:205) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.j > ava:894) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.j > ava:909) > > at > javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletReq > uestWrapper.java:238) > > at > com.mycompany.myfilter.SaasComponentImpl.getTenantId(SaasComponentImpl > .java:284) > > The excepted behaviour is to redirect the user to the login form and when the > user logs in redirect him to the requested protected resource. > > But the weird thing is this works correctly if the first request send to the > rebooted server ask for the login form!!! It seems that after this tomcat > find and load correctly the cookie class and then all the request are handled > as expected. > > Why tomcat cannot find the Cookie class that is for sure in the > lib/servlet-api.jar? IMHO, no mmetter when this class is asked to be load for > the first time ... it should be there for any valve, servlet, filter, etc ... > I'm right? > > PS: This was working fine before the app was migrated from tomcat 6. > 1. Your exact version of Tomcat x.y.z =? *** Tomcat 7.0.23 2. Your OS * Windows server 2008 3. Do you think that you are running with Java's SecurityManager enabled? [1] *** Is enabled whit the same configurations that we used to use with tomcat 6 4. Is there anything else in the logs? * Nothing else I thing that the "Could not initialize class" message means that the class is found, but its initialization failed. I wonder though why it is not an instance of ExceptionInInitializerError. [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-manager-howto.html Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
2012/1/20 Guillermo GARCIA OCHOA : > I have an application that use j_security for a form-based authentication. > When the application is deployed for the first time (or the tomcat is > restarted) user gets this exception when trying access a protected content > directly (without login). > > GRAVE: Servlet.service() for servlet [default] in context with path > [/mycontext] threw exception [Could not initialize class > javax.servlet.http.Cookie] with root cause > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class > javax.servlet.http.Cookie > > at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.createSessionCookie(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.java:127) > > at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.doGetSession(Request.java:2875) > > at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getSession(Request.java:2307) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction.run(RequestFacade.java:216) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction.run(RequestFacade.java:205) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.java:894) > > at > org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.java:909) > > at > javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWrapper.java:238) > > at > com.mycompany.myfilter.SaasComponentImpl.getTenantId(SaasComponentImpl.java:284) > > The excepted behaviour is to redirect the user to the login form and when the > user logs in redirect him to the requested protected resource. > > But the weird thing is this works correctly if the first request send to the > rebooted server ask for the login form!!! It seems that after this tomcat > find and load correctly the cookie class and then all the request are handled > as expected. > > Why tomcat cannot find the Cookie class that is for sure in the > lib/servlet-api.jar? IMHO, no mmetter when this class is asked to be load for > the first time ... it should be there for any valve, servlet, filter, etc ... > I'm right? > > PS: This was working fine before the app was migrated from tomcat 6. > 1. Your exact version of Tomcat x.y.z =? 2. Your OS = ? 3. Do you think that you are running with Java's SecurityManager enabled? [1] 4. Is there anything else in the logs? I thing that the "Could not initialize class" message means that the class is found, but its initialization failed. I wonder though why it is not an instance of ExceptionInInitializerError. [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-manager-howto.html Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Tomcat 7 - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie
I have an application that use j_security for a form-based authentication. When the application is deployed for the first time (or the tomcat is restarted) user gets this exception when trying access a protected content directly (without login). GRAVE: Servlet.service() for servlet [default] in context with path [/mycontext] threw exception [Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie] with root cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javax.servlet.http.Cookie at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.createSessionCookie(ApplicationSessionCookieConfig.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.doGetSession(Request.java:2875) at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getSession(Request.java:2307) at org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction.run(RequestFacade.java:216) at org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade$GetSessionPrivilegedAction.run(RequestFacade.java:205) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.java:894) at org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession(RequestFacade.java:909) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWrapper.java:238) at com.mycompany.myfilter.SaasComponentImpl.getTenantId(SaasComponentImpl.java:284) The excepted behaviour is to redirect the user to the login form and when the user logs in redirect him to the requested protected resource. But the weird thing is this works correctly if the first request send to the rebooted server ask for the login form!!! It seems that after this tomcat find and load correctly the cookie class and then all the request are handled as expected. Why tomcat cannot find the Cookie class that is for sure in the lib/servlet-api.jar? IMHO, no mmetter when this class is asked to be load for the first time ... it should be there for any valve, servlet, filter, etc ... I'm right? PS: This was working fine before the app was migrated from tomcat 6.
RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
-Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] Sent: 20 January 2012 11:00 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... On 20/01/2012 10:52, Andrew Erskine wrote: > So how do I do that .. I'm only replying to questions .. So, scroll down a bit... > On 20 Jan 2012, at 10:51, "André Warnier" wrote: ... and reply below >> "Top post" is like this : when I reply to a message, at the top of the >> message. >> It makes it much harder to follow the logic flow of a conversation. >> >> Andrew Erskine wrote: >>> Top post ? ... each point. p >>> Win2003svr >>> >>> Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the >>> cache on firefox will try ie >>> >> >> Answering below the question is much clearer. >> >> like this ? .. aha >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> -- [key:62590808]
Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
On 20/01/2012 10:52, Andrew Erskine wrote: > So how do I do that .. I'm only replying to questions .. So, scroll down a bit... > On 20 Jan 2012, at 10:51, "André Warnier" wrote: ... and reply below >> "Top post" is like this : when I reply to a message, at the top of the >> message. >> It makes it much harder to follow the logic flow of a conversation. >> >> Andrew Erskine wrote: >>> Top post ? ... each point. p >>> Win2003svr >>> >>> Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the >>> cache on firefox will try ie >>> >> >> Answering below the question is much clearer. >> >> --> your answer here : >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
So how do I do that .. I'm only replying to questions .. On 20 Jan 2012, at 10:51, "André Warnier" wrote: > "Top post" is like this : when I reply to a message, at the top of the > message. > It makes it much harder to follow the logic flow of a conversation. > > Andrew Erskine wrote: >> Top post ? >> >> Win2003svr >> >> Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the >> cache on firefox will try ie >> > > Answering below the question is much clearer. > > --> your answer here : > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >
Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
"Top post" is like this : when I reply to a message, at the top of the message. It makes it much harder to follow the logic flow of a conversation. Andrew Erskine wrote: Top post ? Win2003svr Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the cache on firefox will try ie Answering below the question is much clearer. --> your answer here : - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
Top post ? Win2003svr Yes correct store .. the only one I've been using .. did try and clear the cache on firefox will try ie Thanks. -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] Sent: 20 January 2012 09:51 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ... On 20/01/2012 02:28, Brooke Hedrick wrote: > Are you sure you updated the correct keystore? Which o/s are you running? (Please don't top post.) It's worth noting that some browsers appear to cache certs and sometimes changes are not immediately apparent. p > On Jan 19, 2012 2:54 PM, "Darryl Lewis" wrote: > >> Did you restart tomcat? >> >> On 20/01/12 5:00 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: >> >>> I have a self certificate that expired today. >>> >>> >>> >>> I removed the certificate from the keystore which the server.xml is >>> pointin= g at and generated a new one with the same alias and I can >>> see that cert in= the keystore. >>> >>> >>> >>> I've been through all my certificate locations on firefox and >>> removed any i= nstance >>> >>> >>> >>> On restarting tomcat and starting a new browser the website is still >>> saying= I have an expired certificate - so where is this being >>> picked up >> >from ? an= d is there a step I'm missing ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > -- [key:62590808] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot rid of expired Certificate ...
On 20/01/2012 02:28, Brooke Hedrick wrote: > Are you sure you updated the correct keystore? Which o/s are you running? (Please don't top post.) It's worth noting that some browsers appear to cache certs and sometimes changes are not immediately apparent. p > On Jan 19, 2012 2:54 PM, "Darryl Lewis" wrote: > >> Did you restart tomcat? >> >> On 20/01/12 5:00 AM, "Andrew Erskine" wrote: >> >>> I have a self certificate that expired today. >>> >>> >>> >>> I removed the certificate from the keystore which the server.xml is >>> pointin= g at and generated a new one with the same alias and I can see >>> that cert in= the keystore. >>> >>> >>> >>> I've been through all my certificate locations on firefox and removed any >>> i= nstance >>> >>> >>> >>> On restarting tomcat and starting a new browser the website is still >>> saying= I have an expired certificate - so where is this being picked up >> >from ? an= d is there a step I'm missing ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [SOLVED] Cannot inherit from final class
On 19/01/2012 22:36, aaron.stro...@rsa.com wrote: > Ugm. Axis2 sample uses it, so did I So Spring 3.1 is now out and the internetz says that Spring 1.2.8 was released 8 May 2006. Is this a production system, might I ask? p > -Original Message- > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:32 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Cannot inherit from final class > > On 19/01/2012 21:38, aaron.stro...@rsa.com wrote: >> deployed in it a web service using Spring v1.2.8 > > Are you really using Spring 1.2.8? > > > p > -- [key:62590808] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
