Re: WebappLoader vs WebappClassLoader
Hi > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > >>WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > >>represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > >>stop/start. > > >>WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > >>application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and WebAppLoader > for > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > >>Yes. > Thanks for the quick explanation. > So it means WebappClassLoader and WebAppLoader both are per web > application. > In tomcat 7 we were able to add repository to the class loader using > WebAppClassLoader.addRepository() >>This is replaced in favor of the new resource implementation. >>Check this [1] and this [2]. Thanks for quick response. I will look into them :) Best Regards 2015-04-21 12:02 GMT+05:30 Violeta Georgieva : > Hi, > > 2015-04-21 6:42 GMT+03:00 Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < > thusithathil...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > > >>WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > > >>represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > > >>stop/start. > > > > >>WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > > >>application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and > WebAppLoader > > for > > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > > >>Yes. > > Thanks for the quick explanation. > > So it means WebappClassLoader and WebAppLoader both are per web > > application. > > In tomcat 7 we were able to add repository to the class loader using > > WebAppClassLoader.addRepository() > > This is replaced in favor of the new resource implementation. > Check this [1] and this [2]. > > Regards, > Violeta > > [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html#Web_application_resources > [2] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/config/resources.html > > > So in Tomcat 8 if we wanna add repositories to the classloader we should > > done that trough the WebAppLoader not with WebAppClassLoader? > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Thanks > > Best Regards > > > > 2015-04-21 1:51 GMT+05:30 Mark Thomas : > > > > > On 20/04/2015 14:22, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > > > > > > WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > > > represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > > > stop/start. > > > > > > WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > > > application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > > > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and > > > WebAppLoader for > > > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > --
Re: WebappLoader vs WebappClassLoader
Hi, 2015-04-21 6:42 GMT+03:00 Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < thusithathil...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > >>WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > >>represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > >>stop/start. > > >>WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > >>application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and WebAppLoader > for > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > >>Yes. > Thanks for the quick explanation. > So it means WebappClassLoader and WebAppLoader both are per web > application. > In tomcat 7 we were able to add repository to the class loader using > WebAppClassLoader.addRepository() This is replaced in favor of the new resource implementation. Check this [1] and this [2]. Regards, Violeta [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html#Web_application_resources [2] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.0-doc/config/resources.html > So in Tomcat 8 if we wanna add repositories to the classloader we should > done that trough the WebAppLoader not with WebAppClassLoader? > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Thanks > Best Regards > > 2015-04-21 1:51 GMT+05:30 Mark Thomas : > > > On 20/04/2015 14:22, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > > > > WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > > represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > > stop/start. > > > > WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > > application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and > > WebAppLoader for > > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > > > > Yes. > > > > Mark > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > --
Re: [Tomcat8] What happened to WebappLoader.addRepository()?
Hi,
> Try addURL().
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> As I understand addURL() method is defined in WebAppClassLoaderBase. So
> should I obtain the WebAppClassLoaderBase using getClassLoader() method
and
> use reflections to call the addURL() method?
>>No need for reflection. Cast to URLClassloader.
>>Note the cast *should* always work but if someone is using a strange
>>custom class loader it will fail. Note that Tomcat 7 required the class
>>loader to be an instance of WebappClassLoader.
>Thanks for quick explanation Mark.
>But still addURL() method is defined as protected. So it is not possible
to call that method by casting right?
This is my implementation with Tomcat 7
public class CarbonWebappLoader extends WebappLoader {
@Override
protected void startInternal() throws LifecycleException {
WebappClassloadingContext webappClassloadingContext;
try {
webappClassloadingContext =
ClassloadingContextBuilder.buildClassloadingContext(getWebappFilePath());
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new LifecycleException(e.getMessage(), e);
}
for (String repository :
webappClassloadingContext.getProvidedRepositories()) {
addRepository(repository);
}
super.startInternal();
//Adding the WebappClassloadingContext to the WebappClassloader
((CarbonWebappClassLoader)
getClassLoader()).setWebappCC(webappClassloadingContext);
}
In Tomcat 8 don't have addRepository() in the WebAppLoader. Suggestion was
to use addURL() method.
But that can be access through WebAppClassLoader. So I must get the
classloader using getClassLoader() and use reflections to call addURL
method.
That would be really costly operation since it will get call for each and
every application.
Is there a better approach than that? Or Should I move this logic to
somewhere else?
Thanks
Best Regards
2015-04-07 16:19 GMT+05:30 Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusithathil...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> >
>
> :)
> I think you meant snip rather than snipe.
>
> > Try addURL().
> > Sorry for the inconvenience.
> > As I understand addURL() method is defined in WebAppClassLoaderBase. So
> > should I obtain the WebAppClassLoaderBase using getClassLoader() method
> and
> > use reflections to call the addURL() method?
>
> >>No need for reflection. Cast to URLClassloader.
>
> >>Note the cast *should* always work but if someone is using a strange
> >>custom class loader it will fail. Note that Tomcat 7 required the class
> >>loader to be an instance of WebappClassLoader.
> Thanks for quick explanation Mark.
> But still addURL() method is defined as protected. So it is not possible
> to call that method by casting right?
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Best Regards
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/04/2015 07:51, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I'm having the same issue. We have extend the WebAppLoader as follows
> in
> >>> the Tomcat 7
> >>>
> >>> public class CarbonWebappLoader extends WebappLoader {
> >>> @Override
> >>> protected void startInternal() throws LifecycleException {
> >>> WebappClassloadingContext webappClassloadingContext;
> >>> try {
> >>> webappClassloadingContext =
> >>> ClassloadingContextBuilder.buildClassloadingContext(
> getWebappFilePath());
> >>> } catch (Exception e) {
> >>> throw new LifecycleException(e.getMessage(), e);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> //Adding provided classpath entries, if any
> >>> for (String repository :
> >>> webappClassloadingContext.getProvidedRepositories()) {
> >>> addRepository(repository);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> super.startInternal();
> >>>
> >>> //Adding the WebappClassloadingContext to the WebappClassloader
> >>> ((CarbonWebappClassLoader)
> >>> getClassLoader()).setWebappCC(webappClassloadingContext);
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Since addRepository method have been removed, what could I do?
> >>
> >> Don't top-post.
> >>
> >> Read the thread history. The answer has already been provided by Chris.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Best Regards
> >>> /Thusitha
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Mark Thomas
> wrote:
> >>>
> On 17/03/2015 18:30, Ed Rouse wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Pilkington, Simon [mailto:simo...@amazon.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:45 PM
> >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> >> Subject: [Tomcat8] What happened to WebappLoader.addRepository()?
> >>
> >> Hey tomcat users,
> >>
> >> The javadoc for WebappLoader still tells me to use addRepository(),
> >> but
> >> that method no longer exists. My team has implemented an extension
> of
> >> WebappLoader that looked like this:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIq3zqb2rzydPhOCYrKrhKCqenTzhOe7cCQrFCzBZUQsL
> >>
> >> 9ICQrFCzBZUQszxP1J6WpEVvd7aabPxLURrFUalAv3UYKrlAv3UYKrKXHXRTT-LPz5TCnA-
> >>
> >> LsKyev7szsQsIFICzB
Re: WebappLoader vs WebappClassLoader
Hi, > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? >>WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that >>represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application >>stop/start. >>WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web >>application is started, a new instance is created and used. > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and WebAppLoader for > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? >>Yes. Thanks for the quick explanation. So it means WebappClassLoader and WebAppLoader both are per web application. In tomcat 7 we were able to add repository to the class loader using WebAppClassLoader.addRepository() So in Tomcat 8 if we wanna add repositories to the classloader we should done that trough the WebAppLoader not with WebAppClassLoader? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks Best Regards 2015-04-21 1:51 GMT+05:30 Mark Thomas : > On 20/04/2015 14:22, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? > > WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that > represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application > stop/start. > > WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web > application is started, a new instance is created and used. > > > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and > WebAppLoader for > > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? > > Yes. > > Mark > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --
Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
Hi there, I would like to explain my scenario, perhaps this has been answered on this forum. A bunch of random Ajax requests from the browser (IE9) end up with a 400 error code on the apache webserver and the the browser hangs for 5 minutes. Httpwatch shows the error code as ERROR_INTERNET_CONNECTION_RESET and then immediately afterwards IE fires the same request again, which shows up with a time taken of 5 minutes and error code as ERROR_HTTP_INVALID_SERVER_RESPONSE. The browser recovers after 5 minutes. Further investigation on the webserver and appserver logs reveals the following:: a.. The request comes from the browser and hits the webserver and then forwards to the appserver instantly. b.. The mod_jk log for the request shows that there is time duration of 5 minutes spent in the ajp_read_fully_server::jk_ajp_common.c(1399): enter. After 5 minutes I get the next line as follows ajp_read_fully_server::jk_ajp_common.c(1432): exit. Then in the next line i see the following ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c(1766) worker 11 browser stop sending data, no need to recover. Later it shows unrecoverable 400, request failed. c.. The forensic.log show the content length as a nonzero value. d.. The applcation server log hangs in the org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProcessor.read method for 5 mintues and the continues the execution. The thread dump also confirms this. The questions I have are:: a.. Is this a problem with IE only because of the keepalive timeout and the apache webserver keepalive time(current value is set to 5seconds) out which is not in sync. b.. Is this a problem with the appserver not able to process requests that are bad/incomplete. c.. Should I increase the Apache webserver timeout value to 60s or more , will this have any performance impact. Kindly advise on the scenario. Many thanks for reading through. Current setup: Apache 2.2.24 Mod_jk 1.2.37 Redhat Linux VM JBoss EAP 6.1.0 JSF 2.1, Richfaces 3.3.4 Warm Regards Razi A. Ansari
Re: Tomcat threads dependency on net.core.somaxconn value on Linux
Thanks Christopher, it makes more sense now. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Satish, > > On 4/17/15 7:20 AM, satish jupalli wrote: > > I would like to support a bust in traffic we are planning to > > increase the umber of threads by adding executor pool with > > misSpareThread to 100 and accept count to 5. However, I'm > > trying to understand the correlation between the tomcat connector > > acceptCount and ThreadCount to the Linux config > > net.core.somaxconn(number of incoming connections) which defaults > > to 128. > > The thread count isn't really a part of this discussion: only the > accept count and /proc/sys/net/core/somaxx > > > Does it makes sense to increase the thread count alone with out > > increasing net.core.somaxconn value? > > Probably not; Linux limits the accept queue using that value and will > not allow client code to exceed that limit. > > https://computing.llnl.gov/linux/slurm/high_throughput.html > > > Below is the config that we are planning to use on Tomcat 7.0.42 on > > Linux 5.x. > > (You should upgrade to 7.0.62 as soon as it feasible for you.) > > > > minSpareThreads="100" maxThreads="300"/> > > > > > connectionTimeout="2" redirectPort="8443" > > enableLookups="false" keepAliveTimeout="30" > > maxKeepAliveRequests="1" acceptCount="5" socketBuffer="10240" > > executor="tomcatThreadPool" compression="on" > > compressableMimeType="text/html, text/xml" xpoweredBy="false" > > server="false" /> > > > > Any inputs regarding the Tomcat threads and Linux > > net.core.somaxconn will be greatly appreciated to support many > > concurrent connections. > > If you use acceptCount="5", Tomcat will ask for that socket queue > size and simply won't get it. You should definitely raise the value of > somaxx on Linux. > > - -chris > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2 > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVMQG4AAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYFuMQAMMbBv7v5jOTHz302TMYNbMB > sc1qH9IuV7Z1DrqAOE+yN19xdzt+7cakNl5YWomHr/U3ePNianLeqY+27WYYUm9V > gTw/kHqBOUYfWttnlFzDCBidUDPw6m3TnhFq8Oia5UBdfPh4IQDR+zxF9FCkncUi > 51evAzsp4gzAOMjDUmxMQMCfYQML1l+VX56Za4RT4S6z2L6HCxyjeVYQSc2nsLnU > Y6G3X0ccomxszHhb5GuU82lldgKjw5BDubkp57/fxBajZ6QcWSU7sr+HlaoAUfLz > +p/PSJhyXDMxlKqGmGsBK8BMMsK5H26yup5LtpKkLDEJuUYSv5N1rsklmQCbUuXk > 0pBzFmVKQG2CRh2miutBC7Vr5l3AOP5ghV2uOOvuCBg+Sg8pzImase2m9Nw9Z1sh > XnLrrJq7a/nvd4C2jRT/y01AJNfv0qJG95RjBxoVdoQ629fjK05Z2MB7avL2Qzwq > 8JpcwhkfhVAWW87JVAIMPluILNuhCCg/LDQSVj4twdtGBy181E29yNSfmIRkq33j > 2Jc83/gLgNU+maM4RzXKWzFYpk8ccLMhHsbh8txqswK+rV8XDfQTLZzxy43IawCK > Nc1rBnWCVQOPMxjumfZWuZtdAy/HlSpw1otRVkXNVONOCLwMcAggLbjeO1TFJiJj > MArVB8ONarkbkDts2quG > =vSf+ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
Re: French chars not displayed correctly - Tomcat 7
On 20/04/2015 15:49, Neill Lima wrote:
> Try adding this to your html:
>
>
> **
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, radiatejava wrote:
>
>> Hello Tomcat users, have code like this in my jsp:
>>
>> "${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}";
>>
>> Where represents a cell of an html table.
>>
>> Value of the variable pageKeys.ui_user_name_label populated in server
>> side is in french and it is exactly as shown below:
>>
>> Nom d'utilisateur
>>
>> However, while displaying this in the browser, this is getting displayed
>> as:
>>
>> Nom d’utilisateur
>>
>>
>> How can I get this corrected ? When I try to see the source code, I
>> see something like this:
>>
>> out.write((java.lang.String)
>>
>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.proprietaryEvaluate("${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}",
>> java.lang.String.class,
>> (javax.servlet.jsp.PageContext)_jspx_page_context, null, false));
>>
>> What I want to know from developers here is whether the above code
>> really does some escaping/encoding of the content ?
Tomcat will use whatever encoding you have configured for the JSP page.
If you don't define an encoding then the default will be used. Note that
using '' is just meaningless template text as far
as Tomcat is concerned and will have no impact on how Tomcat generates
the page.
>> Is a there a way to avoid this encoding ?
You cannot avoid encoding. You have to define the mapping you wish to
use to map from bytes to characters. If you do not, the default will be
used.
You should take a look at the Character Encoding part of the FAQ on the
wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/CharacterEncoding
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: WebappLoader vs WebappClassLoader
On 20/04/2015 14:22, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and > WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? WebappLoader is the Tomcat object that a user can configure that represents the class loader. It remains the same across web application stop/start. WebappClassLoader is the actual class loader. Every time the web application is started, a new instance is created and used. > As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and WebAppLoader for > tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? Yes. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Am 20.04.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Thomas Boniface: Hi, Both nginx and tomcat are hosted on the same server when listing the connections I see both the connections from nginx to tomcat (the first one create) and the one from tomcat to nginx used to reply. I may have presented things the bad way though (I'm not too good regarding system level). I do agree the high number of close wait seems strange, I really feel like nginx closed the connection before tomcat did (what I think leads to the broken pipe expections observed in the catalina.out). In case someone want to have a look I uploaded a netstat log here: http://www.filedropper.com/netsat The connection statistics between clients and nginx http port is: Count IP:Port ConnectionState 45467 178.32.101.62:80 TIME_WAIT 44745178.33.42.6:80 TIME_WAIT 26093178.33.42.6:80 ESTABLISHED 25667 178.32.101.62:80 ESTABLISHED 6898 178.32.101.62:80 FIN_WAIT2 6723178.33.42.6:80 FIN_WAIT2 800 178.32.101.62:80 FIN_WAIT1 792178.33.42.6:80 FIN_WAIT1 712 178.32.101.62:80 LAST_ACK 656178.33.42.6:80 LAST_ACK 234178.33.42.6:80 SYN_RECV 232 178.32.101.62:80 SYN_RECV 18178.33.42.6:80 CLOSING 8 178.32.101.62:80 CLOSING 1178.33.42.6:80 CLOSE_WAIT 10.0.0.0:80 LISTEN So lots of connections in TIME_WAIT state which is kind of expected for a web server doing lots of short time client connections, but slows down the IP stack. Also quite a lot of established connections (about 50.000!), which means that you probably want to check, whether you can reduce your keep alive timeout for nginx. The same statistics for the https port: Count IP:Port ConnectionState 2283 178.32.101.62:443 TIME_WAIT 2125 178.33.42.6:443 TIME_WAIT 1585 178.32.101.62:443 ESTABLISHED 1493 178.33.42.6:443 ESTABLISHED 484 178.32.101.62:443 FIN_WAIT2 420 178.33.42.6:443 FIN_WAIT2 47 178.32.101.62:443 FIN_WAIT1 46 178.33.42.6:443 FIN_WAIT1 25 178.32.101.62:443 LAST_ACK 17 178.33.42.6:443 SYN_RECV 16 178.32.101.62:443 SYN_RECV 16 178.33.42.6:443 LAST_ACK 10 178.33.42.6:443 CLOSING 4 178.32.101.62:443 CLOSING 1 0.0.0.0:443 LISTEN About the same relative picture but only about 5% of the http connection counts. The incoming connection statistics for Tomcat (port 8080) is: Count IP:Port ConnectionState 8381127.0.0.1:8080 CLOSE_WAIT 1650127.0.0.1:8080 ESTABLISHED 127127.0.0.1:8080 SYN_RECV 65127.0.0.1:8080 TIME_WAIT 1 172.16.1.3:8080 LISTEN 1127.0.0.1:8080 LISTEN The many CLOSE_WAIT mean, that the remote side (nginx) has already closed the connection, but not yet Tomcat. Probably the idleconnection timeout / keep alive timeout for connectiosn between nginx and Tomcat is lower on the nginx side, than on the tomcat side. Interestingly the same connections but viewed from the opposite side of the connection (nginx) have totally different statistics: Count IP:Port ConnectionState 20119127.0.0.1:8080 SYN_SENT 4692127.0.0.1:8080 ESTABLISHED 488127.0.0.1:8080 FIN_WAIT2 122127.0.0.1:8080 TIME_WAIT 13127.0.0.1:8080 FIN_WAIT1 I wonder why we have 4692 established connections here, but on 1650 in the table above. In a static situation, the numbers should be the same. It indicates, that the is so much dynamics, taht the numbers vary a lot even while netstat runs. We see a lot of SYN_SENT, so nginx wants to open many more connections to Tomcat but doesn't get them as quickly as it wants. Finally there's a bunch of connections to remote web services: CountIP:Port ConnectionState 286 95.85.3.86:80 CLOSE_WAIT 255 46.228.164.12:80 ESTABLISHED 209 188.125.82.65:80 CLOSE_WAIT 172 176.74.173.230:80 ESTABLISHED 170 54.171.53.252:80 CLOSE_WAIT 136 188.125.82.65:80 LAST_ACK 129 95.85.3.86:80 LAST_ACK 128 23.212.108.209:80 CLOSE_WAIT 106 46.137.157.249:80 CLOSE_WAIT 10181.19.244.69:80 ESTABLISHED 86 146.148.30.94:80 CLOSE_WAIT 8346.137.83.90:80 CLOSE_WAIT 80 188.125.82.65:80 ESTABLISHED 78 37.252.163.221:80 CLOSE_WAIT 7746.137.83.90:80 ESTABLISHED 73 46.137.157.121:80 CLOSE_WAIT 6454.246.89.98:80 CLOSE_WAIT 63 173.194.40.153:80 ESTABLISHED 6193.176.80.69:80 ESTABLISHED 55 23.212.108.198:80 CLOSE_WAIT 5354.72.204.78:80 CLOSE_WAIT 51 37.252.162.230:80 CLOSE_WAIT 51 173.194.40.154:80 ESTABLISHED 50 54.247.113.157:80 CLOSE_WAIT 50 37.252.170.98:80 CLOSE_WAIT 49 23.212.108.191:80 CLOSE_WAIT 47 54.154.23.133:80 CLOSE_WAIT 43 176.34.179.135:80 CLOSE_WAIT 39 146.148.21.73:80 CLOSE_WAIT 36 46.137.87.196:80 CLOSE_WAIT 34 173.194.40.154:80 CLOSE_WAIT 30 46.137.87.163:80 CLOSE_W
Re: French chars not displayed correctly - Tomcat 7
Of course I have that in my html page. My aim was to ask whether tomcat (its libraries) itself is doing encoding of special chars. Thanks. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Neill Lima wrote: > Try adding this to your html: > > > ** > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Hi, Both nginx and tomcat are hosted on the same server when listing the connections I see both the connections from nginx to tomcat (the first one create) and the one from tomcat to nginx used to reply. I may have presented things the bad way though (I'm not too good regarding system level). I do agree the high number of close wait seems strange, I really feel like nginx closed the connection before tomcat did (what I think leads to the broken pipe expections observed in the catalina.out). In case someone want to have a look I uploaded a netstat log here: http://www.filedropper.com/netsat Thomas 2015-04-20 17:13 GMT+02:00 André Warnier : > Thomas Boniface wrote: > >> I did some captures during a peak this morning, I have some lsof and >> netstat data. >> >> It seems to me that most file descriptors used by tomcat are some http >> connections: >> >> thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof| wc -l >> 17772 >> thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof | grep TCP | wc -l >> 13966 >> >> (Note that the application also send request to external servers via http) >> >> >> Regarding netstat I did a small script to try to aggregate connections >> with >> a human readable name, if my script is right the connections between nginx >> and tomcat are as follows: >> >> tomcat => nginx SYN_RECV 127 >> tomcat => nginx ESTABLISHED 1650 >> tomcat => nginx CLOSE_WAIT 8381 >> tomcat => nginx TIME_WAIT 65 >> >> nginx => tomcat SYN_SENT 20119 >> nginx => tomcat ESTABLISHED 4692 >> nginx => tomcat TIME_WAIT 122 >> nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT2 488 >> nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT1 13 >> > > I don't understand the distinction here. Tomcat should never initiate > connections *to* nginx, or ? > > For personal historical reasons, the high number of connections in > CLOSE_WAIT state above triggered my interest. Search Google for : "tcp > close_wait state meaning" > Basically, it can mean that the client wants to go away, and closes its > end of the connection to the server, but the application on the server > never properly closes the connection to the client. And as long as it > doesn't, the corresponding connection will remain stuck in the CLOSE_WAIT > state (and continue to use resources on the server, such as an fd and > associated resources). > All that doesn't mean that this is your main issue here, but it's > something to look into. > > > > >> Concerning the other response and the system max number of file, I am not >> sure this is where our issue lies. The peak itself seems to be a sympton >> of >> an issue, tomcat fd are around 1000 almost all the time except when a peak >> occurs. In such cases it can go up to 1 or more sometimes. >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> 2015-04-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Rainer Jung : >> >> Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: >>> >>> Hi, I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async connector. We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 7.0.28-4). Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured as follows: We use an Nio connector: >>>selectorTimeout="1000" maxThreads="200" maxHttpHeaderSize="16384" address="127.0.0.1" redirectPort="8443"/> In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening with previous version. I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools >>> available >>> you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at >>> "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use >>> the pfiles command. >>> >>> If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are >>> coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via >>> "netstat" in which connection state those are. >>> >>> If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down >>> the strategy. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rainer >>> >>> >>> ---
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Thanks for your time Rainer, I get what you mean regarding the application getting slow. This server was also logging the garbage collection activity and it seems normal even when the problem is occuring, there is no big variation in the time taken to do a garbage collection operation. I don't have a clear view of the server response time around the test I made, so I can't tell if the application gets "slow" before the file descriptor peak but as mentioned before this happen also during low traffic period (in such a period there should have not reason to get slow). Also, it feels unexpected that this version of tomcat makes the application getting slower more often than a server with the other version of tomcat. Thomas 2015-04-20 16:32 GMT+02:00 Rainer Jung : > Am 20.04.2015 um 15:41 schrieb Rainer Jung: > >> Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our >>> platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often >>> on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. >>> >>> Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async >>> connector. >>> We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed >>> between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to >>> give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what >>> can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. >>> >>> The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently >>> with >>> this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 >>> 7.0.28-4). >>> >>> Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured >>> as follows: >>> >>> We use an Nio connector: >>> >>selectorTimeout="1000" >>>maxThreads="200" >>>maxHttpHeaderSize="16384" >>>address="127.0.0.1" >>>redirectPort="8443"/> >>> >>> In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening >>> with >>> previous version. >>> >>> I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" >>> version of >>> tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. >>> >>> My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how >>> what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. >>> >> >> If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools >> available you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux >> looking at "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on >> Solaris use the pfiles command. >> >> If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are >> coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via >> "netstat" in which connection state those are. >> >> If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down >> the strategy. >> > > One more thing: the connection peak might happen, if for some reason your > application or the JVM (GC) gets slow. The reason doesn't have to still be > there at the time when you take the thread dump. > > You might want to add "%D" to your Tomcat access log and ty to estimate, > whether the connection peaks are due to (temporary) application slow down. > > The same holds for activating a GC log and check for long or many > cumulative GC pauses. > > > Regards, > > Rainer > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Thomas Boniface wrote: I did some captures during a peak this morning, I have some lsof and netstat data. It seems to me that most file descriptors used by tomcat are some http connections: thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof| wc -l 17772 thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof | grep TCP | wc -l 13966 (Note that the application also send request to external servers via http) Regarding netstat I did a small script to try to aggregate connections with a human readable name, if my script is right the connections between nginx and tomcat are as follows: tomcat => nginx SYN_RECV 127 tomcat => nginx ESTABLISHED 1650 tomcat => nginx CLOSE_WAIT 8381 tomcat => nginx TIME_WAIT 65 nginx => tomcat SYN_SENT 20119 nginx => tomcat ESTABLISHED 4692 nginx => tomcat TIME_WAIT 122 nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT2 488 nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT1 13 I don't understand the distinction here. Tomcat should never initiate connections *to* nginx, or ? For personal historical reasons, the high number of connections in CLOSE_WAIT state above triggered my interest. Search Google for : "tcp close_wait state meaning" Basically, it can mean that the client wants to go away, and closes its end of the connection to the server, but the application on the server never properly closes the connection to the client. And as long as it doesn't, the corresponding connection will remain stuck in the CLOSE_WAIT state (and continue to use resources on the server, such as an fd and associated resources). All that doesn't mean that this is your main issue here, but it's something to look into. Concerning the other response and the system max number of file, I am not sure this is where our issue lies. The peak itself seems to be a sympton of an issue, tomcat fd are around 1000 almost all the time except when a peak occurs. In such cases it can go up to 1 or more sometimes. Thomas 2015-04-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Rainer Jung : Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: Hi, I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async connector. We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 7.0.28-4). Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured as follows: We use an Nio connector: In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening with previous version. I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools available you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use the pfiles command. If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via "netstat" in which connection state those are. If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down the strategy. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: French chars not displayed correctly - Tomcat 7
Try adding this to your html:
**
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, radiatejava wrote:
> Hello Tomcat users, have code like this in my jsp:
>
> "${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}";
>
> Where represents a cell of an html table.
>
> Value of the variable pageKeys.ui_user_name_label populated in server
> side is in french and it is exactly as shown below:
>
> Nom d'utilisateur
>
> However, while displaying this in the browser, this is getting displayed
> as:
>
> Nom d’utilisateur
>
>
> How can I get this corrected ? When I try to see the source code, I
> see something like this:
>
> out.write((java.lang.String)
>
> org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.proprietaryEvaluate("${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}",
> java.lang.String.class,
> (javax.servlet.jsp.PageContext)_jspx_page_context, null, false));
>
> What I want to know from developers here is whether the above code
> really does some escaping/encoding of the content ? Is a there a way
> to avoid this encoding ?
>
> Appreciate your reply.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
French chars not displayed correctly - Tomcat 7
Hello Tomcat users, have code like this in my jsp:
"${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}";
Where represents a cell of an html table.
Value of the variable pageKeys.ui_user_name_label populated in server
side is in french and it is exactly as shown below:
Nom d'utilisateur
However, while displaying this in the browser, this is getting displayed as:
Nom d’utilisateur
How can I get this corrected ? When I try to see the source code, I
see something like this:
out.write((java.lang.String)
org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.proprietaryEvaluate("${pageKeys.ui_user_name_label}",
java.lang.String.class,
(javax.servlet.jsp.PageContext)_jspx_page_context, null, false));
What I want to know from developers here is whether the above code
really does some escaping/encoding of the content ? Is a there a way
to avoid this encoding ?
Appreciate your reply.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Am 20.04.2015 um 15:41 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: Hi, I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async connector. We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 7.0.28-4). Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured as follows: We use an Nio connector: In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening with previous version. I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools available you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use the pfiles command. If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via "netstat" in which connection state those are. If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down the strategy. One more thing: the connection peak might happen, if for some reason your application or the JVM (GC) gets slow. The reason doesn't have to still be there at the time when you take the thread dump. You might want to add "%D" to your Tomcat access log and ty to estimate, whether the connection peaks are due to (temporary) application slow down. The same holds for activating a GC log and check for long or many cumulative GC pauses. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
I did some captures during a peak this morning, I have some lsof and netstat data. It seems to me that most file descriptors used by tomcat are some http connections: thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof| wc -l 17772 thomas@localhost ~/ads3/tbo11h12 cat lsof | grep TCP | wc -l 13966 (Note that the application also send request to external servers via http) Regarding netstat I did a small script to try to aggregate connections with a human readable name, if my script is right the connections between nginx and tomcat are as follows: tomcat => nginx SYN_RECV 127 tomcat => nginx ESTABLISHED 1650 tomcat => nginx CLOSE_WAIT 8381 tomcat => nginx TIME_WAIT 65 nginx => tomcat SYN_SENT 20119 nginx => tomcat ESTABLISHED 4692 nginx => tomcat TIME_WAIT 122 nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT2 488 nginx => tomcat FIN_WAIT1 13 Concerning the other response and the system max number of file, I am not sure this is where our issue lies. The peak itself seems to be a sympton of an issue, tomcat fd are around 1000 almost all the time except when a peak occurs. In such cases it can go up to 1 or more sometimes. Thomas 2015-04-20 15:41 GMT+02:00 Rainer Jung : > Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: > >> Hi, >> >> I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our >> platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often >> on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. >> >> Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async >> connector. >> We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed >> between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to >> give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what >> can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. >> >> The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with >> this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 >> 7.0.28-4). >> >> Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured >> as follows: >> >> We use an Nio connector: >> >selectorTimeout="1000" >>maxThreads="200" >>maxHttpHeaderSize="16384" >>address="127.0.0.1" >>redirectPort="8443"/> >> >> In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening >> with >> previous version. >> >> I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of >> tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. >> >> My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how >> what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. >> > > If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools available > you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at > "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use > the pfiles command. > > If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are > coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via > "netstat" in which connection state those are. > > If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down > the strategy. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Increasing the amount of opened file descriptors is an accepted fine-tune (*if your application it is handling the threads properly*) ulimit -n ulimit -n [new_value] ulimit -n If even after allowing more fds the performance is not adequate, some sort of scaling (H/V) is necessary. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: > >> Hi, >> >> I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our >> platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often >> on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. >> >> Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async >> connector. >> We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed >> between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to >> give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what >> can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. >> >> The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with >> this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 >> 7.0.28-4). >> >> Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured >> as follows: >> >> We use an Nio connector: >> >selectorTimeout="1000" >>maxThreads="200" >>maxHttpHeaderSize="16384" >>address="127.0.0.1" >>redirectPort="8443"/> >> >> In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening >> with >> previous version. >> >> I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of >> tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. >> >> My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how >> what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. >> > > If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools available > you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at > "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use > the pfiles command. > > If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are > coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via > "netstat" in which connection state those are. > > If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down > the strategy. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
Re: File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Am 20.04.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Thomas Boniface: Hi, I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async connector. We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 7.0.28-4). Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured as follows: We use an Nio connector: In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening with previous version. I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. If the peaks happen long enough and your platforms has the tools available you can use lsof to look for what those FDs are - or on Linux looking at "ls -l /proc/PID/fd/*" (PID is the process PID file) - or on Solaris use the pfiles command. If the result is what is expected, namely that by far the most FDs are coming from network connections for port 8080, then you can check via "netstat" in which connection state those are. If most are in ESTABLISHED state, then you/we need to further break down the strategy. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
WebappLoader vs WebappClassLoader
Hi, Could someone tell me what is the purpose of having WebappLoader and WebappClassLoader in Tomcat? As I understand WebappClassLoader is per web application and WebAppLoader for tomcat server instance. Am I wrong? Thanks Best Regards --
File descriptors peaks with latest stable build of Tomcat 7
Hi, I have tried to find help regarding an issue we experience with our platform leading to random file descriptor peaks. This happens more often on heavy load but can also happen on low traffic periods. Our application is using servlet 3.0 async features and an async connector. We noticed that a lot of issues regarding asynchronous feature were fixed between our production version and the last stable build. We decided to give it a try to see if it improves things or at least give clues on what can cause the issue; Unfortunately it did neither. The file descriptor peaks and application blocking happens frequently with this version when it only happens rarely on previous version (tomcat7 7.0.28-4). Tomcat is behind an nginx server. The tomcat connector used is configured as follows: We use an Nio connector: In catalina I can see some Broken pipe message that were not happening with previous version. I compared thread dumps from server with both the new and "old" version of tomcat and both look similar from my stand point. My explanation may not be very clear, but I hope this gives an idea how what we are experiencing. Any pointer would be welcomed. Thomas
Re: org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn.sessionEvent() equivalent in Tomcat 8
On 20/04/2015 06:41, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne wrote: > Hi > >>> In tomcat 7 there is a method to set session event as follows in the > org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn >>> void sessionEvent(SessionEvent event) > >>> But this method has been removed in tomcat 8. >>> Is there a equivalent in Tomcat 8? Or is there a specific reason to > remove that? >> I think I found the answer >> I can get the sessionListner and configure through that > >> getSessionListener(ssID).sessionEvent(event) > > But how can I get the ssoID ? That is not a setter, it is a handler that responds to session events. Note that in Tomcat 8 the Listener and the Valve are in separate classes. What is it that you are trying to do? Mark > > > 2015-04-20 11:05 GMT+05:30 Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < > thusithathil...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi >> In tomcat 7 there is a method to set session event as follows in the >> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn void sessionEvent(SessionEvent event) >> But this method has been removed in tomcat 8. Is there a equivalent in Tomcat 8? Or is there a specific reason to >> remove that? >> I think I found the answer >> I can get the sessionListner and configure through that >> >> getSessionListener(ssID).sessionEvent(event) >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> 2015-04-20 11:01 GMT+05:30 Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne < >> thusithathil...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In tomcat 7 there is a method to set session event as follows in the >>> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn >>> void sessionEvent(SessionEvent event) >>> >>> But this method has been removed in tomcat 8. >>> Is there a equivalent in Tomcat 8? Or is there a specific reason to >>> remove that? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Best Regards >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> > > > > -- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cluster - Session replication error: Unable to apply diff
This NPE has been caused by that apply the diff data to a ReplicatedMapEntry that has not set a MapOwner. Usually, ReplicatedMapEntry always has to have the MapOwner. I think this is probably a bug. Please open Bugzilla entry. I will scrutinize the code. 2015-04-20 15:04 GMT+09:00 Keiichi Fujino : > Hi > > Are there other error or exception in your log? > > Please show us your cluster configuration in your server.xml. > e.g. > - What is mapSendOptions? > - Which Interceptor do you use? > > > > 2015-04-15 3:55 GMT+09:00 Théo Chamley : > >> Hello, >> >> I have a working Tomcat 8.0.15 cluster with 3 members with the >> BackupManager as session manager. >> The session replication is mostly working except in a few cases. In those >> cases, I get the following error: >> >> 09-Apr-2015 12:16:58.369 SEVERE [Tribes-Task-Receiver-6] >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.tipis.AbstractReplicatedMap.messageReceived >> Unable to apply diff to key:3B286B4C7CA060163A00988969D21923 >> java.lang.NullPointerException >> at >> org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaSession.applyDiff(DeltaSession.java:164) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.tipis.AbstractReplicatedMap.messageReceived(AbstractReplicatedMap.java:664) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.GroupChannel.messageReceived(GroupChannel.java:293) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.ChannelInterceptorBase.messageReceived(ChannelInterceptorBase.java:81) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.TcpFailureDetector.messageReceived(TcpFailureDetector.java:112) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.ChannelInterceptorBase.messageReceived(ChannelInterceptorBase.java:81) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.ChannelInterceptorBase.messageReceived(ChannelInterceptorBase.java:81) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.ThroughputInterceptor.messageReceived(ThroughputInterceptor.java:89) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.ChannelInterceptorBase.messageReceived(ChannelInterceptorBase.java:81) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.ChannelCoordinator.messageReceived(ChannelCoordinator.java:260) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReceiverBase.messageDataReceived(ReceiverBase.java:240) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.nio.NioReplicationTask.drainChannel(NioReplicationTask.java:206) >> at >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.nio.NioReplicationTask.run(NioReplicationTask.java:97) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) >> >> >> I was able to replicate the problem with a scenario in the application, >> but I was not able to understand the underlying problem. >> This happens when the user is making a very specific request and this >> request arrives on a Tomcat where his session is not stored, forcing the >> Tomcat to fetch the session elsewhere. >> >> The 3 tomcats are on the same network with a very low network latency. >> >> Does anybody has some advice on how to debug this problem? >> >> For now, I got around it with sticky sessions on mod_jk, but I find this >> very unsatisfactory. >> >> Thank you in advance for your help, >> >> //Théo >> >> -- >> Keiichi.Fujino >> > -- Keiichi.Fujino
