Re: Multiple submit buttons - CompoundPropertyModel not updated

2010-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg 
You cannot update models without default processing, what If the user typed
"abc"into a text field backed by an integer model? What you can do, however,
is accesses the raw value of the component via getvalue method.

-igor

On Nov 3, 2010 2:37 AM, "Benjamin Lorenz" 
wrote:

Hello,

I have a problem with a form that shall have two submit buttons. One finally
submits the form with all plausibility checks, etc... the other just opens
up a search form, to lookup some data for inclusion in the form. This submit
shall NOT do all the checks on e.g. .setRequired(true), etc..., but it DOES
HAVE to update my CompoundPropertyModel values, to deal with the user's
(partially) entered values so far.

I cannot get this together: setDefaultFormProcessing(false) will not update
my models, setDefaultFormProcessing(true) will finally submit my form, also
calling the form's onSubmit, which is not what I want.

I am using an anonymous form class with the default onSubmit(), and an
additionally attached Button, which has its own onSubmit().

Do you understand what I mean, and can anybody point me to the right
direction? It seems to me like a very basic, fundamental thing to do, two
form buttons, that deal - independently from each other - with the entered
data, but it seems to be tricky nevertheless...

Thanks,
Benjamin



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: generated form and form IDs vs model confusion

2010-11-03 Thread Jeremy Thomerson 
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Troy Cauble  wrote:

> Typically, one sets a FormComponent's ID to match the data model.
> My form is generated from data, so the IDs are a recursive set of
> "fieldFrag",
> "list", "blockFrag", "label", "value" and RepeatingView#newChildID().
>
> My data on the other hand is represented by HashMap
> and CompoundPropertyModel.  The keys are generated.
>
> This works fine when my form has a Model before I construct it.
> Where each FormComponent is constructed I do this.
>
>   new PropertyModel(getDefaultModel(), key);
>
> Anyway, PM doesn't like it when the first arg is null.  So I can't support
> using setDefaultModel() after the form components are instantiated.
>
> How can I support setDefaultModel() ?  ComponentPropertyModel looks
> like it might work if it wasn't read only.
>
> Thanks,
> -troy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
If your form is using a compoundpropertymodel, your form components don't
need an explicit property model.

class YourForm extends Form {
setModel(IModel model) {
// ensure that you always get a compoundpropertymodel:
super.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(model));
}
}

Form form = new YourForm();
form.setModel(new LoadableDetachableFooBarSomethingOrOtherModel());

form.add(new
TextField("someKeyThatRepresentsAPropertyOnTheThingReturnedByAboveModel"));

That should work.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: SV: How to get other page's localized messages ?

2010-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg 
Later versions of wicket also support package level bundles stored in
package.properties files

-igor

On Nov 3, 2010 3:43 AM, "Wilhelmsen Tor Iver"  wrote:

> How do I get Page1's specific localized message in Page2 ?
1) Make a superclass for the two pages and put the message in the
superclass' property file

2) Put the property in the Application's property file

In both cases the mechanisms in Wicket will find the message.

- Tor I.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Send an object to page

2010-11-03 Thread Jeremy Thomerson 
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Peter Ertl  wrote:

> Also, if the userID is the id of the currently logged in user why not just
> store it in your wicket session when logging on to make it inaccessible for
> the client and prevent spoof altogether?


Obviously this is more secure.  And also not even necessary - the ID can be
directly in the link's model, so you can have dozens of links on the page,
all to edit different users, rather than having a single ID in the session.
 That's the whole premise Wicket is built around.

But, you missed this part of the thread apparently:

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, James Carman 
 wrote:

> You could pass the "id" of the object (if possible) as a
> PageParameter.  You can then use a bookmarkable URL for your page.
> You'll have to lookup the object from the db, though.  Again, this is
> only possible if the object is an "entity."


That part of the thread is what I was replying to - that it was then
insecure because the DB ID is in the URL.  This is not a standard way of
doing most links in Wicket - because of the security leak

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: Lazy Load Panel at runtime from another jar

2010-11-03 Thread Jeremy Thomerson 
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:22 PM, cole  wrote:

>
> I have simple plugin frame work for my app. I load plug-in's at startup.
> What
> I would like is to have the plug-in supply a panel for exposing the
> plugin's
> functionality. So a wicket page loads, the app determines if pluginA is
> available and calls, pluginA.getPanel(). pluginA is in a separate jar, the
> class and html file. When the application runs I get :
> (UrlResourceStream.java:108) - cannot convert url:
> jar:file://localhostc:/foo/extenders/pluginA.jar!/pluginA.html to file (URI
> is not hierarchical), falling back to the inputstream for polling
>
> I'm not sure if the resource loader is finding the html file or it simply
> cannot load the html file. Is this a classpath issue or do I need to do
> something special to allow loading panels from jar's at runtime.


It must be classpath / classloader related, although I haven't seen that
error and don't know what it means without digging in more.

HTML panels are loaded from jars all the time.  Every time you use a
DataTable or a FeedbackPanel or dozens of other Wicket components, you're
loading HTML from a (wicket) jar.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

generated form and form IDs vs model confusion

2010-11-03 Thread Troy Cauble 
Typically, one sets a FormComponent's ID to match the data model.
My form is generated from data, so the IDs are a recursive set of "fieldFrag",
"list", "blockFrag", "label", "value" and RepeatingView#newChildID().

My data on the other hand is represented by HashMap
and CompoundPropertyModel.  The keys are generated.

This works fine when my form has a Model before I construct it.
Where each FormComponent is constructed I do this.

   new PropertyModel(getDefaultModel(), key);

Anyway, PM doesn't like it when the first arg is null.  So I can't support
using setDefaultModel() after the form components are instantiated.

How can I support setDefaultModel() ?  ComponentPropertyModel looks
like it might work if it wasn't read only.

Thanks,
-troy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: If-Modified-Since header

2010-11-03 Thread Mauro Ciancio 
Sorry for bringing up this thread, but I'm still looking for advices.
Should I implement this or Wicket can do it for me?

Regards.

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mauro Ciancio  wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I didn't explain myself very well. I'm using wicket resources, I
> inherited from WebResource and implemented the abstract methods.
>
> Also, I mounted the resources using the following code:
>
> String resourceKey = "photos";
> String alias = "photos"
>
> SharedResources sharedResources = application.getSharedResources();
> sharedResources.putClassAlias(MyWebResource.class, alias);
> sharedResources.add(MyWebResource.class, resourceKey, null, null, new
> MyWebResource());
> webApplication.mount(new
> IndexedSharedResourceCodingStrategy("/photos", alias + "/" +
> resourceKey));
>
> So, I get the pretty urls I wanted. My resources gets mounted at
> "domain.com/photos/my/parameters" and according to the parameters I
> serve differents photos.
>
> Once the photos are uploaded they never change, so I'd like the photos
> be cached. I'm expecting to get a 304 not modified, but the
> If-Modified-Since header is ignored because of the mount path is not
> under '/resources'.
>
> Is this clearer?
> Should I implement the checking for the header or it's supposed that
> wicket could do that for me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards.
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Martin Grigorov  wrote:
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> /resources is a special path managed by Wicket, e.g.
>> ResourceReference(MyComponent.class, "myImage.gif") will be reachable at
>> /resources/com.mypackage.MyComponent/myImage.gif
>>
>> Resources which are put in next to WEB-INF folder are not managed by WIcket
>> and they are served directly by the web container
>> Take a look at http://code.google.com/p/wro4j/
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Mauro Ciancio wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone:
>>>
>>> I've been trying to get properly working the caching in my site's
>>> resources using the if-modified-since header. I've noticed that the
>>> check for the header is only done if the resource is mounted under the
>>> '/resources' url (wicket filter @ line 1130, Wicket 1.4).
>>>
>>> My resources are mounted under another url ('/photos'). I was
>>> wondering why the check is restricted to that url. Also, I've tried to
>>> mount my resources under /resources/photos but I get an exception that
>>> says 'cannot be mounted under /resources'.
>>>
>>> Any advices?
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> --
>>> Mauro Ciancio
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mauro Ciancio
>



-- 
Mauro Ciancio

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Send an object to page

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Ertl 
> That's one more reason why I use UUID's for my object ids.  They're
> harder to spoof.


Security by obscurity :-) 

Checking the URL is not an option ... any web app claiming to be secure must do 
that no what what the surrogate database key looks like *imho*

Also, if the userID is the id of the currently logged in user why not just 
store it in your wicket session when logging on to make it inaccessible for the 
client and prevent spoof altogether?

Am 02.11.2010 um 05:29 schrieb James Carman:

> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>  wrote:
>>> 
>> And, of course, it opens you up to doing more security checks i.e., you
>> have editUserProfile.html?userID=123 - now you have to check that the signed
>> in person is allowed to edit whatever user they are trying to edit (since
>> they can twiddle the URL).
>> 
> 
> That's one more reason why I use UUID's for my object ids.  They're
> harder to spoof.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Lazy Load Panel at runtime from another jar

2010-11-03 Thread cole 

I have simple plugin frame work for my app. I load plug-in's at startup. What
I would like is to have the plug-in supply a panel for exposing the plugin's
functionality. So a wicket page loads, the app determines if pluginA is
available and calls, pluginA.getPanel(). pluginA is in a separate jar, the
class and html file. When the application runs I get :
(UrlResourceStream.java:108) - cannot convert url:
jar:file://localhostc:/foo/extenders/pluginA.jar!/pluginA.html to file (URI
is not hierarchical), falling back to the inputstream for polling

I'm not sure if the resource loader is finding the html file or it simply
cannot load the html file. Is this a classpath issue or do I need to do
something special to allow loading panels from jar's at runtime.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Lazy-Load-Panel-at-runtime-from-another-jar-tp3026325p3026325.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: GMap2 off center

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Miklosko 
Yeap, that is my battle plan for tomorrow.



On 3 November 2010 19:12, Sven Meier  wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
> I have no idea what's going wrong on your page B.
> Try removing features (e.g. the flash animation) to make B more like A,
> repeat until it works then build up again.
>
> Regards
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 11/03/2010 01:15 PM, Peter Miklosko wrote:
>
>> In our application we are using Wicket GMap2 in some cases successfully in
>> other case with problems. The map is being off center, having about
>> 10-15px
>> grey border on the left and bottom of the map and in case of multiple
>> markers on the map being zoomed out to 0.0 in Firefox. The map is showing
>> fine in Chromium and to big surprise in IE6.
>>
>> I'm trying to determinate what is problem here and bellow is just
>> short comparison of differences.
>> Page A with working map does quick search for geographical location to be
>> presented to user, pin these locations to map and show descriptions
>> retrieved from DB.
>> Page B with not working map first runs flash animation while does the
>> search
>> for flights, once flights found it will redirect results to next page and
>> pin locations to map plus plus populate table with search results.
>>
>> Anyone had similar problem? Can you give some pointers to solve this?
>>
>> If more info need it please just let me know
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: GMap2 off center

2010-11-03 Thread Sven Meier 

Hi Peter,

I have no idea what's going wrong on your page B.
Try removing features (e.g. the flash animation) to make B more like A, 
repeat until it works then build up again.


Regards

Sven

On 11/03/2010 01:15 PM, Peter Miklosko wrote:

In our application we are using Wicket GMap2 in some cases successfully in
other case with problems. The map is being off center, having about 10-15px
grey border on the left and bottom of the map and in case of multiple
markers on the map being zoomed out to 0.0 in Firefox. The map is showing
fine in Chromium and to big surprise in IE6.

I'm trying to determinate what is problem here and bellow is just
short comparison of differences.
Page A with working map does quick search for geographical location to be
presented to user, pin these locations to map and show descriptions
retrieved from DB.
Page B with not working map first runs flash animation while does the search
for flights, once flights found it will redirect results to next page and
pin locations to map plus plus populate table with search results.

Anyone had similar problem? Can you give some pointers to solve this?

If more info need it please just let me know

Peter

   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread tommy 

ok thanks, I'll try and put something together tonight. Are you able to
answer either of those questions?

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+3025865-1659550532-201...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:03 AM, tommy <[hidden 
> email]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi
> > Can you point me to a link that explains what a quickstart is and how I
> > create one?
> >
> > Also maybe you consider these questions
> >
> > 1. If I can pass in a RadioGroup object to a Radio() constructor does the
>
> > RadioGroup also need to be added to the page and if so, does it matter
> where
> > on the page the RadioGroup is rendered, and in both cases: why the need?
> > given that the Radio objects are now bound to the RadioGroup object
> > directly.
> >
> > 2. Are there any examples of RadioGroup/Radio usage where RadioGroup is
> > passed in to the Radio() constructor?
> >
> > Thanks, Tom
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> > [hidden email] 
> > <[hidden
> email] >
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> best way for us to help you is for you to create a quickstart and
> >> attach it to your email or a jira issue.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:40 AM, tommy <[hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3025609&i=0>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I asked the following question on stack-overflow but was advised to
> ask
> >> here
> >> > instead.
> >> >
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4074028/in-wicket-how-can-i-create-radiogroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarc
> >> >
> >> > I am using Wicket and would like to create a grid of radio buttons
> using
> >> > html as shown below (outer lists will be displayed vertically, inner
> >> lists
> >> > will be displayed horizontally).
> >> >
> >> > I would like the radio buttons grouped vertically.
> >> >
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >   
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> > 
> >> >
> >> > Unfortunately it seems that RadioGroup only allow one to group radio
> >> buttons
> >> > according to the grouping defined by their layout.
> >> >
> >> > eg RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("radioGroupA");
> >> >
> >> > group.add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1)) ;
> >> >
> >> > Problem with this is that I cannot then layout the way I want.
> >> >
> >> > Is there another way? Manually specifying the name and gather results?
>
> >> >
> >> > UPDATE: I notice that Radio can take a RadioGroup as a parameter. So
> one
> >> can
> >> > do something like:
> >> >
> >> > // create some groups
> >> > for (0..n) {
> >> >  RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("myRadioGroup", new Model { .. } );
>
> >> >  groupArray.add(group)
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > //create a ListView for the RadioGroups so we can attach them to page
> >> > ListView radioListView = ListView("radioGroupList") { populate from
> >> > groupArray }
> >> > add(radioListView);
> >> >
> >> > // create our grid of radio buttons
> >> > // outer -> rows
> >> > for (0..x) {
> >> >  // inner -> columns
> >> >  for (0..n)
> >> >// supply group from our groupArray
> >> >add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1), groupArray.get(n) ));
> >> >  }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > I can then add the Radios and RadioGroups to the form independently of
>
> >> > layout and this has the desired effect in terms of the grouping.
> >> >
> >> > 
> >> >  < span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
> >> > < span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
> >> >  < /span>
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > But now, when I submit I am getting the following error:
> >> >
> >> > WicketMessage: submitted http post value [radio33] for RadioGroup
> >> component
> >> >
> >>
> [2:tContainer:list:2:tPanel:myForm:orderedRadioGroupList:0:orderedRadioGroup]
>
> >>
> >> > is illegal because it does not contain relative path to a Radio
> >> componnet.
> >> > Due to this the RadioGroup component cannot resolve the selected Radio
>
> >> > component pointed to by the illegal value. A possible reason is that
> >> > componment hierarchy changed between rendering and form submission.
> >> >
> >> > Any idea what this means?
> >> >
> >> > The spelling mistake 'componment' suggests it's not seen too often.
> >> >
> >> > I am using wicket 1.4.12.
> >> >
> >> > I found this ticket that looks related too :
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1055
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025204.html

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg 
http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html

-igor

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:03 AM, tommy  wrote:
>
> Hi
> Can you point me to a link that explains what a quickstart is and how I
> create one?
>
> Also maybe you consider these questions
>
> 1. If I can pass in a RadioGroup object to a Radio() constructor does the
> RadioGroup also need to be added to the page and if so, does it matter where
> on the page the RadioGroup is rendered, and in both cases: why the need?
> given that the Radio objects are now bound to the RadioGroup object
> directly.
>
> 2. Are there any examples of RadioGroup/Radio usage where RadioGroup is
> passed in to the Radio() constructor?
>
> Thanks, Tom
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
> ml-node+3025609-175919079-201...@n4.nabble.com
>> wrote:
>
>> best way for us to help you is for you to create a quickstart and
>> attach it to your email or a jira issue.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:40 AM, tommy <[hidden 
>> email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I asked the following question on stack-overflow but was advised to ask
>> here
>> > instead.
>> >
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4074028/in-wicket-how-can-i-create-radiogroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarc
>> >
>> > I am using Wicket and would like to create a grid of radio buttons using
>> > html as shown below (outer lists will be displayed vertically, inner
>> lists
>> > will be displayed horizontally).
>> >
>> > I would like the radio buttons grouped vertically.
>> >
>> > 
>> >  
>> >    
>> >       
>> >       
>> >       
>> >    
>> >  
>> >  
>> >    
>> >       
>> >       
>> >       
>> >    
>> >  
>> >  
>> >    
>> >       
>> >       
>> >       
>> >    
>> >  
>> > 
>> >
>> > Unfortunately it seems that RadioGroup only allow one to group radio
>> buttons
>> > according to the grouping defined by their layout.
>> >
>> > eg RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("radioGroupA");
>> >
>> > group.add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1)) ;
>> >
>> > Problem with this is that I cannot then layout the way I want.
>> >
>> > Is there another way? Manually specifying the name and gather results?
>> >
>> > UPDATE: I notice that Radio can take a RadioGroup as a parameter. So one
>> can
>> > do something like:
>> >
>> > // create some groups
>> > for (0..n) {
>> >  RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("myRadioGroup", new Model { .. } );
>> >  groupArray.add(group)
>> > }
>> >
>> > //create a ListView for the RadioGroups so we can attach them to page
>> > ListView radioListView = ListView("radioGroupList") { populate from
>> > groupArray }
>> > add(radioListView);
>> >
>> > // create our grid of radio buttons
>> > // outer -> rows
>> > for (0..x) {
>> >  // inner -> columns
>> >  for (0..n)
>> >    // supply group from our groupArray
>> >    add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1), groupArray.get(n) ));
>> >  }
>> > }
>> >
>> > I can then add the Radios and RadioGroups to the form independently of
>> > layout and this has the desired effect in terms of the grouping.
>> >
>> > 
>> >  < span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
>> >     < span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
>> >  < /span>
>> >  
>> >    
>> >
>> > But now, when I submit I am getting the following error:
>> >
>> > WicketMessage: submitted http post value [radio33] for RadioGroup
>> component
>> >
>> [2:tContainer:list:2:tPanel:myForm:orderedRadioGroupList:0:orderedRadioGroup]
>>
>> > is illegal because it does not contain relative path to a Radio
>> componnet.
>> > Due to this the RadioGroup component cannot resolve the selected Radio
>> > component pointed to by the illegal value. A possible reason is that
>> > componment hierarchy changed between rendering and form submission.
>> >
>> > Any idea what this means?
>> >
>> > The spelling mistake 'componment' suggests it's not seen too often.
>> >
>> > I am using wicket 1.4.12.
>> >
>> > I found this ticket that looks related too :
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1055
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025204.html
>> > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>> > email]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
>> > email]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]

Re: Wicket-auth annotations to hide a link problem

2010-11-03 Thread Ivana 

I just found this works - but has other problems:

I have a page with a menu made of links. The links replace the main panel
the user is looking at. Depending on user role, some panels are not
available and the corresponding links are not shown.

I have implemented this like this:
@AuthorizeAction(action = Action.RENDER, roles = { Roles.internal })
class InternalAjaxReplacementLink extends AjaxFallbackLink{
... replace panel, change/append css styles
}

@AuthorizeAction(action = Action.RENDER, roles = {Roles.public,
Roles.internal })
class PublicAjaxReplacementLink extends AjaxFallbackLink{
... replace panel, change/append css styles
}On my page i add the links, according to which users should have access to
which resources - and this works.
A user that has only the 'public' role sees only the links leading to public
resources, internal users see more resources. 


Except: the welcome panel is accesible to both 'internal' and 'public'
user-roles. When 'internal' users click an InternalAjaxReplacementLink, the
container asks them to authenticate again before they can continue. Nothing
happens with this new login: i have tried loggin in as a different
authorized user and the original credentials are not overwritten.  What is
going on?

I'm using tomcat form based security while developing. I intend to replace
this in the near future with spring security.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-auth-annotations-to-hide-a-link-problem-tp2542360p3025671.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread tommy 

Hi
Can you point me to a link that explains what a quickstart is and how I
create one?

Also maybe you consider these questions

1. If I can pass in a RadioGroup object to a Radio() constructor does the
RadioGroup also need to be added to the page and if so, does it matter where
on the page the RadioGroup is rendered, and in both cases: why the need?
given that the Radio objects are now bound to the RadioGroup object
directly.

2. Are there any examples of RadioGroup/Radio usage where RadioGroup is
passed in to the Radio() constructor?

Thanks, Tom

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+3025609-175919079-201...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> best way for us to help you is for you to create a quickstart and
> attach it to your email or a jira issue.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:40 AM, tommy <[hidden 
> email]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I asked the following question on stack-overflow but was advised to ask
> here
> > instead.
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4074028/in-wicket-how-can-i-create-radiogroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarc
> >
> > I am using Wicket and would like to create a grid of radio buttons using
> > html as shown below (outer lists will be displayed vertically, inner
> lists
> > will be displayed horizontally).
> >
> > I would like the radio buttons grouped vertically.
> >
> > 
> >  
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  
> >  
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  
> >  
> >
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >  
> > 
> >
> > Unfortunately it seems that RadioGroup only allow one to group radio
> buttons
> > according to the grouping defined by their layout.
> >
> > eg RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("radioGroupA");
> >
> > group.add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1)) ;
> >
> > Problem with this is that I cannot then layout the way I want.
> >
> > Is there another way? Manually specifying the name and gather results?
> >
> > UPDATE: I notice that Radio can take a RadioGroup as a parameter. So one
> can
> > do something like:
> >
> > // create some groups
> > for (0..n) {
> >  RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("myRadioGroup", new Model { .. } );
> >  groupArray.add(group)
> > }
> >
> > //create a ListView for the RadioGroups so we can attach them to page
> > ListView radioListView = ListView("radioGroupList") { populate from
> > groupArray }
> > add(radioListView);
> >
> > // create our grid of radio buttons
> > // outer -> rows
> > for (0..x) {
> >  // inner -> columns
> >  for (0..n)
> >// supply group from our groupArray
> >add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1), groupArray.get(n) ));
> >  }
> > }
> >
> > I can then add the Radios and RadioGroups to the form independently of
> > layout and this has the desired effect in terms of the grouping.
> >
> > 
> >  < span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
> > < span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
> >  < /span>
> >  
> >
> >
> > But now, when I submit I am getting the following error:
> >
> > WicketMessage: submitted http post value [radio33] for RadioGroup
> component
> >
> [2:tContainer:list:2:tPanel:myForm:orderedRadioGroupList:0:orderedRadioGroup]
>
> > is illegal because it does not contain relative path to a Radio
> componnet.
> > Due to this the RadioGroup component cannot resolve the selected Radio
> > component pointed to by the illegal value. A possible reason is that
> > componment hierarchy changed between rendering and form submission.
> >
> > Any idea what this means?
> >
> > The spelling mistake 'componment' suggests it's not seen too often.
> >
> > I am using wicket 1.4.12.
> >
> > I found this ticket that looks related too :
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1055
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025204.html
> > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> > email]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
>
>
>
> --
>  View message @
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025609.html
> To unsubscribe

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread Igor Vaynberg 
best way for us to help you is for you to create a quickstart and
attach it to your email or a jira issue.

-igor

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:40 AM, tommy  wrote:
>
> I asked the following question on stack-overflow but was advised to ask here
> instead.
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4074028/in-wicket-how-can-i-create-radiogroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarc
>
> I am using Wicket and would like to create a grid of radio buttons using
> html as shown below (outer lists will be displayed vertically, inner lists
> will be displayed horizontally).
>
> I would like the radio buttons grouped vertically.
>
> 
>  
>    
>       
>       
>       
>    
>  
>  
>    
>       
>       
>       
>    
>  
>  
>    
>       
>       
>       
>    
>  
> 
>
> Unfortunately it seems that RadioGroup only allow one to group radio buttons
> according to the grouping defined by their layout.
>
> eg RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("radioGroupA");
>
> group.add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1)) ;
>
> Problem with this is that I cannot then layout the way I want.
>
> Is there another way? Manually specifying the name and gather results?
>
> UPDATE: I notice that Radio can take a RadioGroup as a parameter. So one can
> do something like:
>
> // create some groups
> for (0..n) {
>  RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("myRadioGroup", new Model { .. } );
>  groupArray.add(group)
> }
>
> //create a ListView for the RadioGroups so we can attach them to page
> ListView radioListView = ListView("radioGroupList") { populate from
> groupArray }
> add(radioListView);
>
> // create our grid of radio buttons
> // outer -> rows
> for (0..x) {
>  // inner -> columns
>  for (0..n)
>    // supply group from our groupArray
>    add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1), groupArray.get(n) ));
>  }
> }
>
> I can then add the Radios and RadioGroups to the form independently of
> layout and this has the desired effect in terms of the grouping.
>
> 
>  < span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
>     < span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
>  < /span>
>  
>    
>
> But now, when I submit I am getting the following error:
>
> WicketMessage: submitted http post value [radio33] for RadioGroup component
> [2:tContainer:list:2:tPanel:myForm:orderedRadioGroupList:0:orderedRadioGroup]
> is illegal because it does not contain relative path to a Radio componnet.
> Due to this the RadioGroup component cannot resolve the selected Radio
> component pointed to by the illegal value. A possible reason is that
> componment hierarchy changed between rendering and form submission.
>
> Any idea what this means?
>
> The spelling mistake 'componment' suggests it's not seen too often.
>
> I am using wicket 1.4.12.
>
> I found this ticket that looks related too :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1055
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025204.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: set focus in Modal Window

2010-11-03 Thread Eric Hamel 
Thanks for posting this.

I'm having a similar issue. I updated my behavior with your changes, but
still doesn't seem to work on the component in the modal window.

I have a Panel with the FormComponents that is being used on a page and on a
modal window. The Focus Behavior works on the Page, but not the modal
window.

Eric

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Stefan Lindner  wrote:

> Try this:
>
>
> public class FocusBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
>
>private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
>private Component component;
>
>@Override
>public void bind(final Component component) {
>this.component = component;
>component.setOutputMarkupId(true);
>}
>
>@Override
>public void renderHead(final IHeaderResponse response) {
>
>  response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript("document.getElementById('" +
> component.getMarkupId() + "').focus();");
>}
>
> }
>
>
>
> And do
>
>TextField bla = new Textfield();
>Bla.add(new FocusBeahvior());
>
> Stefan
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henry, Mike [GCG-PFS] [mailto:mike.he...@primerica.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 19:58
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: set focus in Modal Window
>
> I have successfully set the focus on a text field in a Modal window but
> after it is closed and re-opened it no longer sets the focus to that field.
> If I reload the whole parent page it will work once but again If the modal
> window is closed and re-opened same problem. I have tried all of these with
> the same result:
> target.appendJavascript("document.findRepform.searchString.focus();");
>
> target.focusComponent(((FindRepDetailsPanel)selectModalWindow.get("conte
> nt")).get("findRepform:searchString"));
>
> ((FindRepDetailsPanel)selectModalWindow.get("content")).get("findRepform
> :searchString").add(new DefaultFocusBehavior())
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> Mike
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sent by Eric Hamel

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread tommy 

If you look at the original html I showed you can see 3 groups called A, B,
C (I've included again below with values to make it clearer).

I want to be able to select one item from group A, one item from group B and
one item from group C. The number of groups will vary, eg sometimes it will
go to D or E or F etc.

Each group of radio buttons with the same name will be shown vertically, ie
All group A will be shown one on top of the other.

Each group has radios with the same set of values that (1..n).

The rows will show a slice across the groups where the values are the same
and some text at the end. a bit like this.

 A1  B1  C1   some text about 1
 A2  B2  C2   some text about 2
 A3  B3  C3   some text about 3

Your suggestion requires adding the radioButtons of the same group to a
parent object that represents the radio grouping. I dont see how you can do
this and at the same time, also have them as part of a ListView that groups
them by their value so I can display them as shown.


  

   
   
   

some text
  
  

   
   
   
  some text

  
  

   
   
   
 some text

  




On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+3025457-596905818-201...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:

> If you only need to select one Radio then one RadioGroup will work no
> matter how many nested radio's there are (the model object of the
> selected radio is assigned to the model object of the radio when the
> form submits)
>
> If you actually have different radio's (i.e. multiple selections are
> allowed) then using RadioChoice may make more sense.
>
> add (new ListView("listview") {
>
> protected void populateItem(final ListItem item);
>
>  item.add (rc = new RadioChoice("choice", new Model(),
> choiceList));
>
>  rc.setPrefix("");
>  rc.setSuffix("");
>
>  }
> }
>
> 
> 
> 
>
> Not tested but it should work close to this way and cause each  type="radio">... to be wrapped in a  like you want.
>
> Mike
>
> > Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry
> I
> > maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when you
>
> > dont know how many there will be?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Tom Howe<[hidden 
> > email]>
>  wrote:
> >
> >> Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry
> I
> >> maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when
> you
> >> dont know how many there will be?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh [via Apache Wicket]<
>
> >> [hidden email] 
> >> <[hidden
> email] >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The RadioGroup just needs to wrap the radio's in your markup.
>  Typically
> >>> it does not even render markup in the resultant page.
> >>>
> >>> Instead of this:
>  
>  <   span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
> <   span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
>  <   /span>
>  
>    
> >>> do this:
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>   
> >>> <  /span>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> add (rg = new RadioGroup("radioGroup"));
> >>>
> >>> rd.add (new ListView("listView") {...});
> >>>
> >>> This way the radio group will contain the Model Object of the Radio
> that
> >>> was selected by the user when the form submits.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3025272&i=0>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]<
> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3025272&i=1>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>   View message @
> >>>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025272.html
> >>> To unsubscribe from How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined
> by
> >>> component hierarchy/layout ?, click here<
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3025204&code=dG9tbXl0YXN0aWNAZ21haWwuY29tfDMwMjUyMDR8MTM3MjA2NTU0MQ==>.
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh 
If you only need to select one Radio then one RadioGroup will work no 
matter how many nested radio's there are (the model object of the 
selected radio is assigned to the model object of the radio when the 
form submits)


If you actually have different radio's (i.e. multiple selections are 
allowed) then using RadioChoice may make more sense.


add (new ListView("listview") {

   protected void populateItem(final ListItem item);

item.add (rc = new RadioChoice("choice", new Model(), 
choiceList));


rc.setPrefix("");
rc.setSuffix("");

}
}





Not tested but it should work close to this way and cause each type="radio">... to be wrapped in a  like you want.


Mike


Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry I
maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when you
dont know how many there will be?

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Tom Howe  wrote:


Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry I
maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when you
dont know how many there will be?



On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh [via Apache Wicket]<
ml-node+3025272-1259231181-201...@n4.nabble.com

wrote:
Hi,

The RadioGroup just needs to wrap the radio's in your markup.  Typically
it does not even render markup in the resultant page.

Instead of this:


<   span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
   <   span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
<   /span>

  

do this:




  
<  /span>


add (rg = new RadioGroup("radioGroup"));

rd.add (new ListView("listView") {...});

This way the radio group will contain the Model Object of the Radio that
was selected by the user when the form submits.

Regards,

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
email]



--
  View message @
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025272.html
To unsubscribe from How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by
component hierarchy/layout ?, click 
here.






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread tommy 

Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry I
maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when you
dont know how many there will be?

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Tom Howe  wrote:

> Ah but I have varying number of groups, hence the radioGroupList ( Sorry I
> maybe didnt make this point clear enough). How can you nest them when you
> dont know how many there will be?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh [via Apache Wicket] <
> ml-node+3025272-1259231181-201...@n4.nabble.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The RadioGroup just needs to wrap the radio's in your markup.  Typically
>> it does not even render markup in the resultant page.
>>
>> Instead of this:
>> > 
>> ><  span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
>> >   <  span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
>> ><  /span>
>> >
>> >  
>>
>> do this:
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> < /span>
>> 
>>
>> add (rg = new RadioGroup("radioGroup"));
>>
>> rd.add (new ListView("listView") {...});
>>
>> This way the radio group will contain the Model Object of the Radio that
>> was selected by the user when the form submits.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
>> email]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  View message @
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025272.html
>> To unsubscribe from How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by
>> component hierarchy/layout ?, click 
>> here.
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025394.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread Michael O'Cleirigh 

Hi,

The RadioGroup just needs to wrap the radio's in your markup.  Typically 
it does not even render markup in the resultant page.


Instead of this:


   <  span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
  <  span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
   <  /span>
   
 


do this:




 
< /span>


add (rg = new RadioGroup("radioGroup"));

rd.add (new ListView("listView") {...});

This way the radio group will contain the Model Object of the Radio that 
was selected by the user when the form submits.


Regards,

Mike

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

GMap2 off center

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Miklosko 
In our application we are using Wicket GMap2 in some cases successfully in
other case with problems. The map is being off center, having about 10-15px
grey border on the left and bottom of the map and in case of multiple
markers on the map being zoomed out to 0.0 in Firefox. The map is showing
fine in Chromium and to big surprise in IE6.

I'm trying to determinate what is problem here and bellow is just
short comparison of differences.
Page A with working map does quick search for geographical location to be
presented to user, pin these locations to map and show descriptions
retrieved from DB.
Page B with not working map first runs flash animation while does the search
for flights, once flights found it will redirect results to next page and
pin locations to map plus plus populate table with search results.

Anyone had similar problem? Can you give some pointers to solve this?

If more info need it please just let me know

Peter

How can I create RadioGroups that are not defined by component hierarchy/layout ?

2010-11-03 Thread tommy 

I asked the following question on stack-overflow but was advised to ask here
instead.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4074028/in-wicket-how-can-i-create-radiogroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarc

I am using Wicket and would like to create a grid of radio buttons using
html as shown below (outer lists will be displayed vertically, inner lists
will be displayed horizontally).

I would like the radio buttons grouped vertically.


  

   
   
   

  
  

   
   
   

  
  

   
   
   

  


Unfortunately it seems that RadioGroup only allow one to group radio buttons
according to the grouping defined by their layout.

eg RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("radioGroupA");

group.add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1)) ;

Problem with this is that I cannot then layout the way I want.

Is there another way? Manually specifying the name and gather results?

UPDATE: I notice that Radio can take a RadioGroup as a parameter. So one can
do something like:

// create some groups
for (0..n) {
  RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("myRadioGroup", new Model { .. } );
  groupArray.add(group)
}

//create a ListView for the RadioGroups so we can attach them to page
ListView radioListView = ListView("radioGroupList") { populate from
groupArray }
add(radioListView);

// create our grid of radio buttons
// outer -> rows
for (0..x) {
  // inner -> columns
  for (0..n)
// supply group from our groupArray
add( new Radio("myradio", new Model(1), groupArray.get(n) ));
  }
}

I can then add the Radios and RadioGroups to the form independently of
layout and this has the desired effect in terms of the grouping.


  < span wicket:id="radioGroupList">
 < span wicket:id="radioGroup"/>
  < /span>
  


But now, when I submit I am getting the following error:

WicketMessage: submitted http post value [radio33] for RadioGroup component
[2:tContainer:list:2:tPanel:myForm:orderedRadioGroupList:0:orderedRadioGroup]
is illegal because it does not contain relative path to a Radio componnet.
Due to this the RadioGroup component cannot resolve the selected Radio
component pointed to by the illegal value. A possible reason is that
componment hierarchy changed between rendering and form submission.

Any idea what this means?

The spelling mistake 'componment' suggests it's not seen too often.

I am using wicket 1.4.12.

I found this ticket that looks related too :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1055

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-can-I-create-RadioGroups-that-are-not-defined-by-component-hierarchy-layout-tp3025204p3025204.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

SV: How to get other page's localized messages ?

2010-11-03 Thread Wilhelmsen Tor Iver 
> How do I get Page1's specific localized message in Page2 ?

1) Make a superclass for the two pages and put the message in the superclass' 
property file

2) Put the property in the Application's property file

In both cases the mechanisms in Wicket will find the message.

- Tor I.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

How to get other page's localized messages ?

2010-11-03 Thread smallufo 
If I have two WebPages :
Page1.java
Page1.properties , which stores default value
Page1_zh.properties , which stores Chinese translations

And Page2.java

How do I get Page1's specific localized message in Page2 ?

I noticed the StringResourceModel , but it seems not what I want.
StringResourceModel's constructor must pass a Component object , but I
cannot new Page1 in Page2

Is there anything like :
SomeModel("key" , Page1.class) , so that I can get "key" bound to Page1 ?

Thanks.

Re: wicket-ajax header from url?

2010-11-03 Thread Frank van Lankvelt 
I think it would make sense to have any requests targeting an
abstract-ajax-behavior be marked as 'ajax', without requiring client-side
logic.  This makes client-side integration quite straightforward.  One then
only needs to implement the server side of the protocol, without having to
intercept the request creation process.  It also makes request handling more
robust in the face of concurrent requests, as I experienced.

Implementing this behavior with the wicket:ajax parameter in the url does
require support when rendering urls; should be easy in 1.5, is currently not
possible in 1.4 since the webrequestcodingstrategy does not render
user-defined request parameters.  I'm now doing it by simply appending
'&wicket:ajax=true' in the getCallbackUrl method.

There are probably alternative solutions that do not require a parameter in
the url; I haven't looked into those yet.

thanks for clarifying, Frank


On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> the url parameter is there only as a workaround for when we cannot set
> the header. i think the only usecase is for fileuploads where we have
> to set an ajax url on iframe's src attribute. the header is the
> preferred way to do this and you can set it yourself i you need or use
> wicket's ajax js to perform the request - which will set it for you.
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
>  wrote:
> > well, the two kinds of ajax requests differ; the WebRequest#isAjax method
> > returns true for wicket-ajax, but false for non-wicket-ajax requests.
>  The
> > 'wicket-ajax' request has the Wicket-Ajax header, the other does not.  So
> I
> > should have said that the first (locking) request was non-wicket-ajax;
> i.e.
> > an ajax request but without the Wicket-Ajax header set.
> >
> > Some further digging turned up the wicket:ajax request parameter; I guess
> I
> > should simply append it to the URL for the non-wicket-ajax behavior.
> >  Perhaps that could happen in the base class AbstractAjaxBehavior?
> >
> > cheers, Frank
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg  >wrote:
> >
> >> so why is there the non-ajax request?
> >>
> >> once the page is loaded everything else - communication with ext -
> >> should be happening via ajax requests...
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
> >>  wrote:
> >> > it returned false because
> >> > a) the locking request was not ajax
> >> > b) the current request was ajax
> >> > c) they shared the same page version
> >> > Page versioning is disabled, though that shouldn't matter.  (that
> might
> >> be a
> >> > worthwhile additional check before comparing versions; I'm not very
> >> familiar
> >> > with versions)
> >> >
> >> > It's a concurrency issue for one page, with some non-wicket-ajax
> >> behaviors,
> >> > so it might be pushing what people have seen?
> >> >
> >> > Both ext-js integration projects I've found have the same basic setup;
> >> use
> >> > AbstractAjaxBehavior to provide data services, use
> >> > AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior subclasses for listening to Ext events.
>  So
> >> > that's also where my bug occurs; I'm switching between ext components
> on
> >> the
> >> > client as the result of some action.  The action leads to a
> notification
> >> to
> >> > wicket, the new component starts fetching data.
> >> >
> >> > thanks, Frank
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> did you check why it returns false? ajax requests should not
> increment
> >> >> the page version, so they should always be "current". people have
> >> >> built extjs integrations before, you may look into one of those for
> >> >> hints.
> >> >>
> >> >> -igor
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Frank van Lankvelt
> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >> > In my attempts to integrate a javascript client-side framework
> >> (ext-js)
> >> >> to
> >> >> > wicket, I'm running into the problem that the client-side framework
> >> >> expects
> >> >> > URLs to send requests to, expecting a JSON/XML response.  This is
> of
> >> >> course
> >> >> > perfectly natural behavior for a js framework.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The documentation I could find suggested to use an
> >> AbstractAjaxBehavior.
> >> >> >  However, this doesn't quite work.  Concurrent proper wicket-ajax
> >> >> requests
> >> >> > (abstractdefaultajaxbehavior) are aborted due to
> >> >> > WebSession#isCurrentRequestValid returning false.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Am I doing something wrong here, or should I simply override the
> >> >> > isCurrentRequestValid method to always return true?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thanks, Frank
> >> >> >
> >> >> > PS: I'm using wicket-1.4.9; but couldn't find relevant issues that
> >> have
> >> >> been
> >> >> > fixed since this release
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Hippo
> >> >> > Europe  •  Amsterdam  Oosteinde 11  •  1017 WT Amsterdam  •  +31
> (0)20
> >> >> 522
> >> >> > 4466
> >> >> > USA  • San Francisco  185 H Street

Multiple submit buttons - CompoundPropertyModel not updated

2010-11-03 Thread Benjamin Lorenz 
Hello,

I have a problem with a form that shall have two submit buttons. One finally 
submits the form with all plausibility checks, etc... the other just opens up a 
search form, to lookup some data for inclusion in the form. This submit shall 
NOT do all the checks on e.g. .setRequired(true), etc..., but it DOES HAVE to 
update my CompoundPropertyModel values, to deal with the user's (partially) 
entered values so far.

I cannot get this together: setDefaultFormProcessing(false) will not update my 
models, setDefaultFormProcessing(true) will finally submit my form, also 
calling the form's onSubmit, which is not what I want. 

I am using an anonymous form class with the default onSubmit(), and an 
additionally attached Button, which has its own onSubmit().

Do you understand what I mean, and can anybody point me to the right direction? 
It seems to me like a very basic, fundamental thing to do, two form buttons, 
that deal - independently from each other - with the entered data, but it seems 
to be tricky nevertheless...

Thanks,
Benjamin



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org