RE: Intellij9 integration
Nick, biggest problem was "RTFM". Most plugins in IJ don't need to be "activated". I didn't realize that there were more steps than "install plugin" :) Any chance you can just auto-add the Wicket module? If it's "heavy", then at least add the comment to the plugin description like: " WicketForge assists developers creating Wicket applications. To activate for a given project, add to modules. See http://code.google.com/p/wicketforge/wiki/UsageInstructions for details on how to do so. This plugin... " I added the module, now I can jump b/w the declarations etc. The html editor still complains about wicket:id tags, of course. Which makes the 20 fake errors in html errors cover up the REAL error of non-matching wicket:id to code. But I am sure you know about that already. Would love to help you with patches, but I know NOTHING about IJ plugin development :( Drop a line in the forum when you release, please! -Original Message- From: Nick Heudecker [mailto:nheudec...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 5:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration >From my experience, WicketForge already displays a warning if the components can't be located in the HTML or Java code. Toggling between Java and HTML also works fine for me. You can either submit a bug report or a patch. Also, feel free to submit a patch with templates you'd like to see added to WF. I'm getting ready to release 0.5.7 this week. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Alex Rass wrote: > Would be good if it told you about "unmentioned" wicket:ids from the html > so > you didn't have to wait till you run. > Or if you are declaring a component that it can't find in html. > > Jumping back and forth between code and html d/n seem to work for me. > > Entirely too much typing for my taste! Idea is REALLY good at minimizing on > that. > > Bunch of templates can be written for Wicket programmers to simplify > typical > stuff. > > But yes, a lot of things in IJ work already because wicket isn't a stretch > for java. > > > -----Original Message- > From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration > > Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in > type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once > you get the idea :-) > > Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker: > > > What do you mean that the current one shows up? I haven't updated > > WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9. > > > > Feel free to submit patches. Right now WicketForge does everything I > need > > it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my > > needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it. > > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass wrote: > > > >> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. > >> These guys are very sales oriented. > >> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. > >> When they see there's a demand - they move on it. > >> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just > may, > >> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that > and > >> it's better" has been their selling angle. > >> > >> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - > that'd > >> be > >> cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] > >> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM > >> To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration > >> > >> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the > >> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at > >> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ > >> and there is already a beta version available at > >> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html > >> > >> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my > >> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better > >> develop plugins since it is open source now. > >> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression > >> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and > >> "find usages" of those getters > >> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids > >> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. > >> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable > >> class" warning in components for fields that are injected. > >> > >> br > >> andreas > >> > >> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Intellij9 integration
>From my experience, WicketForge already displays a warning if the components can't be located in the HTML or Java code. Toggling between Java and HTML also works fine for me. You can either submit a bug report or a patch. Also, feel free to submit a patch with templates you'd like to see added to WF. I'm getting ready to release 0.5.7 this week. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Alex Rass wrote: > Would be good if it told you about "unmentioned" wicket:ids from the html > so > you didn't have to wait till you run. > Or if you are declaring a component that it can't find in html. > > Jumping back and forth between code and html d/n seem to work for me. > > Entirely too much typing for my taste! Idea is REALLY good at minimizing on > that. > > Bunch of templates can be written for Wicket programmers to simplify > typical > stuff. > > But yes, a lot of things in IJ work already because wicket isn't a stretch > for java. > > > -Original Message- > From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration > > Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in > type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once > you get the idea :-) > > Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker: > > > What do you mean that the current one shows up? I haven't updated > > WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9. > > > > Feel free to submit patches. Right now WicketForge does everything I > need > > it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my > > needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it. > > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass wrote: > > > >> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. > >> These guys are very sales oriented. > >> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. > >> When they see there's a demand - they move on it. > >> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just > may, > >> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that > and > >> it's better" has been their selling angle. > >> > >> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - > that'd > >> be > >> cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] > >> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM > >> To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration > >> > >> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the > >> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at > >> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ > >> and there is already a beta version available at > >> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html > >> > >> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my > >> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better > >> develop plugins since it is open source now. > >> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression > >> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and > >> "find usages" of those getters > >> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids > >> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. > >> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable > >> class" warning in components for fields that are injected. > >> > >> br > >> andreas > >> > >> > >
RE: Intellij9 integration
Would be good if it told you about "unmentioned" wicket:ids from the html so you didn't have to wait till you run. Or if you are declaring a component that it can't find in html. Jumping back and forth between code and html d/n seem to work for me. Entirely too much typing for my taste! Idea is REALLY good at minimizing on that. Bunch of templates can be written for Wicket programmers to simplify typical stuff. But yes, a lot of things in IJ work already because wicket isn't a stretch for java. -Original Message- From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once you get the idea :-) Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker: > What do you mean that the current one shows up? I haven't updated > WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9. > > Feel free to submit patches. Right now WicketForge does everything I need > it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my > needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it. > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass wrote: > >> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. >> These guys are very sales oriented. >> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. >> When they see there's a demand - they move on it. >> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just may, >> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that and >> it's better" has been their selling angle. >> >> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - that'd >> be >> cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] >> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM >> To: users@wicket.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration >> >> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the >> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at >> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ >> and there is already a beta version available at >> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html >> >> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my >> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better >> develop plugins since it is open source now. >> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression >> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and >> "find usages" of those getters >> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids >> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. >> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable >> class" warning in components for fields that are injected. >> >> br >> andreas >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Intellij9 integration
Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once you get the idea :-) Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker: > What do you mean that the current one shows up? I haven't updated > WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9. > > Feel free to submit patches. Right now WicketForge does everything I need > it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my > needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it. > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass wrote: > >> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. >> These guys are very sales oriented. >> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. >> When they see there's a demand - they move on it. >> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just may, >> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that and >> it's better" has been their selling angle. >> >> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - that'd >> be >> cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] >> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM >> To: users@wicket.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration >> >> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the >> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at >> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ >> and there is already a beta version available at >> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html >> >> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my >> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better >> develop plugins since it is open source now. >> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression >> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and >> "find usages" of those getters >> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids >> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. >> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable >> class" warning in components for fields that are injected. >> >> br >> andreas >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Intellij9 integration
What do you mean that the current one shows up? I haven't updated WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9. Feel free to submit patches. Right now WicketForge does everything I need it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it. On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass wrote: > You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. > These guys are very sales oriented. > They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. > When they see there's a demand - they move on it. > And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just may, > to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that and > it's better" has been their selling angle. > > But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - that'd > be > cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. > > > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration > > i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the > roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at > http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ > and there is already a beta version available at > http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html > > but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my > suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better > develop plugins since it is open source now. > *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression > Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and > "find usages" of those getters > *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids > *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. > *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable > class" warning in components for fields that are injected. > > br > andreas > >
RE: Intellij9 integration
You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now. These guys are very sales oriented. They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal. When they see there's a demand - they move on it. And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just may, to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that and it's better" has been their selling angle. But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - that'd be cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive. -Original Message- From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at] Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ and there is already a beta version available at http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better develop plugins since it is open source now. *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and "find usages" of those getters *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable class" warning in components for fields that are injected. br andreas > If any of you guys are using Intellij Idea, I HIGHLY suggest you go to the > EAP Forum http://intellij.net/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=22 > and post that you want Wicket support in 9. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Intellij9 integration
i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/ and there is already a beta version available at http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better develop plugins since it is open source now. *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and "find usages" of those getters *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings. *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable class" warning in components for fields that are injected. br andreas If any of you guys are using Intellij Idea, I HIGHLY suggest you go to the EAP Forum http://intellij.net/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=22 and post that you want Wicket support in 9. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Intellij9 integration
If any of you guys are using Intellij Idea, I HIGHLY suggest you go to the EAP Forum http://intellij.net/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=22 and post that you want Wicket support in 9. They have opened up EAP for version 9 and it's now or "god knows when". They are starting an Open Source version this time. And their product is 100x better than Eclipse. Lets get them to integrate wicket in, so it gets popularity and recognition it deserves. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
