RE: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-02-04 Thread Dan Kaplan
As I understand facebook apps more, I see that this separation is distinct.
That being said, I don't understand your last paragraph.  I think I already
accomplished that with the wiki post.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Levy
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:19 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

We have been thinking about this a little bit as well... It broke down into
two parts:

Making FaceBook Wicket components that represent and render the
corresponding FBML.

Integrating the wicket session with facebooks session.  It seemed like to us
that the calls from facebook across multiple users would break / not
maintain a wicket session as well as include an easy mechanism to retrieve
data from facebook.

j



On Feb 2, 2008 5:27 AM, tieTYT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi Eelco,
>
> I wanted to give you an update of what i learned about facebook apps:
> there's 2 types: FBML and IFRAME
>
> fbml apps are actually translated from your webapp and facebook renders it
> with their server (me thinks).
> the IFRAME app is just literally your app rendered from your server but
> displayed on theirs
>
> if you want to do it as IFRAME, that wiki post i made is pretty much all
> you
> need...  that and you need to understand how to use the FaceBookRestClient
> that you put in the session.  As I prefer the IFRAME approach, that's what
> i'm going to use.
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> > for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> > turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> > shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> > posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> > Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> > this WIKI).
> >
> > How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> > a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> > and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> > specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> > just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> > [2]
> http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> > [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Challenge%3A-write-something-really-sleek-for-Facebook
--tp15220672p15241533.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-02-04 Thread Jeremy Levy
We have been thinking about this a little bit as well... It broke down into
two parts:

Making FaceBook Wicket components that represent and render the
corresponding FBML.

Integrating the wicket session with facebooks session.  It seemed like to us
that the calls from facebook across multiple users would break / not
maintain a wicket session as well as include an easy mechanism to retrieve
data from facebook.

j



On Feb 2, 2008 5:27 AM, tieTYT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi Eelco,
>
> I wanted to give you an update of what i learned about facebook apps:
> there's 2 types: FBML and IFRAME
>
> fbml apps are actually translated from your webapp and facebook renders it
> with their server (me thinks).
> the IFRAME app is just literally your app rendered from your server but
> displayed on theirs
>
> if you want to do it as IFRAME, that wiki post i made is pretty much all
> you
> need...  that and you need to understand how to use the FaceBookRestClient
> that you put in the session.  As I prefer the IFRAME approach, that's what
> i'm going to use.
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> > for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> > turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> > shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> > posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> > Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> > this WIKI).
> >
> > How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> > a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> > and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> > specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> > just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> > [2]
> http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> > [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Challenge%3A-write-something-really-sleek-for-Facebook--tp15220672p15241533.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-02-02 Thread tieTYT

Hi Eelco,

I wanted to give you an update of what i learned about facebook apps:
there's 2 types: FBML and IFRAME

fbml apps are actually translated from your webapp and facebook renders it
with their server (me thinks).
the IFRAME app is just literally your app rendered from your server but
displayed on theirs

if you want to do it as IFRAME, that wiki post i made is pretty much all you
need...  that and you need to understand how to use the FaceBookRestClient
that you put in the session.  As I prefer the IFRAME approach, that's what
i'm going to use.


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> this WIKI).
> 
> How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
> 
> Eelco
> 
> 
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> [2] http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Challenge%3A-write-something-really-sleek-for-Facebook--tp15220672p15241533.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-02-01 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On Feb 1, 2008 11:09 AM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd do it, but I don't know enough about making a facebook app yet :)

My problem too. Facebook generates a lot of fuzz, but I haven't got
exited enough to actually do something else than creating an account
:-)

Eelco

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-02-01 Thread Dan Kaplan
I'd do it, but I don't know enough about making a facebook app yet :)  I
don't even know how much more integration would be necessary.  I suspect
taking that wiki code and putting it in a jar wouldn't be sufficient.  

-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:44 PM
To: wicket user list
Cc: Dan Kaplan
Subject: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

Hi,

Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
this WIKI).

How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)

Eelco


[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
[2] http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
[3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-01-31 Thread Martijn Dashorst
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/index.html

On 2/1/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i get 404 on [1] ...
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 11:14 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Could that someone please *not* link directly to the confluence page as
> is
> > stated on the front page of the wiki [1]?
> >
> > This link goes to the same page, but is 100x times faster and puts 100x
> less
> > load on the server.
> >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> >
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Index
> >
> >
> > On 2/1/08, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> > > for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> > > turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> > > shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> > > posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> > > Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> > > this WIKI).
> > >
> > > How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> > > a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> > > and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> > > specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> > > just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> > > [2]
> http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> > > [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0


Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-01-31 Thread Igor Vaynberg
i get 404 on [1] ...

-igor


On Jan 31, 2008 11:14 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could that someone please *not* link directly to the confluence page as is
> stated on the front page of the wiki [1]?
>
> This link goes to the same page, but is 100x times faster and puts 100x less
> load on the server.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
>
>
> Martijn
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Index
>
>
> On 2/1/08, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> > for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> > turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> > shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> > posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> > Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> > this WIKI).
> >
> > How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> > a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> > and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> > specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> > just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> > [2] http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> > [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Challenge: write something really sleek for Facebook?

2008-01-31 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Could that someone please *not* link directly to the confluence page as is
stated on the front page of the wiki [1]?

This link goes to the same page, but is 100x times faster and puts 100x less
load on the server.

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Facebook+Integration


Martijn

[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/Index

On 2/1/08, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Kaplan wrote a WIKI page[1] that describes how to set up Wicket
> for Facebook. Someone posted a link to that on DZone[2], and that in
> turn prompted Dave from Alfresco to write an alternative to it that
> shows it can be done much shorter[3]. I know that several people
> posted the idea before of writing a simple integration framework for
> Facebook/ Wicket, but so far no-one actually contributed code (besides
> this WIKI).
>
> How about it? Is that blog posting a challenge enough to come up with
> a simple framework that makes writing Facebook apps with Wicket short
> and elegant? I can imagine we'd need a component (set) and/ or
> specialized models for parsing external REST requests. But maybe I'm
> just talking crap here. Any takers? :-)
>
> Eelco
>
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Facebook+Integration
> [2] http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/apache_wicket_facebook_integration.html
> [3] http://blogs.alfresco.com/davidc/?p=12
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0