Re: [xwiki-users] How to prevent unregistered users from viewing user profiles
Hi, On 20 Dec 2013 at 17:41:45, Matthias Albert (matthias.alb...@gmx.de(mailto://matthias.alb...@gmx.de)) wrote: > We are using XWiki 5.2.1. One problem is, that every unregistered user > can view the profile pages of all registered useres. > > I tried the following: In the XWiki space, I managed to prevent > unregistered users to view any page of the XWiki space. This removed the > mentioned problem. > > But then two other problems occured: unregistered users cannot see the > logo in the top-left corner, and they cannot see the tag-cloud macro > contents, which is signalled by an red-coloured error message. > > Are there any solve theses problems? Not easily. Each page can have its own right so you could protect each user profile page. But I agree it’s a bit of a pain. You could also script it in order to do that at once. The algorithm would be: - find all documents having a XWikiUsers objects attached to it - verify the rights for the page and if the page isn’t protected, set the rights on it In the future, our goal is to have one space dedicated to the user pages so it would be extra easy to just protect that space. Thanks -Vincent ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] How to prevent unregistered users from viewing user profiles
We are using XWiki 5.2.1. One problem is, that every unregistered user can view the profile pages of all registered useres. I tried the following: In the XWiki space, I managed to prevent unregistered users to view any page of the XWiki space. This removed the mentioned problem. But then two other problems occured: unregistered users cannot see the logo in the top-left corner, and they cannot see the tag-cloud macro contents, which is signalled by an red-coloured error message. Are there any solve theses problems? Thanks in advance Matthias ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)
Vincent, I think the two use cases are different. Synchronizing selected parts of a wiki, including (fat) attachments is a normal part of a staging and deployment process, and can also be part of an editorial workflow. In all these cases, the shared attachments mount-point does not help (since it only works for wikis that share the complete the set of pages, which is never the case between a development, staging, and production platform). paul On 20 déc. 2013, at 10:31, vinc...@massol.net wrote: >> I mean also: >> - import-export as you already mentioned >> - synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so >> we need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as >> I understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as >> far as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet. > > Ok thanks. > > For this last point, the solution we recommend is to use a distributed > filesystem (NFS or other). > ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Fwd: upgrade from 5.1
No, I didn't cancel it but I tried so many ways to migrate that I'm not sure anymore in which state is my wiki. If I copy data on a fresh installation of xwiki 5.3, can I run this wizard? If I export pages from my 5.1 xwiki and import them on a fesh install of xwiki 5.3, are the pages are migrated? Another question: it seems that the distribution wizard needs an internet access (the server has no access but the browser that displays the distribution wizard have it). Thanks 2013/12/19 Thomas Mortagne > Did you cancel it ? > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Christophe Domas > wrote: > > How do you force the distribution wizard (I read on a precedent mail > that I > > can play with environment.permanentDirectory but I'm not able to find the > > mail). > > > > regards > > > > > > > > 2013/12/19 Thomas Mortagne > > > >> Did you upgraded only the WAR or did you upgraded the wiki pages too > >> (generally using the distribution wyzard you get when you start XWiki > >> after upgrading the war). > >> > >> If you get those warning without upgrading the page this is simply > >> because the old page you have are using deprecated API like the > >> message say, if you upgrade to the new pages you won't have those > >> messages anymore. > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Christophe Domas > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I'm trying to upgrade our 5.1 xwiki to 5.3 and I get a lot of warning > >> > messages (5.1 to 5.2.2 upgrade has the same result): > >> > > >> > WARN o.x.v.i.DefaultVelocityEngine - Deprecated usage of getter > >> > [com.xpn.xwiki.api.DeprecatedContext.getMacro] in > >> > xwiki:XWiki.XWikiUserSheet@78,32 > >> > > >> > WARN o.x.v.i.DefaultVelocityEngine - Deprecated usage of getter > >> > [com.xpn.xwiki.a > >> > pi.DeprecatedContext.getDatabase] in xwiki:XWiki.XWikiUserSheet@81,22 > >> > > >> > etc.. > >> > > >> > I tried different solutions (I'm using standalone version): > >> > - replace war > >> > - copy database and conf file on a fresh install > >> > - export/import > >> > > >> > > >> > What could I do to remove all these messages? > >> > > >> > What is the less painfull way to migrate a wiki (I read the doc > >> > http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Upgrade). > >> > I really think that there's should be a simpler way to upgrade xwiki > for > >> > standalone version. Each of the above solution has its drawbacks. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > ___ > >> > users mailing list > >> > users@xwiki.org > >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Mortagne > >> ___ > >> users mailing list > >> users@xwiki.org > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > ___ > > users mailing list > > users@xwiki.org > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > ___ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle
Hello, I cannot access to google drive from my company but as a new user on xwiki, I think xwiki must improve on several parts (I'm used to confluence): - review documentation: information is dispatched on too many pages and should be more end-users oriented exemple on rights management: - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Access+Rights - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/RightsManagement - http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/GettingStarted/SettingUserRights - upgrading a version is painful (jenkins is the model) and should be done from browser (my server has no access to internet) - xwiki default template contains to much information on "lifecyle" page (last modified, comments, history are present on the header - should be before title on ultra small fonts - and on the footer) - it doesn't help to focus on the content - style must be more easier to customize (exemple: how to change default font is not easy) - rights management is non intuitive (see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/GettingStarted/SettingUserRights- I check with my coworkers) - wysiwyg editor: - limitation on shortcuts that applies only on selection - if I want to type some bold text, I cannot hit CTRL-B and begin to type - is is sometimes difficult to use it to control precisely text - all my coworkers use now the markup language - hierarchy: - a macro should be in the standard distribution and could be used to display subtree (the tree in "document index" is a good start) - children pages should be more accessible (not in information tab but in the footer of the page?) - asciidoc support? - copy/paste image - allow word doc import without installing libreoffice My feeling is currently a developer platform more than a end-user oriented wiki. I know that everything is customizable but simple things should be simpler to do. By the way, there are a lot of features that I love in xwiki, like the editable sections that are a must to have. Regards, Christophe 2013/12/20 Dmitry Bakbardin > Hi, Silvia! > > I'd add one more feature: > > Make Filesytem storage ready for production. > > Hope, I'm not alone :-) > > > Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu < > silvia.r...@xwiki.com>: > >Hi, > > > >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about > >features to have in XWiki in priority: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009 > >(results at: > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119 > >) > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012 > >(results at: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204 > >) > > > >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order > >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap. > >The survey is available at: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013 > > > >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January > 31. > >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared > >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February. > > > >Thank you, > >Silvia > >___ > >users mailing list > >users@xwiki.org > >http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > Kind regards, > > Dmitry > ___ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] Merry Christmas!
Hi everyone, I’d like to wish you some very good Christmas holidays and a happy new year since I’m going on holidays tonight for 1 week. Several committers are already on holidays and next week there’ll be very few of us active so it’ll be a quite week :) We’re charging up our batteries for the new XWiki 6.x development cycle next year! If you wish to help please fill the quick survey about what you’d like to see in XWiki 6.x: bit.ly/1c6evZQ Thanks a lot to all Merry Christmas -Vincent Massol ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)
See below On 20 Dec 2013 at 10:13:06, Dmitry Bakbardin (haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote: > Hi, Vincent, > > See below. > > > Пятница, 20 декабря 2013, 9:04 +01:00 от "vinc...@massol.net" < > vinc...@massol.net >: > >Hi, > > > >On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin > >(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote: > > > >> Hi, Silvia! > >> > >> I'd add one more feature: > >> > >> Make Filesytem storage ready for production. > > > >On this topic: > >* You mean for attachments only, right? > >* What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you > >could list the JIRA issues that would be great) > Yes and no. > Yes: > * XWIKI-9065 XWiki.DeletedAttachments shows nothing when filesystem > attachments are enabled - this makes recycle bin useless for attachments now > and causes undesired side-effects. > * XWIKI-9710 While filesytem is on, attachments are deleted, but folders in > storage are not - not a big problem, but still > No. > I mean also: > - import-export as you already mentioned > - synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so > we need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as > I understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as > far as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet. Ok thanks. For this last point, the solution we recommend is to use a distributed filesystem (NFS or other). Thanks -Vincent > I hope that's it :) > > > > > > >> Hope, I'm not alone :-) > > > >No you’re not alone. > > > >We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it > >increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new > >wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need > >to support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user > >where the attachments are stored. > > > >Thanks a lot > >-Vincent > > > >> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu : > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about > >> >features to have in XWiki in priority: > >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009 > >> >(results at: > >> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119 > >> >) > >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012 > >> >(results at: > >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204 > >> >) > >> > > >> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order > >> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap. > >> >The survey is available at: > >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013 > >> > > >> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January > >> >31. > >> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared > >> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February. > >> > > >> >Thank you, > >> >Silvia ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)
Hi, Vincent, See below. Пятница, 20 декабря 2013, 9:04 +01:00 от "vinc...@massol.net" < vinc...@massol.net >: >Hi, > >On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin >(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote: > >> Hi, Silvia! >> >> I'd add one more feature: >> >> Make Filesytem storage ready for production. > >On this topic: >* You mean for attachments only, right? >* What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you could >list the JIRA issues that would be great) Yes and no. Yes: * XWIKI-9065 XWiki.DeletedAttachments shows nothing when filesystem attachments are enabled - this makes recycle bin useless for attachments now and causes undesired side-effects. * XWIKI-9710 While filesytem is on, attachments are deleted, but folders in storage are not - not a big problem, but still No. I mean also: - import-export as you already mentioned - synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so we need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as I understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as far as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet. I hope that's it :) > > >> Hope, I'm not alone :-) > >No you’re not alone. > >We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it >increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new >wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need to >support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user where >the attachments are stored. > >Thanks a lot >-Vincent > >> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu : >> >Hi, >> > >> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about >> >features to have in XWiki in priority: >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009 >> >(results at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119 >> >) >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012 >> >(results at: >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204 >> >) >> > >> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order >> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap. >> >The survey is available at: >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013 >> > >> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 31. >> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared >> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February. >> > >> >Thank you, >> >Silvia > >___ >users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users Kind regards, Dmitry ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)
Hi, On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin (haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote: > Hi, Silvia! > > I'd add one more feature: > > Make Filesytem storage ready for production. On this topic: * You mean for attachments only, right? * What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you could list the JIRA issues that would be great) > Hope, I'm not alone :-) No you’re not alone. We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need to support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user where the attachments are stored. Thanks a lot -Vincent > Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu : > >Hi, > > > >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about > >features to have in XWiki in priority: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009 > >(results at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119 > >) > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012 > >(results at: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204 > >) > > > >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order > >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap. > >The survey is available at: > >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013 > > > >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 31. > >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared > >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February. > > > >Thank you, > >Silvia ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
