[xwiki-users] Lucene File Indexing

2010-10-28 Thread Thomas Höschele
Hallo,

 

I noticed that lucene is capable of Indexing various office files (excel,
word, outlook mails); however, this doesn’t happen automatically.
When I add the file it does not get indexed no matter how long I wait. When
I rebuild the Index via the administration terminal the files get indexed. 

 

Also I get an error in the logs (error getting content of attachment … of
doc …).

 

Is this an Lucene Error or has it something todo with my configuration?

 

Thomas

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Lucene File Indexing

2010-10-28 Thread Thomas Höschele
Hallo,

checked broken attachments. There some put these are picture files only,
which should not be affected by the lucene engine.
Also how can I make the rebuild with the scheduler, my code does not seem to
work. 

Thanks for your answer.
Thomas

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] Im Auftrag von
[Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010 11:54
An: XWiki Users
Betreff: Re: [xwiki-users] Lucene File Indexing

Hi!

Thomas Höschele wrote:
 Hallo,

  

 I noticed that lucene is capable of Indexing various office files (excel,
 word, outlook mails); however, this doesn’t happen automatically.
 When I add the file it does not get indexed no matter how long I wait.
When
 I rebuild the Index via the administration terminal the files get indexed.


   
Please, Thomas, could you give more details about your installation? 
XWiki release? Servlet container/application server (Jetty, Tomcat, 
GlassFish,..)? Database?
  

 Also I get an error in the logs (error getting content of attachment … of
 doc …).

  
   

Could you also check if you have broken attachments and those are the 
ones causing these errors? You can use this:

http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Snippets/AllBrokenAttachments
 Is this an Lucene Error or has it something todo with my configuration?
   

I had the same type of errors here (XE/XEM 2.4.1 running on a Suse Linux 
10sp3 box with Apache Tomcat 5.5.27 and Java 1.5.0 ). All but a small 
bunch where related with broken attachments. Among these, three Excel 
spreadsheets with xlsb format. The rest, PDF files. You talk about 
Microsoft Office files, let's see if we can reproduce the error!

I'll try in a new installation running the last XE snapshot ASAP. I'll 
keept this thread posted. If you could confirm that some xlsb files are 
causing problems in Lucene, I think it will be worth to create a new 
Jira issue on this.

Thanks!
  

 Thomas

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

   

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using Scheduler issues (groovy questions)

2010-10-24 Thread Thomas Höschele
Could be not a script problem at all.
If you test the scheduler via triggering, you need to unschedule, then
reschedule, then trigger the job. Don't ask me why but it worked for me.

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] Im Auftrag von
Eugen Colesnicov
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2010 17:14
An: users@xwiki.org
Betreff: Re: [xwiki-users] Using Scheduler issues (groovy questions)



Paul Libbrecht wrote:
 
 
 On 24 oct. 2010, at 13:54, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
 
 call the web page from groovy
 new java.net.URL(blablalba).getContent()
 
 Thanks beforehand!
 Eugen
 
 
 Yes, but note that the URL will be fetched without any session 
 information, so if the requested page is private (not visible for 
 guests), it won't work.
 
 or call http://user:passw...@host:port/xwiki/bin/view/Space/Name
 

Paul, can you give exactly example? What I should write in a scheduler field
- Job script?
Because of I tried different variants - but without results.

Also, I rewrited my original code from velocity to groovy. I tested my
groovy rewrited code in a another xwiki page - all is working fine. But when
I putted this groovy code to the scheduler - no any actions. Looks like,
that scheduler don't work at all, but standart xwiki watchlists - working
... I cannot understand nothing. Maybe somebody can help me. I attached my
groovy code (as I said - from another xwiki page - this code working fine).
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/file/n5667864/groovy_code.txt
groovy_code.txt
Also, my original question (how need to call velocity code from groovy code
in a scheduler) also is interesting for me.

Thanks beforehand
Eugen Colesnicov
-- 
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Using-Scheduler-issues-groovy-questions-tp
5666438p5667864.html
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Bulletin Board Application Unable to create Topics/Categorys

2010-10-05 Thread Thomas Höschele
Weird it worked for me, just a couple of days ago. 
Have you saved the pages with programming rights ? 
Also there seems to be a small missscripting as only administrators could
create a category on my xwiki (changed that ...)
Also what XWiki Version are you using. I used the 2.4 release.

Best Regards
Thomas

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] Im Auftrag von
BartK
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010 19:04
An: users@xwiki.org
Betreff: Re: [xwiki-users] Bulletin Board Application Unable to create
Topics/Categorys


So what is happening, I can create a new topic or category but only if i
click edit then preview, from there it shows me the Topics page i have
created, I click on create a new topic add a name and click view once again,
it shows me the new topic i have created if.  If i click save and view, then
save and view again, to save the topic i created and the topics code page,
it will then create my topic. If i am not within the edit mode it will not
create the topic
-- 
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Bulletin-Board-Application-Unable-to-creat
e-Topics-Categorys-tp5603673p5603997.html
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] A simpler configuration?

2010-07-08 Thread Thomas Höschele
Hi,

I'm not quite sure what you mean, and i admit i don't know wikidot. But
found XWiki out of the box quite easy. You can limit the features for your
users unless you need them by simply declining them the right to access the
space. E.g. Your Users only see Main, Sandbox, Annotations and maybe Blog as
well as their naturell spaces which you or they create. Then its only site
editing with WYSIWIG Editor (no need to learn code) and history comments
attachments annotations on the bottom. 

Maybe i'm wrong but I don't think thats too complicated.


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] Im Auftrag von
abc6587
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010 20:08
An: XWiki Users
Betreff: [xwiki-users] A simpler configuration?

Hi,

I've installed xwiki, and found it a bit too rich in features, out of
the box, for a novice user. Maybe because I did not use it right?

I confess I am a wikidot fan. With all its limitations, it's intuitive
and mirrors the way people think. It has a very small set of features,
but that's probably its strength, as it's very easy to learn.
Unfortunately, its access control is too primitive to my (intranet)
needs; plus, as a programmer, the idea of programmable wiki surely
sounds sweet.

In a nutshell, I feel wikidot makes easy things simple. xwiki makes
complex things possible. Ideally, I'd love to find a wiki that does
both. A wiki that looks just like wikidot out of the box, then grows
on you as you learn advanced tricks. Not a system that shocks end
users with busy screens and code in the edit window. 90% of users
don't want to learn that; not until they are captivated by the
system's ease of use.

Is there such a thing?
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users