Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)

2013-12-26 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:04 AM, vinc...@massol.net  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin 
> (haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote:
>
>> Hi, Silvia!
>>
>> I'd add one more feature:
>>
>> Make Filesytem storage ready for production.
>
> On this topic:
> * You mean for attachments only, right?
> * What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you 
> could list the JIRA issues that would be great)
>
>> Hope, I'm not alone :-)
>
> No you’re not alone.
>
> We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it 
> increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new 
> wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need to 
> support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user 
> where the attachments are stored.

You are mixing two things, whatever the kind of attachment they will
end up in any XAR package you export. You don't get attachment only
when you back the database.

>
> Thanks a lot
> -Vincent
>
>> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu :
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about
>> >features to have in XWiki in priority:
>> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009
>> >(results at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119
>> >)
>> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012
>> >(results at:
>> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204
>> >)
>> >
>> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order
>> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap.
>> >The survey is available at:
>> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013
>> >
>> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 31.
>> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared
>> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February.
>> >
>> >Thank you,
>> >Silvia
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)

2013-12-20 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Vincent,

I think the two use cases are different.

Synchronizing selected parts of a wiki, including (fat) attachments is a normal 
part of a staging and deployment process, and can also be part of an editorial 
workflow.
In all these cases, the shared attachments mount-point does not help (since it 
only works for wikis that share the complete the set of pages, which is never 
the case between a development, staging, and production platform).

paul


On 20 déc. 2013, at 10:31, vinc...@massol.net wrote:

>> I mean also:
>> - import-export as you already mentioned
>> - synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so 
>> we need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as 
>> I understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as 
>> far as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet.
> 
> Ok thanks.
> 
> For this last point, the solution we recommend is to use a distributed 
> filesystem (NFS or other).
> 

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)

2013-12-20 Thread vinc...@massol.net
See below

On 20 Dec 2013 at 10:13:06, Dmitry Bakbardin 
(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote:

> Hi, Vincent,
>  
> See below.
>  
>  
> Пятница, 20 декабря 2013, 9:04 +01:00 от "vinc...@massol.net" < 
> vinc...@massol.net >:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin 
> >(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Silvia!
> >>
> >> I'd add one more feature:
> >>
> >> Make Filesytem storage ready for production.
> >
> >On this topic:
> >* You mean for attachments only, right?
> >* What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you 
> >could list the JIRA issues that would be great)
> Yes and no.
> Yes:
> * XWIKI-9065 XWiki.DeletedAttachments shows nothing when filesystem 
> attachments are enabled - this makes recycle bin useless for attachments now 
> and causes undesired side-effects.
> * XWIKI-9710 While filesytem is on, attachments are deleted, but folders in 
> storage are not - not a big problem, but still
> No.
> I mean also:
> - import-export as you already mentioned
> - synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so 
> we need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as 
> I understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as 
> far as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet.

Ok thanks.

For this last point, the solution we recommend is to use a distributed 
filesystem (NFS or other).

Thanks
-Vincent
 
> I hope that's it :)
>  
> >
> >
> >> Hope, I'm not alone :-)
> >
> >No you’re not alone.
> >
> >We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it 
> >increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new 
> >wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need 
> >to support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user 
> >where the attachments are stored.
> >
> >Thanks a lot
> >-Vincent
> >
> >> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu :
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about
> >> >features to have in XWiki in priority:
> >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009
> >> >(results at: 
> >> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119
> >> >)
> >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012
> >> >(results at:
> >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204
> >> >)
> >> >
> >> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order
> >> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap.
> >> >The survey is available at:
> >> > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013
> >> >
> >> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 
> >> >31.
> >> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared
> >> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February.
> >> >
> >> >Thank you,
> >> >Silvia

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)

2013-12-20 Thread Dmitry Bakbardin
 Hi, Vincent,

See below.


Пятница, 20 декабря 2013, 9:04 +01:00 от "vinc...@massol.net" < 
vinc...@massol.net >:
>Hi,
>
>On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin 
>(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote:
>
>> Hi, Silvia!
>> 
>> I'd add one more feature:
>> 
>> Make Filesytem storage ready for production.
>
>On this topic:
>* You mean for attachments only, right?
>* What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you could 
>list the JIRA issues that would be great)
Yes and no.
Yes:
*  XWIKI-9065 XWiki.DeletedAttachments shows nothing when filesystem 
attachments are enabled -  this makes recycle bin useless for attachments now 
and causes undesired side-effects.
*  XWIKI-9710    While filesytem is on, attachments are deleted, but folders in 
storage are not - not a big problem, but still
No.
I mean also:
- import-export as you already mentioned
- synchronizing multiple wikis in cluster. DB clustering won't work here, so we 
need a mechanism of syncing attachments in FS. This task is not simple as I 
understand, but new Wiki Streaming system could evolve to make it real as far 
as I understand. I didn't put it in Jira yet.

I hope that's it :)

>
>
>> Hope, I'm not alone :-)
>
>No you’re not alone.
>
>We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it 
>increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new 
>wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need to 
>support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user where 
>the attachments are stored.
>
>Thanks a lot
>-Vincent
>
>> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu :
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about
>> >features to have in XWiki in priority:
>> >  http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009
>> >(results at:  http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119
>> >)
>> >  http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012
>> >(results at:
>> >  http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204
>> >)
>> >
>> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order
>> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap.
>> >The survey is available at:
>> >  http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013
>> >
>> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 31.
>> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared
>> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February.
>> >
>> >Thank you,
>> >Silvia
>
>___
>users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Kind regards,

Dmitry
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[xwiki-users] FS Attachments (was Re: XWiki Features survey for the 6.x cycle)

2013-12-20 Thread vinc...@massol.net
Hi,

On 20 Dec 2013 at 04:15:50, Dmitry Bakbardin 
(haru_mamb...@mail.ru(mailto://haru_mamb...@mail.ru)) wrote:

> Hi, Silvia!
>  
> I'd add one more feature:
>  
> Make Filesytem storage ready for production.

On this topic:
* You mean for attachments only, right?
* What is missing in your opinion for it to be production-ready? (If you could 
list the JIRA issues that would be great)

> Hope, I'm not alone :-)

No you’re not alone.

We need to make FS attachments the default ASAP I believe (even though it 
increases the complexity of exporting content). BTW @thomas, does your new 
wikistream export take into account FS attachments yet? We might want/need to 
support that in our XAR export/import to make it transparent to the user where 
the attachments are stored.

Thanks a lot
-Vincent
 
> Четверг, 19 декабря 2013, 14:40 +02:00 от Silvia Rusu :
> >Hi,
> >
> >In 2009 and 2012 the xwiki.org project launched some surveys about
> >features to have in XWiki in priority:
> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009
> >(results at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119
> >)
> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012
> >(results at:
> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/FeatureSurveyResult201204
> >)
> >
> >I thought it would be nice to launch a similar survey in 2013 in order
> >to give the project some information to prepare the XWiki 6.x roadmap.
> >The survey is available at:
> >http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2013
> >
> >It would be great if you could help by filling in the survey by January 31.
> >The results will be published on xwiki.org and shared
> >with the XWiki committers list at the beginning of February.
> >
> >Thank you,
> >Silvia

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users