[vchkpw] vpopmail + procmail problem for users above 100

2005-01-10 Thread focuz info
Dear all,
I have  a qmail mailserver with vpopmail. I am creating users using vadduser 
command. I had created some 8 domain name  with some 150 users in total 
domainnames.The main domainname is like test.com . Domain names are like 
thistest.com  - 80 usersadmin.test.com - 10 usersafd.test.com  - 5 
usersamd.test.com - 7 usersstaff.test.com- 8 usersrd.test.com- 9 
userscse.test.com-10 userselect.test.com-5users
Now one more problem occured. I have setup procmail in all users directory. 
There will be
.qmail-guest . in /home/vpopmail/domains/test.com/.This file is like this
| preline procmail -t ./guest/Maildir/Procmail/procmailrc

In procmail folder procmailrc file is like this
SHELL=/bin/sh
PMDIR=./guest/Maildir/Procmail
LOGFILE=$PMDIR/pmlog
VERBOSE=on
:0
*
./guest/Maildir/
this syntax i was following till number of users were below 100. Filtering 
with procmail was also working for users below 100. Now after 100 users i 
added the .qmail-username file,procmailrc file but filtering is not working. 
I had checked the filepaths in procmailrc files, it was currect..
Please suggest me a solution why the filtering with procmail was not working 
for users created after 100.
Th
anks for any help

_
Hey there NRIs! Desi news, films, ‘n more! http://www.msn.co.in/nri/ Stay in 
the loop!



[vchkpw] [OT] Storage Performance

2005-01-10 Thread Duane Wylie
We are running a qmail/vpopmail 'cluster' with the backend storage shared via 
NFS from a Solaris 8 system.  Our mail system delivers approximately 400K 
messages a day on a disk system that has 30 10K drives in a RAID 10 setup.  
This has worked fine for us for a few years, but we are now finding that the 
system's performance may not be able to accomodate future growth for much 
longer.

I was wondering if anyone is experiencing this same problem, and what different 
approaches are being used to solve it.

Thanks in advance,
Duane Wylie


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail + procmail problem for users above 100

2005-01-10 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 9, 2005, at 11:19 PM, focuz info wrote:
this syntax i was following till number of users were below 100. 
Filtering with procmail was also working for users below 100. Now 
after 100 users i added the .qmail-username file,procmailrc file but 
filtering is not working. I had checked the filepaths in procmailrc 
files, it was currect..
Please suggest me a solution why the filtering with procmail was not 
working for users created after 100.
Write a script to build the .qmail-guest and procmailrc files, but have 
it use vuserinfo to get the user's real home directory (which may be 
~vpopmail/domains/domain.xyz/0/guest).

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/


Re: [vchkpw] [OT] Storage Performance

2005-01-10 Thread Clint Ricker
I've had similar problems on our server platform that is much more modest in
both hardware although demand is probably the same.

We generally handle about 300k messages a day inbound that are from outside,
plus there are 20k or so a day internal (we're an ISP, so by internal I mean
messages that don't leave our network).

Our platform is two AMD1700+ processor based mail servers, one acting
primarily as an NFS server, and exports its mail share over NFS.

We had been for a long time experiencing periodic high load issues.  Two
things have fixed this.

The first is simply to reduce the amount of mail handled.  It is probably
desirable to split out your outbound smtp server if you haven't already.
Storage isn't really much of an issue for that, just enough to spool if
something gets backed up.  But, it is read/write intensive on the drive, so
removing it will mean a lot less demand on your disk server.Also, using the
chkuser package to reject messages for unknown users out of hand will also
drastically reduce load on your mail server, as the default unpatched qmail
behavior is to accept such messages, and then send out an error message.
This, again, involves a lot of disk i/o activicty.

The other method that I have done is just to increase the IO on the
fileserver.  We were doing IDE raid1; I have replaced this with a SATA raid 5
system.  That has entirely solved all load issues.  With as many drives as you
have, I would think that the SCSI raid should be able to handle that amount
without a problem.  Use various benchmarking tecnniques to isolate the
issue...do you have bandwidth issues getting to the machine?  Then (if you
haven't already), impliment a seperate physical network using secondary
ethernet interfaces to handle all of NFS traffic.  Upgrade to gigabit.  If it
is disk issues, then make sure that you are tuning the disks as much as
possible.  Isolate all non-essential disk I/O functions to another disk and/or
server (outbound SMTP, accepting of unknown email addresses, and the qmail
queue folder) to reduce unneccesary disk I/O.

Good luck!

-Clint Ricker
Systems and Network Administrator
NorthEast Georgia Internet Access





 I was wondering if anyone is experiencing this same problem, and what 
 different
 approaches are being used to solve it.

 Thanks in advance,
 Duane Wylie


-- 
-- 
Clint Ricker
Systems and Network Administrator
Northeast Georgia Internet Access (NEGIA)
(706)546-5787




Re: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP Auth delay...can it be sped up ????

2005-01-10 Thread Allie D
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:

exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/true 21

Any other options ???

Peter Palmreuther said:
 Hello Allie,

 On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 5:43:11 AM Allie wrote:

 I'm running vpopmail-5.4.9, netqmail-1.05, and Bill Shupp's TLS +
 SMTP-AUTH patch. It runs great...but the delay is bordering on
 grueling. No matter what the client is it takes a goods 10-20
 seconds to send mail. The server is 2G P4..so it's not the server.
 Is it the patch...or something else ??? Thanks in advance ;)

 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#smtp-slow
 --
 Best regards
 Peter Palmreuther

 Do not follow in the footsteps of men of old; seek what they sought.






Re: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP Auth delay...can it be sped up ????

2005-01-10 Thread Rick Widmer

Allie D wrote:
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/true 21
Any other options ???
Did you read the link?  It clearly says to add certain options to 
tcpserver!  Here it is again:

http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#smtp-slow
Peter Palmreuther said:
Hello Allie,
On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 5:43:11 AM Allie wrote:

I'm running vpopmail-5.4.9, netqmail-1.05, and Bill Shupp's TLS +
SMTP-AUTH patch. It runs great...but the delay is bordering on
grueling. No matter what the client is it takes a goods 10-20
seconds to send mail. The server is 2G P4..so it's not the server.
Is it the patch...or something else ??? Thanks in advance ;)
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#smtp-slow
--
Best regards
Peter Palmreuther
Do not follow in the footsteps of men of old; seek what they sought.






Re: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP Auth delay...can it be sped up ????

2005-01-10 Thread Allie D
Ok fine...I did exactly as it states and it didn't make a difference. It takes 
from 20 to 40 seconds to send an email...that's horrible. If I disable TLS it's 
immediateI can see qmail-smtpd just sitting there while it's 
authenticating..the entire time. Should I use http://inoa.net/qmail-tls/ 
instead of Bill Shupp's patch 

vpopmail 15967  0.0  0.180   760 ??  I 10:35PM0:00.00 
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/tru

How many seconds does it take to send an email for others using this patch ?

Rick Widmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:45:20PM -0700:
 
 
 Allie D wrote:
 
 Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
 interest follows from my run file:
 
 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
 -u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
 /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/true 21
 
 Any other options ???
 
 Did you read the link?  It clearly says to add certain options to 
 tcpserver!  Here it is again:
 
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#smtp-slow
 
 Peter Palmreuther said:
 
 Hello Allie,
 
 On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 5:43:11 AM Allie wrote:
 
 
 I'm running vpopmail-5.4.9, netqmail-1.05, and Bill Shupp's TLS +
 SMTP-AUTH patch. It runs great...but the delay is bordering on
 grueling. No matter what the client is it takes a goods 10-20
 seconds to send mail. The server is 2G P4..so it's not the server.
 Is it the patch...or something else ??? Thanks in advance ;)
 
 http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#smtp-slow
 --
 Best regards
 Peter Palmreuther
 
 Do not follow in the footsteps of men of old; seek what they sought.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
Drain Fade (A Daneman) '98 ZX9R
http://drainfade.com