Re: [Veritas-bu] hp lto3 in sun library
If this is a hardware based encryption product, then you probably still want the tape drive to do compression. Although it won't do much, typically the ends of blocks get compressed. For our Decru appliances, the Decru expert we had on site said to make sure that tape drive compression stayed enabled since there will be a nice set of zeros padding the end of the buffers that the drive will compress away. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of X_S > > ok, thanks for your response. reason is, we're testing a new > encryption product (compresses/encrypts) and the lto3 is new to me as > well. I did see elsewhere that the lto3 will disable compression > automatically if it has to but i don't know how to confirm that this is > actually happening. therefore, i just wanted to see if i can disable > it from the get-go so i can be sure that the results that i'm looking > at are real. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
No other activity on the server except for the read stream from VTL and the write stream to LTO3. There are a couple GB allocated for shmmem. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
Depending on how many streams and write drives are running concurrently, check your shared memory settings in /etc/system. On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Chris_Millet <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I'm starting to experiment with the use of T2000 for media servers. > The backup server is a T2000 8 core, 18GB system. There is a Qlogic > QLE2462 PCI-E dual port 4Gb adapter in the system that plugs into a > Qlogic 5602 switch. From there, one port is zoned to a EMC CDL 4400 > (VTL) and a few HP LTO3 tape drives. The connectivity is 4Gb from > host to switch, and from switch to the VTL. The tape drive is 2Gb. > > So when using Netbackup Vault to copy a backup done to the VTL to a > real tape drive, the backup performance tops out at about 90MB/sec. > If I spin up two jobs to two tape drives, they both go about 45MB/ > sec. It seems I've hit a 90MB/sec bottleneck somehow. I have > v240s performing better! > > Write performance to the VTL from incoming client backups over the > WAN exceeds the vault performance. > > My next step is to zone the tape drives on one of the HBA ports, and > the VTL zoned on the other port. > > I'm using: > SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS = 262144 > NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS = 64 > > Any other suggestions? > > +-- > > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +-- > > > > ___ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
Let us know how it goes - I'm looking at doing the same thing with a T2000. -Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris_Millet Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:57 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3 Seems like that shouldn't be the case, but OK i'll try it. Our Qlogic rep states this adapter should be fully capable of 380MB/sec, full duplex, on both ports, simultaneously. "best in industry" And the T2000 is no slouch in the PCI-E department. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
Seems like that shouldn't be the case, but OK i'll try it. Our Qlogic rep states this adapter should be fully capable of 380MB/sec, full duplex, on both ports, simultaneously. "best in industry" And the T2000 is no slouch in the PCI-E department. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
You may see better performance by connecting the tapes and CDL to different HBAs in different slots on separate busses. Yes, there's more than enough "bandwidth", but the bus has to reverse direction to send/receive, so if you have your cards laid out so one bus is "sending" and the other "receiving" you will see better total throughput. Paul -- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Chris_Millet > Sent: November 16, 2007 1:00 PM > To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3 > > > > I'm starting to experiment with the use of T2000 for media > servers. The backup server is a T2000 8 core, 18GB system. > There is a Qlogic QLE2462 PCI-E dual port 4Gb adapter in the > system that plugs into a Qlogic 5602 switch. From there, one > port is zoned to a EMC CDL 4400 (VTL) and a few HP LTO3 tape > drives. The connectivity is 4Gb from host to switch, and > from switch to the VTL. The tape drive is 2Gb. > > So when using Netbackup Vault to copy a backup done to the > VTL to a real tape drive, the backup performance tops out at > about 90MB/sec. If I spin up two jobs to two tape drives, > they both go about 45MB/sec. It seems I've hit a 90MB/sec > bottleneck somehow. I have v240s performing better! > > Write performance to the VTL from incoming client backups > over the WAN exceeds the vault performance. > > My next step is to zone the tape drives on one of the HBA > ports, and the VTL zoned on the other port. > > I'm using: > SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS = 262144 > NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS = 64 > > Any other suggestions? > > +- > - > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +- > - > > > ___ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] hp lto3 in sun library
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:43:35AM -0800, X_S wrote: > ok, thanks for your response. reason is, we're testing a new > encryption product (compresses/encrypts) and the lto3 is new to me as > well. I did see elsewhere that the lto3 will disable compression > automatically if it has to but i don't know how to confirm that this > is actually happening. therefore, i just wanted to see if i can > disable it from the get-go so i can be sure that the results that i'm > looking at are real. Sounds good. If you have a scratch tape and the time to do it, I'd run a 'dd' test. mt -f /dev/rmt/0cbn rewind dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt/0cbn bs=256k mt -f /dev/rmt/0cbn rewind dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rmt/0hbn bs=256k Count the number of blocks transferred and multiply by 256K to get bytes. The first should be several times larger than the second due to the high compressibility of the zeros. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] poor backup speeds
We need more details too. I'm guessing this is probably 420KB/sec (like what you would see in the job detail) which is dismal. Even 4.2MB/sec is pretty bad. 42MB/sec would be OK, but I'd be guessing the bottleneck is the VM. It sounds like you are saying you have one of the tape drives zoned directly to the VM and it writes directly to the drive so that data is not going over the network. If so, you should see good performance. Things to consider.. Make absolutely sure the data is being sent to the drive on the VM. Double-check your configs. Have you confirmed I/O is on the VM going to the drive? Maybe your accidently sending it to the master/media server still over the network. Consider the VM resources.. what is it doing during the backup? Is the CPU pegged, memory util at 100% or what? Data type.. file systems with millions of tiny files tend to backup slow. You could try a raw device backup or Flashbackup. Consider this a last resort. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Suggestions for large files?
Have you tried the backup already? If so, what are the policy settings and how fast are your drives streaming? LTO3 is rated for 70MB/sec native..more if the data compresses well, so make sure your backup server has at least 1000Mbps network connection and same goes for the client. If your drives are streaming that fast or better already, you might be able to make it go faster by aggregating a second gigabit link on both servers to remove that bottleneck. Then you could try to get two tape drives to do the backup by breaking up the backup selection in the policy into two chunks using the NEW_STREAM directive. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
I'm starting to experiment with the use of T2000 for media servers. The backup server is a T2000 8 core, 18GB system. There is a Qlogic QLE2462 PCI-E dual port 4Gb adapter in the system that plugs into a Qlogic 5602 switch. From there, one port is zoned to a EMC CDL 4400 (VTL) and a few HP LTO3 tape drives. The connectivity is 4Gb from host to switch, and from switch to the VTL. The tape drive is 2Gb. So when using Netbackup Vault to copy a backup done to the VTL to a real tape drive, the backup performance tops out at about 90MB/sec. If I spin up two jobs to two tape drives, they both go about 45MB/sec. It seems I've hit a 90MB/sec bottleneck somehow. I have v240s performing better! Write performance to the VTL from incoming client backups over the WAN exceeds the vault performance. My next step is to zone the tape drives on one of the HBA ports, and the VTL zoned on the other port. I'm using: SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS = 262144 NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS = 64 Any other suggestions? +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] hp lto3 in sun library
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:34:38AM -0800, X_S wrote: > can someone tell me how i can disable compression on an hp 960 lto3 > that is in a sun library. on a windows server, the option to disable > is greyed out when looking at the driver properties, and LT&T won't > read the drive info (can't load nt miniport driver issue). called hp > and they couldn't help and told me to call sun. called sun and they > were no help either. It depends on the drive and some other bits, but generally the 'st' driver on Solaris is set up so that the 'c' or 'u' device provides the highest density with compression, while the 'h' device provides the highest density without compression. (This isn't always true). You can try it, but if you're working on a drive that doesn't have external LEDs, it's not easy to tell if it's working. I've never tried to write uncompressed LTO3, so I can't verify. Can I ask why you want to do this? The drive shouldn't slow down or expand already compressed data. It has a check to just dump raw if the compression routines try to expand. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Encryption via appliance
Crossroads & vormetric are now in the game as well. --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 6:40 AM To: WALLEBROEK Bart Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Encryption via appliance On 11/16/07, WALLEBROEK Bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Can anyone suggest for an encryption appliance compatible with NetBackup? There are 2 big players in the game: Decru (now owned by NetApp) and NeoScale. There is at least 1 smaller player that a Google search just found (hifn) but the general discussion on this list has been around the Decru and NeoScale products. We use the Decru encryption appliances - http://www.decru.com - and we've been very impressed with them. They do compression and encryption at the same time. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] hp lto3 in sun library
ok, thanks for your response. reason is, we're testing a new encryption product (compresses/encrypts) and the lto3 is new to me as well. I did see elsewhere that the lto3 will disable compression automatically if it has to but i don't know how to confirm that this is actually happening. therefore, i just wanted to see if i can disable it from the get-go so i can be sure that the results that i'm looking at are real. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Encryption via appliance
On 11/16/07, WALLEBROEK Bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Can anyone suggest for an encryption appliance compatible with NetBackup? There are 2 big players in the game: Decru (now owned by NetApp) and NeoScale. There is at least 1 smaller player that a Google search just found (hifn) but the general discussion on this list has been around the Decru and NeoScale products. We use the Decru encryption appliances - http://www.decru.com - and we've been very impressed with them. They do compression and encryption at the same time. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows_Flashbackup configuration question
On 11/16/07, tburrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As for moving the media server to a new master- I've never done that, but > my inclination would be to rebuild the media server, rather than try to move > it. Less likely to have unknown settings throwing you off, and I find that > a clean build is usually faster in the end. This is especially true of NetBackup 5.1 since there is a media catalog on the media server. You might get away with just pointing a 6.0 media server to a new master but I sure wouldn't do it on 5.1. There is also a documented procedure somewhere for properly decommissioning a media server from a master. Make sure you go through this on your old master or you will have issues when you upgrade to 6.x. At a minimum, do a full uninstall of the NetBackup components, delete all the hangover files if there are any, and then re-install the media server pieces again. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Windows_Flashbackup configuration question
Andy, What is your client OS? windows 2000 or win2k3? As for moving the media server to a new master- I've never done that, but my inclination would be to rebuild the media server, rather than try to move it. Less likely to have unknown settings throwing you off, and I find that a clean build is usually faster in the end. Tom Burrell AndyS wrote: > Can someone give me some advice concerning the configuration of > Windows_Flashbackup to a UNIX based Master Server? > > > Master Server. > Solaris 10 > NBU 5.1 MP6 > > > Media Server > Windows 2003 > NBU 5.1 MP1 > > > I am trying to setup a Windows_Flashbackup policy from the Java console > > Policy Type: Flashbackup-Windows > > The Perform snapshot backups is automatically selected. When I try and apply > this I get the following error message. > > An error occurred while changing policy Win_Test, status 20 > Snapshot method configured not valid for this Policy type or attributes. > > > If I select the Advanced Snapshot Options button, I get the following error > message > > Unable to retrieve snapshot methods for policy Win_Test, > Error status 227: No snapshot methods found. > > > I am trying to migrate the Media Server from a Windows Master (NBU 5.1 MP3) > to this new environment. > > Can anyone give me any advice? > > > Regards, > > > Andy Skates +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Missing "Policy Type for restore" when try to restore
You cannot restore those two type from the master server to the client. They can only be "client initiated" via the Client DB agent. Paul -- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ssloh > Sent: November 16, 2007 2:27 AM > To: veritas-bu > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Missing "Policy Type for restore" when > try to restore > > > Hi folk, > > Environment NBU 6.0 MP4 Solaris 9, when I try to restore from > master server to client, after selecting the source and destination, > at the "Policy Type for restore" colume, I could NOT find any > policy type name as Oracle or MS-SQL-Server. > > Is there a way to add back the missing policy type name or > bcos some binary get corrupted ??? > > On another master server, I am able to see both policy type > name exist. > > Thanks. La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] hp lto3 in sun library
can someone tell me how i can disable compression on an hp 960 lto3 that is in a sun library. on a windows server, the option to disable is greyed out when looking at the driver properties, and LT&T won't read the drive info (can't load nt miniport driver issue). called hp and they couldn't help and told me to call sun. called sun and they were no help either. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Windows_Flashbackup configuration question
Can someone give me some advice concerning the configuration of Windows_Flashbackup to a UNIX based Master Server? Master Server. Solaris 10 NBU 5.1 MP6 Media Server Windows 2003 NBU 5.1 MP1 I am trying to setup a Windows_Flashbackup policy from the Java console Policy Type: Flashbackup-Windows The Perform snapshot backups is automatically selected. When I try and apply this I get the following error message. An error occurred while changing policy Win_Test, status 20 Snapshot method configured not valid for this Policy type or attributes. If I select the Advanced Snapshot Options button, I get the following error message Unable to retrieve snapshot methods for policy 'Win_Test', Error status 227: No snapshot methods found. I am trying to migrate the Media Server from a Windows Master (NBU 5.1 MP3) to this new environment. Can anyone give me any advice? Regards, Andy Skates ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Encryption via appliance
we have used the appliance from neoscale for about a year but then stopped a year ago. we have a windows netbackup environment and disappearing tape drives is just a headache. we use persistent binding and that helps but at the time the appliance itself would shuffle the drives whenever it was rebooted or brought down for some reason. other than this, it worked just fine. however, do a lookup for Cisco's SME, you may want to consider this. this is an alternative to the appliance and should be coming out sometime soon. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] poor backup speeds
I wish i could get that speed ;oppp On Nov 16, 2007 1:55 AM, Martin, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Care to amend that 420MB/sec. Do you mean KB or possibly 420MB/hour? > 420MB/sec is very fast. :) > > -Jonathan > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rongill > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:51 PM > To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: [Veritas-bu] poor backup speeds > > > I have my backup data on a VM thats going into a FC switch. Also going > into the switch is our backup server (SUN v245) and our tape library. > > I have an agent running on the VM that backs it up to the tape. I'm not > sure if it uses the sun box as a buffer but my backup speeds are roughly > 420MB/sec with software compression disabled. Have Lto3 tape drives. > > Any suggestions? > > Also, how do I enable the hardware compression? > > +-- > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +-- > > > ___ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > ___ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > -- Gregory DEMILDE Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GSM : +352 691 915620 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Is there a way to get an e-mail alert for..
Whenever a drive is cleaned, I want an e-mail alert? Is there a (tpclean).CALLED script or anything like that anyone is where of? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0MP5 client for x86_64 Windows?
This is what I tried but it almost broke my Windows 2003 server(s), tried installing this plain and over the 6.0 (GA) client, no luck. On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, tburrell wrote: > > Try this: > > http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290388.htm > > Tom Burrell > > > jpiszcz wrote: >> Does anyone know the correct install procedure for this? >> >> For the 6.0 software, there is no tar.gz for x86_64 for Windows, only >> X86, any comments? >> >> Justin. >> ___ >> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > > > +-- > |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. > |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +-- > > > ___ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Drive Time Statistics
tpclean -L On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Steve Bally wrote: > All, > > > > I am trying to get some reporting together and need a little help. I > need to get drive times for specific drives on a specific robot, over a > specified period of time. > > > > Additionally I would like to get the actual time for specific policies > to run and complete the backup, i.e. a policy for all the Windows server > named Windows_OS, there are several clients within the policy but I > would like to find out how long each client took to complete. > > > > NBU Statistics: > > > > NBU 6.0 MP5 > > Windows 2003 Master Server > > > > TIA > > > > Regards, > > > > Steve > > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
