[Veritas-bu] Domino ( lotus notes ) on Windows
Hi Boris, I realize it's been awhile but your post re: Lotus Notes backup throughput to LTO-3 drives got me interested. Can you tell me some more of your configuration ? How are you getting that type of throughput ? SAN ? Thanks, /Steve +-- |This was sent by sk...@hotmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU and Clustered MSCS fileserver, Flashbackup?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Spellacy, Sean wrote: > > I have recently added to my job list a Fileserver cluster made up of four > win2k3r2 machines with roughly 5TB of data on them, millions of files. > As expected this takes a relative eternity to backup. > > I was hoping to use flashbackup to be able to pull them but I read in the > documentation that flashbackup is not supported on clusters. > > Is this true? This does not work or this is not supported? Is anyone using > flashbackup on win clusters? > It's absolutely false - it does work and we use it a lot on clusters with far more than 5TB of data. You need to create a snapshot volume and you MUST add this to the cluster group with the data volume. Then use the cluster virtual server name that contains these volume to do the backup. > > So far I have broken these jobs down into multiple streams and that has > bought me some ground, but I suspect the real issue here is the millions of > files being parsed. I have also balanced to jobs across two media servers. > > Does anyone have any insights or opinions as to how I may be able to speed > up these jobs. > We found roughly a 2x performance increase using FlashBackup although I haven't benchmarked it in several years. Not only that, but the CPU hit on the client is considerably reduced from walking the file systems. 64-bit clients really, really help. One thing to watch out for is the maximum job on the client. Because you're using virtual server names, you may end up running multiple jobs on the same physical server. Although I've complained to Symantec many times about this, they have yet to give us any ability to control the number of jobs you can run. What I do is dedicate a DSSU to the cluster for the large data volumes and set the limit to 1. It ensures that only job runs in the cluster but my admins whine like you wouldn't believe if I kick off 2 jobs on the same node. There's currently no way to ensure that only 1 job can run per node in your cluster. This is one of the reasons why I have claimed - and continue to claim - that NetBackup doesn't really support clusters. It tolerates them but real cluster support isn't there yet. .../Ed ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU and Clustered MSCS fileserver, Flashbackup?
I asked this question a while back and someone responded that it does work. You need to create a small lun and use NTFS mapping to map folders under that shard for the actual huge luns you want to back up. Unfortunately I haven't had time to test this. Might want to look in the archives. -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Spellacy, Sean Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:14 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU and Clustered MSCS fileserver, Flashbackup? Good day all I hope you might be able to provide some suggestions to my problem. I have recently added to my job list a Fileserver cluster made up of four win2k3r2 machines with roughly 5TB of data on them, millions of files. As expected this takes a relative eternity to backup. I was hoping to use flashbackup to be able to pull them but I read in the documentation that flashbackup is not supported on clusters. Is this true? This does not work or this is not supported? Is anyone using flashbackup on win clusters? So far I have broken these jobs down into multiple streams and that has bought me some ground, but I suspect the real issue here is the millions of files being parsed. I have also balanced to jobs across two media servers. Does anyone have any insights or opinions as to how I may be able to speed up these jobs. Thanks in advance SSS ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU and Clustered MSCS fileserver, Flashbackup?
Good day all I hope you might be able to provide some suggestions to my problem. I have recently added to my job list a Fileserver cluster made up of four win2k3r2 machines with roughly 5TB of data on them, millions of files. As expected this takes a relative eternity to backup. I was hoping to use flashbackup to be able to pull them but I read in the documentation that flashbackup is not supported on clusters. Is this true? This does not work or this is not supported? Is anyone using flashbackup on win clusters? So far I have broken these jobs down into multiple streams and that has bought me some ground, but I suspect the real issue here is the millions of files being parsed. I have also balanced to jobs across two media servers. Does anyone have any insights or opinions as to how I may be able to speed up these jobs. Thanks in advance SSS ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup error message "get_string_: protocol error"
we have Veritas Netbackup 6.5 version (Redhat LINUX client). Recently I continue see messages on log file say: 14:57:14.016 [15792] <2> get_string_: protocol error - string read failed (Timer expired) 14:57:45.001 [15792] <2> get_string_: protocol error - string read failed (Timer expired) 14:58:16.020 [15792] <2> get_string_: protocol error - string read failed (Timer expired) Any one know what is this mean?? _ Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Store, access, and share your photos. See how. http://windowslive.com/Online/SkyDrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_CS_SD_photos_072009___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Well there never has been a Master License. Netbackup Server is a Product for those who don't need or want another mediaserver. Netbackup is focused on the Large Enterprise. Hence Symantec pushs the "Enterprise Server". You can do a lot now with just one server. 6-12 cores on a tier 1,2 server. You can buy "Server" in starter packs. 5, 20 and 40 clients included (some MS agents are packadged in the 20 and 40 client) The Standard Client now comes with bmr and softwareclient encryption free. Jim -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dean Allen Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:42 AM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Simon, I don't think the term "media server" really exists any more, at least as far as licensing is concerned. I think you just need a "Netbackup Enterprise Server" license for whatever platform. I don't think there's any difference in cost/licensing between a master server and a media server. What used to be called a "SAN Media Server" is now an "Enterprise Client". There's also "SAN Client", which is a client which pushes it's data to a media server over FC using the Fibre Transport. What Justin says seems right. Cheers, Dean On 31/07/2009, at 12:11 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Judy > Nope!! All I asked for was a standard enterprise media license ! > > I have one Master and multiple SAN Media Servers. > > This "new" Server is going into a seperate location all on its own, > but > I want it to be part of the NetBackup environment. > no encryption, or SSO, just a Media Server Enterprise Software > License I > guess! > It will have its own Tape Library as well. > > Does this sound right. > Simon > > -Original Message- > From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com > [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:07 PM > To: WEAVER, Simon (external); jpis...@lucidpixels.com > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > That means a standard media server license; if you have enterprise > netbackup then you want enterprise media server. > > BUT if you are doing encryption already - and you want to encrypt your > backup on the new server - ( which is the stuff they are asking you > about) > > Then you should match what you are doing now - so are you currently > encrypting your backups? > > -Original Message- > From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of > WEAVER, > Simon (external) > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:27 AM > To: Justin Piszcz > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > Hi Justin > This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment. So I do > not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server that has > the ability to: > > 1) Attach to its own robotic drive > 2) Backup itself and 2 other servers > > Simon > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM > To: WEAVER, Simon (external) > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > Hi, > > You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing > you don't want that? > > It sounds like you want a standard license: > Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server > > Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature > > that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). > > Justin. > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > >> Hi All >> Can I just clarify something please. >> >> I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network >> based Servers. >> >> The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want >> >> VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA >> SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA >> SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER >> >> Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup >> itself > >> and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! >> Thanks, Sim >> >> This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/ >> or > >> privileged information or information otherwise protected from >> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the >> sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and >> do > >> not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but >> delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium >> disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus >> corrupted, altered or falsified. >> -o- >> Astrium Limited, Registered in England a
[Veritas-bu] SLP
- So what I understand you are doing is using the SLP to get around the boundaries of tape pools being assigned to a given media, this way all the data gets backed up by a pool of all of the tapes as one group? - Yes, we backup to disk into one or two pools, with a short retention (SLP actually sets retention to infinite so no danger of losing data, then reverts to short retention, so it expires and the tape becomes the active primary copy) - I assume vault is the underlying technology but the SLP is just the layer at which you configure and run it all. Do you need the Shared Storage Option for this? - Nope - only if you want to share drives. - In your experience does the data get split across all of the drives evenly? If one tape finishes its list of images does it just sit there or does NBU find more data for it to backup? (similarly to how the resource manager would do when we used to copy straight to tape)? - Yes, it balances across drives well. You have to do some parameter configuration in terms of how large a backup to write immediately or how long to wait before duping to optimize this. - I guess this could help keep my drives spinning, won't do much for my speed issue but it seems like it could help with the data allocation... thanks for your advice. - You are welcome. Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:16:07 -0400 From: jkearns Subject: [Veritas-bu] Vaulting images from disk = slow tape speed, ideas??? To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Message-ID: <1248804967.m2f.311...@www.backupcentral.com> > We backup about 16Tb of data over the course of a weekend. We used to run NBU > 6.0 MP2 with four LTO3 drives fiber connected. We recently changed to NBU > 6.5.3 and a disk to disk appliance... we now vault from the disk images (DSU) > to tape for offsite storage and DR. By my estimates the drives used to copy > at roughly 62 Gb/Hr multiplexed. So we would be finished over the course of a > weekend. Now that we are vaulting from disk to tape, the tape drives cannot > multiplex from disk to tape. My vault jobs take extremely long to finish and > if a drive is busy when the vault job begins then it only runs on the > remaining available tape drives (which for us, we have two tape storage > groups with two drives in each one based on what master/media they belong to) > so when something happens to one drive I end up copying images for half of my > environment to one tape drive. The drive non-multiplexed are copying at about > 30-35 Gb /Hr. Moving to a disk replication would solve this but my DR plan is a cold site so I have to keep tape. Is there anything I can do to improve this performance? > > * > > This is exactly what I found, and SLP (storage lifecycle policies) are my > solution. > You set up the SLP to backup to disk pool A as step one, and have a second > step that copies that from disk to tape pool B with your normal retention. > Essentially you get a one tape drive vault process, and no longer lose your > efficiency. > > * > > So what I understand you are doing is using the SLP to get around the > boundaries of tape pools being assigned to a given media, this way all the > data gets backed up by a pool of all of the tapes as one group? I assume > vault is the underlying technology but the SLP is just the layer at which you > configure and run it all. Do you need the Shared Storage Option for this? > In your experience does the data get split across all of the drives evenly? > If one tape finishes its list of imiages does it just sit there or does NBU > find more data for it to backup? (similarly to how the resource manager would > do when we used to copy straight to tape)? > I guess this could help keep my drives spinning, won't do much for my speed > issue but it seems like it could help with the data allocation... thanks for > your advice. > +-- |This was sent by jkea...@amig.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Simon, I don't think the term "media server" really exists any more, at least as far as licensing is concerned. I think you just need a "Netbackup Enterprise Server" license for whatever platform. I don't think there's any difference in cost/licensing between a master server and a media server. What used to be called a "SAN Media Server" is now an "Enterprise Client". There's also "SAN Client", which is a client which pushes it's data to a media server over FC using the Fibre Transport. What Justin says seems right. Cheers, Dean On 31/07/2009, at 12:11 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Judy > Nope!! All I asked for was a standard enterprise media license ! > > I have one Master and multiple SAN Media Servers. > > This "new" Server is going into a seperate location all on its own, > but > I want it to be part of the NetBackup environment. > no encryption, or SSO, just a Media Server Enterprise Software > License I > guess! > It will have its own Tape Library as well. > > Does this sound right. > Simon > > -Original Message- > From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com > [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:07 PM > To: WEAVER, Simon (external); jpis...@lucidpixels.com > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > That means a standard media server license; if you have enterprise > netbackup then you want enterprise media server. > > BUT if you are doing encryption already - and you want to encrypt your > backup on the new server - ( which is the stuff they are asking you > about) > > Then you should match what you are doing now - so are you currently > encrypting your backups? > > -Original Message- > From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of > WEAVER, > Simon (external) > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:27 AM > To: Justin Piszcz > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > Hi Justin > This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment. > So I do not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server > that has the ability to: > > 1) Attach to its own robotic drive > 2) Backup itself and 2 other servers > > Simon > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM > To: WEAVER, Simon (external) > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! > > Hi, > > You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing > you don't want that? > > It sounds like you want a standard license: > Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server > > Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature > > that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). > > Justin. > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > >> Hi All >> Can I just clarify something please. >> >> I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network >> based Servers. >> >> The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want >> >> VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA >> SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA >> SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER >> >> Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup >> itself > >> and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! >> Thanks, Sim >> >> This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/ >> or > >> privileged information or information otherwise protected from >> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the >> sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and >> do > >> not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but >> delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium >> disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus >> corrupted, altered or falsified. >> -o- >> Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 >> Registered Office: >> Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England >> > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do > not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but > delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium > disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus > corrupted, altered or falsified. > -o- > Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered > Office: > Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England >
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Judy Nope!! All I asked for was a standard enterprise media license ! I have one Master and multiple SAN Media Servers. This "new" Server is going into a seperate location all on its own, but I want it to be part of the NetBackup environment. no encryption, or SSO, just a Media Server Enterprise Software License I guess! It will have its own Tape Library as well. Does this sound right. Simon -Original Message- From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:07 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external); jpis...@lucidpixels.com Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! That means a standard media server license; if you have enterprise netbackup then you want enterprise media server. BUT if you are doing encryption already - and you want to encrypt your backup on the new server - ( which is the stuff they are asking you about) Then you should match what you are doing now - so are you currently encrypting your backups? -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:27 AM To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Hi Justin This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment. So I do not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server that has the ability to: 1) Attach to its own robotic drive 2) Backup itself and 2 other servers Simon -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Hi, You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing you don't want that? It sounds like you want a standard license: Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). Justin. On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Hi All > Can I just clarify something please. > > I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network > based Servers. > > The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want > > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER > > Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup itself > and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! > Thanks, Sim > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do > not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but > delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium > disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus > corrupted, altered or falsified. > -o- > Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: > Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England __
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
That means a standard media server license; if you have enterprise netbackup then you want enterprise media server. BUT if you are doing encryption already - and you want to encrypt your backup on the new server - ( which is the stuff they are asking you about) Then you should match what you are doing now - so are you currently encrypting your backups? -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:27 AM To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Hi Justin This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment. So I do not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server that has the ability to: 1) Attach to its own robotic drive 2) Backup itself and 2 other servers Simon -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Hi, You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing you don't want that? It sounds like you want a standard license: Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). Justin. On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Hi All > Can I just clarify something please. > > I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network > based Servers. > > The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want > > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER > > Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup itself > and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! > Thanks, Sim > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do > not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but > delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium > disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus > corrupted, altered or falsified. > -o- > Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: > Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Hi Justin This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment. So I do not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server that has the ability to: 1) Attach to its own robotic drive 2) Backup itself and 2 other servers Simon -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question ! Hi, You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing you don't want that? It sounds like you want a standard license: Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). Justin. On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Hi All > Can I just clarify something please. > > I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network > based Servers. > > The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want > > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA > SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER > > Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup itself > and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! > Thanks, Sim > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or > privileged information or information otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do > not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but > delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium > disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus > corrupted, altered or falsified. > -o- > Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: > Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Hi, You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing you don't want that? It sounds like you want a standard license: Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature that you do not have (in this case, 1 media server and 2 clients). Justin. On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Hi All > Can I just clarify something please. > > I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network based > Servers. > > The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want > > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER > VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER > > Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup itself > and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! > Thanks, Sim > > This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential > and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected > from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please > notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any > attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its > content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments > from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this > email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. > -o- > Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 > Registered Office: > Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Hi All Can I just clarify something please. I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network based Servers. The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR ENTERPRISE SERVER VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR SANMEDIA SERVER Anyone advise on this? I said a standard Media Server to backup itself and others, but its fallen on deaf ears ! Thanks, Sim This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. -o- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
