Re: [Veritas-bu] Is the veritas-bu list still alive?
Hello, I work as a contractor and can report that traditional enterprise backup jobs are still strong. Though I am never just a backup administrator. Another thing to consider is that other backup products have been gaining because the cost of Netbackup was deemed pretty high. Also, I am not sure if Netbackup is the best product in the space any longer with EMCs offerings and hardware pairings, Data Domain, Avamar, etc... -Dwayne Adams From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu <veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> on behalf of DRAKE, MICHAEL <md6...@att.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 7:37 AM To: Saran Brar; W. Curtis Preston Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is the veritas-bu list still alive? I am thinking a couple of things may have happened. 1 First, the keeper of this may have moved on thus resulting in an obsolete and eventually unmonitored and closed off email distro list. 2 Secondary thoughts are companies may have drifted away from using backup software in general or the interest in having a dedicated person for backup has dropped considerably with VMware and cloud technologies such as AWS and Microsoft Azure making tape backup strategies an obsolete thought in those companies IT leadership minds. Mike Drake, 6σGB TP Data Core Engineering Group 5600 Glenridge Drive Atlanta, GA 30342 2w84h Cell 404-368-8079 Skype 678-917-0581 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Saran Brar Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 2:54 AM To: W. Curtis Preston <wcurtispres...@gmail.com> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is the veritas-bu list still alive? yeah me too. No active users in this forum...surprised From: "W. Curtis Preston" <wcurtispres...@gmail.com<mailto:wcurtispres...@gmail.com>> Sent: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:06:38 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<mailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Is the veritas-bu list still alive? I know I've been gone for a while, but I was surprised to see the archives stopped in 2016. Did something happen I don't know about? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu<mailto:Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.eng.auburn.edu_mailman_listinfo_veritas-2Dbu=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=wIX4R2aOctum7aF5dLtDnA=usQA4Iy7u6H6fCfKS8K-j6r6ZYSR389qX4Hz56sttys=eLfef2T6Pf5yNEYf6JkuQSvka9aJPW8VkFV9DDpqJvY=> ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Oracle DB server and NetBackup Media Server on same machine for RMAN?
Jeff, I would be careful about making a DB server a NBU Media Server. It sounds like a great idea until you realize that you married your backup system to the DB server and it now has a dependency with the DB server. You should weigh the alternatives and see if it is really worth the dependency to the backup system. I believe there is a SAN Media Server license that will allow you to backup data for that server only. Of course you will need the RMAN\Oracle license as well. Regards, Dwayne Adams Dwayne C. Adams, Jr. Netbackup Guru and Windows Systems Administrator email: dc_adam...@hotmail.com cell:x website: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dcadamsjr From: jlight...@water.com To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:48:26 + Subject: [Veritas-bu] Oracle DB server and NetBackup Media Server on same machine for RMAN? Does the Netbackup Media Server license on a host include the Oracle client like the Netbackup Client itself does? On reviewing the guide at http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=DOC3672 it talks about the client but always seems to suggest that the client has to be pushed to a separate media server (or the master/media server). We need to do a large RMAN backup per vendor of an Oracle DB so I’m thinking of making this Oracle DB server its own media server so it can push directly to tape and deduplication storage units rather than having to transfer over the network to a separate media or master.It just isn’t clear to me this is possible and I need to know. This is NetBackup 7.1. I know for it to be a media server I have to get the license for standard media server and the shared storage license. Do I need any other license for Oracle/RMAN to work on a media server that backs only itself up? Do I need to full media server license instead of the back itself up one if it is doing its own RMAN client on same server? Athena®, Created for the Cause™ Making a Difference in the Fight Against Breast Cancer How and Why I Should Support Bottled Water! Do not relinquish your right to choose bottled water as a healthy alternative to beverages that contain sugar, calories, etc. Your support of bottled water will make a difference! Your signatures count! Go to http://www.bottledwatermatters.org/luv-bottledwater-iframe/dswaters and sign a petition to support your right to always choose bottled water. Help fight federal and state issues, such as bottle deposits (or taxes) and organizations that want to ban the sale of bottled water. Support community curbside recycling programs. Support bottled water as a healthy way to maintain proper hydration. Our goal is 50,000 signatures. Share this petition with your friends and family today! - CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Archive options
Hello, Do you archive data for long periods of time (think 7 to 18 years)? If so, please share your experience in long term backup platform independent archiving solutions you are using or have considered. (LTFS?, what else besides tape?) Thanks, Dwayne Adams ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12
Daniel, Do you have experience with the EMC hardware? Dwayne DWAYN --- Original Message --- From: Daniel Jimenez sta...@hotmail.com Sent: September 14, 2013 10:31 PM To: Tom Moore thomas.mo...@cox.net, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, Dwayne Adams dc_adam...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 EMCs strategy is NDMP through an NDMP accelerator node that has an initial full and then only sends the changes thereafter but each backup is considered a full. Daniel Sent from Windows Mail From: Dwayne Adams Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:12 PM To: Tom Moore, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Tom, Thanks. Interesting. That is a horrible way to backup volumes. That was the solution before NDMP. CommVault suggested the same thing. EMC has a hardware solution that they say gets good Dedupe rates with inline NDMP stream backups with an incremental forever strategy. I wanted to see if the Netbackup Accelerator offers similar features. Dwayne --- Original Message --- From: Tom Moore thomas.mo...@cox.net Sent: September 14, 2013 11:24 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Per conversations with engineering, ndmp does not dedupe well. It was suggested that we mount the volumes to a media server and run it to a dedupe pool. Ymmv Cheers, On Sep 14, 2013, at 10:00 AM, veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu wrote: Netbackup NDMP Dedupe ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12
Tom, Thanks. Interesting. That is a horrible way to backup volumes. That was the solution before NDMP. CommVault suggested the same thing. EMC has a hardware solution that they say gets good Dedupe rates with inline NDMP stream backups with an incremental forever strategy. I wanted to see if the Netbackup Accelerator offers similar features. Dwayne --- Original Message --- From: Tom Moore thomas.mo...@cox.net Sent: September 14, 2013 11:24 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 89, Issue 12 Per conversations with engineering, ndmp does not dedupe well. It was suggested that we mount the volumes to a media server and run it to a dedupe pool. Ymmv Cheers, On Sep 14, 2013, at 10:00 AM, veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu wrote: Netbackup NDMP Dedupe ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup NDMP Dedupe
Hello, Can someone share their experience with NDMP stream Deduplication using Netbackup Accelerator? Thanks, Dwayne Adams http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/power-netbackup-deduplication-application-awareness-and-global-deduplication ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk
Is anyone using Replication Director as a replacement for backups to tape in a 100% disk to disk environment, or do you use VTLs and Dedupe? Also, what are you doing for filer\ndmp backups and Dedupe? Thanks, Dwayne Adams From: sk...@hotmail.com To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:35:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk For the sites that have gone completely to disk, did you have to make adjustments to your retention period(s) ? I'm also curious on how you're handling your archival requirements ... Thanks, /Steve -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:58:18 -0700 From: Dwayne Adams dc_adam...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: bay174-w16d101d5366db902528ef5f5...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hello, Who is really doing all disk backups for all their data sets today? I keep hearing about the demise of tapes. This email is a survey to see if shops are really doing this. I have yet to see it in any of my contact positions. Thanks, Dwayne Adams snip ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk
Hello, Who is really doing all disk backups for all their data sets today? I keep hearing about the demise of tapes. This email is a survey to see if shops are really doing this. I have yet to see it in any of my contact positions. Thanks, Dwayne Adams ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Strategy
Hello, What are you seeing out there in terms of backup strategies in the petabyte+ data set range? Is there mostly D2D? Synthetic fulls, Netbackup Accelerator, Infinite INC? What is a the best white paper floating around? Thanks, Dwayne Dwayne C. Adams, Jr. Information Technology Professional email: dc_adam...@hotmail.com website: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dcadamsjr ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Len, Thanks for the info. -Dwayne From: len.bo...@sas.com To: vidit.ko...@blackrock.com; jpis...@lucidpixels.com; dc_adam...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:19:52 + The technote has an url to enable the download of an eeb to fix the issue. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Kohli, Vidit Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:16 PM To: Justin Piszcz; 'Dwayne Adams'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? There is major bug in 7.5.0.5 as per Symantec, so better wait for 7.5.0.6 nbsl experiences a memory leak which results in a core dump. http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH201979 Product The following versions of NetBackup are affected by this issue: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 Summary The nbsl daemon crashes intermittently and creates a core dump. It was observed that memory consumed by nbsl was constantly growing, and when it reached somewhere around 4GB, nbsl would crash. This issue is scheduled to be addressed in the following release: · NetBackup 7.5 Maintenance Release 6 (7.5.0.6) From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 5:13 PM To: 'Dwayne Adams'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? Hi, Unsure for Windows, for Linux/64-bit and 7.5.0.5: Yes there is a problem with ghost jobs: (you will see 100s-1000s of jobs Active but they really complete) This EEB fixes that issue: https://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH203521 Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dwayne Adams Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:52 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? Hello, I am starting to plan for a 7.5 upgrade from 6.5.6 in an environment that I am consulting at for the next few months. Has anyone run into any major bugs or issues with 7.5.0.5 after the upgrade? I am running Windows x64 as my master with multiple NDMP filers and no media servers. Thanks, Dwayne Adams THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, AND MAY BE PRIVILEGED. If this message was misdirected, BlackRock, Inc. and its subsidiaries, (BlackRock) does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and destroy the message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and opinions of BlackRock, unless the author is authorized by BlackRock to express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from this address is subject to electronic storage and review by BlackRock. Although BlackRock operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being passed. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Hello, I am starting to plan for a 7.5 upgrade from 6.5.6 in an environment that I am consulting at for the next few months. Has anyone run into any major bugs or issues with 7.5.0.5 after the upgrade? I am running Windows x64 as my master with multiple NDMP filers and no media servers. Thanks, Dwayne Adams ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Thanks Justin for sharing. Yikes -Dwayne From: jpis...@lucidpixels.com To: dc_adam...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:12:33 -0400 Hi, Unsure for Windows, for Linux/64-bit and 7.5.0.5: Yes there is a problem with ghost jobs: (you will see 100s-1000s of jobs Active but they really complete) This EEB fixes that issue:https://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH203521 Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dwayne Adams Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:52 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues? Hello, I am starting to plan for a 7.5 upgrade from 6.5.6 in an environment that I am consulting at for the next few months. Has anyone run into any major bugs or issues with 7.5.0.5 after the upgrade? I am running Windows x64 as my master with multiple NDMP filers and no media servers. Thanks, Dwayne Adams ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Apple xsan backups
Hello, Is anyone using Backup Exec or Netbackup to backup a Apple Xsan? Please share the details of your setup. Do you use a StoreNext on another machine to plug your backup server into the shared file system..etc. I have been tasked with developing a backup solution. I would like to build on our existing Symantec backup infrastructure... Thanks in advance. Dwayne Adams - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk at (415) 581-5552 or by e-mailing us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Reg: update MP4 patch to multiple client at a time
Hello, What are others doing to backup Xserver/Xraid with Netbackup or Backup Exec? Are there any options for LAN free backups? Thanks in advance. Dwayne Adams - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk at (415) 581-5552 or by e-mailing us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Multiplexing?
I think NDMP v5 has multiplexing in the design spec. http://www.ndmp.org/info/ndmp_mission.shtml -Dwayne Adams On 8/30/07 2:07 PM, Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NONDMP is never multiplexed...only one stream to a tape drive at a time.=20 True for NDMP storage units (tapes attached to an NDMP host). I don't believe there's a way to ask an NDMP host to multiplex to a local drive, Netbackup or otherwise. ...with NetBackup... (There are products that multiplex NDMP images together.) Can NetBackup not multiplex NDMP-Remote jobs (NDMP streams to a standard Media Manager storage unit)? I had just assumed that since it's the Media Manager talking to the tape, the contents of the stream would be irrelevant for multiplexing. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk at (415) 581-5552 or by e-mailing us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance
Hello, I tested changing the block size using these settings with Onstor filers and came up empty. I matched block size changes on the filer with SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS_NDMP. Every test of changing the block size resulted in I/O errors. In the end NDMP performance seems to be highly dependent on the performance of the underlying file system you are backing up along with NDMP throttling to guarantee a certain level of performance for the users accessing the data during the backup. I have also read that you don't have the 64k limit in Windows if you use the VERITAS drivers. -Dwayne Adams -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney, David Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:22 AM To: Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance Good idea, From the unix world myself, however we have overcome the blocksize limit on our windows media servers with Microsoft KB907418. 2003 SP1 I presume Anyhow I think they have now bundled the fix into the next SP release and is therefore not available for download. I have a copy of the fix if you need it. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: 21 August 2007 13:34 To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance I put in a call to Symantec Tech Support on this, given that its not documented anywhere and the tech indicated this is the write to tape block size. So given that your tape drive can handle it, setting this as high as 256KB can net you performance improvements. I however am on Windows, so 64K seems to be it for me. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: Clooney, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 4:31 AM To: Len Boyle; Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance I was under the impression that if the drives are directly attached there is not a lot that can be done from an NBU point of view. If you are running a 3 way scenario then the touch file could possibly make a difference, I seem to remember from the past that if you are in a 3 way setup you can change the way the NDMP mover agent starts with regard to buffers. Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Boyle Sent: 21 August 2007 04:06 To: Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance The answer may depend on what device is at the other end of NDMP. I was told that with NetApp NDMP that changing the buffer did not change performance due to the way that the WAFL filesystem handled things. It would be interesting to revisit this and see if they had made any changes to enable larger buffers sizes improve performance. Some of the other NDMP devices with different filesystems may show an improvement. len -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 3:12 PM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance Anyone know anything about the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS_NDMP touch file? Is this even still valid? I can't seem to find anything about it in NBU documentation, just a reference in the archives of this mailing list. Is this worth investigating as a performance enhancer for NDMP? -Jonathan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu Notice to recipient: The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity. If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Exec Reporting
Hello, I just joined a new organization that uses Backup Exec 10d for backups after working with Netbackup 4.5 - 6.0 for the last 4 years. What are others using to report on Backup Exec? I have 4 BE sites and would like to combine reporting for all locations. Thanks in advance Dwayne Adams - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk at (415) 581-5552 or by e-mailing us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
