Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows)
Daniel, I use the follow script (nothing to do with scratch tapes) when space gets tight on our DDs and I want to pre-expire some NBU images. #!/bin/sh for tapeid in `cat delete-DD.txt`; do slot=`vmquery -m $tapeid | grep robot slot` slotn=`echo $slot | cut -b 13-` barcode=`echo $tapeidL1` date echo $barcode echo $slotn # Netbackup Expire the tape. bpexpdate -m $tapeid -d 0 -force vmdelete -m $tapeid -h b2u32 # # DD - Export/Delete/Add/Import the tape ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl export DD-VTL slot $slotn ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl tape del $barcode ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl tape add $barcode capacity 100 ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl import DD-VTL barcode $barcode done ssh -l sysadmin datadomain filesys clean start - The L1 above is because we use LTO1 in the DD. SSH keys are setup from one of our Linux Media Servers to do both the NBU and DD commands. Randy From: Jimenez, Daniel daniel.jime...@owb.com To: Jeff Lightner jlight...@water.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 2:07:15 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) Jeff Try running quick erases on your tapes after you run a filesys clean and then run a filesys clean again and see if you recover additional space on the DDR’s. This will tell you how efficiently you are using your tapes. In addition, this is information we received from our Data Domain representative and from other techs we have worked with so this takes us right back to why we need the script. Daniel Jimenez Data Protection Team From:Jeff Lightner [mailto:jlight...@water.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:00 AM To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) We use Data Domain here and haven’t seen that. Are you running image cleanup jobs in NBU? From:Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:daniel.jime...@owb.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:45 PM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) Jeff When you use Data Domain DDR’s if one of the tapes becomes scratch and is not re-used right away, they hold data that is not cleaned up on the DDR until they are used or quick erased so there can be a few GB’s or several hundred GB’s that can be sitting on the DDR that can be cleaned up. Which is why we are looking for a script. Daniel Jimenez Data Protection Team From:Jeff Lightner [mailto:jlight...@water.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:34 AM To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) There’s no need to erase scratch tapes. When they are scratch then they will be overwritten the next time NBU uses them. From:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez, Daniel Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:04 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) Hey guys Does anyone have a quick erase script for Netbackup 6.5.3.1 (Windows 2003 Enterprise server)? I would like to be able to schedule the script to find all scratch tapes and run a quick erase on these tapes on a weekly basis. In addition, we have Unix utilities on the box so we can use these commands on the server. Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks. Daniel Jimenez Data Protection Team Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. --___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows)
Interesting - I'll look at bplabel the next go around. Thanks From: A Darren Dunham ddun...@taos.com To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 3:47:50 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick Erase Script (Windows) On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Randy Doering wrote: Daniel, I use the follow script (nothing to do with scratch tapes) when space gets tight on our DDs and I want to pre-expire some NBU images. ? vmdelete -m $tapeid -h b2u32 # # DD - Export/Delete/Add/Import the tape ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl export DD-VTL slot $slotn ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl tape del $barcode ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl tape add $barcode capacity 100 ssh -l sysadmin datadomain vtl import DD-VTL barcode $barcode ? done ssh -l sysadmin datadomain filesys clean start I'm sure what you're doing works fine. But you can replace everything above with a single 'bplabel' command, and you don't have to run an inventory afterward. (And it'll work with any VTL) -- Darren ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sharing a library
Sounds like you want: Inventory Robot - Advanced Options - Barcode Rules Randy From: Schaefer, Harry harry.schae...@turner.com To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:47:09 AM Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sharing a library We have an SL8500 that will be sharing applications (NetBackup and Quantum Storage Manager). The Quantum will be using 9840D tape drives and NetBackup will use LTO4, and we are not hard partitioning the library. The tapes for the different apps have different barcode schemes. The NBU tapes all start with BKP***. Is there a way to tell NBU to only add tapes that start with BKP to its volume database? I have scanned through the manuals and done some volume previews with different options and nothing has worked so far. ACSLS reports both 9840D and LTO tapes as HCART so I cant specify that way... Harry S. Atlanta ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice
Wayne, We have a couple of DD690s (1 Appliance, 1 Gateway) and I've really got only good things to say about them. They're easy to setup and configure (VTL and NFS). You might want to consider what your retention periods will be for the data you keep on it. We use 3 months max for the VTL, and anything over goes to Physical Tape for offsite storage. At www.datadomain.com there is a pointer to a Best Practices guide for Netbackup. Randy From: BeDour, Wayne wbed...@lear.com To: scott.geo...@parker.com Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 1:03:34 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice We are still going to do offsite storage. The plan is to write from the vtl to the smaller library and send offsite. Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 313-593-9876 Internet: wbed...@lear.com -Original Message- From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:01 AM To: BeDour, Wayne Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice I am making the assumption that you: a) have no requirement for offsite storage or to put it in industry terms, a disaster recovery requirement, and b) are comfortable with keeping all of your backups on virtual storage. Personally, I would be uneasy with this, because in the event of a catastrophic failure with your VTL (as highly unlikely as it is) your backups are gone. If you are a smaller shop, this risk is acceptable. On the upside, the performance increase is going to phenomenal. We just replaced a non-deduping EMC VTL with a newer one. One of the things that NetBackup required was to actually emulate the EMC virtual library. Otherwise, you will run into some licensing issues. No biggie, the EMC could emulate as many drives and as many tapes as the physical disk storage would allow. There is probably something similar with the Data Domain. BeDour, Wayne wbed...@lear.com Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 10/14/2009 09:32 AM To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Adding a DataDomain VTL need advice All Our environment HP-UX 11.31 a SureStore 20/700 library with 10 LTO-1 drives, NetBackup 6.5.2 Master / Media server and one Windows Media server using SSO. We are looking at purchasing a Data Domain device, eliminating the SureStore library as it is at its end of life and replacing it with a smaller library. We have no experience with a VTL or what pitfalls or things to look out for while setting up the new environment. Any advice on where to look to gather info, or experiences of what to look out for? Thanks in advance. Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 313-593-9876 Internet: wbed...@lear.com ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any
[Veritas-bu] MS SQL Restore
Got a MS SQL user who needs a restore of MS SQL database from last night. We've been doing these SQL backups and this is the first time a restore is needed. It was already in place when I got here. The user is in the SQL part of NBU (6.5.3) and kicks off his restore request - with the start/end dates selected. The process sits for a moment and then he gets: ERROR Initializing NetBackup Catalog. This could be caused by a missing or expired NetBackup license key. I put a MS SQL Server extension license key on the media server that does the backups, but the error is still there. Any idea what the problem could be? Thanks, Randy ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetApp and Scaler i2000
On the NetApp, do the tape drives show up with the sysconfig command? If not, you may need to offline/online the specific FC Host Adapter. See the fcadmin command after priv set advanced. Randy From: Spearman, David sp...@co.henrico.va.us To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:47:08 AM Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetApp and Scaler i2000 I am trying to get ndmp running to our NetApp. (everything is working on ndmp to Celera) I have fc zoned the Scaler library to the NetApp and the Scaler seems to be happy enough with zones and lun mapping. However the NetApp is not playing nice. I have been through the Ontap 7.3 tape backup guide but no matter what I do the NetApp refuses to recognize the library and tape units. Anyone know where that last button to be pushed lives? I can three way just fine with my 6.5.3 system. David Spearman County of Henrico, Va. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Clean up disk space on Data Domain
What we do when space gets tight on our DataDomain is to identify Images that are soon to expire within NBU. Go ahead and pre-expire them, then afterwards kick off a clean. In our case, we use VTL and pre-expire the volumes that are soon to expire (we have 3 month retention), go out to the DD and vtl export/vtl tape del; followed by a vtl tape add/vtl import. Randy From: dmehta netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 12:54:43 PM Subject: [Veritas-bu] Clean up disk space on Data Domain Hi, We are using NBU 6.5.3 and all our backups are going to Data Domain. One of our backend disk is at 100% and we want to get some space back. However we do not know how can we get it faster other than running the clean process of DD, even after which we will be getting 265 GB space. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Dushyant Mehta +-- |This was sent by dushyant_me...@symantec.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Sun NDMP NetBackup 6.5.3
This sounds like a problem we have with Isilon NDMP restores. Try Host Properties - Media Servers; Right Click on Media Server and pick Properties, then General Server. If Checked, Uncheck it. In our case the directory were restored but the process was really slow. Randy From: "Clooney, David" david.cloo...@bankofamerica.comTo: Patrick netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:34:57 AMSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Sun NDMP NetBackup 6.5.3 Hey Pat, long time We use this config across all our environments, R200 and the FAS series. No issues what so ever. Regards David Clooney Enterprise Storage Services From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of PatrickSent: 10 March 2009 20:16To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Sun NDMP NetBackup 6.5.3 Does anyone have any experience with this configuration? I am having problems restoring although the backups work fine. If I click a specific file or files the restore works, however if I pick the directory only the directory is restored, none of the files. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Patrick Whelan VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX. VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows. netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk Notice to recipient:The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. For all U.K. corporate disclosures, please refer to www.bankofamerica.com/ukcompanies ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential= Another Full
Thanks for the replies/pointers to this question. The 200644.htm doc was helpful. Now, I've tested 3 environments: Isilon - NDMP; NetApp - NDMP and Solaris - Standard backup. In each case, I used a chgrp command to change the ctime of a small set of files. I then kicked off a Differential for that client. And in each case the small set of files that I had changed were included in the Differential Incremental for each client. I don't have USE_CTIME_FOR_INCREMENTALS in any bp.conf files on clients/media servers or master server. So, I'm still confused, and I guess I'll open up a ticket with Symantec to try and get to the bottom of this. Thanks again, Randy From: Donaldson, Mark mark.donald...@staples.com To: Randy Doering rdoeri...@verizon.net; A Darren Dunham ddun...@taos.com; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:37:52 PM Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential= Another Full Netbackup, by default, uses mtime for incrementals. It can be configured to use C-time in bp.conf but that's not usual at all. More here: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/200644.htm -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Randy Doering Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:42 PM To: A Darren Dunham; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential= Another Full Mystery solved - or so it seems. Last week we had a helpdesk ticket where the user wanted some chmod/chgrp modifications of all files/directories in this area. My co-worker did that on Thursday/Friday of last week. Seems this changes the ChangeTime (ctime), which NBU is using for determining if something has Changed. I then did a Differential, and it was looking at the ctime. For one of the files: stat error.txt File: `error.txt' Size: 338713 Blocks: 962 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 1dh/29d Inode: 4365470520 Links: 1 Access: (0664/-rw-rw-r--) Uid: ( 2370/ cgoina) Gid: ( 9003/jtc-solexa) Access: 2008-10-15 09:44:41.235029187 -0400 Modify: 2008-10-15 09:44:41.235029187 -0400 Change: 2008-12-09 19:00:21.895757388 -0500 Turns out, the chmod/chgrp needed to be rerun on Monday/Tuesday this week. Is there a way for NBU to look at mtime instead of ctime? Thanks, Randy - Original Message - From: A Darren Dunham ddun...@taos.com To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential = Another Full On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:42:41AM -0800, Randy Doering wrote: Backup Client = Isilon NAS Unit - NDMP. NBU version is 6.5.3. With this?one (10+TBs, 1,643,099 files) during the backup NBU said it was doing a Differential, but when it was all done, it had actually backedup everything again. If I kick off another Differential this coming weekend, I certainly don't want to have yet another backup that gets all of the data once again. Any thoughts? Since this is NDMP, Netbackup isn't making any of the file level decisions. It's just passing a set of parameters to the host (dump level, date of backup, file path, tape drive, etc...) and letting the make the selections. I don't have it in my notes, but you can up the log level of ndmp on the isilon and view exactly what NBU is sending over. It'll show up in the ndmp logs. Ah. Found my notes... On any node of the cluster, edit the file /etc/mcp/templates/syslog.conf and change the line: *.=info /var/log/isi_ndmp_d to: *.* /var/log/isi_ndmp_d This should increase the logging levels on the cluster for ndmp. You may want to check with your support contacts before doing this, but it's just a log level change. With that in place, you can start a manual differential and see what it looks to be doing. You'll be able to kill it so it won't consume tapes for you. If nothing looks obviously wrong, you may have to contact support. Good luck! -- Darren ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential = Another Full
Greetings, Backup Client = Isilon NAS Unit - NDMP. NBU version is 6.5.3. Did Complete Fulls, with all of the /ifs/projects/ areas in the Backup Selection, starting on 11/26. This past weekend I kicked off Differential Incrementals for the same Backup Selections. All of the areas in that /ifs/projects appeared to have completed as expected except for one. With this one (10+TBs, 1,643,099 files) during the backup NBU said it was doing a Differential, but when it was all done, it had actually backedup everything again. I can go into Backup and Restore for this client, and choosing show all backups, it will show the Full that was started on 11/26 and will also show the Differential that was started on 12/6 with the same Modification date (prior to 11/26) for each. Wouldn't have noticed so much, but with it taking 4+ days and using 16 tapes, has got me wondering about it. If I kick off another Differential this coming weekend, I certainly don't want to have yet another backup that gets all of the data once again. Any thoughts? Thanks, Randy___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential = Another Full
Mystery solved - or so it seems. Last week we had a helpdesk ticket where the user wanted some chmod/chgrp modifications of all files/directories in this area. My co-worker did that on Thursday/Friday of last week. Seems this changes the ChangeTime (ctime), which NBU is using for determining if something has Changed. I then did a Differential, and it was looking at the ctime. For one of the files: stat error.txt File: `error.txt' Size: 338713 Blocks: 962IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 1dh/29d Inode: 4365470520 Links: 1 Access: (0664/-rw-rw-r--) Uid: ( 2370/ cgoina) Gid: ( 9003/jtc-solexa) Access: 2008-10-15 09:44:41.235029187 -0400 Modify: 2008-10-15 09:44:41.235029187 -0400 Change: 2008-12-09 19:00:21.895757388 -0500 Turns out, the chmod/chgrp needed to be rerun on Monday/Tuesday this week. Is there a way for NBU to look at mtime instead of ctime? Thanks, Randy - Original Message - From: A Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential = Another Full On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:42:41AM -0800, Randy Doering wrote: Backup Client = Isilon NAS Unit - NDMP. NBU version is 6.5.3. With this?one (10+TBs, 1,643,099 files) during the backup NBU said it was doing a Differential, but when it was all done, it had actually backedup everything again. If I kick off another Differential this coming weekend, I certainly don't want to have yet another backup that gets all of the data once again. Any thoughts? Since this is NDMP, Netbackup isn't making any of the file level decisions. It's just passing a set of parameters to the host (dump level, date of backup, file path, tape drive, etc...) and letting the make the selections. I don't have it in my notes, but you can up the log level of ndmp on the isilon and view exactly what NBU is sending over. It'll show up in the ndmp logs. Ah. Found my notes... On any node of the cluster, edit the file /etc/mcp/templates/syslog.conf and change the line: *.=info /var/log/isi_ndmp_d to: *.* /var/log/isi_ndmp_d This should increase the logging levels on the cluster for ndmp. You may want to check with your support contacts before doing this, but it's just a log level change. With that in place, you can start a manual differential and see what it looks to be doing. You'll be able to kill it so it won't consume tapes for you. If nothing looks obviously wrong, you may have to contact support. Good luck! -- Darren ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.3 - What is your experience?
My Error 196's (introduced in 6.5.2) have gone away. Randy From: Steve Hedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 3:08:01 PM Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.3 - What is your experience? NetBackup 6.5.3 has recently entered into a First Availability program. We in NetBackup development are excited with the comments and results we’ve seen with this new version in production and in test systems. What has been your experience? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
