Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread Tony T.

 It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on the volume so
 of course it will fragment.  Either defragment the volume or set the minimum
 threshold lower so that more files get deleted when the cleanup process runs
 to reduce the fragmentation.

.../Ed

 --
 Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the info guys.

It sounds like fragmentation is  just a given when it comes to backing up to
disk?  I understand that, as seeing it explained does make sense.  I have
been looking for some of this well documented information and have come up
empty.  Searching for fragmentation on Symantecs site is like a journey
through the looking glass.  I will keep looking, but if anyone has any links
to a white paper or something it would be much appreciated.

Also, when you say set the minimum threshold lower so that more files get
deleted...  This confused me; I mean, isn't the fragmentation being caused
by so many file creation/deletions?  Wouldn't increasing the amount of files
being deleted also increase the fragmentation?

Or did I misread that?

Thanks again for the info,

T.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)

Today's NTFS handles fragmentation alot better - in fact, FAT and FAT32
were really the main file systems that would always get fragmented. That
is not to say NTFS is not immune to the fragmentation that people may
experience, but there are ways around to minimise it even more.
 
Depending on the volume itself, and its intention is the key to keeping
fragmentation down. When you format a volume you get the option of a
cluster size. But you must be aware of what the volume itself will be
storing. (for example, large files, or millions of small files).
 
By default, when formatting, Windows keeps a default setting in place.
Choosing a smaller cluster variable will waste less disk space but
likely to cause fragmentation.
 
Likewise, a larger cluster variable will cause less fragmentation but
waste space. further details can be found in the online help of Win2k3,
XP, 2000, ect !
 
Not to put my foot in it, but I am sure other systems suffer, but maybe
its a NTFS thing ;-)
Simon.
 
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony T.
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:07 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation





It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on the
volume so of course it will fragment.  Either defragment the volume or
set the minimum threshold lower so that more files get deleted when the
cleanup process runs to reduce the fragmentation.

   .../Ed


-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the info guys.

It sounds like fragmentation is  just a given when it comes to backing
up to disk?  I understand that, as seeing it explained does make sense.
I have been looking for some of this well documented information and
have come up empty.  Searching for fragmentation on Symantecs site is
like a journey through the looking glass.  I will keep looking, but if
anyone has any links to a white paper or something it would be much
appreciated.

Also, when you say set the minimum threshold lower so that more files
get deleted...  This confused me; I mean, isn't the fragmentation being
caused by so many file creation/deletions?  Wouldn't increasing the
amount of files being deleted also increase the fragmentation?

Or did I misread that?

Thanks again for the info,

T.





This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread Sesar, Steven L.
I still think that MS's undelete feature plays a part in this. When
data is deleted in Windows, NTFS marks blocks to be released without
actually erasing them. Rather than reusing released blocks, NTFS
prefers new, unused blocks, which leads to fragmentation.

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:21 AM
To: Tony T.; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation

 

Today's NTFS handles fragmentation alot better - in fact, FAT and FAT32
were really the main file systems that would always get fragmented.
That is not to say NTFS is not immune to the fragmentation that people
may experience, but there are ways around to minimise it even more.

 

Depending on the volume itself, and its intention is the key to keeping
fragmentation down. When you format a volume you get the option of a
cluster size. But you must be aware of what the volume itself will be
storing. (for example, large files, or millions of small files).

 

By default, when formatting, Windows keeps a default setting in
place. Choosing a smaller cluster variable will waste less disk space
but likely to cause fragmentation.

 

Likewise, a larger cluster variable will cause less fragmentation but
waste space. further details can be found in the online help of Win2k3,
XP, 2000, ect !

 

Not to put my foot in it, but I am sure other systems suffer, but maybe
its a NTFS thing ;-)

Simon.

 

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony T.
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:07 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation

 


It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on
the volume so of course it will fragment.  Either defragment the volume
or set the minimum threshold lower so that more files get deleted when
the cleanup process runs to reduce the fragmentation.

   .../Ed


-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the info guys.

It sounds like fragmentation is  just a given when it comes to backing
up to disk?  I understand that, as seeing it explained does make sense.
I have been looking for some of this well documented information and
have come up empty.  Searching for fragmentation on Symantecs site is
like a journey through the looking glass.  I will keep looking, but if
anyone has any links to a white paper or something it would be much
appreciated.

Also, when you say set the minimum threshold lower so that more files
get deleted...  This confused me; I mean, isn't the fragmentation
being caused by so many file creation/deletions?  Wouldn't increasing
the amount of files being deleted also increase the fragmentation?

Or did I misread that?

Thanks again for the info,

T.

 

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and
all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)

H Not sure its common in NTFS though, however the older file
systems FAT  FAT32 definetely would play a part in this.
 
Saying that, if users continually delete files from the same volume and
they are restored from tape, would this increase fragmentation?



From: Sesar, Steven L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:51 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Tony T.; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation



I still think that MS's undelete feature plays a part in this. When
data is deleted in Windows, NTFS marks blocks to be released without
actually erasing them. Rather than reusing released blocks, NTFS prefers
new, unused blocks, which leads to fragmentation.

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:21 AM
To: Tony T.; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation

 

Today's NTFS handles fragmentation alot better - in fact, FAT and FAT32
were really the main file systems that would always get fragmented. That
is not to say NTFS is not immune to the fragmentation that people may
experience, but there are ways around to minimise it even more.

 

Depending on the volume itself, and its intention is the key to keeping
fragmentation down. When you format a volume you get the option of a
cluster size. But you must be aware of what the volume itself will be
storing. (for example, large files, or millions of small files).

 

By default, when formatting, Windows keeps a default setting in place.
Choosing a smaller cluster variable will waste less disk space but
likely to cause fragmentation.

 

Likewise, a larger cluster variable will cause less fragmentation but
waste space. further details can be found in the online help of Win2k3,
XP, 2000, ect !

 

Not to put my foot in it, but I am sure other systems suffer, but maybe
its a NTFS thing ;-)

Simon.

 

 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony T.
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:07 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy
fragmentation

 


It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on the
volume so of course it will fragment.  Either defragment the volume or
set the minimum threshold lower so that more files get deleted when the
cleanup process runs to reduce the fragmentation.

   .../Ed


-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the info guys.

It sounds like fragmentation is  just a given when it comes to backing
up to disk?  I understand that, as seeing it explained does make sense.
I have been looking for some of this well documented information and
have come up empty.  Searching for fragmentation on Symantecs site is
like a journey through the looking glass.  I will keep looking, but if
anyone has any links to a white paper or something it would be much
appreciated.

Also, when you say set the minimum threshold lower so that more files
get deleted...  This confused me; I mean, isn't the fragmentation being
caused by so many file creation/deletions?  Wouldn't increasing the
amount of files being deleted also increase the fragmentation?

Or did I misread that?

Thanks again for the info,

T.

 

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and
all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

 



This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread Jon Bousselot
I'm curious if the image fragment size has any impact on file system 
fragmentation?

I have used 2gb for disk staging on vxfs/solaris successfully, but I 
never got the DSU volume much past 80% full.



-Jon


 Today's NTFS handles fragmentation alot better - in fact, FAT and 
 FAT32 were really the main file systems that would always get 
 fragmented. That is not to say NTFS is not immune to the fragmentation 
 that people may experience, but there are ways around to minimise it 
 even more.
  
 Depending on the volume itself, and its intention is the key to 
 keeping fragmentation down. When you format a volume you get the 
 option of a cluster size. But you must be aware of what the volume 
 itself will be storing. (for example, large files, or millions of 
 small files).
  
 By default, when formatting, Windows keeps a default setting in 
 place. Choosing a smaller cluster variable will waste less disk space 
 but likely to cause fragmentation.
  
 Likewise, a larger cluster variable will cause less fragmentation but 
 waste space. further details can be found in the online help of 
 Win2k3, XP, 2000, ect !
  
 Not to put my foot in it, but I am sure other systems suffer, but 
 maybe its a NTFS thing ;-)
 Simon.
  

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-20 Thread Tony T.
On Feb 20, 2008 11:10 AM, Martin, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I have found through testing when we first added some 16TB of storage for
 Disk-2-Disk that your fragmentation is going to be directly related to how
 many simultaneous streams you write to a DSU/DSSU at a time.  In my testing,
 I got a minimum amount of fragmentation with 1-2 Streams, a bit worse with 4
 streams, and at my current 20 max streams we're completely 100% fragmented.
 Sysinternals has a took that allows you to look at your disks sector by
 sector to look for fragmentation, but its a bit difficult to you use on
 disks that are 1TB or better.

 I created this slide for a Netbackup Training presentation I did 6 months
 ago...


Wow, this is excellent! Thanks much for the insight.

T.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-19 Thread Tony T.
Has anyone heard of this issue? I have an environment where NBU 5.1 (plans
to get to 6.5.1 are in the works) is backing up to disk then staging to
tape.
The admins tell me that the area where the backups are going gets very
fragmented after each backup.  It is a Windows box, using NTFS.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-19 Thread rcarlisle
It is pretty well documented that any area you use for disk staging should
be defragmented regularly.
 
 
 
ReneƩ Carlisle 
ServerWare Corporation



 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony T.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:37 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation


Has anyone heard of this issue? I have an environment where NBU 5.1 (plans
to get to 6.5.1 are in the works) is backing up to disk then staging to
tape.
The admins tell me that the area where the backups are going gets very
fragmented after each backup.  It is a Windows box, using NTFS.






This Email has been scanned for all viruses by PAETEC Email Scanning
Services, utilizing MessageLabs proprietary SkyScan infrastructure. For more
information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock,
around the globe, visit http://www.paetec.com.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1: Disk staging causing heavy fragmentation

2008-02-19 Thread Ed Wilts
On Feb 19, 2008 12:37 PM, Tony T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone heard of this issue? I have an environment where NBU 5.1 (plans
 to get to 6.5.1 are in the works) is backing up to disk then staging to
 tape.
 The admins tell me that the area where the backups are going gets very
 fragmented after each backup.  It is a Windows box, using NTFS.


It's NTFS and you're creating and deleting a lot of files on the volume so
of course it will fragment.  Either defragment the volume or set the minimum
threshold lower so that more files get deleted when the cleanup process runs
to reduce the fragmentation.

   .../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu