Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
If you have windows, there is a great open source shell extension called tortoise SVN. I bought Versions assuming it would have merge abilities for the trunk (since, you know, it seems to be the most important of things to do with subversion) and was pretty upset last night when I found out I'd have to use windows. Tortoise SVN works great, though. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Bookmarks not working
I'm having the same problem, although I'm running Leopard. Any fixes? On Jul 18, 10:41 am, taurus lucatore...@gmail.com wrote: hello, i've the last version of Versions and Snow Leopard. When I create a bookmark and I create a working copy the application works great. But when I restart the application all the bookmarks are gone. Any known issue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Feature Request : Search
+1 here too. Am 06.08.2009 um 12:45 schrieb holgerh: +1 John C. Descy IT-Experte Sebastianstraße 7c D-85049 Ingolstadt Telefon: +49 - (0)841 - 135 48 33 Fax: +49 - (0)841 - 159 60 14 www.descy.de --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
FYI, merging is probably the most-requested feature — it would be nice to check through the Google Group archives before posting a new thread on it. Merging is important for many people, but realize that many people work only in trunk. The developers are well aware of the features of other SVN tools, and particularly TortoiseSVN. I trust that they want to make Versions the best SVN client possible, and not just on the Mac. Also realize that Pico Sofa have finite resources, compared to the open-source TortoiseSVN, and creating a polished app takes a lot of work. And just to be slightly contrary, I'd submit that commit and update are probably the most important of things to do with subversion. ;-) - Quinn On Aug 6, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Scott Klein wrote: If you have windows, there is a great open source shell extension called tortoise SVN. I bought Versions assuming it would have merge abilities for the trunk (since, you know, it seems to be the most important of things to do with subversion) and was pretty upset last night when I found out I'd have to use windows. Tortoise SVN works great, though. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Bookmarks not working
I've found removing the bookmark.plist and license file from user folder and starting again worked for me. On Jul 18, 10:41 am, taurus lucatore...@gmail.com wrote: hello, i've the last version of Versions and Snow Leopard. When I create a bookmark and I create a working copy the application works great. But when I restart the application all the bookmarks are gone. Any known issue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
On Aug 7, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Shan wrote: Even though it's brought up pretty much weekly, nobody on the Versions team has even hinted that they're working on it. The other decent OS X SVN client, Cornerstone, also lacks this feature, and they seem to be equally unresponsive (they don't even support SVN 1.6 yet). I'm giving the Versions team about a week to respond saying that they're working on it, before abandoning it and switching to Syncro SVN. Yes, it's written in Java, but supporting all basic SVN commands is better than not. http://www.syncrosvnclient.com Wow, I had forgotten how horrendous Syncro SVN looks. (It's like Eclipse's cousin, and I don't mean that as a compliment.) I can't even think where I might look to perform a merge... It makes me appreciate the Versions interface all the more. I think I'd rather merge by hand from Terminal than deal with such a busy, non-obvious interface. :-/ Please don't take offense at this, but personally I get tired of people making demands or issuing ultimatums on this list. As a consumer, you can vote with your dollars, but it's unbecoming to act as though one has a bigger stake in the app, let alone the mandate to order the developers around. I don't imagine that such was your intent, but similar emails seem to come off that way. Especially when you post to a group list rather than just leaving it between you and the devs — it has the feel of attempting the embarrass them publicly, and that doesn't win any friends. I happen to know that the devs are working hard on both 1.1 and 2.0 releases of Versions. Can you imagine that they would possibly NOT be working on merge? Given the pent-up demand, it would be borderline suicidal for the app. Nobody likes to hear it will be done when it's done, but it's a well-known fact that if you rush software, you get crappy software. (Anyone ever tried eating 30-minute brownies that have cooked for 5 minutes?) I'd rather wait for merge done right than deal with merge done poorly now. My 2¢, - Quinn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
Quinn, No offense taken. At first, I shared your opinion, but unfortunately given the utter silence from the Versions team, and lack of responses to any methods of communication other than this group, they really left me with no other options. I've waited patiently since the beta for any sort of hint that they'll be adding merge, yet week after week someone asks for merge to be a feature, with no feedback from the team. I don't feel that I'm more important than anyone else, but I'd rather let them know they're about to lose a customer now, rather than they just don't see me upgrade to 2.0 because I'm already gone. It's nice that you happen to know that 1.1 and 2.0 are being worked on, but all I can do IS imagine, because of the lack of communication from the Versions team. From what I've read on the group, they barely respond to sales requests, and almost never to support requests, until you come to this group and raise a ruckus. I'm not saying that the the feature needs to be done tomorrow, or even a timeline on when it might be done, I'm just asking that the team acknowledge a year's worth of complaints of users who need the functionality, and give us some hope that they're actually planning on doing something about it. Shan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Shan wrote: Quinn, No offense taken. At first, I shared your opinion, but unfortunately given the utter silence from the Versions team, and lack of responses to any methods of communication other than this group, they really left me with no other options. I've waited patiently since the beta for any sort of hint that they'll be adding merge, yet week after week someone asks for merge to be a feature, with no feedback from the team. I don't feel that I'm more important than anyone else, but I'd rather let them know they're about to lose a customer now, rather than they just don't see me upgrade to 2.0 because I'm already gone. It's nice that you happen to know that 1.1 and 2.0 are being worked on, but all I can do IS imagine, because of the lack of communication from the Versions team. From what I've read on the group, they barely respond to sales requests, and almost never to support requests, until you come to this group and raise a ruckus. I'm not saying that the the feature needs to be done tomorrow, or even a timeline on when it might be done, I'm just asking that the team acknowledge a year's worth of complaints of users who need the functionality, and give us some hope that they're actually planning on doing something about it. Shan Glad I haven't offended. I totally understand your sentiment, and agree that some degree transparency is generally beneficial. Something between stony silence and disclosing competitive secrets, of course. ;-) If a yes, we're working on it (and maybe a hint of timeframe?) is sufficient, I'm all in favor. If I didn't already have a dream job, I might be tempted to pursue working with Pico/Sofa on Versions, but that's not on the horizon right now. Maybe someday... - Quinn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Merging Branches Into Trunk
I have hope that they are working on it. http://twitter.com/thekarladam/status/2243960191 http://twitter.com/koenbok/status/2244407711 -Ray On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Quinn Taylor quinntay...@mac.com wrote: On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Shan wrote: I'm just asking that the team acknowledge a year's worth of complaints of users who need the functionality, and give us some hope that they're actually planning on doing something about it. Shan Glad I haven't offended. I totally understand your sentiment, and agree that some degree transparency is generally beneficial. Something between stony silence and disclosing competitive secrets, of course. ;-) If a yes, we're working on it (and maybe a hint of timeframe?) is sufficient, I'm all in favor. If I didn't already have a dream job, I might be tempted to pursue working with Pico/Sofa on Versions, but that's not on the horizon right now. Maybe someday... - Quinn --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
