Re: Merge feature
I have 3 mac users switching from PC in the office and using Versions, they are all crying for merge. So I guess that makes +3 On May 7, 4:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Yep, +1 here too. I introduced SVN to our shop in the last month. With our staff still grasping concepts, keeping all the interaction within one UI will encourage us all to become Versions evangelists, not to mention depend all the more on your tool instead of searching for alternatives. Cheers, -- Eric DB www.mydbsolution.com On Jun 14, 5:44 pm, Robin Charlton charlton.ro...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for me. Having recently moved from Perforce to SVN I'm a little surprised how poorly supported merging is (in general). In the past we'd create branches for any non-trivial development task and integrate back into the trunk only after acceptance testing. Whilst Perforce's clients are certainly no shining example of usability they do support a very capable merging GUI. Of course it is rather pricey in comparison. ;-) ~ Robin | m...@robincharlton.me | twitter: robincharlton 2009/6/14 echo goo...@echozone.com I bought and use Versions, and use Subcommander for svn merge + svn switch. I guess I'll add my +1 on the chance it might help to influence the developers, and add what I posted a year ago, expanding on Ray's suggestion to share how we use our tools.. Our workflow uses developer branches, that we merge from a dev branch. We then switch our working copy to the dev branch, merge remote dev with second source of our branch (now remote), then merge that back to remote dev branch, then switch our wc back to our branch. In Subcommander, merge is from a contextual menu of a revision (or span of revisions) from a log. switch is from a contextual menu from a browse repository view. On Jun 1, 7:30 am, Ray raimondi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never used a tool other than command line svn and a text editor to handle merges because all of my merging has been pretty simple. However, I would probably become more adventurous with what I used merging for if I had a good tool to help me with it. To make this thread more helpful to the Versions team, would people be willing to outline what they like or don't like about the merge tools they currently use? Then Versions may become even more of an obvious choice. -Ray --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
+1 for me. Having recently moved from Perforce to SVN I'm a little surprised how poorly supported merging is (in general). In the past we'd create branches for any non-trivial development task and integrate back into the trunk only after acceptance testing. Whilst Perforce's clients are certainly no shining example of usability they do support a very capable merging GUI. Of course it is rather pricey in comparison. ;-) ~ Robin | m...@robincharlton.me | twitter: robincharlton 2009/6/14 echo goo...@echozone.com I bought and use Versions, and use Subcommander for svn merge + svn switch. I guess I'll add my +1 on the chance it might help to influence the developers, and add what I posted a year ago, expanding on Ray's suggestion to share how we use our tools.. Our workflow uses developer branches, that we merge from a dev branch. We then switch our working copy to the dev branch, merge remote dev with second source of our branch (now remote), then merge that back to remote dev branch, then switch our wc back to our branch. In Subcommander, merge is from a contextual menu of a revision (or span of revisions) from a log. switch is from a contextual menu from a browse repository view. On Jun 1, 7:30 am, Ray raimondi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never used a tool other than command line svn and a text editor to handle merges because all of my merging has been pretty simple. However, I would probably become more adventurous with what I used merging for if I had a good tool to help me with it. To make this thread more helpful to the Versions team, would people be willing to outline what they like or don't like about the merge tools they currently use? Then Versions may become even more of an obvious choice. -Ray --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Another +1 from me. We're a cross-platform shop so I tend to use TortoiseSVN on Windows to do merges, but a fast, integrated merge window would make Versions much nicer to use. On May 7, 5:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Conflict resolution is a separate issue and feature from merge support — conflicts can occur even without branches or tags, and even with a single developer, so long as there are conflicting edits in multiple working copies. Out of curiosity, do other clients offer conflict resolution? In my experience, there is no single quick fix for conflicts — each case is different and requires human interaction to figure out which changes to use. (SVN 1.5 added interactive conflict resolution, but there is no way to automatically guess the right thing to do.) - Quinn On Jun 1, 2009, at 6:22 AM, iVira wrote: +1. Version such a great svn client in all other cases. But lack of conflicts resolving... I have to avoid revert my changes, update and add them again. It's such a headache On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to addmergesupport??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and themergefunctionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Merge feature
+1 here. On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
+1. Version such a great svn client in all other cases. But lack of conflicts resolving... I have to avoid revert my changes, update and add them again. It's such a headache On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to addmergesupport??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and themergefunctionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
I've never used a tool other than command line svn and a text editor to handle merges because all of my merging has been pretty simple. However, I would probably become more adventurous with what I used merging for if I had a good tool to help me with it. To make this thread more helpful to the Versions team, would people be willing to outline what they like or don't like about the merge tools they currently use? Then Versions may become even more of an obvious choice. -Ray --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Isn't it merging when you hold alt and drag the dir/file into the dir you want to merge with. On May 29, 9:30 am, denisa de...@riverocktech.com wrote: Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature. On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax elvery@gmail.com wrote: Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I discovered this was missing. svn switch too. On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier rwgr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I discovered this was missing. svn switch too. On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier rwgr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature. On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax elvery@gmail.com wrote: Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I discovered this was missing. svn switch too. On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier rwgr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Merge feature
+1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us. Thanks for answering. Regards, J-C --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Versions group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
