date:20060101

IT'S A DONE DEAL.
I tried deleting the imovie .plist file, restarted the computer,
repaired permissions, and ran my cron tasks.

It didn't work. I just saved the project using the highest setting
quicktime .mov file.

I started another iMovie project and burned it to iDVD 4 with no problem.

Then for the hell of it I deleted the .plist file again and reopened
the pesky iMovie 4 short. It shared Full Quality DV. Go figure.--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
> > iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
> > movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
> > archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
> > would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
> > difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be easier.
> 
> 
> i know its obvious...but try quitting out and restarting iMovie.
> usually these bugs smooth themselves out.
> you should be able to choose "Full Quality".
> 
> Jay
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Adventures in Videoblogging
> 
> 
> 
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: iMovie4 - won't share still clips as DV file, why?

IT'S A DONE DEAL.
I tried deleting the imovie .plist file, restarted the computer,
repaired permissions, and ran my cron tasks.

It didn't work. I just saved the project using the highest setting
quicktime .mov file.

I started another iMovie project and burned it to iDVD 4 with no problem.

Then for the hell of it I deleted the .plist file again and reopened
the pesky iMovie 4 short. It shared Full Quality DV. Go figure.--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ermmm, It doesn't let you save it as full quality? 
> share.>quicktime>full quality
> this is a DV file.
> Save it as a .mov, get a new imovie project going, import the .mov file 
> and then share it as full quality.
> 
> It does sound odd though.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 2 Jan 2006, at 00:16, francisco_daum wrote:
> 
> > I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
> >  iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
> >  movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
> >  archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
> >  would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
> >  difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be
easier.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Individual
> > Fireant
> > Typepad
> > Use
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > âª  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >  
> > âª  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> > âª  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> > Service.
> >
> >
> >
> Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
> 
> http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
> 
> It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] professional vlog start up

2006-01-01 Thread Misha Kleider

hi,

i would like to start up a fancy looking vlog.  is movable type the format 
to use or should i make my own set up starting from scratch? what would you 
recommend. oh, what does rocket boom or other really successful vlogs use?

thanks,

kind regards, misha kleider




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: iMovie4 - won't share still clips as DV file, why?

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "francisco_daum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
> iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
> movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
> archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
> would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
> difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be easier.
>

IT'S A DONE DEAL.
I tried deleting the imovie .plist file, restarted the computer,
repaired permissions, and ran my cron tasks.

It didn't work. I just saved the project using the highest setting
quicktime .mov file.

I started another iMovie project and burned it to iDVD 4 with no problem.

Then for the hell of it I deleted the .plist file again and reopened
the pesky iMovie 4 short. It shared Full Quality DV. Go figure.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] chinese videolbog

as some of you may know...im obsessed with chinese videobloggers.
there are so few that I can find.
i just found the latest:
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/129742

eventhough language is still a barrier, i think its exciting and
important for people to start throwing media into the same ring.
somehow the bridge makers will do the connecting.

china has over a billion people...let the video flow.

jay

--
Adventures in Videoblogging





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: Best quality video?

2006-01-01 Thread Rob Parrish

Ok here we go.

All the software I mention you can find via Google, and they are all
shareware or free.

You download the MPEG2

Then you use bbDEMUX to demux it.  I'm not an expert on this, but
demux means you are separating out the video and audio portions of the
file.

You take the video portion to DiVA and you convert the file to full
720x480, 30 fps.

Then you use MAD Play to convert the audio to an AIFF.  

You can then remarry the video and the audio in Final Cut or whatever
you use to edit.

I'm doing this from memory, but I think its all right.  Feel free to
e-mail off list if you run into problems.

Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Harold Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Rob,
> 
> Ultimately, I will be compressing for the 'net, but I like to begin all
> projects with the best possible quality to edit from.  Would you mind
> explaining how to use the MPEG2 file?  I'm currently on a Mac,
though I do
> have part-time access to a PC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Harold
> 
> On 12/31/05, Rob Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Harold Johnson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've found a Public Domain video on the Internet Archive
> > (archive.org) that
> > > I want to sample from:
> > >
> > > http://www.archive.org/details/Medicusc1939_3
> > >
> > > The video is available in several formats, and I want to use the
best
> > > available quality video to begin editing/sampling from.  Which
of the
> > > available formats is the best?  Here's what's available:
> > >
> > > 64Kb MPEG4
> > >
> >

> > (20
> > > MB)
> > > 256Kb MPEG4
> > >
> >
 > >(47
> > > MB)
> > > Cinepack
> > (58
> > > MB)
> > > MPEG1
> >
(191
> > > MB)
> > > MPEG4
> > >
> >
 > >(209
> > > MB)
> > > MPEG2
> >
(507
> > > MB)
> > >
> > > Thanks for guiding fledging videoblogger,
> > >
> > > Harold J. Johnson
> > > http://podcasterherald.com
> > >
> >
> > Well Harold, you ask a complicated question.  If you're just going to
> > compress for the web, I don't know the best answer.  However, if you
> > want to have a 720x480, 30fps version, then MPEG2 is the way to go.
> > The conversion process is a bit time consuming, but you end up with a
> > very good looking movie.  It can be done with freeware.  Let me know
> > if that is is what you want and I'll tell you how to do it.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  SPONSORED LINKS
> >  
Individual
> >
Fireant
> >
Typepad
> >
Use
> >  --
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> >-  Visit your group
"videoblogging"
> >on the web.
> >
> >-  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >-  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> >Service .
> >
> >
> >  --
> >
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Devlon




We (you know who) replace the pornographic feed's thumbnail with an advisory-style image so the content isn't censored, or filtered, but at least grandma, or little joey don't have bare asses, etc thrown in their faces.  
We have to do this manually right now, and if the content is really nasty then we'd pull itthe porn, pull the porn off the site that is.  (Yeesh, hard to avoid the puns isn't it.)
On 1/1/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold itback are worthy.

Spam, Dupes, Tests, and non-vlog video content are some of the reasons why I have chosen not to pull in all the 'feeds' that exist out there onto my site at 
vlogdir.com.  Someone needs to take a few minutes of their time to add a videoblog entry to vlogdir.  This person, so far 
99.9% of the time, is typcially the vlog/channel author.  They are interested to share and expose their content.My letting VLOGDIR be a user-driven and thus commuity-driven directory, it acts as a very passive filter.  I dont have to worry about removing crap... once or twice I had to remove a commercial entry that was not a vlog, just some infomercial... but I deal with it as they come in.  
If I took in all the feeds from all the different sites out there, i'd have a headache that i dont need and more noise in the directory for the audience.    Though vlogdir is an open system, at this point i see a benefit to not sucking in a spitting out every single rs feed that may exist across a group of video hosting sites.  Less is More and all that.   I'm not saying it is right or wrong, just is what it is right now based on my opinion and specifically related to the core directory.  I could in an hour or so build a new page that takes in all the newest video posted and generate and aggreagate an RSS feed for it.  I might do that actually.  But that would be just a vlogospheric feed and not the actual directory.  So, their are ways to make availabel the actual video content that is being spewed out from all over... without potentially corrupting a directory with the everything and anything system.
I have not had any porn vlogs added to vlogdir but if they come, i'll evaluate what to do (go ahead, insert joke here).On 1/1/06, 
Enric <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> We>> as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say> *something*...>

> Sexual content is just a type of content.  Like extreme sports.  If it> is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.>> Of course, if a site says , "NO PORN" then they have to undertake the
> tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system.>There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold itback are worthy.  -- Enric> I know that 
Veoh.com allows adult and gives you the ability to tag it> as such.  That way, unles you change your default settings, you would
> never see the risque content in searches or on the site.
>> -Halcyon> www.SpreadingThePink.com> 
www.PinkBroadcasting.com On 1/1/06, Paul Knight <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Dear all,> >> > On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through> > the net and landed writhing on the pages of 

blip.tv It is also> > happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am> > talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know> > about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
> > these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safehaven for> > me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artisticvalue and> > creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
> > bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the> > worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get suckedinto> > porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
> > make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's> > come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.> >> > Paul Knight> >> >
> > Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog> >> > http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
> >> > It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
> >> >> >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links> >> >> >> >> >> >>  --> 

www.SpreadingThePink.com>Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- 
sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born"- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
http://vlogdir.com
 - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggre

Re: [videoblogging] iMovie4 - won't share still clips as DV file, why?

> I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
> iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
> movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
> archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
> would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
> difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be easier.


i know its obvious...but try quitting out and restarting iMovie.
usually these bugs smooth themselves out.
you should be able to choose "Full Quality".

Jay



--
Adventures in Videoblogging





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] new guy

Here's a new videoblog in Amsterdam:
http://www.macdocman.com/

Michael Schaap is some kind of TV journalist/comedian.
someone told me he was well-known locally.
he came to VlogEurope..and was extremely skeptical and obnoxious at first.
by the second day, we had all won him over on how cool videoblogging was.

he keeps talkign about some big plan he hasso stay tuned.
leave a comment so he fels the love...or hate.

Jay


--
Adventures in Videoblogging





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Michael Sullivan




There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold itback are worthy.
Spam, Dupes, Tests, and non-vlog video content are some of the reasons why I have chosen not to pull in all the 'feeds' that exist out there onto my site at vlogdir.com.  Someone needs to take a few minutes of their time to add a videoblog entry to vlogdir.  This person, so far 
99.9% of the time, is typcially the vlog/channel author.  They are interested to share and expose their content.My letting VLOGDIR be a user-driven and thus commuity-driven directory, it acts as a very passive filter.  I dont have to worry about removing crap... once or twice I had to remove a commercial entry that was not a vlog, just some infomercial... but I deal with it as they come in.  
If I took in all the feeds from all the different sites out there, i'd have a headache that i dont need and more noise in the directory for the audience.    Though vlogdir is an open system, at this point i see a benefit to not sucking in a spitting out every single rs feed that may exist across a group of video hosting sites.  Less is More and all that.   I'm not saying it is right or wrong, just is what it is right now based on my opinion and specifically related to the core directory.  I could in an hour or so build a new page that takes in all the newest video posted and generate and aggreagate an RSS feed for it.  I might do that actually.  But that would be just a vlogospheric feed and not the actual directory.  So, their are ways to make availabel the actual video content that is being spewed out from all over... without potentially corrupting a directory with the everything and anything system.
I have not had any porn vlogs added to vlogdir but if they come, i'll evaluate what to do (go ahead, insert joke here).On 1/1/06, Enric <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:--- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> We>> as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say> *something*...>
> Sexual content is just a type of content.  Like extreme sports.  If it> is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.>> Of course, if a site says , "NO PORN" then they have to undertake the
> tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system.>There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold itback are worthy.  -- Enric> I know that 
Veoh.com allows adult and gives you the ability to tag it> as such.  That way, unles you change your default settings, you would> never see the risque content in searches or on the site.
>> -Halcyon> www.SpreadingThePink.com> www.PinkBroadcasting.com On 1/1/06, Paul Knight <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Dear all,> >> > On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through> > the net and landed writhing on the pages of 
blip.tv It is also> > happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am> > talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know> > about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
> > these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safehaven for> > me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artisticvalue and> > creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
> > bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the> > worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get suckedinto> > porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
> > make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's> > come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.> >> > Paul Knight> >> >
> > Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog> >> > http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com> >> > It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
> >> >> >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links> >> >> >> >> >> >>  --> 
www.SpreadingThePink.com>Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born"- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com
 - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe

[videoblogging] smil with text tracks - sometimes not displaying until you rew to start of movie and playback?

2006-01-01 Thread Kathy O'Donnell




hiya, hoping someone might be able to point out a quirk I'm seeing with quicktime & smil movies. I tried out Andreas' Linukbator and then read some of the quicktime docos & modified the file so it links to a couple of movies and audio and has some text (+ the bug from linkubator). I'm just testing at the moment to see how it works, but I don't know if it's just because I'm cached.. but sometimes the text just displays the text region rectangle with no text, but then if you reverse back to the start of the movie and hit play again it works. same thing happens when it changes text part way through the movie, if u rewind and play it comes good. has anyone else seen this? and is there a workaround? I've tried clearing my cache but it still does it. 
http://www.aliak.com/files/smile.mov has the problem (or see code below) if u have time/interest to take a look. (don't worry about the content, just testing atm)
thanks for your helpKath=SMILtext
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/resources/smilextensions" qt:autoplay="false" qt:time-slider="true" qt:immediate-instantiation="true">        
                
                
                        http://www.aliak.com/mp3/big_banana_switch_vs_mcguyver.mp3
" id="song" end="54sec" />         http://www.archive.org/download/Bangalore_sport/bangalore_sport.mov
" begin="0sec" end="34sec" />                
                http://www.aliak.com" show="new" qt:target="_blank">            
                http://www.archive.org/download/colours_of_Auckland/20051227_colours_of_auckland_320x240.mov
" begin="31sec" end="54sec" />        http://www.aliak.com/blog/" show="new" >          
                
-- http://www.aliak.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

good one

On 2 Jan 2006, at 00:32, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:

At 23:03 + 1/1/06, Paul Knight wrote:
 >I should get paid for this you know.

 Does "paid out" count?



SPONSORED LINKS 
Individual 
Fireant 
Typepad 
Use 

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

▪ 	 Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  
▪ 	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
▪ 	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog

http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com

It's worth a laugh and work friendly.

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Loiez D.

The porn is not authorized on Dailymotion.  Dailymotion is a French  
company.  For an open site under 18 years old it's the French law.   
There is moderators on Daily and you can  announce an abuse under  
each video (porn, racism..)

Loiez (Because  i am also a father)

Le 1 janv. 06 à 09:37, Paul Knight a écrit :

> On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
> the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
> happening in Dailymotion.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest

At 23:03 + 1/1/06, Paul Knight wrote:
>I should get paid for this you know.

Does "paid out" count?


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] iMovie4 - won't share still clips as DV file, why?

Ermmm, It doesn't let you save it as full quality? share.>quicktime>full quality
this is a DV file.
Save it as a .mov, get a new imovie project going, import the .mov file and then share it as full quality.

It does sound odd though.

Paul


On 2 Jan 2006, at 00:16, francisco_daum wrote:

I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
 iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
 movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
 archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
 would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
 difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be easier.






SPONSORED LINKS 
Individual 
Fireant 
Typepad 
Use 

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

▪ 	 Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  
▪ 	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
▪ 	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog

http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com

It's worth a laugh and work friendly.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Eddie Codel

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:17:54AM -, Enric wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We
> > 
> > as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say
> > *something*...
> > 
> > Sexual content is just a type of content.  Like extreme sports.  If it
> > is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.
> > 
> > Of course, if a site says , "NO PORN" then they have to undertake the
> > tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system.
> > 
> 
> There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold it
> back are worthy.

Most people would agree that spam is not a content type that people WANT
to watch. The same can't always be said for porn.

Seems like a bigger issue is how does someone like blip or Veoh deal
with the newly expanded 2257 reporting requirements? Wouldn't they be 
considered a
"secondary producer" in the eyes of the feds?

-eddie

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Enric

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We
> 
> as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say
> *something*...
> 
> Sexual content is just a type of content.  Like extreme sports.  If it
> is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.
> 
> Of course, if a site says , "NO PORN" then they have to undertake the
> tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system.
> 

There's also a deluge of spam on open systems.  Actions to hold it
back are worthy.

  -- Enric


> I know that Veoh.com allows adult and gives you the ability to tag it
> as such.  That way, unles you change your default settings, you would
> never see the risque content in searches or on the site.
> 
> -Halcyon
> www.SpreadingThePink.com
> www.PinkBroadcasting.com
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/1/06, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
> > the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
> > happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am
> > talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know
> > about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
> > these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe
haven for
> > me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic
value and
> > creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
> > bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the
> > worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get sucked
into
> > porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
> > make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's
> > come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.
> >
> > Paul Knight
> >
> >
> > Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
> >
> > http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
> >
> > It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> www.SpreadingThePink.com
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] iMovie4 - won't share still clips as DV file, why?

I've got an iMovie 4 movie composed entirely of jpegs from a shared
iPhoto 2 library. They have transitions and Ken Burns effects. The
movie can be saved using all options except as a DV file. For now, my
archive of this movie is the original movie folder- about 2 GBs. I
would rather have a DV file though. 1.5 GB's of storage isn't much of
difference but compiling DV files in a single project would be easier.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Halcyon Lujah

We

as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say
*something*...

Sexual content is just a type of content.  Like extreme sports.  If it
is labeled properly, I don't see the problem.

Of course, if a site says , "NO PORN" then they have to undertake the
tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system.

I know that Veoh.com allows adult and gives you the ability to tag it
as such.  That way, unles you change your default settings, you would
never see the risque content in searches or on the site.

-Halcyon
www.SpreadingThePink.com
www.PinkBroadcasting.com

On 1/1/06, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
> the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
> happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am
> talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know
> about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
> these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for
> me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and
> creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
> bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the
> worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get sucked into
> porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
> make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's
> come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.
>
> Paul Knight
>
>
> Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
>
> http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
>
> It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
www.SpreadingThePink.com

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

I should get paid for this you know.

Paul

On 1 Jan 2006, at 22:34, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:

>both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for
 >me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and
 >creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
 >bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.

 Gotta say, this is a classic line. :-)

 Regards,
   Richard

 -- 
 Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
 Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

▪ 	 Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.

▪ 	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

▪ 	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog

http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com

It's worth a laugh and work friendly.

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest

>both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for
>me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and
>creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
>bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.

Gotta say, this is a classic line. :-)

Regards,
  Richard

-- 
Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

> On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
> the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
> happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am
> talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know
> about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
> these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for
> me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and
> creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
> bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the
> worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get sucked into
> porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
> make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's
> come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.

agreed.
plenty of other places for porn.
speaking of...here's one Swordfight's remedy: remix porn

http://www.destroyhotaction.com/

Jay

--
Adventures in Videoblogging





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] WANTED: Looking for Vloggers to be Discussion Panelist on Tues Jan 10th

2006-01-01 Thread Its A Mystery and So Im I


Hi,

My nake is Jerry Hart and run a local Sony Vegas 
Users Group. We have meetings at B&H on the first 
or second Tuesday(6pm) of the month.  I would to 
speak  to NY/BJ vloggers who would like to share 
their work and knowledge about the subject with 
newbies.

I'm specifically looking for vloggers
that fit one of the following:

* Documentary/Filmmaker
* Educator
* Activist
* Vlogging Service Provider Rep

If you're interested, please contact me
off-line at [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Thank you in advance.


Jerry Hart
NYSVUG 
Co-Moderator







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Enric

Charles Hope wrote:

>Paul Knight wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
>> the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
>> happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am
>> talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.
>
>Thanks for notifying us. We do our best to remove such content when
we >notice it on blip. But we have no automagical way to detect
>inappropriate content, and this particular post happened to be posted
>at 2 in the morning on a holiday night when most good Americans 
>are otherwise occupied.

LeNxO, http://enric.blip.tv/posts/?user=LeNxO, has reposted that porn
as "Nothing good", http://enric.blip.tv/file/8074.  There's also at
least one other new porn entry, firstcast, http://blip.tv/file/8082.








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: for the wordpress users....

2006-01-01 Thread Edmund Yeo

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "taoofdavid65" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Edmund...
> 
> Not sure if this would work for you however there is a plugin to embed
> Flash. It's called Kimili Flash Embed.
> 
> http://www.kimili.com/journal/38/kimili-flash-embed---wordpress-edition
> 
> No idea if it will work in Wordpress 2.0 though?
> 
> David
> http://www.taoofdavid.com
> 

Nope, it doesn't work with Wordpress.

Based on the last few comments on that Kimili page, it seems that all
Wordpress 2.0. users are suffering from what I'm suffering too.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] daughter's new vlog!

2006-01-01 Thread Richard Show




My daughter, Lisa, just created a video blog with her first video, which is short an entertaining, involving a dog, and a song.Please visit and comment!thanks! ... Richardvlog:
http://ravenesse.blogspot.com/feed:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheGrasshopperAtYourFeet-- Richard 
http://www.richardshow.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[videoblogging] Re: The Best Codec

2006-01-01 Thread Steve Watkins

YOu expressed surprise as to why the Real format hadnt won the format
war, I see the comments from people about the negative sides of real
as being the reasons why it shouldnt be surprising.

Factors that influence videoblogging codec choices include:

Image quality/filesize
Encoding time
Cost/availability of encoder & its integration into existing (& free)
video editing apps
Advice in various videoblogging guides
What percentage of net users have the required player software &
whether it sucks
Compatibility with hardware eg ipod

Additional reasons why Real is very far behind, indeed a minority
format for videoblogging, include:

The already mentioned evils of the player, really puts people off
People associate it with its roots, streaming & protected content on
large media sites
Lack of support for loading/editing/converting real files in quite a
few apps
Generally an unpopular container format, avi on windows and mov on mac
remain prevalent due to historical use, with a movement towards wmv
(also quite unpopular container) and mp4.

I dont really undersatnd why you'd be a fan of real if you are againt
monopolyware. Real is jsut as bad. Why not embrace a format like .mp4
container with mpeg4 video, as it isnt controlled by any one company.
Choice of encoder, choice of player. Just because Aple is doing a lot
of the visible stuff with promoting .mp4, doesnt mean they control it,
eg realplayer can play mpeg4 too if you tell it too.

I guess its probably really the filesize/quality issue that has won
you over? Thats fair enough, just cant avoid the fact that other
people may balance factors differently and so thats why real isnt used
much, it scores poorly on other fronts. 

What bitrate etc are you using to achieve the quality/filesize that
you are happy with in real? I would like to compare it to a few
things, as I am also very much influenced by quality factors.

Cheers

Steve of Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael MARZIO
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andreas, Happy New Year to you,
> I know that the real PLAYER sucks - I said as much myself in the
part of my message you snipped out. But if you embed your real media
on your web pages, then you don't get any of the crap, and you also
get the most efficient codec. Pop-up blockers limit the damage if you
use their player as a stand-alone. I am not defending these guys, they
really do suck, but I much prefer uploading a small RM file of good
quality than a mov file taking up much more disk space, of the same
video with same quality. And WMV - well, there is a war going on, and
I still prefer alternatives to Windows monopolyware. Also, Apple is
not an innocent by-stander. They do their best to steal the file
associations too, and also insist that their player remains ON TOP
when playing, one thing that the sucky real player people do NOT do.
> 
> Also, if you're using Windows, there are great free tools to get the
real player completely out of the registry in seconds.
> All my users get a tinyurl shortcut directly to the final step for
download page of the sucky free real player. Makes it very easy to find.
> 
> There are no ideal solutions, are there?
> I just went to your site and see that you embed MOVs. Well, if you
EMBED RMs, the result is exactly the same. All the crap you bring up
in your reply only occurs when you use the real player as a standalone.
> 
> Mike Marzio
> www.real-english.com
> 
> 
> 
>  Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:34:34 +0100
>   From: "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: The Best Codec
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100, Michael MARZIO  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My conclusion is that RM files are absolutely the best hands down,
and I  
> > just don't understand why Real Networks or Real Media or whatever  
> > they're called, haven't won the codec war already.
> [SNIP]
> > I'm sure others are interested in keeping file sizes down and
quality  
> > up. Why do I seem to be the only one who has reached this
conclusion in  
> > favor of RM?
> In case you haven't noticed it the Real Player sucks. It's
impossible to  
> find the free player on their website, it's a real drag on slower  
> computers, it installs all kinds of crap and hijacks half the file
types  
> on the computer. Even when you think you've uninstalled the player
you get  
> these pop-ups above the system tray notifying you of "great offers"
and  
> the likes.
> They can have the best codec in the world, but until they make a
player  
> that works *with* the users instead of against the users no one is
going  
> to watch those videos.
> - Andreas
> -- 
> http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Harold Johnson

LOL, Paul -- I'm with you on that. Porn is a powerful vacuum when you're trying to focus on your creative endeavors, especially when they involve sitting in front of your PC. (I speak from personal experience; just listen to my podcast, "Truth (Pt 2)" at
http://www.somethingthathappened.com/2005/12/truth-part-two-contributorsbrendan.html ) Harold J. JohnsonSomethingThatHappened.com
On 1/1/06, Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear all,

On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through
the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also
happening in Dailymotion. Although a lot softer core. The video I am
talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX. I don't know
about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me
these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for
me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and
creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the
bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper. I have found that the
worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get sucked into
porn. Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to
make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's
come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.

Paul Knight

Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog

http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com

It's worth a laugh and work friendly.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Best Codec

2006-01-01 Thread Harold Johnson




Happy New Year, Michael,Just in regards to this one point you made: I don't believe it helps most users that there are free tools to get Realplayer out of the registry; most folks aren't going to want to hassle with that stuff.  I used to be a big proponet of Realmedia myself, and it'd be great to see them succeed again; the more competition the better, in my opinion.  They've got to make it easy as possible for the consumers (and participants) of content to use, though.
Harold J. JohnsonSomething That Happened:I Woke Up on Day 1 Without a Headachehttp://SomethingThatHappened.comOn 1/1/06, 
Michael MARZIO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, if you're using Windows, there are great free tools to get the real player completely out of the registry in seconds.


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[videoblogging] Re: The Best Codec

2006-01-01 Thread Michael MARZIO

Andreas, Happy New Year to you,
I know that the real PLAYER sucks - I said as much myself in the part of my message you snipped out. But if you embed your real media on your web pages, then you don't get any of the crap, and you also get the most efficient codec. Pop-up blockers limit the damage if you use their player as a stand-alone. I am not defending these guys, they really do suck, but I much prefer uploading a small RM file of good quality than a mov file taking up much more disk space, of the same video with same quality. And WMV - well, there is a war going on, and I still prefer alternatives to Windows monopolyware. Also, Apple is not an innocent by-stander. They do their best to steal the file associations too, and also insist that their player remains ON TOP when playing, one thing that the sucky real player people do NOT do.Also, if you're using Windows, there are great free tools to get the real player completely out of the registry in seconds.All my users get a tinyurl shortcut directly to the final step for download page of the sucky free real player. Makes it very easy to find.There are no ideal solutions, are there?
I just went to your site and see that you embed MOVs. Well, if you EMBED RMs, the result is exactly the same. All the crap you bring up in your reply only occurs when you use the real player as a standalone.Mike Marziowww.real-english.com

Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:34:34 +0100 From: "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: The Best Codec
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100, Michael MARZIO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My conclusion is that RM files are absolutely the best hands down, and I > just don't understand why Real Networks or Real Media or whatever > they're called, haven't won the codec war already.
[SNIP]
> I'm sure others are interested in keeping file sizes down and quality > up. Why do I seem to be the only one who has reached this conclusion in > favor of RM?
In case you haven't noticed it the Real Player sucks. It's impossible to find the free player on their website, it's a real drag on slower computers, it installs all kinds of crap and hijacks half the file types on the computer. Even when you think you've uninstalled the player you get these pop-ups above the system tray notifying you of "great offers" and the likes.
They can have the best codec in the world, but until they make a player that works *with* the users instead of against the users no one is going to watch those videos.
- Andreas-- http://www.solitude.dk/ >Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.

[videoblogging] Re: for the wordpress users....

2006-01-01 Thread taoofdavid65

Edmund...

Not sure if this would work for you however there is a plugin to embed
Flash. It's called Kimili Flash Embed.

http://www.kimili.com/journal/38/kimili-flash-embed---wordpress-edition

No idea if it will work in Wordpress 2.0 though?

David
http://www.taoofdavid.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Edmund Yeo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hmm, I'll give it a try too then. I had some trouble trying to embed
> flash files (the ones from vSocial, hehe) on my www.swiftyworks.com
> site. Weird.
> 
> Edmund Yeo
> http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "taoofdavid65" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > A few tweaks here and there an my upgrade was rather painless as well.
> > A simple understanding of web design is all it takes.
> > 
> > Lisa, I use Mudbombs WYSIWYG editor. You might have better luck with
> > that.
> http://mudbomb.com/archives/2005/02/02/wysiwyg-plugin-for-wordpress/
> > 
> > David
> > http://www.taoofdavid.com
> >
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: for the wordpress users....

2006-01-01 Thread Edmund Yeo

Eeek, I'm at 2.0 too. It IS WYSIWYG. But I just can't seem to embed
anything. Especially flash files. Gah.

Edmund
http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had to fix a bunch of bugs in my code, but I'm now at 2.0
> 
> ;-)
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[videoblogging] Re: for the wordpress users....

2006-01-01 Thread Edmund Yeo

Hmm, I'll give it a try too then. I had some trouble trying to embed
flash files (the ones from vSocial, hehe) on my www.swiftyworks.com
site. Weird.

Edmund Yeo
http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "taoofdavid65" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> A few tweaks here and there an my upgrade was rather painless as well.
> A simple understanding of web design is all it takes.
> 
> Lisa, I use Mudbombs WYSIWYG editor. You might have better luck with
> that.
http://mudbomb.com/archives/2005/02/02/wysiwyg-plugin-for-wordpress/
> 
> David
> http://www.taoofdavid.com
>  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] The Best Codec

2006-01-01 Thread Andreas Haugstrup

On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:03:05 +0100, Michael MARZIO  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My conclusion is that RM files are absolutely the best hands down, and I  
> just don't understand why Real Networks or Real Media or whatever  
> they're called, haven't won the codec war already.

[SNIP]

> I'm sure others are interested in keeping file sizes down and quality  
> up. Why do I seem to be the only one who has reached this conclusion in  
> favor of RM?

In case you haven't noticed it the Real Player sucks. It's impossible to  
find the free player on their website, it's a real drag on slower  
computers, it installs all kinds of crap and hijacks half the file types  
on the computer. Even when you think you've uninstalled the player you get  
these pop-ups above the system tray notifying you of "great offers" and  
the likes.

They can have the best codec in the world, but until they make a player  
that works *with* the users instead of against the users no one is going  
to watch those videos.

- Andreas
-- 
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

2006-01-01 Thread Charles HOPE







Paul Knight wrote:

Dear all,
  
On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through 
the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also 
happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am 
talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX. 
  

Thanks for notifying us. We do our best to remove such content when we
notice it on blip. But we have no automagical way to detect
inappropriate content, and this particular post happened to be posted
at 2 in the morning on a holiday night when most good Americans are
otherwise occupied.


-- 
Unlike most marine mammals, otters do not have a layer of insulating blubber, and even the marine sea otter must come ashore regularly to wash its coat in fresh water.





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[videoblogging] The Best Codec

2006-01-01 Thread Michael MARZIO

Hi All - I'm a new member with an important question. Happy 2006.
Nearly two years ago, I did a lot of experimentation with the different codecs for the big 3 players (rm, mov, wmv), trying to figure out which was the best codec for the audience. I define "best" as the smallest file size for the same subjective quality for all 3 codecs, all 3 players.
Things were simpler then. We chose one audience, for example all users capable of streaming at 256 Kbps as our target audience. Now we have these elastic codecs. As a "member of the the audience", MP4, MOV, and WMV files, originally encoded at 320 x 240 size will transform themselves to as much as 640 x 480 in my experience, when my DSL connection is really feeling its oats.
I don't want my videos to get bigger than 320 x 240. They are usually embedded in a web page where a size change is theoretically impossible anyway.
My question: what is **the best codec for single rate clips at 320 x 240** size? I spent a long time, I mean like a good 3 weeks, trying to answer the question on my own, simply by trying out all the settings possible in every format, always using the same raw avi clip as the starting point. My conclusion is that RM files are absolutely the best hands down, and I just don't understand why Real Networks or Real Media or whatever they're called, haven't won the codec war already.
Big disclaimer: I have no interest in this company, and I hate their pop-ups, and I even hate them more for trying to steal all the multimedia file associations on my computers, but they sure as hell have got the most efficient codec. Whether I use the old free real producer 8, or the newer Real Producer 10 plus which cost me $, the results are the same: for the same visual quality, admittedly a subjective affair, MOV and WMV files are at least TWICE AS LARGE AS THE CORRESPONDING RMs.
Recently, after visiting a lot of vlogs, I see so many people using MOVs and WMVs, and like everybody else, I'm using Quicktime Pro 7 to make MP4s for Google Beta Video, so I redid my experiments and came up with the same conclusions. Despite this, RM is the ONLY FORMAT that some free vlog sites do NOT accept! I'm sure others are interested in keeping file sizes down and quality up. Why do I seem to be the only one who has reached this conclusion in favor of RM?
Mike Marziohttp://www.real-english.comhttp://www.realenglish.tm.fr/

[videoblogging] XXX on Blip.tv

Dear all,

On the subject of Pornography, something seems to have slipped through 
the net and landed writhing on the pages of blip.tv It is also 
happening in Dailymotion.  Although a lot softer core.  The video I am 
talking about is called XXX and was posted by LeNoX.  I don't know 
about you but, although I have nothing against pornography, but for me 
these video sites both blip and dailymotion used to be a safe haven for 
me away from porn where I could concentrate, more on artistic value and 
creativity rather than having to suppress the urge to run to the 
bathroom every five minutes for tissue paper.  I have found that the 
worst thing you need when you have vloggers block is to get sucked into 
porn.  Or maybe I take this whole thing a bit too seriously, I wish to 
make films, I wish to share my creativity, it's enough when corpo's 
come on ranting about companies, I think that sucks also, big time.

Paul Knight


Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog

http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com

It's worth a laugh and work friendly.



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [videoblogging] convert to .wmv