[videoblogging] Problems with Archive.org and RSS
I have a couple of feeds that are hosted at the Archive website. They are: http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeocachingVideozineDivx and http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeocachingVideozineH264 I uploaded a new episode however when I use my rss reader (Juice and iTunes) I'm only getting a partial download. When I got to the Archive site, I can download the entire file directly. Anyone else having the same problem, or know what may be causing it? -- www.icenrye.com www.icenrye.blogspot.com www.icenryelikes.blogspot.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
- Original Message - From: "Michael Verdi" > The battery in the camera is not an issue. My Digital 8 camera circa > 1999 has an "8 hour" battery. I once took it to New Orleans and shot > nearly 4 hours of footage over a 3 day period without recharging. > Besides .. if it was a memory card based camera might not the battery last longer since there is not electric motor needed to move the tape? But, I'm not familiar with card based cameras .. do they have "larger" than normal batteries available .. or even replaceable batteries? Frankly I think we're over thinking this ... it was a good movie and as with many movies it was not an attempt to be scientifically accurate. Remember ... "Suspension of Disbelief" Richard Amirault Boston, MA, USA http://n1jdu.org http://bostonfandom.org http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
[videoblogging] HDV to Square Pixel Video [was: Re: Blip.tv and 1.33 aspect ratio
> I have been looking for a workflow which will allow me to move quickly > from my HDV video (Sony FX1) from the non square format to square > format for the web, Blip etc. > > I use Vegas pro 8 for NLE and I wish to end up with video encoded to > various web flavored formats. I realize I can convert the video in the > editor. I'm looking to find an optimal work flow that involves the > least personal attention after editing (while encoding) because it > seems to be very compute intensive. A semi random search for Nirvana > in the encoding world looks like it will be very time consuming. I > have high hopes of finding some sage advice here. Nothing about editing and publishing HD video is quick. :) My current editing strategy is to go from HDV to 1280x720 30p video using Sony Vegas and then uploading the result to Blip. I think it takes about 10 minutes for every minute of video I publish. You can do it faster, but not if you want to end up with video that looks good. Jake Ludington http://www.jakeludington.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
The battery in the camera is not an issue. My Digital 8 camera circa 1999 has an "8 hour" battery. I once took it to New Orleans and shot nearly 4 hours of footage over a 3 day period without recharging. - Verdi
[videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
I appreciate the points that you are making. I do think that this "home movie" style can influence and inspire in some interesting ways. I do however have to disagree on some points. Cloverfield has the appearance of being low budget with all "in camera" editing but of course that was not the case in reality, that was just the premise of the movie. it wasn't edited in camera it was just made to look that way. even if much of the film was shot on an HVX, that's not a home movie camera. Cloverfield had big money special effects. this is a studio film made by established, rich people, and promoted with a huge budget. This film cost $30 million to make. yeah, that's low budget for Paramount. yes, go run with the premise, be inspired. but as you say use the device to tell "interesting stories." that's what truly independent filmmakers should be doing. if you don't have 30 million to create Cloverfield you can't get away with repeating the lines "What was that thing?" over and over again and expect nobody to actually care what that thing was. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Tim Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think Cloverfield does take things beyond the Blair Witch Project > and does a great job of fictional organic "Home Video" story telling. > > The filmmakers have set some ground rules for themselves and they > stick to those ground rules. Everything that happens on that "tape" > from a storytelling point of view happens in real time with nothing > other than "in camera edits." > > I'm envious of what the filmmakers have done with Cloverfield. I've > been exploring fictional organic home video storytelling since I did > For the Love of Julie in 1999 and I Can Still Tell Your Wife Bill in > 2001 and I've been waiting for more stories to be told this way so > that it doesn't seem gimmicky. I think Loney Girl 15 does a good job > of this but every so often their characters get a little bit too > "cinematic" in the production of their videos and it pulls me out of > the story but non the less LG15 is breaking new ground with this type > of storytelling and they are intertwining it with ARG which is way cool. > > I really look forward to seeing what new films are created using this > approach to storytelling and how it matures so that it's not seen as a > gimmick. > > If this type of filmmaking is embraced it lowers the financial bar of > entry for what is acceptable for theatrical film releases and > increases the chances of getting theatrical distribution for > storytellers who can't afford a traditional cinematic production. > > If you are at all interested in telling stories that are shown on the > big screen I urge you to take a closer look at Cloverfield and think > about what emotionally compelling stories you could tell using this > organic home video approach. There are some very creative people on > this list and I think one or several of us could someday have a > theatrical release by using this type of storytelling. > > > > > > Tim Street > Creator/Executive Producer > French Maid TV > Subscribe for FREE @ > http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes > MyBlog > http://1timstreet.com > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Sull wrote: > > > "it never pays to over analyze a movie like this" > > but i'll offer up a counter perspective. > > > > why did the the characters go into > > > an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes > > > and batteries? > > > > > > > the electronics store scene came from one characters sole focus to > > get his > > phone working so he could try to communicate with another character. > > this relationship drove the story/path. the character had zero > > interest in > > getting equipped to document the devastation they were smothered in. > > the character who was filming everything was originally only > > supposed to > > film a going away party. > > as the events unfolded, this character did realize the importance of > > the > > footage but i am sure he also was not interested in getting more > > equipment > > that would allow him to document more than he could with what he had > > (within > > story, some unknown SSD camera) and would happily be rescued over > > further > > gallivanting around a city under attack by a monster. > > > > how they went 7 hours without having to change a battery. > > > > > > > not sure when the film is supposedly taking place. was their a year > > mentioned? > > but a 7 hour batter is not too absurd. > > > > personally, i could ask alot of questions and potential > > inaccuracies... but > > screw that. > > i thought it was fantastic. > > > > their will undoubtedly be sequels and this was just an introduction > > to the > > monster. > > more details and plot would be added in future. > > > > On Jan 27, 2008 12:03 PM, David S Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i can't help thinking about these things. I know it's just s
[videoblogging] Re: Blip.tv and 1.33 aspect ratio
By way of brief introduction, "I am a long time lurker, first time poster" and trying to find time for a videoblog. I have been looking for a workflow which will allow me to move quickly from my HDV video (Sony FX1) from the non square format to square format for the web, Blip etc. I use Vegas pro 8 for NLE and I wish to end up with video encoded to various web flavored formats. I realize I can convert the video in the editor. I'm looking to find an optimal work flow that involves the least personal attention after editing (while encoding) because it seems to be very compute intensive. A semi random search for Nirvana in the encoding world looks like it will be very time consuming. I have high hopes of finding some sage advice here. Bob... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jake Ludington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Good arguments, however, neither 1440x1080 nor 720x480 Anamorphic are > > meant to be viewed (as you stated in your other post, so I'm not > > telling you anything new) in those dimensions in square pixels. Since > > blip delivers video to computers, which use square pixels, IMO, > > there's no reason they should cater to anything other than 16x9 or 4x3 > > formats. > > One more time, with feeling: I'm not asking them to present non square > pixels. I'm asking them to convert non-square pixels for the Web. > > As you say below: "How come videos are expected to be formatted at > television sizes (4:3 and 16:9)?" I'm expecting them not to be and you're > telling me I shouldn't. ;) > > And because I'm feeling snarky, from the Blip site: > > "We're sending our top shows directly to the television set with Internet > video on demand. And that's just the start. We believe that your show should > be indistinguishable from a show on a broadcast network in terms of how > people find and watch it. We're working hard to make this happen." > > More snark quoting Blip on the issue of formats: > > "You shouldn't have to choose between great quality Flash video and > compatibility with iTunes. Your videos should work everywhere, no question. > That's why blip.tv supports every video format under the sun, from Flash 8 > (much higher quality than most Flash video) to Quicktime (for the > all-important iTunes) to DivX and 3gp (we think cell phones are cool, too)." > > That sounds like a utility knife to me. ;) > > > > I think you bring up an interesting discussion. How come videos are > > expected to be formatted at television sizes (4:3 and 16:9)? > > other question is "What is the benefit to a company to accommodate > > people that choose not to conform? > > If I'm an average video guy who just wants to make video, how would I know > whether I'm conforming or not? I have a vision, my camera shoots at this > resolution, I can output files in the same resolution from my video editor, > so how am I *not* conforming? > > > Jake Ludington > > http://www.jakeludington.com >
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
I think Cloverfield does take things beyond the Blair Witch Project and does a great job of fictional organic "Home Video" story telling. The filmmakers have set some ground rules for themselves and they stick to those ground rules. Everything that happens on that "tape" from a storytelling point of view happens in real time with nothing other than "in camera edits." I'm envious of what the filmmakers have done with Cloverfield. I've been exploring fictional organic home video storytelling since I did For the Love of Julie in 1999 and I Can Still Tell Your Wife Bill in 2001 and I've been waiting for more stories to be told this way so that it doesn't seem gimmicky. I think Loney Girl 15 does a good job of this but every so often their characters get a little bit too "cinematic" in the production of their videos and it pulls me out of the story but non the less LG15 is breaking new ground with this type of storytelling and they are intertwining it with ARG which is way cool. I really look forward to seeing what new films are created using this approach to storytelling and how it matures so that it's not seen as a gimmick. If this type of filmmaking is embraced it lowers the financial bar of entry for what is acceptable for theatrical film releases and increases the chances of getting theatrical distribution for storytellers who can't afford a traditional cinematic production. If you are at all interested in telling stories that are shown on the big screen I urge you to take a closer look at Cloverfield and think about what emotionally compelling stories you could tell using this organic home video approach. There are some very creative people on this list and I think one or several of us could someday have a theatrical release by using this type of storytelling. Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com On Jan 27, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Sull wrote: > "it never pays to over analyze a movie like this" > but i'll offer up a counter perspective. > > why did the the characters go into > > an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes > > and batteries? > > > > the electronics store scene came from one characters sole focus to > get his > phone working so he could try to communicate with another character. > this relationship drove the story/path. the character had zero > interest in > getting equipped to document the devastation they were smothered in. > the character who was filming everything was originally only > supposed to > film a going away party. > as the events unfolded, this character did realize the importance of > the > footage but i am sure he also was not interested in getting more > equipment > that would allow him to document more than he could with what he had > (within > story, some unknown SSD camera) and would happily be rescued over > further > gallivanting around a city under attack by a monster. > > how they went 7 hours without having to change a battery. > > > > not sure when the film is supposedly taking place. was their a year > mentioned? > but a 7 hour batter is not too absurd. > > personally, i could ask alot of questions and potential > inaccuracies... but > screw that. > i thought it was fantastic. > > their will undoubtedly be sequels and this was just an introduction > to the > monster. > more details and plot would be added in future. > > On Jan 27, 2008 12:03 PM, David S Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i can't help thinking about these things. I know it's just supposed > > to be entertaining and it never pays to over analyze a movie like > this > > but in this case wasn't the whole movie just a gimmick anyway? > wasn't > > the whole thing just about how clever the filmmakers thought they > were > > being? so if they were so clever, why did the the characters go into > > an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes > > and batteries? that's all they would have had to do to keep me from > > thinking about how this footage looks edited and how they went 7 > hours > > without having to change a battery. > > > > but forget all of that. if they were so clever, how did they think > > they could get away with making a movie that supplants a plot for a > > gimmick. that's never a good idea! > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
"it never pays to over analyze a movie like this" but i'll offer up a counter perspective. why did the the characters go into > an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes > and batteries? > the electronics store scene came from one characters sole focus to get his phone working so he could try to communicate with another character. this relationship drove the story/path. the character had zero interest in getting equipped to document the devastation they were smothered in. the character who was filming everything was originally only supposed to film a going away party. as the events unfolded, this character did realize the importance of the footage but i am sure he also was not interested in getting more equipment that would allow him to document more than he could with what he had (within story, some unknown SSD camera) and would happily be rescued over further gallivanting around a city under attack by a monster. how they went 7 hours without having to change a battery. > not sure when the film is supposedly taking place. was their a year mentioned? but a 7 hour batter is not too absurd. personally, i could ask alot of questions and potential inaccuracies... but screw that. i thought it was fantastic. their will undoubtedly be sequels and this was just an introduction to the monster. more details and plot would be added in future. On Jan 27, 2008 12:03 PM, David S Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i can't help thinking about these things. I know it's just supposed > to be entertaining and it never pays to over analyze a movie like this > but in this case wasn't the whole movie just a gimmick anyway? wasn't > the whole thing just about how clever the filmmakers thought they were > being? so if they were so clever, why did the the characters go into > an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes > and batteries? that's all they would have had to do to keep me from > thinking about how this footage looks edited and how they went 7 hours > without having to change a battery. > > but forget all of that. if they were so clever, how did they think > they could get away with making a movie that supplants a plot for a > gimmick. that's never a good idea! > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David S Kessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but forget all of that. if they were so clever, how did they think > they could get away with making a movie that supplants a plot for a > gimmick. that's never a good idea. A horror movie doesn't need a plot in order to be good, any more than an amusement park thrill ride or a pizza-induced nightmare needs a plot. Whether a horror movie needs a plot in order to be "great", well that's arguable. DUEL, for instance, is a horror movie I'd consider great despite having even less plot than CLOVERFIELD. As far as no-plot horror movies go, I tend to think less is more when it comes to budget. Give me an earnest shot-on-a-shoestring backyard zombie flick over some festering pile of big studio crap like THE RING 2. That said, I am curious about CLOVERFIELD and do hope that it's good. If only because I've always loved giant monster movies but have always secretly wished for one that had some legitimate scares... Chris
[videoblogging] Re: Yo La Tengo Videoblogging!?
Hey Mark, let's go to NJ and offer some vlogging services to YLT. i love those guys david --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Schoneveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of my favorite bands of all time in the whole entire universe just posted a funny little > video on their website and it looks like they might be making it into a full-fledged video > blog! FTW! > > http://www.yolatengo.com/kaplanskorner.html > > > Enjoy! > > Mark* > xlntads.com/blog >
[videoblogging] Re: Cloverfield "hand held" major movie
i can't help thinking about these things. I know it's just supposed to be entertaining and it never pays to over analyze a movie like this but in this case wasn't the whole movie just a gimmick anyway? wasn't the whole thing just about how clever the filmmakers thought they were being? so if they were so clever, why did the the characters go into an electronics store and not consider grabbing a couple extra tapes and batteries? that's all they would have had to do to keep me from thinking about how this footage looks edited and how they went 7 hours without having to change a battery. but forget all of that. if they were so clever, how did they think they could get away with making a movie that supplants a plot for a gimmick. that's never a good idea. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Amirault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just got back from the movies. I saw CLOVERFIELD and all I knew about it > going in was that it was a "monster" movie. > > I had no idea that the entire movie would be from the point of view of a > character with a hand held video camera. You never see the actual camera and > while they refer to "tape" in the movie I would strongly suspect that the > camera is a memory card based device, not a tape camera, and that they (the > writers) intentionally had the characters use the most common term. > > Frankly I was not impressed with the beginning of the movie and actually > closed my eyes for the first half hour or so. I didn't want to watch all > the shaky footage .. and was considering leaving the theatre .. but when the > s**t hit the fan I started watching and they really did a credible job. > > There was some times where I couldn't believe that the character operating > the camera would be 'filming' certain scenes .. and that he would turn it on > and off .. or NOT turn it on or off .. at certain times .. but that's where > "suspension of disbelief" comes in. > > It's a decent "monster movie" .. I recommend it .. especially for video > enthusiasts. > > Richard Amirault > Boston, MA, USA > http://n1jdu.org > http://bostonfandom.org > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ >
Re: [videoblogging] PARIS special flashmeeting
Sorry it's today and it's right now flashmeeting @ 18:00 GMT michael, jay & ryanne just arrived ! Le 27 janv. 08 à 17:11, Irina a écrit : > what time my best friend from virginia lives in paris what day > > On Jan 27, 2008 6:47 AM, Gabriel Soucheyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > >> Vlogger dinner in Paris with (expected) Jay, Ryanne, Mathieu, >> Benjamin >> Bejbaum (ceo daily motion), les explorateurs du web (paris), >> bureauwiki (paris), systaime, ... everyone around is welcome @ 4 >> place >> de Valois (1er) next to Palais Royal or on flashmeeting : >> ... http://tinyurl.com/ywecz6 >> >> >> Gabriel Soucheyre >> >> >> T + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 >> Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre >> my vlog : http://gasprod.blip.tv/ >> feed://gasprod.blip.tv/rss/itunes/ >> .. >> VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain >> www.videoformes.com >> BP 80411 63011 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 / France >> T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612 >> 59 27 53 >> >> >> SVP / P lease : n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if >> necessary >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > > -- > http://geekentertainment.tv > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Gabriel Soucheyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Département Métiers du livre et éditions numériques Université Blaise Pascal 34, av Carnot BP 185 63006 Clermont-Ferrand cedex T + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre my vlog : http://gasprod.blip.tv/ feed://gasprod.blip.tv/rss/itunes/ .. VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain www.videoformes.com BP 80411 • 63011 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 / France T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 • Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 SVP / P lease : n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if necessary [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] PARIS special flashmeeting
what time my best friend from virginia lives in paris what day On Jan 27, 2008 6:47 AM, Gabriel Soucheyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vlogger dinner in Paris with (expected) Jay, Ryanne, Mathieu, Benjamin > Bejbaum (ceo daily motion), les explorateurs du web (paris), > bureauwiki (paris), systaime, ... everyone around is welcome @ 4 place > de Valois (1er) next to Palais Royal or on flashmeeting : > ... http://tinyurl.com/ywecz6 > > > Gabriel Soucheyre > > > T + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 > Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre > my vlog : http://gasprod.blip.tv/ > feed://gasprod.blip.tv/rss/itunes/ > .. > VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain > www.videoformes.com > BP 80411 63011 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 / France > T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612 > 59 27 53 > > > SVP / P lease : n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if > necessary > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Yo La Tengo Videoblogging!?
> One of my favorite bands of all time in the whole entire universe just > posted a funny little video on their website and it looks like they might be > making it into a full-fledged video > blog! FTW! > http://www.yolatengo.com/kaplanskorner.html FTW is right! hopefully they dont feel like it's always got to be a "film". this structure usually paralyzes people from posting since the bar gets set too high. encourage them for sure. jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com Personal: http://momentshowing.net Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
[videoblogging] Semanal: video comments!
We've been doing some experimenting over at Semanal.org. We wanted to (mildly) recreate Ning using Wordpress so we could have better control over the data we're gathering over the year. The first big issue is embeddable videos in a thread. What we did was add some extra fields in the comments. (actually Michael Aivaliotis and Ze Nuno did it) Check out how posting a comment looks: http://semanal.org/2008/01/20/week-4-videos/#comments Now you can add a thumbnail URL, video URL, and permalink URL. A video comment looks like this: http://semanal.org/2008/01/20/week-4-videos/#comment-163 vPIP makes the video play in place. Michael made a step by step guide for how to install this plugin and customize it: http://videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/Adding-video-commenting-to-WordPress Cool! anyway...come join the fun and post a video. jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com Personal: http://momentshowing.net Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
Re: [videoblogging] PARIS special flashmeeting
On Jan 27, 2008 3:47 PM, Gabriel Soucheyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vlogger dinner in Paris with (expected) Jay, Ryanne, Mathieu, Benjamin > Bejbaum (ceo daily motion), les explorateurs du web (paris), > bureauwiki (paris), systaime, ... everyone around is welcome @ 4 place > de Valois (1er) next to Palais Royal or on flashmeeting : > ... http://tinyurl.com/ywecz6 yeah, if youre in paris...come join the party in person. i'm looking at the Louvre right now. videos to follow. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Professional: http://ryanishungry.com Personal: http://momentshowing.net Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
[videoblogging] PARIS special flashmeeting
Vlogger dinner in Paris with (expected) Jay, Ryanne, Mathieu, Benjamin Bejbaum (ceo daily motion), les explorateurs du web (paris), bureauwiki (paris), systaime, ... everyone around is welcome @ 4 place de Valois (1er) next to Palais Royal or on flashmeeting : ... http://tinyurl.com/ywecz6 Gabriel Soucheyre T + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 Skype : callto:gabrielsoucheyre my vlog : http://gasprod.blip.tv/ feed://gasprod.blip.tv/rss/itunes/ .. VIDEOFORMES vidéo et nouveaux médias dans l'art contemporain www.videoformes.com BP 80411 63011 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1 / France T + 33 (0) 473 17 02 17 Direction : Gabriel SOUCHEYRE + 33 (0) 612 59 27 53 SVP / P lease : n'imprimer que si nécessaire / print only if necessary [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Where is the Sanyo HD Waterproof Camera?
I've got the Sanyo Waterproof Camera, the fully submersible one.. Man do I love that camera, but I'm anxiously awaiting the HD Version. (no announcement or rumors I just want them to develop it because it would ROCK) I've been surprised how much having a waterproof camera helps. Asside from the regular playing in the water I had my previous camera die in a lite rain! The next time the camera is going to be a great help is my upcomming Speical Olympics Fundraiser! Seems I've volunteered to help raise money for Special Olympics. Worse of course is that I've agreed that if I meet my goal I'll jump into the FREEZING Cold Ocean in New Hampshire on February 3rd with the other nuts like myself who've agreed to this insanity! Man I love having a waterproof camera. If anyone would like to donate any amount helps, best of all is that you can donate online at my Participant's Page: http://www.firstgiving.com/christopherbergeron The event is called the Penguin Plunge and it's an annual thing so there is the risk that I'll be bothering you again next year. So I guess I'm asking for you to sponsor me on this insanity. There will be a vlog post of course. So the fun doesn't need to end when your finished parting with your money! Everyone knows the great work that the Special Olympics does. And that's what it's really all about, doing what's right for the kids. Just donate what you can and remember the difference you're going to make to some kid. Thanks. -Chris http://www.TheRamblingLoggerhead.com ps. I hate forwards but if you know anyone else who either has too much money and needs a tax right off, or who has kids, knows any kids, or even better LIKES kids and wants to see these special kids have the opportunity that the Special Olympics gives them please forward this email to them, or heck forwarding this message to your entire mailbox would be nice. Or a blog post? Hint Hint Hint Thanks Again.
