Re: [videoblogging] Re: feeds into mogulus

[schlomo rabinowitz]

theuptake.org has used Mogulus extensively as well.  When I've done stuff
with them, they usually have their office in MN have master control and a
bunch of us in various cities chiming in from, say, election polling places.
Worked really well for me, has lots of little gadgets for you to use, and
actually usually works! (which is always a plus)

Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
AIM:schlomochat


On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, @sull  wrote:

>   thanks jan.
>
> i've been wondering if mogulus is the bliptv of live broadcasting so to
> speak ;)
> been itching to try some live stuff myself... not to necessarily do a live
> show but just get familiar with the tech/services around this.
> its an area i had decided long ago to ignore because the quality was
> godawful and i personally was not turned on by LIVE stuff like some
> were/are.
> but not tech is better and its def more interesting to me. 24artists24hours
> also was inspiring/motivating.
>
> sull
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jan McLaughlin 
> 
> >wrote:
>
> > Having used a bunch of these services in various applications
> > (including the live broadcast of "35" and VlogEurope 07), I've stuck
> > with Mogulus for my own stuff. Not that I do altogether that much
> > live...
> >
> > That said, I like that I can easily 'go' live and create a storyboard
> > that lives on with material around that 'live' work. I like that I can
> > auto import media via RSS. I like that the vids and their site can be
> > branded.
> >
> > That their pro level exists indicates a commitment to scaling the
> > thing. Should the need arise, it's there. Some comfort in that...
> >
> > If anyone's interested in playing around with two remote location
> > producers working back and forth live, I've been looking for someone
> > to fool around with that interface...let me know off-list.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jan
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, danielmcvicar 
> > 
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I think I found my solution...mix the video and audio, and then advc
> > > 110 it into my computer.
> > > I been playing with mogulus, I like it. I use Cam Twist to get my
> > > webcam (MAC) to read.
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear opinions about Mogulus, Justin.tv, Ustream and all...
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > > D
> > >
> > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
> > >  40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "danielmcvicar"
> > >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi!
> > >> I am loking to do a feed from a separate camera through a computer
> > >> (hopefully Mac) into mogulus. Anyone been doing this?
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jan McLaughlin
> > Production Sound Mixer
> > air = 862-571-5334
> > aim = janofsound
> > skype = janmclaughlin
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Re: feeds into mogulus

[@sull]

thanks jan.

i've been wondering if mogulus is the bliptv of live broadcasting so to
speak ;)
been itching to try some live stuff myself... not to necessarily do a live
show but just get familiar with the tech/services around this.
its an area i had decided long ago to ignore because the quality was
godawful and i personally was not turned on by LIVE stuff like some
were/are.
but not tech is better and its def more interesting to me.  24artists24hours
also was inspiring/motivating.

sull

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jan McLaughlin wrote:

>   Having used a bunch of these services in various applications
> (including the live broadcast of "35" and VlogEurope 07), I've stuck
> with Mogulus for my own stuff. Not that I do altogether that much
> live...
>
> That said, I like that I can easily 'go' live and create a storyboard
> that lives on with material around that 'live' work. I like that I can
> auto import media via RSS. I like that the vids and their site can be
> branded.
>
> That their pro level exists indicates a commitment to scaling the
> thing. Should the need arise, it's there. Some comfort in that...
>
> If anyone's interested in playing around with two remote location
> producers working back and forth live, I've been looking for someone
> to fool around with that interface...let me know off-list.
>
> Best,
> Jan
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, danielmcvicar 
> >
> wrote:
> > I think I found my solution...mix the video and audio, and then advc
> > 110 it into my computer.
> > I been playing with mogulus, I like it. I use Cam Twist to get my
> > webcam (MAC) to read.
> >
> > I'd like to hear opinions about Mogulus, Justin.tv, Ustream and all...
> >
> > What do you think?
> > D
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
> "danielmcvicar"
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >> I am loking to do a feed from a separate camera through a computer
> >> (hopefully Mac) into mogulus. Anyone been doing this?
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jan McLaughlin
> Production Sound Mixer
> air = 862-571-5334
> aim = janofsound
> skype = janmclaughlin
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] let's just be perfectly clear about the past - i know, knot possible yet change

[liza jean]

yet change occurs.

imagine being the smallest of seven.  imagine being small whilst 
changining things.

imagine being so small, forever, that changing things seems beyond you.

imagine changing things anyway.

 

[videoblogging] 30 years to today

[liza jean]

Synthavision was the result of the Pentagon hoping to know where 
missiles would land.  wishing to know in 3D.

Synthavision was the t.  happily, i did not have to watch all the 
missile test stuff to qualify for the job.  

i was working for Midnight Blue at the time i saw the posting in the  
new york post for a job which required knowledge of some sort, 
knowledge of video to film.

i had knowledge of 2" tape edits fromw 1972.  no doubt most of ya'll 
don't.  i do.

there is, of course,the future.  the past, of course, will continue to 
be the future.

[videoblogging] supreme court today, my life 30 years ago

[liza jean]

today, according to NPR, the Supreme court of these United States for 
the third time this year sent back to a lower court a dismissal of  
case about a retaliatory firing on the basis of sexual harrasment.

30 years ago this happened to me.  i was 22, and, well, 22 then.  no 
notice was taken.  well , events prove some official notice was taken, 
but none ever reached my bank account in any useful sort of way.

the worm does turn, but the accounting is fuzzy.

so, do what you gotta do, no matter what you do the accounting will be 
fuzzy.  it's not about what you make, but about what you keep that's 
any use to you.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: feeds into mogulus

[Jan McLaughlin]

Having used a bunch of these services in various applications
(including the live broadcast of "35" and VlogEurope 07), I've stuck
with Mogulus for my own stuff. Not that I do altogether that much
live...

That said, I like that I can easily 'go' live and create a storyboard
that lives on with material around that 'live' work. I like that I can
auto import media via RSS. I like that the vids and their site can be
branded.

That their pro level exists indicates a commitment to scaling the
thing. Should the need arise, it's there. Some comfort in that...

If anyone's interested in playing around with two remote location
producers working back and forth live, I've been looking for someone
to fool around with that interface...let me know off-list.

Best,
Jan

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, danielmcvicar  wrote:
> I think I found my solution...mix the video and audio, and then advc
> 110 it into my computer.
> I been playing with mogulus, I like it.  I use Cam Twist to get my
> webcam (MAC) to read.
>
> I'd like to hear opinions about Mogulus, Justin.tv, Ustream and all...
>
> What do you think?
> D
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "danielmcvicar"
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> I am loking to do a feed from a separate camera through a computer
>> (hopefully Mac) into mogulus.  Anyone been doing this?
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



-- 
Jan McLaughlin
Production Sound Mixer
air = 862-571-5334
aim = janofsound
skype = janmclaughlin

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Yes We Can

[Matthew Milam]

Everyone wants YouTube fame because YouTube has made a few people
famous. Some are even banging thousands of dollars in monthly checks.
That's why they are doing it.

Now whether they will actually see all of that is another matter
entirely. I don't -- I'm too monotone.

On 1/21/09, Heath  wrote:
> Why anyone would want YouTube "fame" is beyond memost of the
> comments on YT sicken me, I'd rather do my thing and have a close
> circle of friends anyday of the weekall else is vanity...someone
> once told me...  :-)
>
> Heath
> http://heathparks.com
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert  wrote:
>>
>> As for the feed autodiscover, that's a glitch - I contacted them
>> about that.  You've got to expect things like that on the first
> day.
>> Also, they don't have any videos up yet, so that might explain why
>> it's not been found yet.
>>
>>
>> I think comments are overrated, especially for politics.  They
> didn't
>> have comments enabled on the Obama campaign blog, either.  If I
> were
>> them, I wouldn't have open comments.  It would quickly fill up
> with
>> hate and anonymous trolls, and put off people who don't hate.
>> You don't want that on the WhiteHouse.gov site
>> They do have comments enabled on youtube.com/whitehouse
>> I don't have comments enabled on my youtube videos
>> This is the first page of comments from the video of his Inaugural
>> address, when I looked there, which I think say it all.
>> These comments are inappropriate for the White House site.
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> daryl060761
>> You bitter smartasses that can't deal with Barack Obama being
>> president can go ask George Bush if he'll let you move into his
>> exclusive gated community in Texas.
>>
>> PreyTheSun
>> All I know is that our four so called father are turning over in
>> their graves right now because of this. His very name is
> unacceptable.
>>
>> HearTalent
>> type mark nikollaj new song sexy in the search bar
>>
>> SwornReaper
>> fuck that! he is not even natural born citizen. This country is
>> funken up with blacks everywhere. Ask yourself, did George
>> Washington fight this country for NegroesWhat were they even
>> brought here forIs this even their land???
>>
>> chitownbound
>> and YES BUSH DID give tax-cuts to the rich for 8 years.YES HE DID!!!
>>
>> PreyTheSun
>> your fucking clown shoes yourself, chitownbound
>>
>> SamirMuaremi
>> Agree with HarryPuntCunnington .
>>
>> HarryPuntCunnington
>> One of the most important events of the last century, and someone
>> can't keep a camera steady. . .
>>
>> jimitl5
>> "I wish Bush was still in office."
>> I am going to miss him also. I am going to miss all the good
> laughs
>> from all his screw ups with language. Strategery! LOL!!!
>>
>> obamatownmassacre
>> Yes, we can spend $200 MILLION dollars on an inauguration while
> the
>> US is facing financial collapse. YES WE CAN!!!
>>
>> chitownbound
>> these obama h8ters are comical.
>>
>> svetlity
>> fuck you ! Go Obama !!
>>
>> thebestkpm
>> i wait that the thinks changes, really not absolutely but i have
>> faith in him!!
>>
>>
>> On 21-Jan-09, at 3:15 AM, Jan McLaughlin wrote:
>>
>> And comments are not enabled in the White House blog :(
>>
>> They're headed in the right direction, tho. That's for sure.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Christian Wach
>>  wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On 21 Jan 2009, at 02:42, Rupert wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> the president is a weekly videoblogger.
>>  >>
>>  >> watched the whole thing this morning on a laptop, full screen,
> via
>>  >> wifi, live.
>>  >> not so long ago, all this was science fiction.
>>  >
>>  > noble intentions for sure - unfortunately, the auto-discovery
> feed
>>  > link doesn't work and there are no feeds listed on the RSS page.
>>  >
>>  > *sigh*
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > 
>>  >
>>  > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>> --
>> Jan McLaughlin
>> Production Sound Mixer
>> air = 862-571-5334
>> aim = janofsound
>> skype = janmclaughlin
>>
>>
>>
>> Rupert
>> http://twittervlog.tv/
>> Creative Mobile Filmmaking
>> Shot, edited and sent with my Nokia N93
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
>

[videoblogging] Re: More than 10 minutes

[liza jean]

how long was the very first moving picture ever made?  if memory 
serves, it was a few seconds of a racehorse . . .  and people had to 
learn how to hold the photos in their head to make sense of the 
assemblage.

time and technology go hand in hand.  i want to look at these long 
videos mentioned here but my air card is not as interested . . .





--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman  
wrote:
>
> > Jay, thanks for posting that link. I agree that it would not have 
been so
> > moving if anything
> > was left out.
> > It's actually a girl who made the video. 8-)
> 
> http://vimeo.com/2371774
> Mistake on my part.
> Big up to the ladies. Amazing work.
> 
> Jay
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://ryanishungry.com
> http://jaydedman.com
> 917 371 6790
>

[videoblogging] Re: New Xacti cameras coming in February

[Steve Watkins]

Looks good, think they will be out in March in USA & UK.

And one of them is the normal xacti form factor so I would think it will fit in 
your pocket 
ok?

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz  wrote:
>
> Pretty awesome, but I would never be able to carry that around in my pocket;
> which is part of what I like about Xactis.
> Schlomo Rabinowitz
> http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
> http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
> AIM:schlomochat
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Michael Verdi wrote:
> 
> >   The HD2000 has a cold shoe, mic input and headphone jack. Shoots
> > 1920x1080 60P at 24Mbps. Takes 8 megapixel stills. Will go for $600.
> > Announcement:
> > http://www.sanyo.com/news/2009/01/21-1en.html
> >
> > Hands on video:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEbdl4gmHkE
> >
> > Sanyo specs PDF
> > http://www.sanyo.com/news/2009/01/img/090121xacti.pdf
> >
> > - Verdi
> >
> > --
> > http://michaelverdi.com
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Yes We Can

[Christian Wach]

On 26 Jan 2009, at 14:01, Christian Wach wrote:

> Quick follow up to this thread: there's a good article on the  
> trauma of the new IT staff on entering the White House here:
>
>  horrors>

Of course, when I wrote "good article", I obviously meant  
"provocative article" :)

[videoblogging] Re: Yes We Can

[Christian Wach]

Quick follow up to this thread: there's a good article on the trauma of the new 
IT staff on 
entering the White House here:



Well, given this situation, it looks like they're doing pretty well.

Cheers,

Christian


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath"  wrote:
>
> Why anyone would want YouTube "fame" is beyond memost of the 
> comments on YT sicken me, I'd rather do my thing and have a close 
> circle of friends anyday of the weekall else is vanity...someone 
> once told me...  :-)
> 
> Heath
> http://heathparks.com