[videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
The reactions are so funny ... I could only imagine because of teh
music that it might be something like a wedding or other normal scene
and ... maybe someone puked, then another ... retching is contagious  

Gotta give them some credit for originality ... in this game of
getting eyeballs and ad dollars ... I am not sure if this is a sad
commentary on consumerism ... 

or maybe I am way wrong and this is a new kind of Survivor pilot
reality TV mix ... BM meets ER ... BM'ER coming in 2008 on Fox

Maybe it is a "cautionary tail" ... the future "MTV Jack ASS" ...
Xtreme Recycling ...

I have been told my posts can be too long ... I'll get to the nitty
gritty ... 


"If you are interested in bringing some traffic to your website,
consider advertising with 2girls1cup.com"

The real stories ...
What did the "Want Ad" read ... Wanted two actresses with
experience/no experience ...?

Where was the "Want Ad" placed? 

What was for dinner the night before? 

who will be first to advertise (besides "fling")?

Exactly how much crack did it take?

Who cleaned up afterwards?

Is the Number One fan, a fan of number two too, or the only fan?

Was an exhaust fan used in the making of Two Girls One Cup?









--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "pdelongchamp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So...um...has anyone heard of the youtube phenominon of vlogging your
> reaction to watching '2 Girls 1 Cup' for the first time?
> 
> Three things I want to mention.  
> 
> 1. Definitely watch the reaction videos below, they're very funny. 
> 2. DO NOT WATCH 2 GIRLS 1 CUP!
> 3. *If* you do watch it, you *HAVE* to vlog yourself watching it for
> the first time.  See below for details on where to find it.
> 
> These are a couple of my favourite reaction videos, they may contain
> vulgarity but are otherwise safe for work.
> 
> "2 Girls 1 Cup Reaction #1"
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtRzf_ZcM0U
> 
> "2 girls 1 cup reaction"
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI3Km0y1jWs
> 
> 
> So *if* you do decide to watch it, you can't be mad at me.  It's your
> own fault.  Do not watch this for the first time without vlogging your
> reaction.  To watch the very unsafe for work video go to
> http://www.2girls1cup.com (I repeat, NSFW)
> 
> and if you vlog yourself, even it's it's for NaVloPoMo, post your
> video in this thread.  Oh and go search youtube for more reaction
> videos.  There are hundreds.  Each is priceless.
>




[videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Susan
David, I'm right there with you man.  I'm incredibly curious though...
maybe this will be Saturday's video for me.
Susan 
http://vlog.kitykity.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> the reaction videos are hilarious ... but I'm not sure I want to put
> myself through whatever they've been through.  :-)
> 
> On Nov 15, 2007 11:59 PM, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...i meant to say "phenomenon"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.DavidMeade.com
>




[videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
It is pretty gross, save your eyes and mind ... One thing I am
convinced of, this video "2 girls 1 cup" is a metaphor for the crap
that is consumed by the masses...

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, I'm right there with you man.  I'm incredibly curious though...
> maybe this will be Saturday's video for me.
> Susan 
> http://vlog.kitykity.com
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Meade" 
> wrote:
> >
> > the reaction videos are hilarious ... but I'm not sure I want to put
> > myself through whatever they've been through.  :-)
> > 
> > On Nov 15, 2007 11:59 PM, Patrick Delongchamp  wrote:
> > > ...i meant to say "phenomenon"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > http://www.DavidMeade.com
> >
>




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
No vlogs yet?  Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.

On Nov 16, 2007 7:57 AM, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The reactions are so funny ... I could only imagine because of teh
>  music that it might be something like a wedding or other normal scene
>  and ... maybe someone puked, then another ... retching is contagious
>
>  Gotta give them some credit for originality ... in this game of
>  getting eyeballs and ad dollars ... I am not sure if this is a sad
>  commentary on consumerism ...
>
>  or maybe I am way wrong and this is a new kind of Survivor pilot
>  reality TV mix ... BM meets ER ... BM'ER coming in 2008 on Fox
>
>  Maybe it is a "cautionary tail" ... the future "MTV Jack ASS" ...
>  Xtreme Recycling ...
>
>  I have been told my posts can be too long ... I'll get to the nitty
>  gritty ...
>
>  
>  "If you are interested in bringing some traffic to your website,
>  consider advertising with 2girls1cup.com"
>
>  The real stories ...
>  What did the "Want Ad" read ... Wanted two actresses with
>  experience/no experience ...?
>
>  Where was the "Want Ad" placed?
>
>  What was for dinner the night before?
>
>  who will be first to advertise (besides "fling")?
>
>  Exactly how much crack did it take?
>
>  Who cleaned up afterwards?
>
>  Is the Number One fan, a fan of number two too, or the only fan?
>
>  Was an exhaust fan used in the making of Two Girls One Cup?
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "pdelongchamp"
>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > So...um...has anyone heard of the youtube phenominon of vlogging your
>  > reaction to watching '2 Girls 1 Cup' for the first time?
>  >
>  > Three things I want to mention.
>  >
>  > 1. Definitely watch the reaction videos below, they're very funny.
>  > 2. DO NOT WATCH 2 GIRLS 1 CUP!
>  > 3. *If* you do watch it, you *HAVE* to vlog yourself watching it for
>  > the first time. See below for details on where to find it.
>  >
>  > These are a couple of my favourite reaction videos, they may contain
>  > vulgarity but are otherwise safe for work.
>  >
>  > "2 Girls 1 Cup Reaction #1"
>  > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtRzf_ZcM0U
>  >
>  > "2 girls 1 cup reaction"
>  > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI3Km0y1jWs
>  >
>  >
>  > So *if* you do decide to watch it, you can't be mad at me. It's your
>  > own fault. Do not watch this for the first time without vlogging your
>  > reaction. To watch the very unsafe for work video go to
>  > http://www.2girls1cup.com (I repeat, NSFW)
>  >
>  > and if you vlog yourself, even it's it's for NaVloPoMo, post your
>  > video in this thread. Oh and go search youtube for more reaction
>  > videos. There are hundreds. Each is priceless.
>  >
>
>  


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Brook Hinton
Maybe I'm just cranky today, I guess the fact of that particular site
as someone's business venture just gives me a reaction not unlike
those in the reaction videos. So carry on pukin'!

B



On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> dubious cultural value?
>
>  lol, Brook, it's just a joke. If people want to participate, they'll
>  do it because it's funny. No cultural value implied. :P
>
>
>  On Nov 16, 2007 12:22 PM, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Well...
>  >
>  >
>  > On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.
>  >
>  > Maybe the fact that it's been done quite a bit already, as you
>  > described, limits the appeal. What do further "responses" add to
>  > anything? And why would we want to use our navlopomo videos to
>  > publicize some external commercial project of dubious cultural value?
>  >
>  > Actually there hasn't been any shortage of ideas with navlopomo'ers at
>  > all. No one seems to be having any trouble coming up with their own
>  > ideas from what I've seen. The emphasis on the personal in the group
>  > might also be a factor in the lack of participation in this
>  > "challenge".
>  >
>  > For me, the problem hasn't been ideas, but time.
>  >
>  > Brook
>  > ___
>  > Brook Hinton
>  > film/video/audio art
>  > www.brookhinton.com
>  > studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
>  >
>
>
>  


-- 
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Jay dedman
> No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.

It already got me before your email.
I would have never have thought that shit-porn would hit the mainstream.
peace on earth may actually be possible.

Jay


-- 
http://jaydedman.com
917 371 6790
Video: http://ryanishungry.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
dubious cultural value?

lol, Brook, it's just a joke.  If people want to participate, they'll
do it because it's funny.  No cultural value implied. :P

On Nov 16, 2007 12:22 PM, Brook Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well...
>
>
>  On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.
>
>  Maybe the fact that it's been done quite a bit already, as you
>  described, limits the appeal. What do further "responses" add to
>  anything? And why would we want to use our navlopomo videos to
>  publicize some external commercial project of dubious cultural value?
>
>  Actually there hasn't been any shortage of ideas with navlopomo'ers at
>  all. No one seems to be having any trouble coming up with their own
>  ideas from what I've seen. The emphasis on the personal in the group
>  might also be a factor in the lack of participation in this
>  "challenge".
>
>  For me, the problem hasn't been ideas, but time.
>
>  Brook
>  ___
>  Brook Hinton
>  film/video/audio art
>  www.brookhinton.com
>  studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
>  


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Adam Quirk
I'm completely blown away by this.  Scat has been online longer than Google,
but I would have never thought I'd be getting sent links to it out in the
open.  This is the 5th or 6th time I've been made aware of that site, most
recently forwarded by a friend back in Indiana who only uses his computer
for email. Crazy how something like this can spread.  It makes me very
hopeful, not because I intend to broadcast shit-porn, but because if people
don't flinch at sending around links like this, their standards are
obviously low enough to send around my work.

On Nov 16, 2007 1:31 PM, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.
>
> It already got me before your email.
> I would have never have thought that shit-porn would hit the mainstream.
> peace on earth may actually be possible.
>
> Jay
>
>
> --
> http://jaydedman.com
> 917 371 6790
> Video: http://ryanishungry.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaydedman
> Photos: http://flickr.com/photos/jaydedman/
> RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck & Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Easy Idea for NaVloPoMo

2007-11-16 Thread Brook Hinton
Well...

On 11/16/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No vlogs yet? Someone *has* to be up for the challenge.

Maybe the fact that it's been done quite a bit already, as you
described, limits the appeal. What do further "responses" add to
anything? And why would we want to use our navlopomo videos to
publicize some external commercial project of dubious cultural value?

Actually there hasn't been any shortage of ideas with navlopomo'ers at
all. No one seems to be having any trouble coming up with their own
ideas from what I've seen. The emphasis on the personal in the group
might also be a factor in the lack of participation in this
"challenge".

For me, the problem hasn't been ideas, but time.

Brook
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab