[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-06 Thread Christopher Polack
The delay I was experiencing is due to being behind the camera in a  
small, echo-y room. If you monitor via the AV mode, you get a buzz  
from the video track.

Thanks everybody!

Topher Polack


Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-06 Thread Brian Richardson - WhatTheCast?
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:06 am, Christopher Polack wrote:
 If you monitor via the AV mode, you get a buzz
 from the video track.

Could that just be noisy/cheap pre-amps?
--
Brian Richardson
  - http://whatthecast.com
  - http://siliconchef.com
  - http://dragoncontv.com
  - http://www.3chip.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-05 Thread Adam Quirk
I use little Sony earbuds and I haven't experienced any delay.  Maybe try
messing around with the AT and wind cut options?  Not sure.

On Feb 5, 2008 1:10 PM, Christopher Polack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone experienced an audio delay while using headphones with the
 HV20? I've tried it both with and with out my AT Mic and I hear a
 delay. On the tape it's fine.

 Any thoughts?

 Topher Polack



 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-05 Thread Irene Duma
I was hearing an ³echo² type thing last time. Freaked me out, but it wasn¹t
on the tape. Luckily.


On 2/5/08 1:22 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  
 
 I use little Sony earbuds and I haven't experienced any delay.  Maybe try
 messing around with the AT and wind cut options?  Not sure.
 
 On Feb 5, 2008 1:10 PM, Christopher Polack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:ottorabbit%40gmail.com  wrote:
 
  Has anyone experienced an audio delay while using headphones with the
  HV20? I've tried it both with and with out my AT Mic and I hear a
  delay. On the tape it's fine.
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  Topher Polack
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-05 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Check your settings to see if there's an audio setting to listen off tape.

If there *is such an option, that's very cool to know since that is a more
'pro' kinda thing - to hear what you've actually recorded as opposed to a
signal that just goes straight through the camera electronics.

That made me curious.

Check page 30 of the manual - the headphone out does double duty as A/V out
- and there's a menu setting to choose audio or A/V. I'm guessing that the
A/V out setting gives you audio 'off tape', which would account for the
delay.

Jan

On Feb 5, 2008 3:56 PM, Irene Duma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was hearing an ³echo² type thing last time. Freaked me out, but it
 wasn¹t
 on the tape. Luckily.


 On 2/5/08 1:22 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 
  I use little Sony earbuds and I haven't experienced any delay.  Maybe
 try
  messing around with the AT and wind cut options?  Not sure.
 
  On Feb 5, 2008 1:10 PM, Christopher Polack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:ottorabbit%40gmail.com  wrote:
 
   Has anyone experienced an audio delay while using headphones with the
   HV20? I've tried it both with and with out my AT Mic and I hear a
   delay. On the tape it's fine.
  
   Any thoughts?
  
   Topher Polack
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  




 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
aim=janofsound
air=862.571.5334
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Jan McLaughlin
For the Solo Video Practitioner:

Your statements here are why I advocate simply keeping the camera (a small
camera) within 3 feet of the speaking subject for the solo practitioner who
wants good sound.

It takes a good long time to get good at recording good sound with lots of
tools in the mix AND your dedicated ear, listening to what's going down on
tape.

If you ear is NOT dedicated, you're going to screw it up eventually - and
the more gear you have between the voice and the medium the more chance of
goofing it up.

What I LOVE about this medium is that you CAN do quality work without all
the bells  whistles. I know what it is to work with all the bells 
whistles. To heck with that :)

Another suggestion for the solo practitioner: Consider two recording
devices. One for video and one for audio. Use the camera for excellent
b-roll of the subject and environment. Record an audio-only interview where
you can really focus on questions and answers and know to a great deal of
certainty that you are getting good audio. Then cut the two together. Here's
an example of that idea used to good effect: 
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com/2007/04/composer-andrew-shapiro-interview.html


Jan

On Jan 31, 2008 11:38 PM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Every HV20 seems to have a diffferent level of mechanical noise, but
 they are all a bit loud.

 The DM50 does not do well vs. the videomics according to those who
 have used both. The DM50 is a decidedly consumer product - both the
 Rode's are designed to bring pro level sound to high-Z
 consumer/prosumer equipment.

 Beachtek boxes and the like are great IF you already have a $500+ pro
 mic and a good mount for it. I have used them on multiple cameras.
 They do NOT improve the mic preamp you are stuck with in the camera
 (fortunately the HV20's hi-z preamp isn't nearly as bad as those on
 Sony's consumer cams). But the Rode videomics really change this
 equation, as they can deliver excellent sound and are DESIGNED for
 camtop use. I have a beachtek, phantom power supply, and $900 AT4073s
 that I use in a variety of applications, and I even HAVE a camtop
 shock mount that works with them, but I'm still going for the videomic
 (probably both models) for my HV20. I wish the videomics were smaller
 and less look at me in appearance, but the only better option there
 is the tinymic, and they are uber uber pricey (and that tiny diaphragm
 just makes me nervous. How can it be a shotgun mic when my first
 impulse is to convert it into a contact mic?)

 There are reports that the stereo videomic still picks up camera noise
 in very quiet environments, while the shotgun model is less prone to
 this.

 yeah, lavs solve a lot of problems. For straight talent on camera
 work a GOOD wireless lav setup is wise, but in general I don't like
 the sound of lavs. I prefer even imperfect open sound that has a sense
 of space to the sound of lavs, as long as intelligibibility isn't an
 issue.

 The best sound will always be from an overhead boom as close to the
 subject as possible, but that doesn't help the solo filmmaker.

 Brook




 ___
 Brook Hinton
 film/video/audio art
 www.brookhinton.com
 studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab



 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
aim=janofsound
air=862.571.5334
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



RE: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Jake Ludington
 For the Solo Video Practitioner:
 
 Your statements here are why I advocate simply keeping the camera (a
 small
 camera) within 3 feet of the speaking subject for the solo practitioner
 who
 wants good sound.

I would disagree with this for the HV20 - get an external microphone and you
will get better sound.

Get a microphone that works well within 3 feet of you or less, put it on a
stand outside the range of your shot, do some testing then forget about it.
The videos will sound better.

If you have the option to record straight to your hard drive and skip the
tape, even better.

Jake Ludington

http://www.jakeludington.com




[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Check this out. http://www.vimeo.com/463187
It does however pick up the camera noise from the HV20... God bless
hard drive based camcorders :)

cheers

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For all you HV20 owners out there, I have a problem (and I know Kent
Bye has
 the same issue)
 
 Camera Noise!!
 
 Check out all the camera noise in this video I made with the camera:
 http://vimeo.com/475731
 
 Lots of high-pitched noise
 obviously this is because the internal mic is so close to the tape
 mechanism. And obviously, when the room is quiet the auto-gain
ettenuator
 makes that noise even louder.
 
 I have used lapel mics to get rid of the noise and that works great,
but I
 want a solution for when I am just filming other people and things. I
 thought about getting a shotgun mic but I am not sure if it would
help as
 much as I want it to.
 
 so I am asking these questions:
 
 - does your HV20 camera make this much noise?
 - what do you do to stop the camera noise?
 - what kind of shotgun works well with the camera?
 
 -- 
 Josh Leo
 
 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.ultrakawaii.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread influxxmedia
That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini jack, 
bypassing the need 
for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from many people. 

What sort of battery  life does it get?

adam



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Josh Leo
it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to, it doesn't
look very compact:
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014

the canon does look a little smaller:
http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg


On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini
 jack, bypassing the need
 for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from many
 people.

 What sort of battery life does it get?

 adam

  




-- 
Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com
www.ultrakawaii.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Michael Verdi
Josh it looks like that canon mic doesn't have a shock mount. The Rode
mic does. Also you put it on a boom pole and run an extension to the
camera if you want.

- Verdi

On Feb 1, 2008 3:42 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






 it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to, it doesn't
  look very compact:
  http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014

  the canon does look a little smaller:
  http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg


  On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini
   jack, bypassing the need
   for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from many
   people.
  
   What sort of battery life does it get?
  
   adam
  
  
  

  --
  Josh Leo

  www.JoshLeo.com
  www.ultrakawaii.com
  www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
  www.SlowLorisMedia.com

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  



-- 
http://michaelverdi.com
http://freevlog.org
http://nscape.tv


[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread influxxmedia
Just came across this on DVCreators.net

Looks remarkably similar to the Rode many people were raving about.

http://www.dvcreators.net/the-sennheiser-mke-400-shotgun-mic/

--To give you an idea of the size, it's physical length and width is that of 
your pinky finger. Yes, that's one 
amazingly short shotgun microphone. It's surprisingly directional for such a 
small mic. The design team at 
Sennheiser was able to innovate while answering the market's request for an 
even smaller on-camera mic. They 
maintained the same high quality sound since they built the very first shotgun 
mic, yes, Sennheiser invented the 
interference tube design that all of today's shotgun mics are based on. 

This mic is a great upgrade to a stock mic because it improves sound, yet is so 
unobtrusive. Attached to a mid sized 
camera, I can easily maneuver through a crowd without attracting too much 
attention. That's great when you need 
to be stealth. Yet you're still getting that high quality sound that Sennheiser 
is famous for- and that sound is from 
the direction that you're shooting - great for events, Steadicam, ENG, behind 
the scenes and documentary style 
work.The accessory pack is a must! It adds both the wind stopping long haired 
wind muff and an XLR adapter. This 
is a must have upgrade to any small camera's stock mic. --

adam



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Adam Quirk
You can also buy shoe shock mounts a la carte for around $30:
http://urltea.com/2mj0

I have the HV20 with one of those shock mounts and this Azden mic:
http://urltea.com/2mj1

It's a nice little set up for under $100.  The mic picks up only what you
point it at.

I've found it's necessary to use the external mic at all times.  I've only
shot a few things without it, and you can hear the camera mechanism pretty
obviously, like in the first 5 seconds of this video:
http://www.vimeo.com/435808

Other than this minor flaw, the HV20 is the best little camera I've ever
had.

On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 PM, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Josh it looks like that canon mic doesn't have a shock mount. The Rode
 mic does. Also you put it on a boom pole and run an extension to the
 camera if you want.

 - Verdi

 On Feb 1, 2008 3:42 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to, it
 doesn't
   look very compact:
   http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014
 
   the canon does look a little smaller:
   http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg
 
 
   On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini
jack, bypassing the need
for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from many
people.
   
What sort of battery life does it get?
   
adam
   
   
   
 
   --
   Josh Leo
 
   www.JoshLeo.com
   www.ultrakawaii.com
   www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
   www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://freevlog.org
 http://nscape.tv



 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Adam Quirk
While we're on the HV20 topic, has anyone noticed any difference in quality
when shooting with HD Mini DV tapes VS regular Mini DV tapes?

On Feb 1, 2008 7:51 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You can also buy shoe shock mounts a la carte for around $30:
 http://urltea.com/2mj0

 I have the HV20 with one of those shock mounts and this Azden mic:
 http://urltea.com/2mj1

 It's a nice little set up for under $100.  The mic picks up only what you
 point it at.

 I've found it's necessary to use the external mic at all times.  I've only
 shot a few things without it, and you can hear the camera mechanism pretty
 obviously, like in the first 5 seconds of this video:
 http://www.vimeo.com/435808

 Other than this minor flaw, the HV20 is the best little camera I've ever
 had.


 On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 PM, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Josh it looks like that canon mic doesn't have a shock mount. The Rode
  mic does. Also you put it on a boom pole and run an extension to the
  camera if you want.
 
  - Verdi
 
  On Feb 1, 2008 3:42 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
  
   it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to, it
  doesn't
look very compact:
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014
  
the canon does look a little smaller:
http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg
  
  
On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini
 jack, bypassing the need
 for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from
  many
 people.

 What sort of battery life does it get?

 adam



  
--
Josh Leo
  
www.JoshLeo.com
www.ultrakawaii.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com
  
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://michaelverdi.com
  http://freevlog.org
  http://nscape.tv
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 


 --
 Adam Quirk
 Wreck  Salvage
 551.208.4644
 Brooklyn, NY
 http://wreckandsalvage.com




-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Brook Hinton
Regular mini dv seems a little more dropout-prone.

Brook


On 2/1/08, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






 While we're on the HV20 topic, has anyone noticed any difference in quality
  when shooting with HD Mini DV tapes VS regular Mini DV tapes?


  On Feb 1, 2008 7:51 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   You can also buy shoe shock mounts a la carte for around $30:
   http://urltea.com/2mj0
  
   I have the HV20 with one of those shock mounts and this Azden mic:
   http://urltea.com/2mj1
  
   It's a nice little set up for under $100. The mic picks up only what you
   point it at.
  
   I've found it's necessary to use the external mic at all times. I've only
   shot a few things without it, and you can hear the camera mechanism
 pretty
   obviously, like in the first 5 seconds of this video:
   http://www.vimeo.com/435808
  
   Other than this minor flaw, the HV20 is the best little camera I've ever
   had.
  
  
   On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 PM, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Josh it looks like that canon mic doesn't have a shock mount. The Rode
mic does. Also you put it on a boom pole and run an extension to the
camera if you want.
   
- Verdi
   
On Feb 1, 2008 3:42 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






 it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to, it
doesn't
 look very compact:
 http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014

 the canon does look a little smaller:

 http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg


 On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8 mini
  jack, bypassing the need
  for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements from
many
  people.
 
  What sort of battery life does it get?
 
  adam
 
 
 

 --
 Josh Leo

 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.ultrakawaii.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




   
   
   
--
http://michaelverdi.com
http://freevlog.org
http://nscape.tv
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
  
  
   --
   Adam Quirk
   Wreck  Salvage
   551.208.4644
   Brooklyn, NY
   http://wreckandsalvage.com

  --
  Adam Quirk
  Wreck  Salvage
  551.208.4644
  Brooklyn, NY
  http://wreckandsalvage.com

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  


-- 
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-02-01 Thread Adam Quirk
What are you capturing with?  Have you tried HDVSplit?
http://strony.aster.pl/paviko/

That's what I use to capture 24p stuff.  Premiere seems to work fine for
regular 1080i footage with no dropped frames (yet).

I haven't had any dropout problems with either tape format though. And I
haven't seen any other noticeable differences in quality, so I'm thinking
I'll just stick with regular DV and save myself a few bucks a tape.

On Feb 1, 2008 9:59 PM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Regular mini dv seems a little more dropout-prone.

 Brook


 On 2/1/08, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  While we're on the HV20 topic, has anyone noticed any difference in
 quality
   when shooting with HD Mini DV tapes VS regular Mini DV tapes?
 
 
   On Feb 1, 2008 7:51 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
You can also buy shoe shock mounts a la carte for around $30:
http://urltea.com/2mj0
   
I have the HV20 with one of those shock mounts and this Azden mic:
http://urltea.com/2mj1
   
It's a nice little set up for under $100. The mic picks up only what
 you
point it at.
   
I've found it's necessary to use the external mic at all times. I've
 only
shot a few things without it, and you can hear the camera mechanism
  pretty
obviously, like in the first 5 seconds of this video:
http://www.vimeo.com/435808
   
Other than this minor flaw, the HV20 is the best little camera I've
 ever
had.
   
   
On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 PM, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Josh it looks like that canon mic doesn't have a shock mount. The
 Rode
 mic does. Also you put it on a boom pole and run an extension to
 the
 camera if you want.

 - Verdi

 On Feb 1, 2008 3:42 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  it looks nice, but compared to the camera I would attach it to,
 it
 doesn't
  look very compact:
  http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=5379014
 
  the canon does look a little smaller:
 
  http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o253/alphaelectronics/P9020057.jpg
 
 
  On Feb 1, 2008 4:38 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   That Rode mic looks pretty sweet. Not least because it has 1/8
 mini
   jack, bypassing the need
   for a converter like the BeachTek. Good to get endorsements
 from
 many
   people.
  
   What sort of battery life does it get?
  
   adam
  
  
  
 
  --
  Josh Leo
 
  www.JoshLeo.com
  www.ultrakawaii.com
  www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
  www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://freevlog.org
 http://nscape.tv



 Yahoo! Groups Links




   
   
--
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com
 
   --
   Adam Quirk
   Wreck  Salvage
   551.208.4644
   Brooklyn, NY
   http://wreckandsalvage.com
 
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 


 --
 ___
 Brook Hinton
 film/video/audio art
 www.brookhinton.com
 studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab



 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread David Howell
Hey Josh...not sure how much help I can be with this as I dont have an HV20.

That sure is a really bad whine noise you have going there. Do all HV20's make 
that same 
noise when using the onboard mic? That's nasty!

I've been pretty lucky that my onboard mic on my cam is actually quite good. 
Granted, I 
rarely, if ever, use it. I am always using my Rode Videomic with my camera. If 
I am not 
using my Rode, I dont really use the audio that my cam captured.

The Rode is a great mic however, it's big. When people see me with my cam, it's 
the first 
thing they notice. It can be a little intimidating having this big mic on the 
cam I guess? No 
matter to me though. The sound I get from it is fantastic. I use it mounted on 
top of the 
cam and also use it mounted to the side on a bracket that I attach to my cam. 
It never fails 
to give me nice audio.

If a Rode is something you are interested in, and the HV20 has a mic port (I 
cant imagine 
it wouldnt) then I would recommend it. It's not that expensive. If I remember 
correctly, it's 
around $115?

Hope that helps.

David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For all you HV20 owners out there, I have a problem (and I know Kent Bye has
 the same issue)
 
 Camera Noise!!
 
 Check out all the camera noise in this video I made with the camera:
 http://vimeo.com/475731
 
 Lots of high-pitched noise
 obviously this is because the internal mic is so close to the tape
 mechanism. And obviously, when the room is quiet the auto-gain ettenuator
 makes that noise even louder.
 
 I have used lapel mics to get rid of the noise and that works great, but I
 want a solution for when I am just filming other people and things. I
 thought about getting a shotgun mic but I am not sure if it would help as
 much as I want it to.
 
 so I am asking these questions:
 
 - does your HV20 camera make this much noise?
 - what do you do to stop the camera noise?
 - what kind of shotgun works well with the camera?
 
 -- 
 Josh Leo
 
 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.ultrakawaii.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Robert Croma
Josh, that's a hell of a whine. I suspect that's not right. I'd
definitely consider a service. Doesn't sound good. Haven't experienced
anything of the sort on mine. I've been using the same mic as Michael
Verdi [ http://rurl.org/h65 ], with good results. And it takes a dead
cat wind muff, too. I'm sure you could even strap an actual dead cat
to it and things would be dandy. But I haven't tried that yet...but
it's only a matter of time. : )

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know it has that advanced hotshoe so I was thinking about getting that
 Canon DM-50 microphone that works with that...
 
 On Jan 31, 2008 2:52 PM, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
On Jan 31, 2008 1:27 PM, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]joshleo%40gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   - does your HV20 camera make this much noise?
 
  Wow. Mine does not make that much noise.
 
   - what do you do to stop the camera noise?
   - what kind of shotgun works well with the camera?
 
  I've been using the Rhode Video Mic - been pretty happy with it.
 
 
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/363083-REG/Rode_VIDEOMIC_VideoMic_Camera_Mounted.html
 
  - Verdi
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Josh Leo
 
 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.ultrakawaii.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Irene Duma
My hv20 doesn¹t make that much noise either.

I have the Rode video mic too ­ but find that it does pick up some camera
noise still. I read online about getting an L bracket that will lift it up a
bit higher from the body of the camera...anyone know of such a bracket?

I once shot indoors with a dying flourescent bulb that made a horrendous
noise something like that when the mic picked it up. I was able to get rid
of most of it with this FCP plug-in -  Mr. Hum by Wave arts.
http://www.wavearts.com/MasterRestoration.html

Sadly my 30 day free trial expired so am waiting for my next paid gig to buy
the software because it was pretty cool.

I went with the Rode mic vs the Canon when a post in a forum revealed that
with the Rode, you can use it on other cameras that you may have as well,
whereas the Canon will only work with the hotshoe mount. And since mics last
longer than cameras, you¹ll  be able to use the Rode on other subsequent
cameras you buy. Thought that was a good selling point.

Irene

Irene Duma
Strange Duck Media
...a good egg

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T 416-769-1879 C 416-535-0652
web design and creative marketing
blogging easy computer tips http://www.strangeduck.com/blog
and comedy at http://www.bittertonic.com






On 1/31/08 5:00 PM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  
 
 Yeah, I've only played with the camera once, and that noise doesnt sound
 right.  I'd use that warranty and send it in just in case.
 Couldn't hurt!
 
 On Jan 31, 2008 1:46 PM, Robert Croma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:robert.croma%40gmail.com  wrote:
 
Josh, that's a hell of a whine.
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Jackson West
Just from an audio-geek perspective, if you can figure out the pitch of the
hum it should be fairly easy to attenuate it using a notch-filter or
parametric EQ in FCP.  I used to do this all the time with sixty-cycle hum
from old analog equipment.

JW

On Jan 31, 2008 2:16 PM, Irene Duma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   My hv20 doesn¹t make that much noise either.

 I have the Rode video mic too ­ but find that it does pick up some camera
 noise still. I read online about getting an L bracket that will lift it up
 a
 bit higher from the body of the camera...anyone know of such a bracket?

 I once shot indoors with a dying flourescent bulb that made a horrendous
 noise something like that when the mic picked it up. I was able to get rid
 of most of it with this FCP plug-in - Mr. Hum by Wave arts.
 http://www.wavearts.com/MasterRestoration.html

 Sadly my 30 day free trial expired so am waiting for my next paid gig to
 buy
 the software because it was pretty cool.

 I went with the Rode mic vs the Canon when a post in a forum revealed that
 with the Rode, you can use it on other cameras that you may have as well,
 whereas the Canon will only work with the hotshoe mount. And since mics
 last
 longer than cameras, you¹ll be able to use the Rode on other subsequent
 cameras you buy. Thought that was a good selling point.

 Irene

 Irene Duma
 Strange Duck Media
 ...a good egg

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] irene%40strangeduck.com
 T 416-769-1879 C 416-535-0652
 web design and creative marketing
 blogging easy computer tips http://www.strangeduck.com/blog
 and comedy at http://www.bittertonic.com


 On 1/31/08 5:00 PM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]schlomo%40gmail.com
 wrote:

 
 
 
 
  Yeah, I've only played with the camera once, and that noise doesnt sound
  right. I'd use that warranty and send it in just in case.
  Couldn't hurt!
 
  On Jan 31, 2008 1:46 PM, Robert Croma [EMAIL 
  PROTECTED]robert.croma%40gmail.com
  mailto:robert.croma%40gmail.com  wrote:
 
   Josh, that's a hell of a whine.
  

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
Yeah, I've only played with the camera once, and that noise doesnt sound
right.  I'd use that warranty and send it in just in case.
Couldn't hurt!

On Jan 31, 2008 1:46 PM, Robert Croma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Josh, that's a hell of a whine.





-- 
Schlomo Rabinowitz
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://hatfactory.net
AIM:schlomochat


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread influxxmedia
Not used the HV20 per se, but used many miniDV palmcorder types back in school 
days. 
What you are describing does sound like tape whir/whine. This is the problem 
with smaller 
consumer-type cameras, even really good ones like the HV20. So compact the mic 
is right 
there next to the tape drive...

First, if you have the ability in your menu system you can turn off auto gain. 
This will only 
make your audio pulse and pump as levels change. Sounds awful. 

Second, if you can afford it get something like a BeachTek box. This device 
screws into the 
bottom of the camera on the tripod mount, it has an 1/8 inch jack to plug into 
the mic in 
on consumer cameras, and has 2 XLR inputs with the appropriate controls. About 
$100 US 
and work very well. Used with an affordable shotgun mic like an Azden it will 
significantly 
improve your audio. Poor audio is the one really easy thing that separates good 
movies 
from crap ones (speaking as someone who has made a fair few crappy audio crap 
movies).

Of course you could also go to the trouble of getting (wireless) lav system. 
But not having 
used one I cant say. Not sure if they have XLR or 1/8 connections.

So yes, an eternal mic highly recommended.

adam



[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Christopher Polack
I just bought this Audio-technica ATR-55 shotgun mic for $50 bucks off  
of eBay.

Topher Polack
http://www.thediversion.com
http://www.christopherpolack.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Jan McLaughlin
The hum being something horrible happening in the camera, camera hum
generally is a function of 'proximity effect'.

The mic is next to the machine. The mic will pick up that which is closest,
best. Proximity.

That's why lavs work well - they can get closest to the bodies' resonators
for those wide shots and walk and talks.

Sometimes an inch one way or another makes all the difference in the world.

Mic placement is everything.

If the mic ain't in the right place, you got nuthin'.

What ever tool (mic / mixer / camera) know its limits - find its limits in
experiments - and respect them.

You'll make great sound.

Jan

-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
aim=janofsound
air=862.571.5334
skype=janmclaughlin


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread Brook Hinton
Every HV20 seems to have a diffferent level of mechanical noise, but
they are all a bit loud.

The DM50 does not do well vs. the videomics according to those who
have used both. The DM50 is a decidedly consumer product - both the
Rode's are designed to bring pro level sound to high-Z
consumer/prosumer equipment.

Beachtek boxes and the like are great IF you already have a $500+ pro
mic and a good mount for it. I have used them on multiple cameras.
They do NOT improve the mic preamp you are stuck with in the camera
(fortunately the HV20's hi-z preamp isn't nearly as bad as those on
Sony's consumer cams). But the Rode videomics really change this
equation, as they can deliver excellent sound and are DESIGNED for
camtop use. I have a beachtek, phantom power supply, and $900 AT4073s
that I use in a variety of applications, and I even HAVE a camtop
shock mount that works with them, but I'm still going for the videomic
(probably both models) for my HV20. I wish the videomics were smaller
and less look at me in appearance, but the only better option there
is the tinymic, and they are uber uber pricey (and that tiny diaphragm
just makes me nervous. How can it be a shotgun mic when my first
impulse is to convert it into a contact mic?)

There are reports that the stereo videomic still picks up camera noise
in very quiet environments, while the shotgun model is less prone to
this.

yeah, lavs solve a lot of problems. For straight talent on camera
work a GOOD wireless lav setup is wise, but in general I don't like
the sound of lavs. I prefer even imperfect open sound that has a sense
of space to the sound of lavs, as long as intelligibibility isn't an
issue.

The best sound will always be from an overhead boom as close to the
subject as possible, but that doesn't help the solo filmmaker.

Brook




___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise

2008-01-31 Thread JD Lasica
Hey, Josh. I bought my HV20 in December and have edited and posted
only 3 videos so far, like this one:

http://www.realpeoplenetwork.com/2008/01/charlie-firesto.html

To tell you the truth, I haven't heard any camera noise, but the few
videos I've shot have all been in noisy environments. One reason I
bought the HV20 was because of reviews that talked about the good
sound quality from the built-in mike.

So, thanks for the heads up, I'll keep an eye on it. Need to buy a
lapel mic anyway ...

jd lasica
www.realpeoplenetwork.com