Re: [videoblogging] Re: Denver Now Discussing Free Speech Public Safety Issues For DNC

2007-06-16 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone:

On 6/12/07, Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 While the intent to try to control or prevent those who would be
  violent may be laudable and I understand your desire to police from
  within (something most other groups like doctors and lawyers find
  impossible to do), I think the actual attempts will be fraught with
  trouble.

  We cannot control other people.  We can influence them. It creates a
  sticky wicket for the peace-able among us.

  And so I would encourage you to get your message out there as loud as
  possible and attract as many people to your point of view as possible,
  and be able to perhaps demonstrate by the numbers, that the majority
  of new media or the voters or the videobloggers are committed to
  nonviolence or whatever. (Are we?  I don't know actually.)

  Any time any of us attempt to speak for or restrain the acts of others
  without their express buy on, then we are simply doing the same things
  we reject when others attempt to do that to us.  It's one of those one
  way streets that makes sense when you go down it forward, but really
  doesn't makes sense when you turn around and look at it from the other
  direction.

  You meanwhile have a passion and a vehicle and go to town with it and
  see what happens!

Well I have just posted an audio podcast which goes into the point I'm
trying to make (Expressing emotion and passion via text has NEVER been
my forte' if you can tell :) ).  The podcast is at
http://thepcradioshow.blogspot.com/2007/06/pat-cook-show-episode-09.html
(Permalink).  Once you download it, cue it up to the 34 minute mark.
My comments will go pretty much to the end.

The topic was also brought up on my TV show last week, though it will
be posted shortly.  I'll follow up with info on how and where you can
catch that as soon as it's posted. :)

  Cheers :D

-- 
Pat Cook
Denver, Colorado
BLOGS  PODCASTS -
AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS  - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/
PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
PAT'S hEALTH  MEDICAL WONDERS VIDEOCAST -
http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
YOUTUBE CHANNEL - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
THE PAT COOK SHOW  - http://www.livevideo.com/thepcshow
THE PAT COOK SHOW (Blogger Page) - http://thepctvshow.blogspot.com/
THE PAT COOK SHOW (Audio Podcast) - http://thepcradioshow.blogspot.com/


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Denver Now Discussing Free Speech Public Safety Issues For DNC

2007-06-16 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone:

On 6/16/07, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well I have just posted an audio podcast which goes into the point I'm
 trying to make (Expressing emotion and passion via text has NEVER been
 my forte' if you can tell :) ).  The podcast is at
 http://thepcradioshow.blogspot.com/2007/06/pat-cook-show-episode-09.html
 (Permalink).  Once you download it, cue it up to the 34 minute mark.
 My comments will go pretty much to the end.

 The topic was also brought up on my TV show last week, though it will
 be posted shortly.  I'll follow up with info on how and where you can
 catch that as soon as it's posted. :)

The video has just been posted.  It is at
http://thepctvshow.blogspot.com/2007/06/pat-cook-show-episode-04.html
(Permalink).  The video leads off with the group I mentioned in my
radio show which aired the following Wednesday that's trying to
recreate Chicago 1968, but after that, go to the 23 minute mark as
that's where I make my point in earnest, though I sorta lead up to it
throughout.

Figured you would wanna know. :D

   Cheers :D

-- 
Pat Cook
Denver, Colorado
BLOGS  PODCASTS -
AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS  - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/
PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
PAT'S hEALTH  MEDICAL WONDERS VIDEOCAST -
http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
YOUTUBE CHANNEL - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
THE PAT COOK SHOW  - http://www.livevideo.com/thepcshow
THE PAT COOK SHOW (Blogger Page) - http://thepctvshow.blogspot.com/
THE PAT COOK SHOW (Audio Podcast) - http://thepcradioshow.blogspot.com/


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Denver Now Discussing Free Speech Public Safety Issues For DNC

2007-06-12 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone:

On 6/11/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Im sure many people consider that violence is in itself the strongest
  form of bad publicity.

Yes and we need to turn the tables back onto them.  In other words,
expose their violent ways and plans so they can be dealt with by
proper authorities BEFORE they strike next year.

  There are those who genuinely believe in a cause but resort to actions
  that hamper the cause.

And there are those who are just plain STUPID enough to not see any
other way which DOES NOT hamper the cause.

  There is also the concept of the Agent Provocateurs:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur

  The state, as the only entity which has 'the legitimate right to
  commit violence', finds it rather easy to deal with opponents who
  resort to violence, it makes it so easy to crush and discredit the
  opponents.

Unfortunately it is this viewpoint which the mainstream public sees
since it's been proven time and time again to the mainstream public
that activists, no matter how well-intended they are, simply CANNOT be
a sustained self-policing community.

(Note when I say they, I refer to the mainstream public's view of us
political activists)

This image has to be changed.  I dunno how.  But we've got to start
somewhere.  And if it means using the power of the Internet and our
blogs/videoblogs/podcasts, then I say SO BE IT.

We've got to DO SOMETHING peoples.  And the DNC next year right here
in Denver is a good time to prove that political activism CAN be
achieved WITHOUT seeing the city get turned upside down and inside out
on national, if not international, television.

We can't really do anything about suicide bombers and other terrorists
wanting to cause harm, but we can take care of our own so the police
can concern themselves with the suicide bombers and other terrorists
WITHOUT having to worry about what we'll do too.

Just my opinion...

-- 
Pat Cook
Denver, Colorado
WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS  - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/
PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
Pat's Health  Medical Wonders VideoCast -
http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/
YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Denver Now Discussing Free Speech Public Safety Issues For DNC

2007-06-12 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone:

On 6/11/07, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The right to freedom of speech is non-negotiable. It can't be withheld
  due to the potential threat of violence.

Ohh??  So does that mean that people shouldn't be allowed to commute
to and from work and home in Downtown Denver because the place where
the convention will be housed is ALSO in Downtown Denver (Along with
the many free speech areas)?

One of the local city council members took the approach that one's
right to commute to and from work and home is non-negotiable too.  It
may not be in the Constitution or any other legal document, but people
shouldn't be FORCED TO TEMPORARILY RELOCATE or take time off from work
just so a bunch of people can excercise their right to free speech
while a bunch of other people turn the city upside down and inside out
on national, if not international, television.

And you know something?  He's got a valid point.  People SHOULD NOT
have to temporarily relocate or take time off from work just so a
bunch of people can excercise their right to free speech while a bunch
of other people turn the city upside down and inside out on national,
if not international, television.  It's just not right.  How would YOU
like it if you had to put your life on hold because of this?  You
probably wouldn't like it too well, would you?

There's got to be a common ground.  It's there alright.  It's just a
process of finding it.

  I have and continue to have serious disagreements with the policies of
  the current administration.  To some in this country that in and of
  itself is act of treason. I'm not an anarchist. I would not and will
  not condone any acts of destruction of personal or private property.

Hey, I'm with you 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000%
(If not more).  :)

  By the criteria you present my presence at the convention would be
  disallowed. I cannot be an agent to assist in political profiling of
  citizens based on group affiliation.

If you have no intention of breaking the law, why would you fear
being, as you put it, disallowed?

  I appreciate the problems Denver will have concerning public safety.
  It will not be easy to balance the rights of citizens with the
  multiplicity of people who want to do harm, both foreign and domestic.

  I am only speaking for myself here. I don't believe using a blog/vlog
  to prevent another person's from expressing their political freedom of
  speech or to address concerns to their government is appropriate.

Okay.  What do you think IS an appropriate medium or method to accomplish this?

  Challenge, yes. Dispute? You Betcha. Profile and prevent other
  expression based on political affiliation?

  No.

Well then, consider it a challenge.  A challenge for the groups to
explain their intentions in case they've somehow been misinterpreted.
If the groups can't explain themselves, then I guess the original
interpretation will just have to stand on their own merits (Whatever
they're worth), now will they?

   Cheers :D

-- 
Pat Cook
Denver, Colorado
WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS  - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/
PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
Pat's Health  Medical Wonders VideoCast -
http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/
YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Denver Now Discussing Free Speech Public Safety Issues For DNC

2007-06-12 Thread Roxanne Darling
While the intent to try to control or prevent those who would be
violent may be laudable and I understand your desire to police from
within (something most other groups like doctors and lawyers find
impossible to do), I think the actual attempts will be fraught with
trouble.

We cannot control other people.  We can influence them. It creates a
sticky wicket for the peace-able among us.

And so I would encourage you to get your message out there as loud as
possible and attract as many people to your point of view as possible,
and be able to perhaps demonstrate by the numbers, that the majority
of new media or the voters or the videobloggers are committed to
nonviolence or whatever. (Are we?  I don't know actually.)

Any time any of us attempt to speak for or restrain the acts of others
without their express buy on, then we are simply doing the same things
we reject when others attempt to do that to us.  It's one of those one
way streets that makes sense when you go down it forward, but really
doesn't makes sense when you turn around and look at it from the other
direction.

You meanwhile have a passion and a vehicle and go to town with it and
see what happens!

Aloha,

Rox



On 6/12/07, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






 Hi everyone:

  On 6/11/07, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   The right to freedom of speech is non-negotiable. It can't be withheld
   due to the potential threat of violence.

  Ohh?? So does that mean that people shouldn't be allowed to commute
  to and from work and home in Downtown Denver because the place where
  the convention will be housed is ALSO in Downtown Denver (Along with
  the many free speech areas)?

  One of the local city council members took the approach that one's
  right to commute to and from work and home is non-negotiable too. It
  may not be in the Constitution or any other legal document, but people
  shouldn't be FORCED TO TEMPORARILY RELOCATE or take time off from work
  just so a bunch of people can excercise their right to free speech
  while a bunch of other people turn the city upside down and inside out
  on national, if not international, television.

  And you know something? He's got a valid point. People SHOULD NOT
  have to temporarily relocate or take time off from work just so a
  bunch of people can excercise their right to free speech while a bunch
  of other people turn the city upside down and inside out on national,
  if not international, television. It's just not right. How would YOU
  like it if you had to put your life on hold because of this? You
  probably wouldn't like it too well, would you?

  There's got to be a common ground. It's there alright. It's just a
  process of finding it.

   I have and continue to have serious disagreements with the policies of
   the current administration. To some in this country that in and of
   itself is act of treason. I'm not an anarchist. I would not and will
   not condone any acts of destruction of personal or private property.

  Hey, I'm with you 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000%
  (If not more). :)

   By the criteria you present my presence at the convention would be
   disallowed. I cannot be an agent to assist in political profiling of
   citizens based on group affiliation.

  If you have no intention of breaking the law, why would you fear
  being, as you put it, disallowed?

   I appreciate the problems Denver will have concerning public safety.
   It will not be easy to balance the rights of citizens with the
   multiplicity of people who want to do harm, both foreign and domestic.
  
   I am only speaking for myself here. I don't believe using a blog/vlog
   to prevent another person's from expressing their political freedom of
   speech or to address concerns to their government is appropriate.

  Okay. What do you think IS an appropriate medium or method to accomplish
 this?

   Challenge, yes. Dispute? You Betcha. Profile and prevent other
   expression based on political affiliation?
  
   No.

  Well then, consider it a challenge. A challenge for the groups to
  explain their intentions in case they've somehow been misinterpreted.
  If the groups can't explain themselves, then I guess the original
  interpretation will just have to stand on their own merits (Whatever
  they're worth), now will they?

Cheers :D

  --
  Pat Cook
  Denver, Colorado
  WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/
  PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/
  Pat's Health  Medical Wonders VideoCast -
  http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/
  MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/
  YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/
  THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow
  


-- 
Roxanne Darling
o ke kai means of the sea in hawaiian
808-384-5554
http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling

http://www.beachwalks.tv
http://www.barefeetshop.com
http://www.barefeetstudios.com