Re: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

2015-06-15 Thread Meghann Matwichuk
A very enthusiastic second to Terry's response.  If we want to get 
into ethics as far as this matter is concerned, aren't those of us 
tasked with funding responsibilities charged with making the best use of 
our limited funds?  To my mind, routinely spending money on rights you 
do not (by law) need raises ethical concerns.  I might also be concerned 
about the copyright specialist's facility with exemptions that fall 
outside the scope of Fair Use (such as the Face-to-Face teaching 
exemption, the TEACH Act, DMCA, etc.)  Just as there are many 
distributors who are ill-informed about PPR and the need for special 
'educational' rights in the U.S., there are plenty of folks in academia 
who use the 'Fair Use' brush inelegantly (perhaps inappropriately).


Good luck,

--
Meghann Matwichuk, M.S.
Associate Librarian
Film and Video Collection
Morris Library, University of Delaware
181 S. College Ave.
Newark, DE 19717
(302) 831-1475
http://www.lib.udel.edu/filmandvideo


On 6/15/2015 12:45 PM, Simpkins, Terry W. wrote:


Hi Anna

This issue crops up in various forms fairly frequently.  First, 
however, a minor point of clarification.  Classroom screenings are 
actually NOT “fair use” (17 U.S. Code § 107) 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 but rather fall under 
a different section of the USCode relating limitations to exclusive 
rights, namely 17 U.S. Code § 110 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/110.  This is actually a 
good thing, in my opinion, since you do not have to apply the 
(notoriously, albeit sometimes usefully, vague) “four factor” fair use 
test when it comes to face-to-face classroom screenings. Section 110 
does, however, outline a variety of other conditions that need to be 
met, but these conditions are pretty straightforward to interpret.


As for the ethicality of doing this: why on earth would it be 
/unethical/ to assert rights granted to you under the law?  If you 
want to talk about what is or is not ethical, how about distributors 
who, whether through ignorance of the law or outright deceit, attempt 
to coerce or scare you into wasting your institutional resources by 
buying overpriced copies that come with PPR you may not need?


At Middlebury, if we need PPR, we purchase PPR.  If we don’t need PPR, 
we buy the lowest price copy we can legally acquire.  Don’t overthink, 
and stand up for rights that are yours.


Regards,

Terry

*Terry Simpkins*

Director, Discovery  Access Services

Library  Information Services

Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753

(802) 443-5045

twsimp...@middlebury.edu mailto:twsimp...@middlebury.edu__

*From:*videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Anna Simon

*Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 PM
*To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
*Subject:* [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional 
video.  Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that 
classroom screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which 
are included in most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy 
the home-use copy of the DVD, if available, and not the institutional 
copy. Of course if a video will be screened outside a class, say at a 
film festival, we will upgrade to a PPR.


At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually 
suggested we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I 
couldn't afford to buy all the videos I wanted from his company at the 
institutional price.


Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do 
other libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy 
the institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the 
video at the lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional 
copy is it because you feel you *should* or another reason?


Thanks for sharing.

Library-logo-ES.png



*Anna Simon *
Collection, Research  Instruction Librarian
Art, Film, and Museum Studies
202-687-7467
ajs...@georgetown.edu mailto:ajs...@georgetown.edu
Ars Hoya: GU Art Blog https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/


Georgetown University
Lauinger Library
37th  O Sts. NW
Washington, DC 20057



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions

Re: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

2015-06-15 Thread Simpkins, Terry W.
Hi Anna
This issue crops up in various forms fairly frequently.  First, however, a 
minor point of clarification.  Classroom screenings are actually NOT “fair use” 
(17 U.S. Code § 107)https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 but rather 
fall under a different section of the USCode relating limitations to exclusive 
rights, namely 17 U.S. Code § 
110https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/110.  This is actually a good 
thing, in my opinion, since you do not have to apply the (notoriously, albeit 
sometimes usefully, vague) “four factor” fair use test when it comes to 
face-to-face classroom screenings.  Section 110 does, however, outline a 
variety of other conditions that need to be met, but these conditions are 
pretty straightforward to interpret.

As for the ethicality of doing this: why on earth would it be unethical to 
assert rights granted to you under the law?  If you want to talk about what is 
or is not ethical, how about distributors who, whether through ignorance of the 
law or outright deceit, attempt to coerce or scare you into wasting your 
institutional resources by buying overpriced copies that come with PPR you may 
not need?

At Middlebury, if we need PPR, we purchase PPR.  If we don’t need PPR, we buy 
the lowest price copy we can legally acquire.  Don’t overthink, and stand up 
for rights that are yours.

Regards,
Terry

Terry Simpkins
Director, Discovery  Access Services
Library  Information Services
Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753
(802) 443-5045
twsimp...@middlebury.edumailto:twsimp...@middlebury.edu


From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Anna Simon
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional video.  
Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that classroom 
screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which are included in 
most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy the home-use copy of the 
DVD, if available, and not the institutional copy. Of course if a video will be 
screened outside a class, say at a film festival, we will upgrade to a PPR.
At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually suggested 
we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I couldn't afford to buy all 
the videos I wanted from his company at the institutional price.
Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do other 
libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy the 
institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the video at the 
lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional copy is it because you 
feel you *should* or another reason?
Thanks for sharing.

[Library-logo-ES.png]

Anna Simon
Collection, Research  Instruction Librarian
Art, Film, and Museum Studies
202-687-7467
ajs...@georgetown.edumailto:ajs...@georgetown.edu
Ars Hoya: GU Art Bloghttps://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/


Georgetown University
Lauinger Library
37th  O Sts. NW
Washington, DC 20057


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

2015-06-15 Thread Anna Simon
Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional
video.  Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that
classroom screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which are
included in most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy the
home-use copy of the DVD, if available, and not the institutional copy. Of
course if a video will be screened outside a class, say at a film festival,
we will upgrade to a PPR.

At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually
suggested we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I couldn't
afford to buy all the videos I wanted from his company at the institutional
price.

Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do other
libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy the
institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the video at
the lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional copy is it
because you feel you *should* or another reason?

Thanks for sharing.

[image: Library-logo-ES.png]
*Anna Simon *
Collection, Research  Instruction Librarian
Art, Film, and Museum Studies
202-687-7467
ajs...@georgetown.edu
Ars Hoya: GU Art Blog https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/


Georgetown University
Lauinger Library
37th  O Sts. NW
Washington, DC 20057
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

2015-06-15 Thread Laura Jenemann
Hi Anna (and all),

I did want to ask a related question that may help Anna: has anyone 
successfully opted out or renegotiated rights from the major educational film 
distributors who
have their PPR bundled into their educational price?

For example: Film costs $400, for educational/PPR and you have renegotiated for 
X price as educational/no PPR?

Regards,
Laura

Laura Jenemann
Media, Film Studies, and Dance Librarian
George Mason University
703-993-7593
ljene...@gmu.edu

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Anna Simon
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional video.  
Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that classroom 
screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which are included in 
most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy the home-use copy of the 
DVD, if available, and not the institutional copy. Of course if a video will be 
screened outside a class, say at a film festival, we will upgrade to a PPR.
At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually suggested 
we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I couldn't afford to buy all 
the videos I wanted from his company at the institutional price.
Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do other 
libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy the 
institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the video at the 
lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional copy is it because you 
feel you *should* or another reason?
Thanks for sharing.

[Library-logo-ES.png]

Anna Simon
Collection, Research  Instruction Librarian
Art, Film, and Museum Studies
202-687-7467
ajs...@georgetown.edumailto:ajs...@georgetown.edu
Ars Hoya: GU Art Bloghttps://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/


Georgetown University
Lauinger Library
37th  O Sts. NW
Washington, DC 20057


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies

2015-06-15 Thread Jessica Rosner
I don't think you can opt out and I doubt you can renegotiate. You can
try to see if the title is available without PPR rights for a lesser cost
usually through sales to individuals. It should be noted that there are
many films almost all non fiction that  basically are educational films and
have little or no market outside of educational institutions. I personally
think things would be far less frustrating if these titles were never
offered for individual sales.It is simply not financially  possible to make
these films on rarefied topics without selling them for a few hundred bucks
to institutions but again offering them for individual sales just muddies
the waters. I have often worked directly with filmmakers and always advised
them NOT to offer these kinds of films for individual sale. In a few cases
we received specific requests often from researchers and we made some
special accommodation but never listed them for sale to individuals.

However there is more confusion and frustration in what I would call films
with a lot of educational interest but also retail and individual interest.
Basically you can't really have your cake and eat it too, if a filmmaker or
distributor wants to make money via retail and individual sales, they are
going to have to expect institutions to buy it at the lower price unless
they have a specific need for PPR. In many cases a film is released at
higher price during the window' between its  first release/showings
before it is available for individual sales  and eventual  retail release
for much less, generally in  3- 6 months. If you want it when it first
comes out you pay a premium if you can wait, it will be less.

I do think streaming rights offer a solution for some but not all of these
situations . Need for PPR is rare (though without mentioning titles I work
or have worked on some that do and should play outside of class) but need
for streaming is increasing. I would think about negotiating  to get
streaming rights rather than PPR rights in cases where a title is not
available at a lower cost.

I think we all want filmmakers and  independent distributors to be able to
survive and it is  pretty much impossible to do this if specialized mainly
non fiction work sells for $30 to 100 institutions and 30 individuals. Both
sides need to work together to find both a pricing and use system that
works.

This issue comes up around once a month. Perhaps there could be more
discussions at ALA and NMM?

Jessica

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Laura Jenemann ljene...@gmu.edu wrote:

  Hi Anna (and all),



 I did want to ask a related question that may help Anna: has anyone
 successfully opted out or renegotiated rights from the major educational
 film distributors who

 have their PPR bundled into their educational price?



 For example: Film costs $400, for educational/PPR and you have
 renegotiated for X price as educational/no PPR?



 Regards,

 Laura



 Laura Jenemann

 Media, Film Studies, and Dance Librarian

 George Mason University

 703-993-7593

 ljene...@gmu.edu



 *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
 videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Anna Simon
 *Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 PM
 *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
 *Subject:* [Videolib] Library policy on buying institutional video copies



 Our library is currently re-writing its policy on buying institutional
 video.  Under the guidance of our copyright specialist who says that
 classroom screenings fall under fair-use and do not require PPR (which are
 included in most institutional prices), our new policy is to buy the
 home-use copy of the DVD, if available, and not the institutional copy. Of
 course if a video will be screened outside a class, say at a film festival,
 we will upgrade to a PPR.

 At least one distributor has balked at this policy; another actually
 suggested we purchase at the home-use price when I mentioned I couldn't
 afford to buy all the videos I wanted from his company at the institutional
 price.

 Legally this seems sound, but I'm still unsure about ethically. Do other
 libraries have a policy on this spelled out? Do you always buy the
 institutional price/PPR if available, or do you try to source the video at
 the lowest possible price? If you do buy the institutional copy is it
 because you feel you *should* or another reason?

 Thanks for sharing.

 [image: Library-logo-ES.png]

 *Anna Simon *
 Collection, Research  Instruction Librarian
 Art, Film, and Museum Studies
 202-687-7467
 ajs...@georgetown.edu
 Ars Hoya: GU Art Blog https://blogs.commons.georgetown.edu/ajs299/


 Georgetown University
 Lauinger Library
 37th  O Sts. NW
 Washington, DC 20057



 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve