[Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Jo Ann Reynolds
Hi Everyone,

 

UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider
interlibrary loan audience. 

 

ILL staff states:  " Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media to
CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston
Library Consortium] libraries.  Since ILL transactions are based upon
reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media
from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection to
unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary Lending
Librarian) will enable us to better serve our users."

 

We no longer have a media library and our media collection is open
stacks and accessible to patrons. The regular loan period is seven days
to all patrons. Reserve loans are 3 hour, longer for faculty who placed
item on reserve.

 

I am responsible for all types of reserve material for classes - books,
purls, scans, personal copies, media, and streaming media - at the main
campus. We serve apx. 31,000 enrollees in 900 courses at all campuses.

 

I'm pretty sure this is going to happen and I am curious as to how other
libraries handle this issue.

 

Concerns for me are:

1.   Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and
the expectation by same that it will be there).

2.   Transit and/or user damage.

3.   Lost/missing/long overdue items.

4.   Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace
items.

5.   A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently
process about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.

6.   Competing uses - ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the
collection to be available to classes.

 

For those with experience in either ILL and/or course reserves:

1.How do you handle this issue of competing resources?

2.   Are damaged items/no returns/long overdues problems?

3.   If you do loan out your media collection via ILL, how's that
working?

4.   What other solutions can you suggest, e.g. using ILL requests
as purchase requests and/or placing heavily used items on permanent
reserve?

 

Thanks in advance for your input.

 

Jo Ann

 

Jo Ann Reynolds

Reserve Services Coordinator

University of Connecticut

Homer Babbidge Library

Storrs,  CT

860-486-1406

jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu

 

Question Reality

 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Hutchison, Jane
JoAnn,  Excellent questions.  We have been loaning media since I became
the AV Librarian back in 1982 at WPUNJ.  I'll try to answer the
questions below in red.

 

Jane B. Hutchison

Associate Director
President

Instruction & Research Technology  CCUMC:
Leadership in Media & Academic Technology

William Paterson University
http://www.ccumc.org

Wayne, NJ 07470

973-720-2980 (work)

973-418-7727 (cell)

973-720-2585 (facs)

hutchis...@wpunj.edu

 

From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jo Ann
Reynolds
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:19 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

 

Hi Everyone,

 

UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider
interlibrary loan audience. 

 

ILL staff states:  " Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media to
CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston
Library Consortium] libraries.  Since ILL transactions are based upon
reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media
from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection to
unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary Lending
Librarian) will enable us to better serve our users."

 

We no longer have a media library and our media collection is open
stacks and accessible to patrons. The regular loan period is seven days
to all patrons. Reserve loans are 3 hour, longer for faculty who placed
item on reserve.

 

I am responsible for all types of reserve material for classes - books,
purls, scans, personal copies, media, and streaming media - at the main
campus. We serve apx. 31,000 enrollees in 900 courses at all campuses.

 

I'm pretty sure this is going to happen and I am curious as to how other
libraries handle this issue.

 

Concerns for me are:

1.   Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and
the expectation by same that it will be there). We have a booking system
so we know what has been reserved by faculty for classes.  Sometimes
that happens, but very infrequently.

2.   Transit and/or user damage.  In all the years I've loaned
media, we only had a couple of damages and they were records
(LPs...remember them) and one VHS tape and they were replaced.

3.   Lost/missing/long overdue items.  The lending libraries are
good about getting them back on time.  If they don't then we don't lend
to them again.

4.   Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace
items.  Those items that are hard to replace, we don't lend out.  When
we get a request, we look at each item to see whether we can or not.

5.   A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently
process about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8. We do place those
items that are out of print and hard to replace on Reserve and also
heavily used items because they are needed throughout the semester.
They go on general reserve.  And we don't lend them out.

6.   Competing uses - ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the
collection to be available to classes.  Just as in #1, we know what's
historically needed for classes and we don't loan those materials and if
they are already booked for classes, then we don't loan.

 

For those with experience in either ILL and/or course reserves:

1.How do you handle this issue of competing resources? We are
providing more licensed streaming media, so ILL wouldn't enter the
picture and the content would be available to any faculty or student.

2.   Are damaged items/no returns/long overdues problems? No, not
really

3.   If you do loan out your media collection via ILL, how's that
working? It's working finewe look at each request and decide whether
we can let the title go or not. 

4.   What other solutions can you suggest, e.g. using ILL requests
as purchase requests and/or placing heavily used items on permanent
reserve? We do have some out of print titles on Reserve and heavily used
items on Reserve; however if they are heavily used, then we see if we
can purchase a license to stream to our campus.  

 

Thanks in advance for your input.

 

Jo Ann

 

Jo Ann Reynolds

Reserve Services Coordinator

University of Connecticut

Homer Babbidge Library

Storrs,  CT

860-486-1406

jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu

 

Question Reality

 

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Ciara Healy
Concerns for me are:

1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the 
expectation by same that it will be there).

- Use the booking module in your ILS. Works with ILL to show an item is 
unavailable for lending if the item is booked. Also trains up the 
professors to request films in advance (at the beginning of the semester 
when they have it on their syllabus - woah!) rather than waiting until 
the last minute.

2. Transit and/or user damage.

- Same as with any other ILL material. The library that asked for the 
loan pays. Why is a media item different from a book in this case? 
Perhaps more expensive media will not be eligible for ILL. Or if an item 
is very heavily used, buy another copy and only loan 1.

3. Lost/missing/long overdue items.

- Same as above. ILL already has procedure in place.

4. Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace items.

- Some don't loan these for this reason. Like a rare book or something 
from the archives may not loan.

5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process 
about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.

Often reserve items sit all semester. If it can sit for the time period 
needed (the week before and after it is shown in class, for example) it 
would be more available for loan.

Competing uses – ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the 
collection to be available to classes.
- How is it different for media than for books in this same situation?

http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/rts/vrt/professionalresources/vrtresources/interlibraryloan.cfm


Ciara Healy
Outreach Librarian
Polk Library
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
(920) 424-7329
Twitter: polklibrary
Facebook: Polk Library, UW Oshkosh



Jo Ann Reynolds wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider 
> interlibrary loan audience.
>
> ILL staff states: “ Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media to 
> CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston 
> Library Consortium] libraries. Since ILL transactions are based upon 
> reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media 
> from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection 
> to unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary 
> Lending Librarian) will enable us to better serve our users.”
>
> We no longer have a media library and our media collection is open 
> stacks and accessible to patrons. The regular loan period is seven 
> days to all patrons. Reserve loans are 3 hour, longer for faculty who 
> placed item on reserve.
>
> I am responsible for all types of reserve material for classes – 
> books, purls, scans, personal copies, media, and streaming media – at 
> the main campus. We serve apx. 31,000 enrollees in 900 courses at all 
> campuses.
>
> I’m pretty sure this is going to happen and I am curious as to how 
> other libraries handle this issue.
>
> Concerns for me are:
>
> 1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the 
> expectation by same that it will be there).
>
> 2. Transit and/or user damage.
>
> 3. Lost/missing/long overdue items.
>
> 4. Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace items.
>
> 5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process 
> about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.
>
> 6. Competing uses – ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the 
> collection to be available to classes.
>
> For those with experience in either ILL and/or course reserves:
>
> 1. How do you handle this issue of competing resources?
>
> 2. Are damaged items/no returns/long overdues problems?
>
> 3. If you do loan out your media collection via ILL, how’s that working?
>
> 4. What other solutions can you suggest, e.g. using ILL requests as 
> purchase requests and/or placing heavily used items on permanent reserve?
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
> Jo Ann
>
> Jo Ann Reynolds
>
> Reserve Services Coordinator
>
> University of Connecticut
>
> Homer Babbidge Library
>
> Storrs, CT
>
> 860-486-1406
>
> jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu
>
> /Question Reality/
>
> 
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
> distributors.
>   



VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an eff

Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Jo Ann Reynolds
Hi Ciara,

Thanks for your response. 

I wrote:
1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the 
expectation by same that it will be there).

You responded:
- Use the booking module in your ILS. Works with ILL to show an item is 
unavailable for lending if the item is booked. Also trains up the 
professors to request films in advance (at the beginning of the semester

when they have it on their syllabus - woah!) rather than waiting until 
the last minute.

My response to you:
We use another method other than the booking module to indicate if an
item is on reserve so I am not worried about items already on reserve
being sent to another institution. I find your second sentence almost
offensive. We spend lots of time "training" faculty how to use our
system to their advantage. The library is here first and foremost to
provide material to the students and faculty at our University and if we
can meet the needs of other institutions without shortchanging our own,
we should do it. Working in reserve I know firsthand just what Johnny
come lately faculty can be BUT they are very busy and have a lot of
demands on their time, most of which we have no direct experience with,
and sometimes which they cannot help. I often get frantic requests from
faculty or adjuncts who have been asked to teach a class at the last
minute to fill in for an illness or an unexpected resignation. They also
might get information from a colleague or at conference about a film
they weren't aware of that greatly enhances their course content. We are
providers of resources and need to accommodate our clients' needs as
best we can and not tell them how to do their job.

I wrote:
2. Transit and/or user damage.

You responded:
- Same as with any other ILL material. The library that asked for the 
loan pays. Why is a media item different from a book in this case? 
Perhaps more expensive media will not be eligible for ILL. Or if an item

is very heavily used, buy another copy and only loan 1.

My response to you:
Media is different as it is generally more expensive and can be harder
to locate. A particular class session can be taught when a book isn't
there but it is impossible to have a class screening without the media.
Also, in many (most?) cases, the entire book is not needed for any one
class so pages needed can scanned and shipped electronically thus
depriving no one of the material. And why should we bear the cost of
purchasing a copy to loan? Just doesn't make sense.

I wrote:  
5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process 
about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8 (competition for media
resources between reserve and ILL).

You responded:
Often reserve items sit all semester. If it can sit for the time period 
needed (the week before and after it is shown in class, for example) it 
would be more available for loan.

My response to you:
Media is used for more than just classroom showings. Sometimes it's just
that but our faculty may put material on reserve as reference or so that
all students have access to it to do papers and assignments or to prep
for the final exam. Sometimes both in class screenings and individual
work are required. Even though material is on reserve it is available to
all patrons for a 3 hour loan except on the date reserved for a
screening.

I wrote:
Competing uses - ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the 
collection to be available to classes.

You responded:
- How is it different for media than for books in this same situation?

My response to you:
Media is different,  you cannot scan the "pages" you need from the media
and send the rest to be loaned or vice versa. And, as mentioned above,
you can have a particular class session without the book but you can't
have a class screening without the media.

It is a classic case of competition for resources and we will best serve
each other, our local patrons, and those of other institutions if we
look for innovative ways to make this work for both Reserve and ILL
clients instead of blaming the faculty for impeding ILL sharing because
they expect to be able to use the resources of their own library.

Regards,
Jo Ann


Jo Ann Reynolds
Reserve Services Coordinator
University of Connecticut
Homer Babbidge Library
Storrs,  CT
860-486-1406
jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu

Question Reality


-Original Message-
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Ciara Healy
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:28 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

Concerns for me are:

1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the 
expectation by same that it will be there).

- Use the booking module in your ILS. Works with ILL to show an item is 
unavailable for lending if the item is booked. Also trains up the 
professors to request films in advance (at the beginning of

Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Mandel, Debra



Hi-

Northeastern University has always been committed to media resource sharing,
and we too moved our collection into open stacks (out of my domain
altogether).  Here is our reserve person's feedback about her typical ILL
woes using our ILL services.As she says, media problems are not necessarily
worse than print ones.


"I do get frustrated when items I need for reserves are out through NExpress
or ILLiad. ILLiad items in particular are usually difficult to recall and
often don¹t come back on time. On more than one occasion I¹ve had to
purchase a replacement copy of an item that eventually came back because I
couldn¹t afford to wait for it any longer. I wouldn¹t say this problem is
any worse with media than for print items though."
 
Stephanie


On 3/5/10 2:27 PM, "Ciara Healy"  wrote:

> Concerns for me are:
> 
> 1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the
> expectation by same that it will be there).
> 
> - Use the booking module in your ILS. Works with ILL to show an item is
> unavailable for lending if the item is booked. Also trains up the
> professors to request films in advance (at the beginning of the semester
> when they have it on their syllabus - woah!) rather than waiting until
> the last minute.
> 
> 2. Transit and/or user damage.
> 
> - Same as with any other ILL material. The library that asked for the
> loan pays. Why is a media item different from a book in this case?
> Perhaps more expensive media will not be eligible for ILL. Or if an item
> is very heavily used, buy another copy and only loan 1.
> 
> 3. Lost/missing/long overdue items.
> 
> - Same as above. ILL already has procedure in place.
> 
> 4. Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace items.
> 
> - Some don't loan these for this reason. Like a rare book or something
> from the archives may not loan.
> 
> 5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process
> about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.
> 
> Often reserve items sit all semester. If it can sit for the time period
> needed (the week before and after it is shown in class, for example) it
> would be more available for loan.
> 
> Competing uses ­ ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the
> collection to be available to classes.
> - How is it different for media than for books in this same situation?
> 
> http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/rts/vrt/professionalresources/vrtresources/interl
> ibraryloan.cfm
> 
> 
> Ciara Healy
> Outreach Librarian
> Polk Library
> University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
> (920) 424-7329
> Twitter: polklibrary
> Facebook: Polk Library, UW Oshkosh
> 
> 
> 
> Jo Ann Reynolds wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider
>> interlibrary loan audience.
>> 
>> ILL staff states: ³ Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media to
>> CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston
>> Library Consortium] libraries. Since ILL transactions are based upon
>> reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media
>> from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection
>> to unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary
>> Lending Librarian) will enable us to better serve our users.²
>> 
>> We no longer have a media library and our media collection is open
>> stacks and accessible to patrons. The regular loan period is seven
>> days to all patrons. Reserve loans are 3 hour, longer for faculty who
>> placed item on reserve.
>> 
>> I am responsible for all types of reserve material for classes ­
>> books, purls, scans, personal copies, media, and streaming media ­ at
>> the main campus. We serve apx. 31,000 enrollees in 900 courses at all
>> campuses.
>> 
>> I¹m pretty sure this is going to happen and I am curious as to how
>> other libraries handle this issue.
>> 
>> Concerns for me are:
>> 
>> 1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the
>> expectation by same that it will be there).
>> 
>> 2. Transit and/or user damage.
>> 
>> 3. Lost/missing/long overdue items.
>> 
>> 4. Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace items.
>> 
>> 5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process
>> about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.
>> 
>> 6. Competing uses ­ ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the
>> collection to be available to classes.
>> 
>> For those with experience in either ILL and/or course reserves:
>> 
>> 1. How do you handle this issue of competing resources?
>> 
>> 2. Are damaged items/no returns/long overdues problems?
>> 
>> 3. If you do loan out your media collection via ILL, how¹s that working?
>> 
>> 4. What other solutions can you suggest, e.g. using ILL requests as
>> purchase requests and/or placing heavily used items on permanent reserve?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for your input.
>> 
>> Jo Ann
>> 
>> Jo Ann Reynolds
>> 
>> Reserve Services Coordinator
>> 
>> University of Connecti

Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread CROWLEY, CHRISTINE
We have two collections for media--the circulating CDs and VHS/DVDs as well as 
the limited circulation DVDs called permanent reserve. The latter contains the 
highly expensive titles like Who Moved My Cheese and the wildly popular titles 
of any price that are used interdisciplinarily. Anyone can view these items in 
the library but they check out to faculty and staff only. We would only rarely 
loan one on ILL and probably only locally. 

 

The circulating collection we are more likely to loan, usually limiting to 
within Texas. It depends on the demand.

 

My motto is "We buy this stuff for people to use" and I mean it. We don't want 
to deprive our own college community of the use, and we do want to be good 
stewards of the local taxpayers money. We try to balance that with the goodwill 
that comes from loaning these items and the hopes that we can borrow from 
others on occasion.

 

Christine Crowley

Dean of Learning Resources

Northwest Vista College

3535 N. Ellison Dr.

San Antonio, TX 78251

210.486.4572 voice

210.486.4504 fax

NEW NAME AND email--ccrowl...@alamo.edu

 

-Original Message-
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu 
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Mandel, Debra
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:48 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

 

 

 

 

Hi-

 

Northeastern University has always been committed to media resource sharing,

and we too moved our collection into open stacks (out of my domain

altogether).  Here is our reserve person's feedback about her typical ILL

woes using our ILL services.As she says, media problems are not necessarily

worse than print ones.

 

 

"I do get frustrated when items I need for reserves are out through NExpress

or ILLiad. ILLiad items in particular are usually difficult to recall and

often don¹t come back on time. On more than one occasion I¹ve had to

purchase a replacement copy of an item that eventually came back because I

couldn¹t afford to wait for it any longer. I wouldn¹t say this problem is

any worse with media than for print items though."

 

Stephanie

 

 

On 3/5/10 2:27 PM, "Ciara Healy"  wrote:

 

> Concerns for me are:

> 

> 1. Material not being there when the faculty/students need it (and the

> expectation by same that it will be there).

> 

> - Use the booking module in your ILS. Works with ILL to show an item is

> unavailable for lending if the item is booked. Also trains up the

> professors to request films in advance (at the beginning of the semester

> when they have it on their syllabus - woah!) rather than waiting until

> the last minute.

> 

> 2. Transit and/or user damage.

> 

> - Same as with any other ILL material. The library that asked for the

> loan pays. Why is a media item different from a book in this case?

> Perhaps more expensive media will not be eligible for ILL. Or if an item

> is very heavily used, buy another copy and only loan 1.

> 

> 3. Lost/missing/long overdue items.

> 

> - Same as above. ILL already has procedure in place.

> 

> 4. Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace items.

> 

> - Some don't loan these for this reason. Like a rare book or something

> from the archives may not loan.

> 

> 5. A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently process

> about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.

> 

> Often reserve items sit all semester. If it can sit for the time period

> needed (the week before and after it is shown in class, for example) it

> would be more available for loan.

> 

> Competing uses ­ ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for the

> collection to be available to classes.

> - How is it different for media than for books in this same situation?

> 

> http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/rts/vrt/professionalresources/vrtresources/interl

> ibraryloan.cfm

> 

> 

> Ciara Healy

> Outreach Librarian

> Polk Library

> University of Wisconsin Oshkosh

> (920) 424-7329

> Twitter: polklibrary

> Facebook: Polk Library, UW Oshkosh

> 

> 

> 

> Jo Ann Reynolds wrote:

>> 

>> Hi Everyone,

>> 

>> UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider

>> interlibrary loan audience.

>> 

>> ILL staff states: ³ Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media to

>> CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston

>> Library Consortium] libraries. Since ILL transactions are based upon

>> reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media

>> from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection

>> to unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary

>> Lending Librarian) will enable us t

Re: [Videolib] Resource sharing of media

2010-03-05 Thread Randal Baier
We have a consortium here in MI called MELCAT, and we've been 
circulating AV media through it. Our students are also getting media 
through it, but I'm not sure if we are giving out more than we are 
requesting.


We can "sequester" any AV materials that are needed for classes and reserve.

I don't know the stats on the benefit or detriment of this program yet 
-- we've been exchanging for about a year now. But the deal was - if our 
crowd was going to get media from all the public libraries that belong 
to the consortium, then we had to follow suit. But course reserves can 
trump.


I'll try to get some more details from our ILL coordinators on this for you.

Randal Baier



Hi Everyone,

 

UConn is mulling over opening up the media collection to a wider 
interlibrary loan audience.


 

ILL staff states:  " Currently, the HBL only lends DVD and VHS media 
to CTW consortium members, Regional Campus Libraries, and BLC [Boston 
Library Consortium] libraries.  Since ILL transactions are based upon 
reciprocity, this restriction is effecting our ability to borrow media 
from other libraries for our users. Opening the HBL media collection 
to unrestricting lending (at the discretion of the Interlibrary 
Lending Librarian) will enable us to better serve our users."


 

We no longer have a media library and our media collection is open 
stacks and accessible to patrons. The regular loan period is seven 
days to all patrons. Reserve loans are 3 hour, longer for faculty who 
placed item on reserve.


 

I am responsible for all types of reserve material for classes -- 
books, purls, scans, personal copies, media, and streaming media -- at 
the main campus. We serve apx. 31,000 enrollees in 900 courses at all 
campuses.


 

I'm pretty sure this is going to happen and I am curious as to how 
other libraries handle this issue.


 


Concerns for me are:

1.   Material not being there when the faculty/students need it 
(and the expectation by same that it will be there).


2.   Transit and/or user damage.

3.   Lost/missing/long overdue items.

4.   Re items 2 & 3, impact on hard to find/impossible to replace 
items.


5.   A growing trend for placing media on Reserve. We currently 
process about 800 titles per year, thus ramping up #8.


6.   Competing uses -- ILL and reciprocal borrowing vs. need for 
the collection to be available to classes.


 


For those with experience in either ILL and/or course reserves:

1.How do you handle this issue of competing resources?

2.   Are damaged items/no returns/long overdues problems?

3.   If you do loan out your media collection via ILL, how's that 
working?


4.   What other solutions can you suggest, e.g. using ILL requests 
as purchase requests and/or placing heavily used items on permanent 
reserve?


 


Thanks in advance for your input.

 


Jo Ann

 


Jo Ann Reynolds

Reserve Services Coordinator

University of Connecticut

Homer Babbidge Library

Storrs,  CT

860-486-1406

jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu

 


/Question Reality/

 




VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.
  


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.