Re: [Videolib] who needs the rights?

2011-02-24 Thread ghandman
Non problema magna est

gary handman


 Oops, make that /denarius/, but who's counting?

 Oh, God, I'm so embarrassed, Commander Yates (high school Latin teacher)
 is rolling in his grave.



 On 2/23/2011 10:23 PM, Randal Baier wrote:
 Well, in my very humble opinion, and mind you, I am spouting off
 without my usual thoughtful and ageless reflection. :)

 The VHS is simply a vessel. It holds the creation. It doesn't matter
 where you get it. If the student has negotiated some kind of copy
 permission and she can get a tape somewhere in order to get it to her
 new vessel, then that's just fine. It's not the library's problem. She
 is paying that $300 (or whatever price she is negotiating for) for her
 copy/rights/whatever. The library has paid their $300. She pay hers.
 The tape  is just a transfer -- shared body.

 There is something strangely biblical in this. I'm not a biblical guy,
 but Jesus sends Peter to get money from the fish's mouth, then turns
 to the tax collector and gives him his gold drachma (or tribute
 penny, /denarii /or /tetradrchm /or whatever it was called). I say,
 render unto Caesar and don't worry so much.

 http://www.wga.hu/tours/brancacc/tribute.jpg

 Randal Baier



 On 2/23/2011 5:31 PM, jwoo wrote:
 Here's a scenario that I don't think we've run across before:

 The library purchased a VHS video art tape from Electronic Arts
 Intermix with the usual limited PPR.  A student wants to exhibit the
 piece continuously as part of her MFA thesis show, and because an
 exhibition copy with rights costs $900, the student is negotiating
 with EAI for a lower price and permission to make a DVD copy of the
 library's VHS tape.

 Question:  Who needs the permission to make a copy?  The student or
 the library?  Does it make a difference if the copy is made in-house
 or outsourced?

 The student is under the assumption that she can check out the $300
 tape from the library and bring it to a video transfer shop.  If
 permission to copy was not granted to the library, would the library
 be infringing for allowing the student to copy its copy?

 Thanks,

 Janice Woo, Director of Libraries
 California College of the Arts
 5212 Broadway Oakland CA 94618
 510.594.3660 || libraries.cca.edu





 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will
 serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a
 channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions,
 and video producers and distributors.
 VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
 issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
 control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
 libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve
 as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
 communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video
 producers and distributors.



Gary Handman
Director
Media Resources Center
Moffitt Library
UC Berkeley

510-643-8566
ghand...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC

I have always preferred the reflection of life to life itself.
--Francois Truffaut


VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


[Videolib] who needs the rights?

2011-02-23 Thread jwoo
Here's a scenario that I don't think we've run across before:

The library purchased a VHS video art tape from Electronic Arts  
Intermix with the usual limited PPR.  A student wants to exhibit the  
piece continuously as part of her MFA thesis show, and because an  
exhibition copy with rights costs $900, the student is negotiating  
with EAI for a lower price and permission to make a DVD copy of the  
library's VHS tape.

Question:  Who needs the permission to make a copy?  The student or  
the library?  Does it make a difference if the copy is made in-house  
or outsourced?

The student is under the assumption that she can check out the $300  
tape from the library and bring it to a video transfer shop.  If  
permission to copy was not granted to the library, would the library  
be infringing for allowing the student to copy its copy?

Thanks,

Janice Woo, Director of Libraries
California College of the Arts
5212 Broadway Oakland CA 94618
510.594.3660 || libraries.cca.edu





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] who needs the rights?

2011-02-23 Thread Randal Baier
Well, in my very humble opinion, and mind you, I am spouting off without 
my usual thoughtful and ageless reflection. :)


The VHS is simply a vessel. It holds the creation. It doesn't matter 
where you get it. If the student has negotiated some kind of copy 
permission and she can get a tape somewhere in order to get it to her 
new vessel, then that's just fine. It's not the library's problem. She 
is paying that $300 (or whatever price she is negotiating for) for her 
copy/rights/whatever. The library has paid their $300. She pay hers. The 
tape  is just a transfer -- shared body.


There is something strangely biblical in this. I'm not a biblical guy, 
but Jesus sends Peter to get money from the fish's mouth, then turns to 
the tax collector and gives him his gold drachma (or tribute penny, 
/denarii /or /tetradrchm /or whatever it was called). I say, render unto 
Caesar and don't worry so much.


http://www.wga.hu/tours/brancacc/tribute.jpg

Randal Baier



On 2/23/2011 5:31 PM, jwoo wrote:

Here's a scenario that I don't think we've run across before:

The library purchased a VHS video art tape from Electronic Arts
Intermix with the usual limited PPR.  A student wants to exhibit the
piece continuously as part of her MFA thesis show, and because an
exhibition copy with rights costs $900, the student is negotiating
with EAI for a lower price and permission to make a DVD copy of the
library's VHS tape.

Question:  Who needs the permission to make a copy?  The student or
the library?  Does it make a difference if the copy is made in-house
or outsourced?

The student is under the assumption that she can check out the $300
tape from the library and bring it to a video transfer shop.  If
permission to copy was not granted to the library, would the library
be infringing for allowing the student to copy its copy?

Thanks,

Janice Woo, Director of Libraries
California College of the Arts
5212 Broadway Oakland CA 94618
510.594.3660 || libraries.cca.edu





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.


Re: [Videolib] who needs the rights?

2011-02-23 Thread Randal Baier

Oops, make that /denarius/, but who's counting?

Oh, God, I'm so embarrassed, Commander Yates (high school Latin teacher) 
is rolling in his grave.




On 2/23/2011 10:23 PM, Randal Baier wrote:
Well, in my very humble opinion, and mind you, I am spouting off 
without my usual thoughtful and ageless reflection. :)


The VHS is simply a vessel. It holds the creation. It doesn't matter 
where you get it. If the student has negotiated some kind of copy 
permission and she can get a tape somewhere in order to get it to her 
new vessel, then that's just fine. It's not the library's problem. She 
is paying that $300 (or whatever price she is negotiating for) for her 
copy/rights/whatever. The library has paid their $300. She pay hers. 
The tape  is just a transfer -- shared body.


There is something strangely biblical in this. I'm not a biblical guy, 
but Jesus sends Peter to get money from the fish's mouth, then turns 
to the tax collector and gives him his gold drachma (or tribute 
penny, /denarii /or /tetradrchm /or whatever it was called). I say, 
render unto Caesar and don't worry so much.


http://www.wga.hu/tours/brancacc/tribute.jpg

Randal Baier



On 2/23/2011 5:31 PM, jwoo wrote:

Here's a scenario that I don't think we've run across before:

The library purchased a VHS video art tape from Electronic Arts
Intermix with the usual limited PPR.  A student wants to exhibit the
piece continuously as part of her MFA thesis show, and because an
exhibition copy with rights costs $900, the student is negotiating
with EAI for a lower price and permission to make a DVD copy of the
library's VHS tape.

Question:  Who needs the permission to make a copy?  The student or
the library?  Does it make a difference if the copy is made in-house
or outsourced?

The student is under the assumption that she can check out the $300
tape from the library and bring it to a video transfer shop.  If
permission to copy was not granted to the library, would the library
be infringing for allowing the student to copy its copy?

Thanks,

Janice Woo, Director of Libraries
California College of the Arts
5212 Broadway Oakland CA 94618
510.594.3660 || libraries.cca.edu





VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues 
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, 
preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and 
related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective 
working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication 
between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and 
distributors.