[VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?

2011-02-01 Thread Monica Hall
   Funny that it shouldn't have reached you before.  I agree that the
   re-entrant tuning works perfectly for most of the repertoire.   It is a
   misconception that the re-entrant tuning is somehow inadequate.



   As for Roncalli - as has already been pointed out he doesn't say
   anything at all on the subject.   And as I have already said before I
   prefer the versions I have heard without a bordon on the 5th course.
   I think that the re-entrant tuning was probably the most widely used in
   Italy.



   But perhaps it is better not to spark off yet another discussion on
   this topic.   (But I have already done so).



   Monica





   - Original Message -

   From: [1]Chris Despopoulos

   To: [2]Monica Hall

   Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:41 AM

   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?

   Ha!  I found this in my SPAM folder for some reason.
   I do not disagree in principle with this compromise.  I tried it out
   for Sanz, however, and for *my* taste and for the expectations I have
   built up from close to a year of playing with no bordones, I can't get
   a satisfactory sound for Sanz with the bordon on the 4th course.
   That's just me.
   Oh, and I'm spreading out to Roncalli now, and I'm pretty happy with
   the sound so far sin bordones.  But again, that's just me.  Of course,
   I wonder whether that's accurate, and hope to ask without starting a
   row.
   If I pick up Corbetta's La Guitarre Royale, I will of necessity add the
   4th bordon...  Thanks your informed understanding of the music.
   cud
 __

   From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   To: Harlan Glotzer hargloresea...@gmail.com
   Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 5:37:23 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
   As far as I am concerned a bourdon on the 4th course but not on the 5th
   is the answer to every maiden's prayer.  It is compromise, and in the
   real world compromises are what work best.  And I think we should
   re-christen it the English tuning because it is the tuning Corbetta
   intended for his La guitarre royale.  He composed all the music in it
   whilst he was in England and dedicated it to good King Charles II
   Chris probably wont agree with me
   Whatever you do - enjoy.
   Monica
   - Original Message - From: Harlan Glotzer
   [3]hargloresea...@gmail.com
   To: Chris Despopoulos [4]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   Cc: Monica Hall [5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk; Vihuelalist
   [6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:11 PM
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
   Thank you both for you speedy and detailed replies!
   I guess I am wondering what the most universally useful stringing would
   be (bourdons on 4  5, bourdon on 4 only, no bourdons). I do understand
   that there is no silver bullet stringing that will be perfect for
   everything and that I will have to experiment, but since I will be
   first starting I think it would behoove me to not have my stringing
   limit the pieces I can explore. That said, I am very interested in the
   works of Sanz and the no bourdons tuning. My fear is that it would
   limit my ability to bring my guitar out and strum chords with people,
   etc.
   I wholly accept I may be overthinking this and should just pick one and
   plunge in. :p
   On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Chris Despopoulos
   [7]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Well said, Monica.  There's no doubt that it's easy to change the
 stringing, and many, if not most, contemporary baroque guitarists do
 just that.  It has no effect one way or the other on the
   construction
 of the instrument, indeed.
 I just wanted to point out that there's no intrinsic limit to the
 musicality you can pull out of the instrument if you do opt for a
   full
 re-entrant tuning.  In the process I thought I'd try for a little
 levity (as opposed to gravity) -- well, I can't vouch for any
   success
 on that front.  And of course, I botched up the history...  Thanks
   for
 the clarification.
 cud
   __
   
 From: Monica Hall [8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
 To: Chris Despopoulos [9]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
 Cc: Vihuelalist [10]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 3:51:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
 Well - it is a serious mis-nomer to call the re-entrant tuning
 Spanish.
 The Spanish would turn in their graves.
 What dear old Sanz says is
 In stringing there is variety, because in Rome musicians string the
 guitar only with thin strings, without a bourdon on either the
   fourth
 or fifth course.  In Spain the opposite is the  case since some use
   two
 bourdons on the fourth course and 

[VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?

2011-02-01 Thread Chris Despopoulos
   I definitely don't want to spark anything.  I'm just looking for any
   obvious prohibitions to using a fully re-entrant tuning with Roncalli.
   For me, first indications are good.  But I'm fairly unwashed...  I take
   your statement that he says nothing, to mean that I should go with what
   feels good.  That makes me feel young again!
   cud
 __

   From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   To: Chris Despopoulos despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 3:25:16 AM
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
   Funny that it shouldn't have reached you before.  I agree that the
   re-entrant tuning works perfectly for most of the repertoire.   It is a
   misconception that the re-entrant tuning is somehow inadequate.

   As for Roncalli - as has already been pointed out he doesn't say
   anything at all on the subject.   And as I have already said before I
   prefer the versions I have heard without a bordon on the 5th course.
   I think that the re-entrant tuning was probably the most widely used in
   Italy.

   But perhaps it is better not to spark off yet another discussion on
   this topic.   (But I have already done so).

   Monica


   - Original Message -

   From: [1]Chris Despopoulos

   To: [2]Monica Hall

   Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:41 AM

   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?

   Ha!  I found this in my SPAM folder for some reason.
   I do not disagree in principle with this compromise.  I tried it out
   for Sanz, however, and for *my* taste and for the expectations I have
   built up from close to a year of playing with no bordones, I can't get
   a satisfactory sound for Sanz with the bordon on the 4th course.
   That's just me.
   Oh, and I'm spreading out to Roncalli now, and I'm pretty happy with
   the sound so far sin bordones.  But again, that's just me.  Of course,
   I wonder whether that's accurate, and hope to ask without starting a
   row.
   If I pick up Corbetta's La Guitarre Royale, I will of necessity add the
   4th bordon...  Thanks your informed understanding of the music.
   cud
 __

   From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   To: Harlan Glotzer hargloresea...@gmail.com
   Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 5:37:23 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
   As far as I am concerned a bourdon on the 4th course but not on the 5th
   is the answer to every maiden's prayer.  It is compromise, and in the
   real world compromises are what work best.  And I think we should
   re-christen it the English tuning because it is the tuning Corbetta
   intended for his La guitarre royale.  He composed all the music in it
   whilst he was in England and dedicated it to good King Charles II
   Chris probably wont agree with me
   Whatever you do - enjoy.
   Monica
   - Original Message - From: Harlan Glotzer
   [3]hargloresea...@gmail.com
   To: Chris Despopoulos [4]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   Cc: Monica Hall [5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk; Vihuelalist
   [6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:11 PM
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Baroque guitar, where to start?
   Thank you both for you speedy and detailed replies!
   I guess I am wondering what the most universally useful stringing would
   be (bourdons on 4  5, bourdon on 4 only, no bourdons). I do understand
   that there is no silver bullet stringing that will be perfect for
   everything and that I will have to experiment, but since I will be
   first starting I think it would behoove me to not have my stringing
   limit the pieces I can explore. That said, I am very interested in the
   works of Sanz and the no bourdons tuning. My fear is that it would
   limit my ability to bring my guitar out and strum chords with people,
   etc.
   I wholly accept I may be overthinking this and should just pick one and
   plunge in. :p
   On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Chris Despopoulos
   [7]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Well said, Monica.  There's no doubt that it's easy to change the
 stringing, and many, if not most, contemporary baroque guitarists do
 just that.  It has no effect one way or the other on the
   construction
 of the instrument, indeed.
 I just wanted to point out that there's no intrinsic limit to the
 musicality you can pull out of the instrument if you do opt for a
   full
 re-entrant tuning.  In the process I thought I'd try for a little
 levity (as opposed to gravity) -- well, I can't vouch for any
   success
 on that front.  And of course, I botched up the history...  Thanks
   for
 the clarification.
 cud
   __
   
 From: Monica Hall