[VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

2013-11-20 Thread Monica Hall
That is a very helpful answer.   Clearly some dissonance is intentional but 
not so much as many players assume.


In particular the dissonant Chord L occurs for a specific reason - because 
the consonant form is awkward to play - and it isn't used that often.  I 
don't thing it justifies arguuing that a similar dissonance is intended when 
there is no obvious practical reason for not doing the correct thing.


As ever
Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "'Martyn Hodgson'" ; "'Monica Hall'" 
; "'WALSH STUART'" 

Cc: "'Vihuelalist'" 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:35 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis



  If I understand him right, Jackson doesn't suggest that these
  dissonances were _never_ doubled in (solo) accompaniment to the solo
  voice. To me the examples he gives were a reason to reconsider present
  practices.

  And indeed the example under discussion is from a solo piece. However,
  even if 3/4 clashes are quite common with some composers, it feels
  uncomfortable that this particular 3-4-3 cadence d#' - e' - d#' ( - e')
  seems never to appear with the open e' included in his book (if I am
  right). Neither in the continuo examples, nor in the solo's.


  And as a reply to Monica's last post: also I think that the open e'
  strings in these examples (Dean p. 263-4) are not clearly intended to
  ring on. I would not play it like that.


  Best wishes, Lex






  Van: Martyn Hodgson [mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
  Verzonden: woensdag 20 november 2013 9:43
  Aan: Lex Eisenhardt; 'Monica Hall'; 'WALSH STUART'
  CC: 'Vihuelalist'
  Onderwerp: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis


  Thank you for this Lex.


  Of course here Jackson is speaking about continuo practice where the
  harmonic clash is already there in other vocal and/or instrumental
  lines.  But in the Matteis example this is a guitar solo.


  Incidentally I'm not entirely convinced by Jackson's paper (and the
  slightly selective examples) that the practice of never doubling
  dissonances in the context was generally universally applied
  historically.


  regards


  Martyn

  ___

  From: Lex Eisenhardt <[1]eisenha...@planet.nl>
  To: 'Martyn Hodgson' <[2]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>; 'Monica Hall'
  <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; 'WALSH STUART' <[4]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
  Cc: 'Vihuelalist' <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 16:51
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

  For an on-line article by Roland Jackson, about all sorts of harmonic
  clashes, follow the download link
  [6]http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/2/
  Lex
  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  Van: [7]lute-...@cs.dartmouth..edu
  [mailto:[8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
  Martyn Hodgson
  Verzonden: zaterdag 16 november 2013 10:26
  Aan: Monica Hall; WALSH STUART
  CC: Vihuelalist
  Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
Dear Monica,
This is all a question of context; mostly to do with expected
  cadential
effects and the prevailing tonality of the melodic line.
1. For example a dissonance of seconds at a cadence was a common
practice at the time; both in orchestral writing as well as on the
guitar etc. The effect even has a modern name: the 'Corelli clash'
after his frequent use of it.  Typically this occurs at a cadence
  where
the (sharp) third of the dominant (the sharpened leading note) is
sounded concurrently with an anticipated tonic (so for a cadence
  ending
with a G major chord an F# is sounded together with a G).  It is, in
  my
view, important to play this effect with 'boldness and conviction'
  to
ensure auditors don't think it's a mistake! In short, it is by no
  means
too exotic for the period as you suppose below  ('Just talking about
the last two bars of line three: playing the top and  bottom courses
open sounds quite rich and exotic! But perhaps far too rich for its
surroundings').
So the B to Em cadence at the end of the third line on page 2 of the
1682 publication with a D# and E sounding concurrently is perfectly
correct. I suppose you could throw in the open fifth course too (to
give a 7th A)  but this is not really in line with general practice
  at
that time (use of sevenths at cadences became much more common in the
18th century).
2. However where there is no such cadential (or similar effect)
context, contemporary auditors would not have expected such rude
clashes interfering with the melodic line. So, for example on the
  same
line and 4 bars from the end, the D chord on the second beat would
  not
have the first course added (an open e' according to Matteis' guitar
tuning) - Matteis either overlooked this or took it as read that a
player would not need to be told. Similarly in the 'Aria' at the
beginning of page 4 the player should not include non-melodic notes
(such as an open e' on the

[VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

2013-11-20 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
   If I understand him right, Jackson doesn't suggest that these
   dissonances were _never_ doubled in (solo) accompaniment to the solo
   voice. To me the examples he gives were a reason to reconsider present
   practices.

   And indeed the example under discussion is from a solo piece. However,
   even if 3/4 clashes are quite common with some composers, it feels
   uncomfortable that this particular 3-4-3 cadence d#' - e' - d#' ( - e')
   seems never to appear with the open e' included in his book (if I am
   right). Neither in the continuo examples, nor in the solo's.


   And as a reply to Monica's last post: also I think that the open e'
   strings in these examples (Dean p. 263-4) are not clearly intended to
   ring on. I would not play it like that.


   Best wishes, Lex






   Van: Martyn Hodgson [mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
   Verzonden: woensdag 20 november 2013 9:43
   Aan: Lex Eisenhardt; 'Monica Hall'; 'WALSH STUART'
   CC: 'Vihuelalist'
   Onderwerp: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis


   Thank you for this Lex.


   Of course here Jackson is speaking about continuo practice where the
   harmonic clash is already there in other vocal and/or instrumental
   lines.  But in the Matteis example this is a guitar solo.


   Incidentally I'm not entirely convinced by Jackson's paper (and the
   slightly selective examples) that the practice of never doubling
   dissonances in the context was generally universally applied
   historically.


   regards


   Martyn

   ___

   From: Lex Eisenhardt <[1]eisenha...@planet.nl>
   To: 'Martyn Hodgson' <[2]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>; 'Monica Hall'
   <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; 'WALSH STUART' <[4]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
   Cc: 'Vihuelalist' <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 16:51
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

   For an on-line article by Roland Jackson, about all sorts of harmonic
   clashes, follow the download link
   [6]http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/2/
   Lex
   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   Van: [7]lute-...@cs.dartmouth..edu
   [mailto:[8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
   Martyn Hodgson
   Verzonden: zaterdag 16 november 2013 10:26
   Aan: Monica Hall; WALSH STUART
   CC: Vihuelalist
   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
 Dear Monica,
 This is all a question of context; mostly to do with expected
   cadential
 effects and the prevailing tonality of the melodic line.
 1. For example a dissonance of seconds at a cadence was a common
 practice at the time; both in orchestral writing as well as on the
 guitar etc. The effect even has a modern name: the 'Corelli clash'
 after his frequent use of it.  Typically this occurs at a cadence
   where
 the (sharp) third of the dominant (the sharpened leading note) is
 sounded concurrently with an anticipated tonic (so for a cadence
   ending
 with a G major chord an F# is sounded together with a G).  It is, in
   my
 view, important to play this effect with 'boldness and conviction'
   to
 ensure auditors don't think it's a mistake! In short, it is by no
   means
 too exotic for the period as you suppose below  ('Just talking about
 the last two bars of line three: playing the top and  bottom courses
 open sounds quite rich and exotic! But perhaps far too rich for its
 surroundings').
 So the B to Em cadence at the end of the third line on page 2 of the
 1682 publication with a D# and E sounding concurrently is perfectly
 correct. I suppose you could throw in the open fifth course too (to
 give a 7th A)  but this is not really in line with general practice
   at
 that time (use of sevenths at cadences became much more common in the
 18th century).
 2. However where there is no such cadential (or similar effect)
 context, contemporary auditors would not have expected such rude
 clashes interfering with the melodic line. So, for example on the
   same
 line and 4 bars from the end, the D chord on the second beat would
   not
 have the first course added (an open e' according to Matteis' guitar
 tuning) - Matteis either overlooked this or took it as read that a
 player would not need to be told. Similarly in the 'Aria' at the
 beginning of page 4 the player should not include non-melodic notes
 (such as an open e' on the first beat of the first full bar or the
   open
 b and e' on the first beat of the next bar).  It simply requires
 careful control of the strum - perhaps some guitarists basing their
 early strumming technique on modern flamenco rasgueado may find this
 more difficult but, of course, it's no reason to believe the Old Ones
 were not technically capable/accomplished to achieve such refined
 playing.
 There's also a parallel with unwritten practice in continuo playing:-
 here sometimes a sixth cord is not figured at all - it

[VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

2013-11-20 Thread Monica Hall
Returning to Dean and Matteis - on p. 263-4  Dean has given three examples 
of a 7-6 suspension over the note F on the 4th course. (p.49. 41 & 64 in 
Matteis)  The 7th - E - is played on the open 1st course and resolves 
downward onto the D played on the 2nd course.   Straightforward you would 
think but Dean claims that the open course will "ring on" when the D is 
played creating a cadential clash and that Matteis has "taken advantage of 
the ease which the F major (sic - it's really a D minor) chord shape can be 
fingered whilst still allowing the 1st course to ring".


Well - it certainly doesn't ring on when I play it - the note dies almost 
immediately and you can't actually play a 7-6 suspension  on F in any other 
way.   Any resemblance to Chord L seems to me to be an illusion.


I think Dean  is reading far too much into these things.  The reason for 
asking these questions is that someone else has asked me.   I disagree with 
a lot of what Dean says - but I would like to give an unbiased reply.


I personally would not include the open courses in the examples we were 
discussing previously.


As ever
Monica


- Original Message - 
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lex Eisenhardt" ; "'Monica Hall'" 
; "'WALSH STUART'" 

Cc: "'Vihuelalist'" 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis



  Thank you for this Lex.
  Of course here Jackson is speaking about continuo practice where the
  harmonic clash is already there in other vocal and/or instrumental
  lines.  But in the Matteis example this is a guitar solo.
  Incidentally I'm not entirely convinced by Jackson's paper (and the
  slightly selective examples) that the practice of never doubling
  dissonances in the context was generally universally applied
  historically.
  regards
  Martyn
__

  From: Lex Eisenhardt 
  To: 'Martyn Hodgson' ; 'Monica Hall'
  ; 'WALSH STUART' 
  Cc: 'Vihuelalist' 
  Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 16:51
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
  For an on-line article by Roland Jackson, about all sorts of harmonic
  clashes, follow the download link
  [1]http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/2/
  Lex
  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  Van: [2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
  Namens
  Martyn Hodgson
  Verzonden: zaterdag 16 november 2013 10:26
  Aan: Monica Hall; WALSH STUART
  CC: Vihuelalist
  Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
Dear Monica,
This is all a question of context; mostly to do with expected
  cadential
effects and the prevailing tonality of the melodic line.
1. For example a dissonance of seconds at a cadence was a common
practice at the time; both in orchestral writing as well as on the
guitar etc. The effect even has a modern name: the 'Corelli clash'
after his frequent use of it.  Typically this occurs at a cadence
  where
the (sharp) third of the dominant (the sharpened leading note) is
sounded concurrently with an anticipated tonic (so for a cadence
  ending
with a G major chord an F# is sounded together with a G).  It is, in
  my
view, important to play this effect with 'boldness and conviction'
  to
ensure auditors don't think it's a mistake! In short, it is by no
  means
too exotic for the period as you suppose below  ('Just talking about
the last two bars of line three: playing the top and  bottom courses
open sounds quite rich and exotic! But perhaps far too rich for its
surroundings').
So the B to Em cadence at the end of the third line on page 2 of the
1682 publication with a D# and E sounding concurrently is perfectly
correct. I suppose you could throw in the open fifth course too (to
give a 7th A)  but this is not really in line with general practice
  at
that time (use of sevenths at cadences became much more common in the
18th century).
2. However where there is no such cadential (or similar effect)
context, contemporary auditors would not have expected such rude
clashes interfering with the melodic line. So, for example on the
  same
line and 4 bars from the end, the D chord on the second beat would
  not
have the first course added (an open e' according to Matteis' guitar
tuning) - Matteis either overlooked this or took it as read that a
player would not need to be told. Similarly in the 'Aria' at the
beginning of page 4 the player should not include non-melodic notes
(such as an open e' on the first beat of the first full bar or the
  open
b and e' on the first beat of the next bar).  It simply requires
careful control of the strum - perhaps some guitarists basing their
early strumming technique on modern flamenco rasgueado may find this
more difficult but, of course, it's no reason to believe the Old Ones
were not technically capable/accomplished to achieve such refined
playing.
There's also a parallel

[VIHUELA] Re: Matteis

2013-11-20 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Thank you for this Lex.
   Of course here Jackson is speaking about continuo practice where the
   harmonic clash is already there in other vocal and/or instrumental
   lines.  But in the Matteis example this is a guitar solo.
   Incidentally I'm not entirely convinced by Jackson's paper (and the
   slightly selective examples) that the practice of never doubling
   dissonances in the context was generally universally applied
   historically.
   regards
   Martyn
 __

   From: Lex Eisenhardt 
   To: 'Martyn Hodgson' ; 'Monica Hall'
   ; 'WALSH STUART' 
   Cc: 'Vihuelalist' 
   Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 16:51
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
   For an on-line article by Roland Jackson, about all sorts of harmonic
   clashes, follow the download link
   [1]http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/2/
   Lex
   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   Van: [2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
   Namens
   Martyn Hodgson
   Verzonden: zaterdag 16 november 2013 10:26
   Aan: Monica Hall; WALSH STUART
   CC: Vihuelalist
   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Matteis
 Dear Monica,
 This is all a question of context; mostly to do with expected
   cadential
 effects and the prevailing tonality of the melodic line.
 1. For example a dissonance of seconds at a cadence was a common
 practice at the time; both in orchestral writing as well as on the
 guitar etc. The effect even has a modern name: the 'Corelli clash'
 after his frequent use of it.  Typically this occurs at a cadence
   where
 the (sharp) third of the dominant (the sharpened leading note) is
 sounded concurrently with an anticipated tonic (so for a cadence
   ending
 with a G major chord an F# is sounded together with a G).  It is, in
   my
 view, important to play this effect with 'boldness and conviction'
   to
 ensure auditors don't think it's a mistake! In short, it is by no
   means
 too exotic for the period as you suppose below  ('Just talking about
 the last two bars of line three: playing the top and  bottom courses
 open sounds quite rich and exotic! But perhaps far too rich for its
 surroundings').
 So the B to Em cadence at the end of the third line on page 2 of the
 1682 publication with a D# and E sounding concurrently is perfectly
 correct. I suppose you could throw in the open fifth course too (to
 give a 7th A)  but this is not really in line with general practice
   at
 that time (use of sevenths at cadences became much more common in the
 18th century).
 2. However where there is no such cadential (or similar effect)
 context, contemporary auditors would not have expected such rude
 clashes interfering with the melodic line. So, for example on the
   same
 line and 4 bars from the end, the D chord on the second beat would
   not
 have the first course added (an open e' according to Matteis' guitar
 tuning) - Matteis either overlooked this or took it as read that a
 player would not need to be told. Similarly in the 'Aria' at the
 beginning of page 4 the player should not include non-melodic notes
 (such as an open e' on the first beat of the first full bar or the
   open
 b and e' on the first beat of the next bar).  It simply requires
 careful control of the strum - perhaps some guitarists basing their
 early strumming technique on modern flamenco rasgueado may find this
 more difficult but, of course, it's no reason to believe the Old Ones
 were not technically capable/accomplished to achieve such refined
 playing.
 There's also a parallel with unwritten practice in continuo playing:-
 here sometimes a sixth cord is not figured at all - it being assumed
 that the player has sufficient knowledge of basic rules of harmony
   that
 in a particular key sequence such bass notes will generally need
   first
 inversion chords (unless otherwise indicated).
 regards,
 Martyn
 PS Incidentally, I find it easier to follow a discussion if the
 responder does not interweave their reply with the sender's text -
   but
 perhaps that's just me
   __
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol11/iss1/2/
   2. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html