[VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

2012-01-10 Thread Chris Despopoulos
   Very nice...  I would love to see this ms some day.  Your little guitar
   sounds very nice.
   As for tuning the mandore, I believe the Chancy ms has three different
   tunings.  His ms seems to be for a plectrum -- well, I was taught that
   he marks up and down strokes, so that would indicate.  He doesn't give
   absolute pitches, he just tunes to the frets.  But the tunings are
   (from memory):
   --h D
   --a--f- A
   -a--f-- D
   a-- G
   --h D
   --a--f- A
   -a--h-- D
   a-- A
   --h D
   --a--f- A
   -a--e-- D
   a-- F#
   The last one is pretty interesting, for the second suite.  But I
   haven't managed to pull the whole suite together yet.
   Drat...  I hope I haven't stuck my foot into it -- I need to pull the
   ms out of storage and verify that these really are the tunings he has.
   Between work and the guitar, I'm afraid my poor mandore has
   languished.  As have my powers of memory.
   cud
 __

   From: Stuart Walsh s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   To: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2012 11:12 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore
   On 08/01/2012 12:48, Monica Hall wrote:
   
   
   
The Scottish, Skene mandore MS is more well known but the Ulm MS of
   French mandore music (of the same time) is very good too. And the
   pieces are much more carefully notated.
   
Here are a couple of courantes and a gavotte - played on a very
   small guitar with a string length of 37 cms. Perhaps there were at
   least two sizes of mandore: the really tiny (c. 30cm string length),
   four-course mandore (some Ulm stuff, Chancy) , played with a plectrum
   and a slightly larger, five course instrument ((Skene, Ulm, Gallot)
   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnC0b9w8QyU
   
Stuart
   
Very nice but what is mandore tuning in this context?
   Thanks. I don't know what you mean 'context'? I think the tuning of the
   mandore at the time of its popularity was more or less fixed... apart
   from the first course. So a four-course mandore was 5-4-5 (e.g.:
   g-d-g-d) and a five-course instrument was 4-5-4-5 (e.g.: d-g-d-g-d). Of
   course the actual pitch might be different. But on either four- or
   five-course instruments the top course could be re-tuned:  e.g. a tone
   lower.  But the bottom courses were not re-tuned.
   So the mandore tuning is quite different from the mandolino tuning in
   fourths (but not that that difference makes it a different instrument).
   Stuart
   Stuart
   
Monica
   
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   
   
   

   --



[VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

2012-01-10 Thread Stuart Walsh

On 10/01/2012 17:41, Chris Despopoulos wrote:

Very nice...  I would love to see this ms some day.  Your little guitar
sounds very nice.
As for tuning the mandore, I believe the Chancy ms has three different
tunings.  His ms seems to be for a plectrum -- well, I was taught that
he marks up and down strokes, so that would indicate.  He doesn't give
absolute pitches, he just tunes to the frets.  But the tunings are
(from memory):
--h D
--a--f- A
-a--f-- D
a-- G
--h D
--a--f- A
-a--h-- D
a-- A
--h D
--a--f- A
-a--e-- D
a-- F#
The last one is pretty interesting, for the second suite.  But I
haven't managed to pull the whole suite together yet.
Drat...  I hope I haven't stuck my foot into it -- I need to pull the
ms out of storage and verify that these really are the tunings he has.
Between work and the guitar, I'm afraid my poor mandore has
languished.  As have my powers of memory.
cud
  _
Thank Chris.  There are three entries in the Cornetto catalogue for 
mandore, and I think they are all MSS from Ulm. I just got number 35 and 
it came as two separate little books: one with  a small number of pieces 
for a four-course instrument - which could be played with a plectrum. 
Like the Chancy pieces, which you play, it takes a skilful player to 
play them. It's not single line stuff. And the larger book (with over 
120 pieces) is for a five-course instrument and needs some kind of 
fingerstyle approach (maybe fingers alone, maybe fingers and plectrum etc)


I'm sure you are right, there are three tunings - (the difference only 
in the first course), e.g.  in Chancy and in Gallot. In the book I've 
got from Ulm for five-course, there are just two tunings. Only a very 
few have the first course down a tone.


(and as Rob pointed out, there is a section in the Skene MS for a tuning 
like the top five courses of a Renaissance lute)


Stuart



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

2012-01-08 Thread Stuart Walsh

On 08/01/2012 12:48, Monica Hall wrote:




The Scottish, Skene mandore MS is more well known but the Ulm MS of 
French mandore music (of the same time) is very good too. And the 
pieces are much more carefully notated.


Here are a couple of courantes and a gavotte - played on a very small 
guitar with a string length of 37 cms. Perhaps there were at least 
two sizes of mandore: the really tiny (c. 30cm string length), 
four-course mandore (some Ulm stuff, Chancy) , played with a plectrum 
and a slightly larger, five course instrument ((Skene, Ulm, Gallot)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnC0b9w8QyU

Stuart


Very nice but what is mandore tuning in this context?


Thanks. I don't know what you mean 'context'? I think the tuning of the 
mandore at the time of its popularity was more or less fixed... apart 
from the first course. So a four-course mandore was 5-4-5 (e.g.: 
g-d-g-d) and a five-course instrument was 4-5-4-5 (e.g.: d-g-d-g-d). Of 
course the actual pitch might be different. But on either four- or 
five-course instruments the top course could be re-tuned:  e.g. a tone 
lower.  But the bottom courses were not re-tuned.


So the mandore tuning is quite different from the mandolino tuning in 
fourths (but not that that difference makes it a different instrument).





Stuart








Stuart




Monica




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html









[VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

2012-01-08 Thread Monica Hall


- Original Message - 
From: Stuart Walsh s.wa...@ntlworld.com

To: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore



On 08/01/2012 12:48, Monica Hall wrote:




The Scottish, Skene mandore MS is more well known but the Ulm MS of 
French mandore music (of the same time) is very good too. And the pieces 
are much more carefully notated.


Here are a couple of courantes and a gavotte - played on a very small 
guitar with a string length of 37 cms. Perhaps there were at least two 
sizes of mandore: the really tiny (c. 30cm string length), four-course 
mandore (some Ulm stuff, Chancy) , played with a plectrum and a slightly 
larger, five course instrument ((Skene, Ulm, Gallot)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnC0b9w8QyU

Stuart


Very nice but what is mandore tuning in this context?


Thanks. I don't know what you mean 'context'? I think the tuning of the 
mandore at the time of its popularity was more or less fixed... apart from 
the first course. So a four-course mandore was 5-4-5 (e.g.: g-d-g-d) and a 
five-course instrument was 4-5-4-5 (e.g.: d-g-d-g-d). Of course the actual 
pitch might be different. But on either four- or five-course instruments 
the top course could be re-tuned:  e.g. a tone lower.  But the bottom 
courses were not re-tuned.


So the mandore tuning is quite different from the mandolino tuning in 
fourths (but not that that difference makes it a different instrument).


and different from the guitar (and incidentally lute) which almost always 
has a 3rd somewhere in the series.   I wonder if this is because instruments 
play more chords and counterpoint rather than simple melodic things.


Monica









Stuart




Monica




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html











[VIHUELA] Re: 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

2012-01-08 Thread Nelson, Jocelyn
   I really enjoyed these, Stuart. I'm listening to it for the 3rd time
   now; can't help but smile with this music.
   Thanks for posting.
   Best,
   Jocelyn

   From: Stuart Walsh [1]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 00:06:26 +
   To: Vihuelalist [2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Subject: [VIHUELA] 3 short pieces from the Ulm MS for mandore

   The Scottish, Skene mandore MS is more well known but the Ulm MS of
   French mandore music (of the same time) is very good too. And the
   pieces
   are much more carefully notated.
   Here are a couple of courantes and a gavotte - played on a very small
   guitar with a string length of 37 cms. Perhaps there were at least two
   sizes of mandore: the really tiny (c. 30cm string length), four-course
   mandore (some Ulm stuff, Chancy) , played with a plectrum and a
   slightly
   larger, five course instrument ((Skene, Ulm, Gallot)
   [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnC0b9w8QyU
   Stuart
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   2. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnC0b9w8QyU
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html