Re: [Viking-devel] Plans for 1.0

2010-09-15 Thread Robert Norris


 The first one is auto-refresh feature.

 Can tester give an eye on this and return feedback on this list, please?
 I think it could be usefull to integrate this feature as it fixes the
 auto-refresh feature for OSM server.

Maybe, I haven't looked into that side of things.
 
 The other one is the exit feature.

 Currently, Ctrl-W and Ctrl-Q have strange behaviour. This is mainly
 because viking is (still) not able to decided if document worth a save
 or not. We already discuss about this, but it seems that nobody find
 time to address this issue.

 Someone interested? Or should I just ignore this?
 
I would ignore it for now.
 
Another point here is the 'exit' doesn't really exit! It only closes the 
current window.
This is especially misleading for the toolbar exit button, as the tool tip 
explicitly says 'Exit the program'
 

 Please, help me to close these two issue and I promise to release the
 most-expected 1.0 release in following weeks. And then, we will
 integrate all fantastic and waiting patches.
 
Hurrah, maybe even elevate viking to 'Beta' status on sourceforge :)
 
 PS: if you have other really important change, just refresh my mind, please.
 
I would like my DEM-UsageOfHeightUnits branch merged since this addresses the 
error that DEM stuff only uses metres.
 
Then my plan on other (simple) fixes to come shortly are:
 
. Better 'sea level' control in DEMs - remove the +1 on DEM height index 
colouring 
. Remove track thickness from DEM properties, use the colour as the min elev 
(sea) colour  change the colour property from a string widget to a proper 
colour picker widget.
. Fix some compiler warnings +
 
. Add keyboard accelerations to layer menus (track/waypoint, GPS, Geo Ref,  
Maps) +
. Fix Track Draw by Velocity ( there's a bug when drawing in this mode about 
using the gc before setting it correctly - so I know how fix it now...)
. Fix Min/Max Track Velocity to use current speed units # *
. Don't save map cache directory if the default #
 
+ Probably be done as branches, others as single patch files.
# These depend on DEM-UsageOfHeightUnits being merged
* I had plans to improve the controls of the Track Draw by Velocity feature, 
but I suppose that will have to wait for 1.0
 
 
I would quite like the only known repeatable crash 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3009431group_id=83870atid=570954
 about the map auto download and GPS auto following conflict to be solved too.
I posted a bit about this on this mailing list a while ago. 
I believe the best way would be a mutex in the struct _VikViewport which could 
then control the access to gdk_draw_pixbuf inside the vik_viewport_draw_pixbuf 
function.
Maybe I'll do that too

 
  
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
___
Viking-devel mailing list
Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/


[Viking-devel] Plans for 1.0

2010-09-14 Thread Guilhem Bonnefille
Hi all,

There are a lot of good patches all around improving or adding
features to viking. But currently, I want to release a stable 1.0
before we merge these patches. Before releasing 1.0, there are some
features I want to check.

The first one is auto-refresh feature.

This feature, based on if-modified HTTP header, is quite old now. It
was introduced for OpenStreetMap servers. Since we added this feature,
Mapnik servers evolved to use an other system: Etag HTTP header. Some
patches for this are pending on the Jocelyn's Git repo.
http://github.com/jocelynj/viking/tree/etag

Can tester give an eye on this and return feedback on this list, please?
I think it could be usefull to integrate this feature as it fixes the
auto-refresh feature for OSM server.

The other one is the exit feature.

Currently, Ctrl-W and Ctrl-Q have strange behaviour. This is mainly
because viking is (still) not able to decided if document worth a save
or not. We already discuss about this, but it seems that nobody find
time to address this issue.

Someone interested? Or should I just ignore this?


Please, help me to close these two issue and I promise to release the
most-expected 1.0 release in following weeks. And then, we will
integrate all fantastic and waiting patches.

PS: if you have other really important change, just refresh my mind, please.
-- 
Guilhem BONNEFILLE
-=- JID: gu...@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefi...@hotmail.com
-=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefi...@gmail.com
-=- http://nathguil.free.fr/

--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
___
Viking-devel mailing list
Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/


Re: [Viking-devel] Plans for 1.0

2010-09-14 Thread Greg Troxel

The release plan sounds good.  I've been meaning to try out all the
rnorris topic branches (and I think his plan of having a bunch of
independent topic branches to be merged is exactly right) but haven't
had time.  But, I think it makes sense to get a 1.0 out and then get
most/all of those integrated, plus changes from other people, and then
have a second stabilization period before 1.1.  There's no rule that
says 1.1 can't follow in a few months.



  Currently, Ctrl-W and Ctrl-Q have strange behaviour. This is mainly
  because viking is (still) not able to decided if document worth a save
  or not. We already discuss about this, but it seems that nobody find
  time to address this issue.

  Someone interested? Or should I just ignore this?

This isn't a regression from the past - it's just still very odd.

If someone has time, I would make ^W close one window and ^Q exit, and
both of them do a popup that says document may or may not have been
modified with discard save cancel.  Sort of what you would do if you
knew it was modified, but always.

After thinking a bit I'm inclined to release 1.0 without changing this.
It feels like an intermediate solution is just a mess.





pgpWZTgKIiqQv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev___
Viking-devel mailing list
Viking-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/viking-devel
Viking home page: http://viking.sf.net/