Re: Portuguese spell files update
Jakson Aquino wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails.  It looks like the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file.  The one that was downloaded looks like this: SET UTF-8 LANG pt_PT TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjÃÂxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQà Yà Éà ÓèÂÚ KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm WORDCHARS - The diff expects:  SET ISO8859-1 - TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjÃÂxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQà Yà Éà ÓèÂÚ Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text.  Are we using the same download? I have made an attempt in fixing this.  Please check the files on the ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/ Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file. It seems that everything is ok now. Thank you very much for fixing it! I deleted all files from my local spell/pt directory and restored them with hg updated -C. I compared the files generated by hg update -C with the ones in the ftp server and they have the same md5sums. Then, I generated and copied the pt.utf-8.spl and pt.latin1.spl files to ~/.vim/spell. European and Brazilian spell check seems to be correct and up to date and the spell suggestions are good. However, the pt.utf-8.spl from the ftp server seems to be outdated... Did you do aap clean before generating it? No, I didn't update the pt_BR files.  I'll do that now.  Hmm, I see a few warnings... I see some duplicate warnings... fixdup.vim can delete 122 duplicates, but about 1600 would remain. The lines weren't duplicates in the original pt_PT.dic because each root entry---even though carrying the same suffixes---had a different grammatical category. They became duplicates after the deletion of the grammatical information. Most of the remaining duplicates can be deleted with: :2,$ sort u But about 200 duplicated roots would still remain because they have different suffixes. Example: advindo/L advindo/fp I guess that, if there is no problem in the .dic being sorted, we can use :2,$ sort u to delete the real duplicates, but I guess that it's better to let the remaining 200 duplicates in the file. So, what to do? The duplicates are not a real problem.  It's useful if you are writing a dictionary. I think using that sort command is good.  You can verify that with and without the sort command the spell file is the same. I've made a copy of pt_BR.aff, pt_BR.dic, pt_PT.aff and pt_PT.dic into four directories. In one directory I ran :so fixdup.vim on pt_PT.dic; in other I ran 2,$ sort u; and in the third one I did both. Then I did :mkspell. The result: md5sum pt*/pt.utf* 9aee104f71db890d10f6cb49525abc0b ptFixdup/pt.utf-8.spl 9aee104f71db890d10f6cb49525abc0b ptFixdupSorted/pt.utf-8.spl 99bdb0f4a6eaa09503206f604022d2a1 ptOrig/pt.utf-8.spl 99bdb0f4a6eaa09503206f604022d2a1 ptSorted/pt.utf-8.spl It's confusing to work with so many files with the same name... If I didn't do any mistake the conclusion is: the sort command doesn't change the result, but the generated spell file is not the same if fixdup.vim is sourced. I'm sending a patch to add the sort command to the preparation of pt_PT.dic. Thanks, this looks safe to include. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 52. You ask a plumber how much it would cost to replace the chair in front of your computer with a toilet. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Portuguese spell files update
Jakson Aquino wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails.  It looks like the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file.  The one that was downloaded looks like this: SET UTF-8 LANG pt_PT TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjÃxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQà Yà Éà ÓèÂÚ KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm WORDCHARS - The diff expects:  SET ISO8859-1 - TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjÃxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQà Yà Éà ÓèÂÚ Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text.  Are we using the same download? I have made an attempt in fixing this.  Please check the files on the ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/ Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file. It seems that everything is ok now. Thank you very much for fixing it! I deleted all files from my local spell/pt directory and restored them with hg updated -C. I compared the files generated by hg update -C with the ones in the ftp server and they have the same md5sums. Then, I generated and copied the pt.utf-8.spl and pt.latin1.spl files to ~/.vim/spell. European and Brazilian spell check seems to be correct and up to date and the spell suggestions are good. However, the pt.utf-8.spl from the ftp server seems to be outdated... Did you do aap clean before generating it? No, I didn't update the pt_BR files.  I'll do that now.  Hmm, I see a few warnings... I see some duplicate warnings... fixdup.vim can delete 122 duplicates, but about 1600 would remain. The lines weren't duplicates in the original pt_PT.dic because each root entry---even though carrying the same suffixes---had a different grammatical category. They became duplicates after the deletion of the grammatical information. Most of the remaining duplicates can be deleted with: :2,$ sort u But about 200 duplicated roots would still remain because they have different suffixes. Example: advindo/L advindo/fp I guess that, if there is no problem in the .dic being sorted, we can use :2,$ sort u to delete the real duplicates, but I guess that it's better to let the remaining 200 duplicates in the file. So, what to do? The duplicates are not a real problem. It's useful if you are writing a dictionary. I think using that sort command is good. You can verify that with and without the sort command the spell file is the same. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 39. You move into a new house and decide to Netscape before you landscape. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Portuguese spell files update
Jakson Aquino wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails. It looks like the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file. The one that was downloaded looks like this: SET UTF-8 LANG pt_PT TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm WORDCHARS - The diff expects: SET ISO8859-1 - TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text. Are we using the same download? I have made an attempt in fixing this. Please check the files on the ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/ Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file. It seems that everything is ok now. Thank you very much for fixing it! I deleted all files from my local spell/pt directory and restored them with hg updated -C. I compared the files generated by hg update -C with the ones in the ftp server and they have the same md5sums. Then, I generated and copied the pt.utf-8.spl and pt.latin1.spl files to ~/.vim/spell. European and Brazilian spell check seems to be correct and up to date and the spell suggestions are good. However, the pt.utf-8.spl from the ftp server seems to be outdated... Did you do aap clean before generating it? No, I didn't update the pt_BR files. I'll do that now. Hmm, I see a few warnings... NOTE: the broffice site was offline. So I used the Vero_pt_BR_V207AOC.oxt that I have downloaded to my home directory yesterday and did some of the commands manually. I'm sending a small patch to delete unnecessary files extracted from the Brazilian oxt file, as you have done with the files extracted from the European oxt. Thanks. -- A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Portuguese spell files update
Jakson Aquino wrote: The Portuguese dictionaries downloaded by runtime/spell/pt/main.aap are outdated. The attached patch fix this and I hope the patch is ok... The European Portuguese list of words has additional information about the grammatical category of the words, as in the lines below: abarrotar/XYPLM [CAT=3Dv,T=3Dinf,TR=3Dt] abastan=E7a [CAT=3Dnc,G=3Df,N=3Ds] abastardar/XYPLM[CAT=3Dv,T=3Dinf,TR=3Dt] I had to delete this information with %s/\t.*// because :mkspell wasn't catching words which didn't have suffix rules. Example: among the lines above, abastan=E7a wasn't added to Vim's word list. To avoid a huge pt_PT.diff file, I deleted the information before generating the pt_BR.orig.dic file. Is that ok? Thanks. Yes, deleting that extra information is good. I didn't want to support this in Vim, because it may hide mistakes. Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails. It looks like the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file. The one that was downloaded looks like this: SET UTF-8 LANG pt_PT TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm WORDCHARS - The diff expects: SET ISO8859-1 - TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text. Are we using the same download? I have made an attempt in fixing this. Please check the files on the ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/ Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file. -- A day without sunshine is like, well, night. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Re: Portuguese spell files update
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails. It looks like
the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file. The one that was
downloaded looks like this:
SET UTF-8
LANG pt_PT
TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ
KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm
WORDCHARS -
The diff expects:
SET ISO8859-1
- TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ
Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text. Are we using the same
download?
I have made an attempt in fixing this. Please check the files on the
ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/
Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file.
It seems that everything is ok now. Thank you very much for fixing it!
I deleted all files from my local spell/pt directory and restored them
with hg updated -C. I compared the files generated by hg update -C
with the ones in the ftp server and they have the same md5sums. Then,
I generated and copied the pt.utf-8.spl and pt.latin1.spl files to
~/.vim/spell. European and Brazilian spell check seems to be correct
and up to date and the spell suggestions are good.
However, the pt.utf-8.spl from the ftp server seems to be outdated...
Did you do aap clean before generating it?
NOTE: the broffice site was offline. So I used the
Vero_pt_BR_V207AOC.oxt that I have downloaded to my home directory
yesterday and did some of the commands manually.
I'm sending a small patch to delete unnecessary files extracted from
the Brazilian oxt file, as you have done with the files extracted from
the European oxt.
Thank you!
Jakson
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
diff -r 6efdc2e61533 runtime/spell/pt/main.aap
--- a/runtime/spell/pt/main.aap Tue Aug 10 22:53:02 2010 +0200
+++ b/runtime/spell/pt/main.aap Tue Aug 10 23:13:54 2010 -0300
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@
:fetch $BR_FNAME
:sys $UNZIP $BR_FNAME
:delete $BR_FNAME
+:delete {f} description.xml
+:delete {f} dictionaries.xcu
+:delete {f} hyph_pt_BR.dic
+:delete {r}{f} META-INF
+:delete {f} README_en.TXT
+:delete {f} README_hyph_pt_BR.TXT
:sys $VIM README_pt_BR.TXT -u NONE -N -e -c set ff=unix -c update -c q
:move README_pt_BR.TXT README_pt_BR.txt
