Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar
Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Sergey Malinin [mailto:sergmali...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 11:16 AM To: Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com>; virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com> Subject: Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar 08/11/16 02:05, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/7/16 10:55 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: >> >> Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining >> this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does OpenLink >> plan to update it and maintain it. >> >> My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss >> where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink roadmap, and also, >> whether we need to dedicate resources ourselves to keep this up to date, or >> socialize the issue with the contributors. The claimed compatibility of >> virt-jena.jar is very old, and while it works up to 2.13.0, Jena 3 is now >> over a year old, and has many releases. >> >> As a government shop, I ran my webapp dependencies through the OWASP >> dependency checker, and while I could make everything compliant, it is not >> the best way >> to override individual dependent libraries, and better to get individual >> dependent libraries to be updated. I'd also love to see the process change >> to use >> Maven or Ant with ivy. >> > > Daniel, > > We are committed to keeping our native Jena Providers up to date. I'll take a > look at the Jena 3 issue. > [Sergey] For Jena 2.13 the virt_jena2.jar must be used For Jena3 the virt_jena3.jar All are in the git open sources. > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software (Home Page:http://www.openlinksw.com) > > Weblogs (Blogs): > Legacy Blog:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ > Blogspot Blog:http://kidehen.blogspot.com Medium > Blog:https://medium.com/@kidehen > > Profile Pages: > Pinterest:https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ > Quora:https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen > Twitter:https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+:https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > Web Identities (WebID): > Personal:http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > :http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.t > tl#this > -- Best Regards, Sergey Malinin -- ___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users -- ___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar
Idehen/Hugh/Sergei, I did my own research on this. OpenLink wrote the initial virt_jena.jar driver, and maintains it, but does not enhance it. Sorry for the dumb questions - I can check this stuff on github.com, but sometimes a conversation is a good thing. Sergei, https://github.com/smalinin, github suggests you contributed both the Jena2 and Jena3 driver and are still contributing to them. Looking at the commits, OpenLink commits the binary virt_jena2.jar and virt_jena3.jar, and changes version numbers, from time to time. It might be good to communicate about the roadmap for these - I see virt_jena3.jar there, but I know my application would need other changes above Virtuoso JDBC and virt_jena3 as well to use Jena 3. If we make these, I will think about any suggestions I could make. Maybe I can make these into github.com issues, with or without pull requests depending on my availability. Dan Davis, Systems/Applications Architect (Contractor), Office of Computer and Communications Systems, National Library of Medicine, NIH From: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 11:05 AM To: virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com>; Sergei Malinin <smali...@openlinksw.com> Subject: Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar On 11/7/16 10:55 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink roadmap, and also, whether we need to dedicate resources ourselves to keep this up to date, or socialize the issue with the contributors. The claimed compatibility of virt-jena.jar is very old, and while it works up to 2.13.0, Jena 3 is now over a year old, and has many releases. As a government shop, I ran my webapp dependencies through the OWASP dependency checker, and while I could make everything compliant, it is not the best way to override individual dependent libraries, and better to get individual dependent libraries to be updated. I'd also love to see the process change to use Maven or Ant with ivy. Daniel, We are committed to keeping our native Jena Providers up to date. I'll take a look at the Jena 3 issue. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com) Weblogs (Blogs): Legacy Blog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen Profile Pages: Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Web Identities (WebID): Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar
On 11/7/16 10:55 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote: > > Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining > this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does > OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. > > > > My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss > where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink roadmap, and also, > whether we need to dedicate resources ourselves to keep this up to > date, or socialize the issue with the contributors. The claimed > compatibility of virt-jena.jar is very old, and while it works up to > 2.13.0, Jena 3 is now over a year old, and has many releases. > > > > As a government shop, I ran my webapp dependencies through the OWASP > dependency checker, and while I could make everything compliant, it is > not the best way to override individual dependent libraries, and > better to get individual dependent libraries to be updated. I’d also > love to see the process change to use Maven or Ant with ivy. > Daniel, We are committed to keeping our native Jena Providers up to date. I'll take a look at the Jena 3 issue. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com) Weblogs (Blogs): Legacy Blog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen Profile Pages: Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Web Identities (WebID): Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
Re: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar
Ah, I see, there's a binsrc/jena, binsrc/jena2, and binsrc/jena3. I will look at the commits to this and try to answer my question on my own. It would be nice to hear clearly what the commitment of OpenLink is to this. From: Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:55 AM To: virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink roadmap, and also, whether we need to dedicate resources ourselves to keep this up to date, or socialize the issue with the contributors. The claimed compatibility of virt-jena.jar is very old, and while it works up to 2.13.0, Jena 3 is now over a year old, and has many releases. As a government shop, I ran my webapp dependencies through the OWASP dependency checker, and while I could make everything compliant, it is not the best way to override individual dependent libraries, and better to get individual dependent libraries to be updated. I'd also love to see the process change to use Maven or Ant with ivy. Thanks, Dan Davis, Systems/Applications Architect (Contractor), Office of Computer and Communications Systems, National Library of Medicine, NIH -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
[Virtuoso-users] Better question on virt-jena.jar
Who is maintaining virt-jena? What is the process of maintaining this, e.g. is this portion of virtuoso purely contributed, or does OpenLink plan to update it and maintain it. My application depends on virt-jena. I will need to tell my boss where an upgrade to virt-jena is in an OpenLink roadmap, and also, whether we need to dedicate resources ourselves to keep this up to date, or socialize the issue with the contributors. The claimed compatibility of virt-jena.jar is very old, and while it works up to 2.13.0, Jena 3 is now over a year old, and has many releases. As a government shop, I ran my webapp dependencies through the OWASP dependency checker, and while I could make everything compliant, it is not the best way to override individual dependent libraries, and better to get individual dependent libraries to be updated. I'd also love to see the process change to use Maven or Ant with ivy. Thanks, Dan Davis, Systems/Applications Architect (Contractor), Office of Computer and Communications Systems, National Library of Medicine, NIH -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi___ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
