RE: VNC thru Cisco VPN and firewall

2002-10-02 Thread Lee Allen

Until very recently, I used VNC in a very similar environment, including
the Cisco VPN.

In my case, the Cisco VPN Concentrator was not "outside" the Pix
firewall, but parallel to it.  So when I establish a VPN connection, I
am not going through the firewall at all.

Can you access other services/servers going through this same setup?
Ie, when you have a VPN connection established, can you surf a web
server that is also located behind the VPN concentrator & Pix firewall?

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VNC thru Cisco VPN and firewall
> 
> 
> I am trying to connect from inside another firewall first 
> using Cisco VPN client and then VNC. I am able to see the VPN 
> client enter my network but VNC "Failed to connect...". I am 
> able to connect from an outside source (my
> home) to the VNC server without any problem. The difference 
> being there is no firewall on the home side.
> 
> My setup is:
> Open a connection with Cisco VPN client and then:
> VNC client: -firewall: ---VPNConcentrator:-Pix
> Firewall:VNC Server
> 
> I have tried the mathematics to use port 80 in the display 
> number to no avail. Do I need to change the registry on 
> either or both machines? If so, what would that be? Is it 
> port 5900 that would need to be opened on the firewall? Also, 
> our internal addresses are private. Should the VNC Server 
> have a public address. Thanks for your help.
> 
> There is absolutely no evidence that suggests life is to be 
> taken seriously!
> 
> Neal Johnson
> 360-442-5066
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Bluetooth and WiFI

2002-10-02 Thread Lee Allen

TCP/IP runs over 802.11b (WiFi), so VNC does.

I have used vnc (viewer) on a Pocket PC device using WiFi.

As for Bluetooth, I am wholly ignorant there.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marcus C. Lopez
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bluetooth and WiFI
> 
> 
> Currently VNC supports TCP/IP protocols.  Is there any 
> support for Bluetooth and WiFi 80211b connectivity with 
> Windows CE, Pocket PC, PalmPC?  Thanks, ml
> 
> 
> -
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! 
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: How to know how many sessions (and IPs) connecting to vnc server

2002-09-25 Thread Lee Allen

If the server is a Unix/Linux system, try 'netstat' (shows IP
connections by IP address & port).

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How to know how many sessions (and IPs) connecting 
> to vnc server
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Does anyone know how to know how many sessions and their IP 
> addresses connecting to the vnc server?
> 
> I have vnc server on one machine so
> other people (in the LAN) can log in to view it.  I would 
> like to know the way to log (or just view) how many of them 
> currently connecting to the machine. Is the any way to do so?
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
> PT
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Displaying the X graphical login prompt through vnc

2002-09-23 Thread Lee Allen

Sounds like you want to run Xvnc in 'inetd' mode.  That means:
-   Xvnc is not pre-started
-   each connection attempt starts an Xvnc session
-   xdm presents a login for each user, and figures out what wm and
apps to run
-   sessions are not persistent

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Durdin
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Displaying the X graphical login prompt through vnc
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Really the subject says it all: How can I have the user shown 
> the graphical login prompt that X gives instead of logging in 
> as the user that the server runs as? In a previous message, 
> someone suggested telnetting in and starting Xvnc, and then 
> logging in, but I don't want to have to do that (I'd like 
> users to be able to login through vnc). And if I do this, 
> what user ought I run the server as (root? something
> else?)
> 
> Please be sure to copy your responses to my address, as I'm 
> not subscribed to the list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Win CE VNC Server

2002-09-23 Thread Lee Allen

> Seems great tool.  It can really remote control WinCE?
>
>I don't have WinCE at handy, but great interest on
>several remote desktop/control programs.

It has been several months since I used it, but my recollection is yes,
it provides remote control of a WinCE device, either through the
USB/cradle connection, or TCP/IP if the Pocket PC has Ethernet or WiFi
installed.  We used it over all 3 of those media for testing.

> Not a RDP client or such for WinCE?

I can't answer that, I'm not familiar with RDP.

I can tell you that this program enables a Windows desktop to display
the contents of the WinCE screen, and I think (this is the part where my
memory is hazy) do input as well, in effect remote controlling it.  The
reproduction of the screen was perfect.

-Lee Allen

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Akira Hatakeyama
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 11:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Win CE VNC Server
> 
> 
> Greetings.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:43:26AM -0400, Lee Allen wrote:
> > I don't think VNC Server is available for Windows CE.
> 
> There's VNC server for WinCE.
> 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wincevncsvr

> But Microsoft provides a 'remote control' tool for Windows CE (aka 
> Pocket PC).  Here's the URL and summary:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/mobile/pocketpc/downloads/powertoys.asp
> 
> "Remote Display Control for Pocket PC
> With the Remote Display Control application, you can display actions 
> on a Pocket PC, including user input, remotely on the display of a 
> desktop or laptop personal computer. This is a great tool for 
> demonstrating the power of the Pocket PC to a large audience. It also 
> allows developers to test their applications for the Pocket PC on a 
> larger screen. "

Seems great tool.  It can really remote control WinCE?
Not a RDP client or such for WinCE?

I don't have WinCE at handy, but great interest on
several remote desktop/control programs.

-- 
Akira HatakeyamaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.sra.co.jp/people/akira/index.html
chigasaki-minami, tsuzuki ward, yokohama, japan
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Win CE VNC Server

2002-09-20 Thread Lee Allen

I don't think VNC Server is available for Windows CE.  

But Microsoft provides a 'remote control' tool for Windows CE (aka
Pocket PC).  Here's the URL and summary:

http://www.microsoft.com/mobile/pocketpc/downloads/powertoys.asp

"Remote Display Control for Pocket PC
With the Remote Display Control application, you can display actions on
a Pocket PC, including user input, remotely on the display of a desktop
or laptop personal computer. This is a great tool for demonstrating the
power of the Pocket PC to a large audience. It also allows developers to
test their applications for the Pocket PC on a larger screen. "

Remote Display Control uses TCP/IP, and it can work with ActiveSyncR
connections via Ethernet or dial-up. "

My recollection is that it allowed remote CONTROL, this seems to say
it's just remote DISPLAY.  

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Wilson
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Win CE VNC Server
> 
> 
> Hi,
> I work for a company who have around 300 sales people out 
> on the road. I've just taken on the role of supplying them 
> all with Compaq Ipaqs running Windows CE ver 3.0. I've 
> downloaded the Viewer side of VNC for CE and it works well. 
> However I really need the Windows CE version of VNC Server, 
> as I would like to be able to fix problems on the Ipaqs from 
> our main office.
> 
> Is VNC Server for Windows CE available? If not is it in 
> development. This tool would be invaluable to me.
> 
> Any help you could give me would be greatly appericiated.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Mike Wilson
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ---
> --
> ---
> ---
> 
> This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
> presented are solely those of the author and do not 
> necessarily represent those of Russ Berrie (UK) Ltd. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have 
> received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, 
> forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
> contact the sender. ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: connection refused

2002-09-11 Thread Lee Allen

'closing ports', when used in the context of security, means two things:
1) shutting down or restricting services, as you described
2) preventing your firewall from allowing outside access to those ports

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ad
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: connection refused
> 
> 
> Thank you everyone for your help.
> 
> I, a novice, successfully connected to the VNC server!
> Yeah!
> 
> As suggested it was a security issue. I checked my 
> /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny settings and found that 
> the settings were wrong.
> 
> Your advice helped me focus my investigation.  
> Now on to Samba.
> 
> May I ask an additional very novice question? There
> are many remarks regarding opening and closing ports. 
> Is this accomplished by only settings in the
> /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny files and
> shutting down unnecessary daemons/services?   (We have
> a separate router that is acting as a Firewall.)
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> 
> --- "Beerse,_Corn・#34;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Seth and Steve, thank you so much for your advice.
> >  We
> > > still havent been able to connect to the Linux
> > VNC
> > > server from our Win client.   When attempting to
> > > connect, I spcified the IP address of the Linux
> > > server in our LAN (e.g., 192.168.0.10:1), but the
> > > dialog box still just disappears.
> > 
> > Does the box disappear before or after the password
> > question? If after the
> > question, it is an vnc issue (like badd password or
> > such) If it is before
> > the question, try the telnet trick: `telnet linuxbox
> > 5901`.
> > 
> > Have  you tried to get access from the console
> > (:0.0) to the local Xvnc
> > (like `vncviewer :1` or `telnet localhost 5901`)? If
> > this gives proper
> > results and remote connections don't, it's the
> > security settings in your
> > linux box that trouble you.
> > 
> > Try to find the firewall and security settings in
> > your distro and open port
> > 5901 for remote access.
> > 
> > > 
> > > As suggested, I downloaded Ethereal and captured
> > the
> > > network messages and have made sure that the
> > > /etc/hosts file in the Linux has the IP address
> > and
> > > name of the Win Client.  I couldnt find anything
> > out
> > > of the ordinary (of course I am not exactly sure
> > what
> > > to look for).  The captures did not look
> > significantly
> > > different from the log of the successful attempt
> > to
> > > connect to another Win2K Vnc Server, except that
> > the
> > > captures for the attempt to connect to the Linux
> > VNC
> > > server were cut off short.Again the Linux VNC
> > > server logs (/home/user/.vnc/hostname) show
> > Refused
> > > connection from client.
> > 
> > This can still be a security issue. Are both
> > machines in the same IP domain
> > (same netmask, similar IP address).
> > 
> > > 
> > > I would appreciate any advice.  What appears to be
> > > wrong?  The DNS server settings?, Access
> > permissions?.
> > >  Also, would any of the followings be the source
> > of
> > > the problem?
> > 
> > I don't think the network is an issue here: The
> > viewer machine gets at the
> > server machine since it appears in the log.
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Best to start at the firewall settings.
> > 
> > > 1./etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny settings
> > (of
> > > the Linux box)
> > > 2./etc/hosts settings (of the Linux box)
> > > 3.PAM auth.  (of  the Linux box)
> > > 4.DNS (ours is on a Win2K machine)
> > > 5.router settings
> > > 
> > > Also, this may or may not be relevant, but we are
> > > having trouble with our Samba connection to the
> > Linux
> > > machine.  Although we can see the Linux
> > files/folders,
> > > we cannot copy files into the Linux folders from a
> > > Windows machines, although we are asked for user
> > and
> > > passwords (we can do the reverse copy).
> > 
> > I bet if you solve one, you solve the other.
> > 
> > 
> > CBee
> > ___
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-> list
> 
> 
> 
> __
> 
> Yahoo! - We Remember
> 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost 
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Problem with vnc in inetd mode

2002-09-10 Thread Lee Allen

The problem seems to be gone in TightVNC 1.2.6.  Or rather, it seems to
be reduced to the point it's no longer a problem.  Every 5th or 10th
connection attempt fails, but the very next attempt succeeds.  The prior
situation was, all subsequent attempts failed, for approximately a
minute.

Thanks for your help, in particular, suggest 1.2.6.  That version also
performs much better.  I like it.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Problem with vnc in inetd mode

2002-09-10 Thread Lee Allen

> > A problem looks like this:
> > 
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: launching: 5900
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: accept: new socket 3
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: pid 24626: exec /usr/local/bin/Xvnc
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: uid: 507  gid: 103 
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: groups: 103 100 102 
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd[24430]: pid 24626: exit status 1 
> > Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: pid 24626, exit status 100
> 
> What's process id 24430?
> How manny instances of inetd have you running?

Just the one.  To run inetd in debug mode, I must kill the inetd daemon,
and run it interactively.

> Is your app working properly without window manager?
> Can it have multiple instances?
> is it the other pid above?

It works fine without a wm.  Yes, it has multiple instances.  I think
pid 24626 is the Xvnc process.

I should point out that this works great the majority of the time.  We
may have 5 or 10 sessions running at a time.  Only 
about one in ten viewer startups fails as described.  Then, it takes
about a minute before that client can connect again.  (Yes, there is
some new information here, I have done much more testing).

I am about to do another test to see if only that client is prevented
from connecting during the minute, or are all clients.
But first, I have installed TightVNC 1.2.6, and I will see if I can
still reproduce the problem.

> For your patched Xvnc, you did not have to patch it. There 
> are more options to start an app at login. For example create 
> a dedicated user and start the app from the ~/.xstartup file 
> (this depends on the used window manager). 

What I am really trying to avoid is the xdm login screen.  Our
application authenticates the user.  I have not been able to find a way
to start an app without (1) pre-starting all sessions, or (2) using xdm
with the redundant (in our case) login.

Can you provide any more information on how to do this?  

-Lee Allen
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Problem with vnc in inetd mode

2002-09-10 Thread Lee Allen

> Have you checked the inetd log? Might need to turn it on or such.

Yes.  When I run inetd in debug mode, a good connect & disconnect looks
like this:

Sep  9 15:18:25 netfinity inetd: launching: 5900
Sep  9 15:18:25 netfinity inetd: accept: new socket 3
Sep  9 15:18:25 netfinity inetd: pid 24605: exec /usr/local/bin/Xvnc 
Sep  9 15:18:25 netfinity inetd: uid: 507  gid: 103 
Sep  9 15:18:25 netfinity inetd: groups: 103 100 102 
Sep  9 15:18:37 netfinity inetd: pid 24605, exit status 0

A problem looks like this:

Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: launching: 5900
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: accept: new socket 3
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: pid 24626: exec /usr/local/bin/Xvnc 
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: uid: 507  gid: 103 
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: groups: 103 100 102 
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd[24430]: pid 24626: exit status 1 
Sep  9 15:18:41 netfinity inetd: pid 24626, exit status 100

> > I prefer to use 5900.  There is no 'plain vncserver' to 
> conflict with, 
> > and by using 5900, the viewer does not have to specify the 
> > port/session number.  Ie, I can use "hostname" instead of 
> > "hostname:50".
> 
> Nice idea.
> What $DISPLAY value do you get? (just a qurious question ;-)

The first session is :2, the second simultaneous connection is :3, and
so on.  If :2 disconnects, the next connection is :2 again.

> You started (if I remember well) with a problem that only 
> happens when using the AT&T vncviewer. I know that has less 
> compression methods for rfb communication. Is it possible 
> that the handshake between server and viewer just takes a 
> (little/lot) longer? Try specifying the compression protocol 
> at both ends.

No, that's not it.  The problem is present with both AT&T and TightVNC
(at both ends).  After one of these failed connections, there is no Xvnc
program running on the server.  

I should point out that I have patched Xvnc to automatically start an
application, to avoid using xdm.  

Keep thinking!  Please.

-Lee Allen
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Problem with vnc in inetd mode

2002-09-10 Thread Lee Allen

> Are you sure you are running in inetd mode? As far as I know 
> inetd, the communication is not on the requested port. IF the 
> connection goes away by itself in a reasonable time (up to 
> several minutes) then you are just waiting for an other 
> session to be setup.

I am definitely using inetd.  And it supports multiple simultaneous
connections, all on port 5900.  So it normally accepts new connections,
regardless of whether there is already a session connected.

> If you use the setup as on 
> http://www.sourcecodecorner.com/articles/vnc/l> inux.asp, the 
> ports for inetd usage are from 5950 upwards to 
> avoid collisions with plain vncserver sessions.

I prefer to use 5900.  There is no 'plain vncserver' to conflict with,
and by using 5900, the viewer does not have to specify the port/session
number.  Ie, I can use "hostname" instead of "hostname:50".

> 1.2.6 is out (however, that should not be the problem here)

I will load that in the next couple days and see if it resolves the
problem.

Thanks.

-Lee Allen
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Problem with vnc in inetd mode

2002-09-09 Thread Lee Allen

I have been using Xvnc for some time now, in inetd mode.  It is running
on a Linux server (RedHat 6.2).  The clients are various Windows systems
running the viewer.  We primarily use TightVNC but I have tested the
standard AT&T distribution and I see the problem there, too.

The problem is this: occassionally the viewer will fail to connect to
the server.  If it fails once, it may fail multiple times.  It may take
several seconds to a minute to get a good connection.

During this time I can only find one "clue" on the server: "netstat -an"
shows this:

Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address  Foreign Address  State
tcp0  0 192.168.0.110:5900 192.168.0.3:2064
TIME_WAIT

the first IP address is the Linux server, the second IP address is the
Windows client.  The Windows client port number varies.

I must wait for this connection to disappear before I can successfully
establish a connection again.

Does anybody have any idea what's going on here?

Using TightVNC 1.2.4

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: Microsoft EULA

2002-09-05 Thread Lee Allen

We run our mainstay "Windows" app on a Linux server, using Wine.  Users
(multiple) access it using VNC, from any supported VNC platform.

We do this for stability and performance.  But it also means we are not
hostage to Microsoft's licensing games and various other antics.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Wyllie
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Microsoft EULA
> 
> 
> I have heard that Microsoft have included in their EULA for 
> Windows 2000 Pro, Server and Windows XP operating systems a 
> little item about VNC.
> 
> It is supposed to state that if a PC/Server, running one of 
> those OS's, has VNC installed, then you need to purchase CALS 
> to cover for each PC on the network which is capble of 
> connecting to it via VNC.
> 
> I have not seen the EULA mentioning VNC myself, but I am 
> wondering if anyone subscribed to this list has heard of this?
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel Wyllie
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



RE: NTL Set Top Box & Router

2002-09-04 Thread Lee Allen

The dynamic hostname services such as dyndns.org work well for this
situation, with one caveat: your router/set-top box must have the
capability to send notification to the service when its IP address
changes.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Heenan
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 6:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NTL Set Top Box & Router
> 
> 
> I connect to the internet via a cable NTL set top box and have a 3 PC 
> network off a router. I have reviewed the replys regarding 
> port forwarding 
> which I understand. My problem is that NTL change the IP 
> address of the set 
> top box (which I assume must be my outside IP) about every 5 hours???
> 
> To VNC to my home PC's is my only solution to purchase a 
> static IP for my 
> router or PC's?
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> Best Wishes
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> _
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: 
> http://messenger.msn.com 
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: Improving performance

2002-07-08 Thread Lee Allen

That's what TightVNC ( www.tightvnc.com ) is for.  It compresses the data
stream for better performance over slow connections.  It puts some load on
the processors at both ends so it's best used with slow connections.

Tight is completely compatible with AT&T VNC - you could substitute the
viewer (client) or the server with Tight, running AT&T VNC at the other end,
and it would still work.  But you get the compression only if you run Tight
at both ends.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS

- Original Message -
From: "Boby, Joseph K (IE10)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:24 AM
Subject: Improving performance


> Hi ,
>
> What are the ways of improving vnc performance over a dialup line? 8 bit
> does increase the performane a lot.
>
> Boby
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: Xvnc and colors

2002-06-27 Thread Lee Allen

"Beerse, Corni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You should play with the '-depth' option with bit-per-pixel values: 8, 16,
> 24 or 32.

I have: the higher depths are too slow.  8 bit depth is perfect except the
screen has a lavender tinge to it.  That's what I want to fix.

> > Can anyone enlighten me about the color related arguments to Xvnc?
> > Specifically:
> > -cc intdefault color visual class
> > -co file   color database file
>
> The '-co file' has the color definitions in it: what color names belong to
> what pixel value.

How can I make such a file?  Is it documented anywhere?

-Lee Allen
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: font server error = 259

2002-06-26 Thread Lee Allen

It looks like you have set the font-path (fp) variable in vncserver to
'tcp/127.0.0.1:7000'
Do you really have a font-server running at this protocol/address/port?

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS

- Original Message -
From: "Jannik Tonsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: font server error = 259


> Hey all,
>
> Please help me with the following error in the /.vnc/server:1.log:
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Xvnc version 3.3.3r2
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Copyright (C) AT&T Laboratories Cambridge.
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 All Rights Reserved.
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 See http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc for information
on
> VNC
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Desktop name 'X' (fox:1)
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Protocol version supported 3.3
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Listening for VNC connections on TCP port 5901
> 26/06/02 22:03:09 Listening for HTTP connections on TCP port 5801
> 26/06/02 22:03:09   URL http://fox:5801
> _FontTransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 239
> failed to set default font path 'tcp/127.0.0.1:7000'
> Fatal server error:
> could not open default font 'fixed'
>
> Best Regards,
> Jannik Tonsberg
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: Xvnc and colors

2002-06-26 Thread Lee Allen

I just realized I omitted an important piece of information.

I tried "-cc 3" per the VNC FAQ.  What happens is really weird.  The
application seems to run as a monochrome negative.  Consistently.  Until I
exit the application.  Then, for a couple of seconds before it disappears
from the screen, the colors are EXACTLY RIGHT.  Tantalizing, and
frustrating.  Why does it look right just at the end, and how can I make it
look right all the time?

This behaviour occurs with both AT&T and Tightvnc, at both ends.

Again, thanks for any and all help.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS

- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Xvnc and colors


> I have an application I am running on a Linux box and accessing from a
> Windows desktop, using vncviewer & Xvnc.  Everything is working great
except
> the colors -- they're a bit "off".  I am running Xvnc at 8 bit depth.  The
> colors are better at 24 bits but then I have a performance (speed)
problem.
>
> Can anyone enlighten me about the color related arguments to Xvnc?
> Specifically:
> -cc intdefault color visual class
> -co file   color database file
>
> The only other information I was able to find was from the VNC FAQ:
>
> cc n
> Sets the colour Visual class used by the server. Some X applications don't
> cope too well with the TrueColor visual normally used by an 8-bit-deep
Xvnc.
> You can make the server use a PseudoColor visual by specifying -cc 3.
>
> Any additional information would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Lee Allen
> Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Xvnc and colors

2002-06-26 Thread Lee Allen

I have an application I am running on a Linux box and accessing from a
Windows desktop, using vncviewer & Xvnc.  Everything is working great except
the colors -- they're a bit "off".  I am running Xvnc at 8 bit depth.  The
colors are better at 24 bits but then I have a performance (speed) problem.

Can anyone enlighten me about the color related arguments to Xvnc?
Specifically:
-cc intdefault color visual class
-co file   color database file

The only other information I was able to find was from the VNC FAQ:

cc n
Sets the colour Visual class used by the server. Some X applications don't
cope too well with the TrueColor visual normally used by an 8-bit-deep Xvnc.
You can make the server use a PseudoColor visual by specifying -cc 3.

Any additional information would be greatly appreciated.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: VNC Server for IPAQ

2002-06-15 Thread Lee Allen

Assuming the answer is "No" (and I think it is), Microsoft makes a utility
for just this purpose -- remote-controlling an iPAQ from a MS-Windows based
PC.  I have lost the utility and I plan to search for it early next week.
Let me know if you're interested.

-Lee Allen

- Original Message -
From: "Nicholson Janet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:51 PM
Subject: VNC Server for IPAQ


> Hello,
>
> Is there a VNC Server that exists for the COMPAQ IPAQ (StrongArm processor
> running windows not Linux)?
> We are trying to view the IPAQ display from a PC, or a UNIX box.
>
> Thanks,
> Janet Nicholson
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Re: Xvnc & xstartup

2002-06-10 Thread Lee Allen

I know vncserver can start applications.  I must use Xvnc in -inetd mode, to
support multiple users and non-persistent sessions.

I was just thinking, since inetd starts Xvnc with a user name, it would be
nice if it could start the apps specified in .vnc/xstartup or xinitrc, and
not require XDMCP.  In my case, the login step required by XDMCP is
unnecessary ... but unavoidable.

-Lee Allen

> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lee Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > When Xvnc is run in -inetd mode, is there some reason it does
> > not execute xstartup or .xinitrc ?
>
> Yes, -inetd is to be used from inetd (or xinetd or tcpserve or stuf like
> that) Hence it get started without a real user.
>
> Actually, Xvnc never starts xstartup or .xinitrc. It's your startup script
> that starts both Xvnc and xstartup or .xiinitrc. vncserver is that script
> for most of you, have a look and try to read what happens.
>
> >
> > I realize it can be configured to use XDMCP, I'm just
> > wondering why this simpler mechanism is not utilized.
>
> It is used as described above. THe reason is the order in which things
> happen: is it first login and then windows startup, then the .xinitrc and
> xstartup scripts can be used. Is it first windows startup and then login,
> it's xdmcp that starts the login.
>
> On most linux machines, you can replay this by putting the machine in
> runlevel 3. Then, at the prompt type `startx` or `xstart` and see the
> windows come to you. If you don't start the windows but start vncserver,
> don't be surprised it gives you display :0.
>
> Just did the next on my (RH 7.3) linux machine:
> reboot to runlevel 3:
> edit /etc/inittab and changed the default runlevel from 5 to 3
> then reboot
>
> At the text-console, login as a normal user
> vncserver :0
> This gives me the vncserver with display :0 at a unix machine
> then to have X windows at the console:
> startx -- :1
> Ending with the reverse world: display:0 is in vnc, display:1 is at the
> display...
>
>
>
> CBee
> ___
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list



Xvnc & xstartup

2002-06-10 Thread Lee Allen

When Xvnc is run in -inetd mode, is there some reason it does not execute
xstartup or .xinitrc ?

I realize it can be configured to use XDMCP, I'm just wondering why this
simpler mechanism is not utilized.

Lee Allen
Leadtec Systems, a division of CGS
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list