RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread James Weatherall
   Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today.
 As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect two 
 networks together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and 
 file-transfer across a firewall/router without either side 
 having to do any port-forwarding adjustments. No really. :)

Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports
enabled/forwarded?  Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really aren't
doing a very good job? ;)

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list


RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread Scott C. Best
Wez:
Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two Kaboodle
users can VNC and file-transfer with each other.
As for what it implies about the firewalls...that's a
very big it depends. Kaboodle uses the open-source echoWare.DLL
to establish a long-term TCP connection with an echoServer called
KaboodleProxy that acts as a relay between Kaboodle clients. So
if the firewall is smart enough to block an echoWare to echoServer
connection, then of course it won't work. But consumer-grade
firewall/routers like LinkSys and Netgear products aren't that
smart: by default, they will allow out any outbound connections.
And since the echoServer owner can run that server on any port
they want (443, for example), the connection will be passed on
most commercial-grade firewalls -- with their out of the box
configuration -- as well.
	With the echoWare/echoServer approach, all of the traffic 
looks like it's outgoing, from the perspective of the firewall.
Which is, of course, the same approach that VNC's add client and 
SSH's reverse tunnels have been utilizing for years.

cheers,
Scott
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today.
As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect two
networks together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and
file-transfer across a firewall/router without either side
having to do any port-forwarding adjustments. No really. :)
Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports
enabled/forwarded?  Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really aren't
doing a very good job? ;)
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list


RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread James Weatherall
Hi Scott,

Understood.  The system you describe will work provided that the required
ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends,
and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume
you provide yourself? 

Cheers,

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.


 -Original Message-
 From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13
 To: James Weatherall
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
 
 Wez:
 
   Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two 
 Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other.
 
   As for what it implies about the firewalls...that's a 
 very big it depends. Kaboodle uses the open-source 
 echoWare.DLL to establish a long-term TCP connection with an 
 echoServer called KaboodleProxy that acts as a relay 
 between Kaboodle clients. So if the firewall is smart enough 
 to block an echoWare to echoServer connection, then of course 
 it won't work. But consumer-grade firewall/routers like 
 LinkSys and Netgear products aren't that
 smart: by default, they will allow out any outbound connections.
 And since the echoServer owner can run that server on any 
 port they want (443, for example), the connection will be 
 passed on most commercial-grade firewalls -- with their out 
 of the box configuration -- as well.
 
   With the echoWare/echoServer approach, all of the 
 traffic looks like it's outgoing, from the perspective of 
 the firewall.
 Which is, of course, the same approach that VNC's add 
 client and SSH's reverse tunnels have been utilizing for years.
 
 cheers,
 Scott
 
 On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
 
 Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today.
  As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect 
 two networks 
  together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and 
 file-transfer across a 
  firewall/router without either side having to do any 
 port-forwarding 
  adjustments. No really. :)
 
  Through two *completely* closed firewalls, i.e. with no ports 
  enabled/forwarded?  Doesn't that imply that the firewalls really 
  aren't doing a very good job? ;)
 
  Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list


RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread Scott C. Best
Wez:
My company provides the echoServer application for anyone to
run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is being worked on). The
idea is that a community of users will have one tech-savvy person who
can run a server so the rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the
details of firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore.
Lots of value for $25, IMO. :)
We're running a demo version of it for proof-of-concept with
Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're interested in selling the server
more than we are subscriptions to the service.
cheers,
Scott
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
Hi Scott,
Understood.  The system you describe will work provided that the required
ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends,
and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume
you provide yourself?
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13
To: James Weatherall
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez:
Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two
Kaboodle users can VNC and file-transfer with each other.
snip
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list


RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread James Weatherall
Scott,

Fair enough.  The only comment I'd make is that the claim that you can
exchange files using Kaboodle without modifying any firewall settings is not
correct - you need the echoServer machine's firewall to be properly
configured to let connections in, and you need to be sure that both ends
allow outgoing connections, at least to the echoServer port.

Cheers,

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 08 November 2004 18:45
 To: James Weatherall
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
 
 Wez:
 
   My company provides the echoServer application for 
 anyone to run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is 
 being worked on). The idea is that a community of users 
 will have one tech-savvy person who can run a server so the 
 rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the details of 
 firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore.
 Lots of value for $25, IMO. :)
 
   We're running a demo version of it for 
 proof-of-concept with Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're 
 interested in selling the server more than we are 
 subscriptions to the service.
 
 cheers,
 Scott
 
 On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
 
  Hi Scott,
 
  Understood.  The system you describe will work provided that the 
  required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the 
 firewalls 
  at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare 
  server, which I assume you provide yourself?
 
  Cheers,
 
  Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13
  To: James Weatherall
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
 
  Wez:
 
 Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two 
 Kaboodle users can 
  VNC and file-transfer with each other.
 snip
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list


RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC

2004-11-08 Thread Scott C. Best
Wez:
	A fair point: I should more accurately say that with 
the echoServer approach, *most* end users will not have to make
any firewall adjustments. The person running the echoServer
may have to, although they are not necessarily an end user
of the client software which uses their server.

Thanks for letting me clarify; I didn't mean to come
across as misleading.
cheers,
Scott
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
Scott,
Fair enough.  The only comment I'd make is that the claim that you can
exchange files using Kaboodle without modifying any firewall settings is not
correct - you need the echoServer machine's firewall to be properly
configured to let connections in, and you need to be sure that both ends
allow outgoing connections, at least to the echoServer port.
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 November 2004 18:45
To: James Weatherall
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez:
My company provides the echoServer application for
anyone to run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is
being worked on). The idea is that a community of users
will have one tech-savvy person who can run a server so the
rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the details of
firewalls or IP-addresses (or even dynamic DNS) anymore.
Lots of value for $25, IMO. :)
We're running a demo version of it for
proof-of-concept with Kaboodle, but unlike GoToMyPC, we're
interested in selling the server more than we are
subscriptions to the service.
cheers,
Scott
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
Hi Scott,
Understood.  The system you describe will work provided that the
required ports are enabled for outgoing access through the
firewalls
at both ends, and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare
server, which I assume you provide yourself?
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 November 2004 18:13
To: James Weatherall
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kaboodle 0.99d and VNC
Wez:
 	Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two
Kaboodle users can
VNC and file-transfer with each other.
snip
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list