RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
Siva.Kumar wrote I think the ':19' after the port is immaterial. Robin Hill wrote The X server you specify here is used purely to figure out which port to connect to - it's not used in any other way by the client. James Weatherall wrote I'm afraid that you are mistaken. In the example you give, either ::4918 Or :4918 Are valid, and will work. I finally get it. Yes (red face) you are all correct. I had somehow become convinced that the viewer needed to know the display number (for reasons other than to derive the ffb port). Yes, vncviewer ...::4918 does indeed work Thanks for straightening me out. John _ Experience Live Search from your PC or mobile device today. http://www.live.com/?mkt=en-ca ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
John, I'm afraid that you are mistaken. In the example you give, either ::4918 Or :4918 Are valid, and will work. ::4918:19 is not a valid server specification but happens to work because of the way VNC Viewer interprets the port/display number specification. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: John Lumby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 October 2006 21:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vnc-list@realvnc.com > Subject: RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer > > James Weatherall wrote > > >John, > > > >No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer > >(host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are: > > > >Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) > >and > >Host::port(always port) > > > >i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display number *or* a TCP > port number. VNC > >display numbers 0-99 are just a short-hand for TCP port > numbers 5900 to > >5999. > > I hate to argue with someone who has a realvnc email but my recent > experience is in direct contracdiction of what you have written: > > 1).I started my vncserver with options >vncserver :19 -geometry 1440x1062 -name x -rfbport 4918 > (I can explain why but not relevant) > > Here is the Xvnc process: > Xvnc :19 -desktop xx ... -geometry 1440x1062 ... -rfbwait 12 > -rfbauth -rfbport 5919 -fp ... -rfbport 4918 > NB the two -rfbport options. - the first (I assume) > always specified, > and the second from my vncserver option. And to show > which one took > precedence: > here is netstat output to show which port it > actually is listening > on: > > netstat -an | egrep -e "4918|5919" > tcp4 0 0 *.4918 *.* > LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 .4918 .34849 > ESTABLISHED > > > 2)and now here is the command I used on my workstation to > connect : > vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19 > and that worked. > > Does that convince you? If not - try it! > > John > > _ > Experience Live Search from your PC or mobile device today. > http://www.live.com/?mkt=en-ca ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
On Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 04:32:37PM -0400, John Lumby wrote: > James Weatherall wrote > > >John, > > > >No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer > >(host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are: > > > >Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) > >and > >Host::port(always port) > > > >i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display number *or* a TCP port number. VNC > >display numbers 0-99 are just a short-hand for TCP port numbers 5900 to > >5999. > > I hate to argue with someone who has a realvnc email but my recent > experience is in direct contracdiction of what you have written: > > 1).I started my vncserver with options > vncserver :19 -geometry 1440x1062 -name x -rfbport 4918 >(I can explain why but not relevant) > The :19 there is telling it to start X server 19 which, by default, would start on port 5919 (hence you get that option in the Xvnc process). This is then overridden by the -rfbport option in your command line, hence the server listens on port 4918. > 2)and now here is the command I used on my workstation to connect : > vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19 and that worked. > > Does that convince you? If not - try it! > The X server you specify here is used purely to figure out which port to connect to - it's not used in any other way by the client. If you explicitly specify the port then it doesn't need that. Have you tried starting the viewer with just: vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918 Anything beyond the port number is (presumably) ignored by the vncviewer application (whether that's by design or purely coincidental I don't know). Cheers, Robin -- ___ ( ' } | Robin Hill<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | / / ) | Little Jim says | // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" | [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
John,
>> vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19
::4918:abcd" or even "::4918abcd"; it works. It makes
sense because you cannot have more than 1 display listening on a single
port (the second Xvnc will complain that it cannot bind to the given
port) unless using inetd.
-siva.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Lumby
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
James Weatherall wrote
>John,
>
>No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer
>(host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are:
>
>Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) and
>Host::port(always port)
>
>i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display number *or* a TCP port number.
>VNC display numbers 0-99 are just a short-hand for TCP port numbers
>5900 to 5999.
I hate to argue with someone who has a realvnc email but my recent
experience is in direct contracdiction of what you have written:
1).I started my vncserver with options
vncserver :19 -geometry 1440x1062 -name x -rfbport 4918
(I can explain why but not relevant)
Here is the Xvnc process:
Xvnc :19 -desktop xx ... -geometry 1440x1062 ... -rfbwait 12
-rfbauth -rfbport 5919 -fp ... -rfbport 4918
NB the two -rfbport options. - the first (I assume) always
specified,
and the second from my vncserver option. And to show which one took
precedence:
here is netstat output to show which port it actually is
listening
on:
netstat -an | egrep -e "4918|5919"
tcp4 0 0 *.4918 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 .4918 .34849
ESTABLISHED
2)and now here is the command I used on my workstation to connect :
vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19 http://www.live.com/?mkt=en-ca
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Confidentiality Notice
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipients
named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and should
not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are not a
named recipient, please notify the sender of that fact and delete the e-mail
from your system.
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
James Weatherall wrote
John,
No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer
(host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are:
Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise)
and
Host::port(always port)
i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display number *or* a TCP port number. VNC
display numbers 0-99 are just a short-hand for TCP port numbers 5900 to
5999.
I hate to argue with someone who has a realvnc email but my recent
experience is in direct contracdiction of what you have written:
1).I started my vncserver with options
vncserver :19 -geometry 1440x1062 -name x -rfbport 4918
(I can explain why but not relevant)
Here is the Xvnc process:
Xvnc :19 -desktop xx ... -geometry 1440x1062 ... -rfbwait 12
-rfbauth -rfbport 5919 -fp ... -rfbport 4918
NB the two -rfbport options. - the first (I assume) always specified,
and the second from my vncserver option. And to show which one took
precedence:
here is netstat output to show which port it actually is listening
on:
netstat -an | egrep -e "4918|5919"
tcp4 0 0 *.4918 *.*LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 .4918 .34849
ESTABLISHED
2)and now here is the command I used on my workstation to connect :
vncviewer -geometry 1440x1062 -passwd z ::4918:19 Experience Live Search from your PC or mobile device today.
http://www.live.com/?mkt=en-ca
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
RE: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
John, No, you don't - the syntax you are specifying to your VNC Viewer (host::port:display) is not valid. The two valid syntaxes are: Host:port_or_display (display if 0-99, port otherwise) and Host::port(always port) i.e. you specify *either* a VNC display number *or* a TCP port number. VNC display numbers 0-99 are just a short-hand for TCP port numbers 5900 to 5999. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Lumby > Sent: 17 October 2006 15:23 > To: vnc-list@realvnc.com > Subject: Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer > > William Hooper wrote : > > >John Lumby wrote: > > >> "If the VNC server is using a non-standard port number to accept > > >> connections then this is specified by adding two colons > to the server's > > >> address or name, followed by the port number" > > >> > > > > > > Yes! thank-you. I did not see that documented but > now I do. > >Thanks > > > for pointing that out.Oh well. And for anyone who > tries this, since > > > the documentation does not state the order of the > subfields when you > >need > > > to specify all three subfields - server-IP-address , server-port , > > > server-display-number I discovered by trial and error > that it is the > >above > > > order, with the three (in total) colons like so : > > > server-IP-address::server-port:server-display-number > > > >You don't need all three. You need either port or display number: > > > >server::5905 or server:5 > > Well - in my case I actually DO need all three. I had to start my > vncserver with an explicitly overridden value for its rfb > port (using the > -rfbport option). So the rfb port is not 5900+display > number. That's > why I needed to set a similar explicit value on the viewer. > > John > ___ > VNC-List mailing list > VNC-List@realvnc.com > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
William Hooper wrote : John Lumby wrote: >> "If the VNC server is using a non-standard port number to accept >> connections then this is specified by adding two colons to the server's >> address or name, followed by the port number" >> > > Yes! thank-you. I did not see that documented but now I do. Thanks > for pointing that out.Oh well. And for anyone who tries this, since > the documentation does not state the order of the subfields when you need > to specify all three subfields - server-IP-address , server-port , > server-display-number I discovered by trial and error that it is the above > order, with the three (in total) colons like so : > server-IP-address::server-port:server-display-number You don't need all three. You need either port or display number: server::5905 or server:5 Well - in my case I actually DO need all three. I had to start my vncserver with an explicitly overridden value for its rfb port (using the -rfbport option). So the rfb port is not 5900+display number. That's why I needed to set a similar explicit value on the viewer. John ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
John Lumby wrote: >> "If the VNC server is using a non-standard port number to accept >> connections then this is specified by adding two colons to the server's >> address or name, followed by the port number" >> > > Yes! thank-you. I did not see that documented but now I do. Thanks > for pointing that out.Oh well. And for anyone who tries this, since > the documentation does not state the order of the subfields when you need > to specify all three subfields - server-IP-address , server-port , > server-display-number I discovered by trial and error that it is the above > order, with the three (in total) colons like so : > server-IP-address::server-port:server-display-number You don't need all three. You need either port or display number: server::5905 or server:5 -- William Hooper ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
William Hooper wrote John Lumby wrote: > ... but no comparable option on the vncviewer, ... Would this be for the case of: "-listen [port] Causes vncviewer to listen on the given port (default 5500) for reverse connections from a VNC server." No Or would this be for the case of: "If the VNC server is using a non-standard port number to accept connections then this is specified by adding two colons to the server's address or name, followed by the port number" Yes! thank-you. I did not see that documented but now I do. Thanks for pointing that out.Oh well. And for anyone who tries this, since the documentation does not state the order of the subfields when you need to specify all three subfields - server-IP-address , server-port , server-display-number I discovered by trial and error that it is the above order, with the three (in total) colons like so : server-IP-address::server-port:server-display-number John ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Re: setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
John Lumby wrote: > I needed to do this recently. I found the -rfbport option on the > vncserver but no comparable option on the vncviewer, which left me unable > to connect to the Xvnc. Would this be for the case of: "-listen [port] Causes vncviewer to listen on the given port (default 5500) for reverse connections from a VNC server." Or would this be for the case of: "If the VNC server is using a non-standard port number to accept connections then this is specified by adding two colons to the server's address or name, followed by the port number" -- William Hooper ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
setting server rfb port to non-default - on the vncviewer
I needed to do this recently. I found the -rfbport option on the vncserver but no comparable option on the vncviewer, which left me unable to connect to the Xvnc.I have made a set of three small patches to vncviewer to add a new -ServerPort parameter on the command-line if anyone is interested. Or did I miss something already available? John ___ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
