Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
Eric, See Guglinski at: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=462 The helical trajectory is related to cold fusion too, because in QRT the neutron is composed by proton+electron. Into the structure of the neutron the electron loses its helical trajectory, and the energy of the zitterbewegung is responsible for the excess energy that occurs in many cold fusion experiments, as for instance in the Conte-Pieralice experiment: in their experiment the cathode was melt, a result not expected by them, since there was not (apparently) energy available for the electron to do it. Please read about neutron synthesis from hydrogen at: http://www.i-b-r.org/NeutronSynthesis.pdf Hope this helps. The Great New Planet Earth starts NOW! The Positive Man Eric Walker wrote: Snip
Re: [Vo]:Robot aircar taxies and ground taxies would provide another degree of freedom
Von: fusion.calo...@gmail.com fusion.calo...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 18:07 Samstag, 7.April 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Robot aircar taxies and ground taxies would provide another degree of freedom Yeah. ingested 2 hours of Monty Python history yesterday. Well, not exactly. After 1 1/2hrs in the wee hours I found out that my dream machine beats the the Montys anytime. G. -- Jed, What you really should try is my time machine. Yes, I programmed my computer to go back in time. Links to OTR. There used to be a blast from the past by a Bloke named Jed from Georgia. He must have moved on. Try my time machine: http://lin2.ash.fast-serv.com:9022/listen.pls I virtually tour past, present and future all over the world.
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
Thanks, Ron, for providing this link. I'm pretty excited. Here's the abstract from Science: Tunneling of electrons through a potential barrier is fundamental to chemical reactions, electronic transport in semiconductors and superconductors, magnetism, and devices such as THz-oscillators. While typically controlled by electric fields, a completely different approach is to bind electrons into bosonic quasiparticles with a photonic component. Quasiparticles made of such light-matter microcavity polaritons have recently been demonstrated to Bose-condense into superfluids, whereas spatially separated Coulomb-bound electrons and holes possess strong dipole interactions. Using tunneling polaritons, we connect these two realms, producing bosonic quasiparticles with static dipole moments. Our resulting three-state system yields dark polaritons analogous to those in atomic systems or optical waveguides offering new possibilities for electromagnetically induced transparency, room-temperature condensation, and adiabatic photonic to electronic transfer. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/04/05/science.1219010.abstract Some interesting points: the new particle is a boson rather than a fermion, and there is the possibility of adiabatic photonic to electronic transfer (for those, like me, who find the language unfamiliar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process). My initial guess is that free electrons in the electron soup that were disassociated from H2 when it entered the metal lattice are combining by way of an intermediate process with the free protons that were split off. You need a flux of hydrogen in order to make free electrons and protons available for the intermediate process. Regarding inverse beta decay, also called electron capture, Wikipedia says, note that a free proton cannot normally be changed to a free neutron by this process: The proton and neutron must be part of a larger nucleus. So the hypothesis being developed here would appear to be at variance with that statement. My apologies for the slurry of newbie physics emails. Anyone who knows this stuff at a much deeper level is very welcome to comment on anything that would be manifestly impossible (not just unlikely) about any of these points. Some questions I have: in electron capture, a neutrino or a positron is involved; also, there's an X-ray and sometimes a gamma ray -- how would any of these details need to be modified by the scheme being proposed here? And what about the quantum numbers makes it difficult for an electron to combine with a proton in the first place? Does it have to do with their spin? Eric On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/**releases/2012/04/120405142156.**htmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120405142156.htm According to team leader, Professor Jeremy Baumberg, the trick to telling electrons how to pass through walls, is to now marry them with light. This marriage is fated because the light is in the form of cavity photons, packets of light trapped to bounce back and forth between mirrors which sandwich the electrons oscillating through their wall. Ron
Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation
At 12:31 AM 4/8/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:34:24 -0500: Hi, [snip] Widom-Larsen theory completely fails to explain the actual experimental results of cold fusion experiments, particularly the PdD reactions of the Pons-Fleischmann Heat Effect. Not that I'm a fan of WL :), but: D + e- = 2 n Pd106 + 2 n = Ru104 + He4 + 11.9 MeV What experimental result does this explain? Pd106 + 2 n would become Pd108, which is stable. Granted 11.9 MeV isn't 23.8 MeV, but it is about half, and I'm not convinced that the He4/heat ratio has been measured all that accurately. The problem, Robin: the difficulty in measuring helium release is in capturing all the helium. The released energy is reasonably well measured through the calorimetry. It is suspected that, in general, about half the helium is trapped in the cathode. If the reaction is a surface reaction, and if helium is born with some energy (it could be below the 20 KeV Hagelstein limit), half the helium will have a trajectory inward to the cathode. The rest will come off with the evolving gas, and be measured. So the heat/helium numbers from experiment, unless adjusted according to some assumption like this, tend to be higher than the actual reaction Q, double or so. Not lower. I personally find it frustrating that more work on measuring Q, and improving accuracy, with more complete capture of the helium, hasn't been done. I've been suggesting that experiments be run with a platinum wire cathode, on which would be plated palladium. (This is done in some SPAWAR co-deposition experiments. I'm putting codeposition in quotes because these are apparently not actually codeposition, because they first plate out the palladium, then raise the voltage to start evolving deuterium. The experiments I know of with a platinum wire cathode were not designed to measure heat or helium, though.) In any case, once the experiment is done and XP measured, then the electrolysis would be reversed and the palladium dissolved, which should release all the helium. It needs to be a platinum base wire for the cathode or it would break up. Just my idea. Storms, however, estimates 25 +/- 5 MeV/He-4, and it's reasonable from the data. 12 MeV would not be. Furthermore, Pd104 + 2 n = Ru102 + He4 + 13.75 MeV and Pd102 + 2 n = Ru100 + He4 + 15 MeV If I'm correct, there is no evidence that dineutrons are even formed, but without the dineutrons, you would have two reactions necessary, and a serious rate problem. There is no evidence that dineutrons would be absorbed in toto, the dineutron is a transient phenomenon. W-L theory would predict a complex of transmutations, but none of them release as much energy as the transmutation of deuterium - helium. These transmutations would show a predictable relationship to the elemental mix in the close environment of the cathode surface. Palladium would, of course, be a common activation target, and if the targets decay by alpha emission, then we'd have hot alphas. I have seen no experimental evidence that such a mix of transmuations is actually found. Transmutations are certainly reported from FPHE experiments, but at very low levels compared with helium. The reactions described would all produce anomalous isotopes of Ruthenium. Hot alphas, i.e., energetic helium nuclei, above 20 KeV, break the Hagelstein limit, they would be observed. Charged particle radiation from FPHE experiments are at quite low levels, not the high levels that would be necessary if the helium is being produced by alpha emission. Pd-104 is stable, so why would Pd102 + 2 n not simply become Pd-104?
Re: [Vo]:more bad news
You were right, it was hard, very hard. In fact we needed zillions of 1 micron transistors to be able to make smaller ones. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: another malthusianst reasoning that will be proved false once again... I was convinced in 85 that it will hard to have transistor below 1µm... I laugh today of my lack of imagination. 2012/4/6 fznidar...@aol.com http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-04/new-research-tracks-40-year-old-prediction-world-economy-will-collapse-2030
