[Vo]:Fwd: Quantum teleportation and more
-Original Message- From: Lewan Mats mats.le...@nyteknik.se To: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com Sent: Mon, Feb 18, 2013 8:41 am Subject: Quantum teleportation and more Hi Frank, As I’m not a member of Vortex I wonder of you could help me post a link there. It’s from a Swedish guy who has been experimenting with some kind of advanced form of biofuels, and in this research he claims to have stumbled on unprecedented levels of entanglement and quantum teleportation. Thought it might be something for the folks at Vortex to have a look at. Here’s the main page: http://fractal-lenr.com/ and here’s the section on “Breakthroughs beyond prediction” http://fractal-lenr.com/breakthroghs-beyond-prediction/ Kind Regards Mats --- Mats Lewan, Managing Editor Next Magasin, Senior staff writer Ny Teknik. Phone: +46-8-796 64 10, Cellular: +46-70-590 72 52, Twitter: matslew
RE: [Vo]:Science Set Free
Is it ever possible to discuss Intelligent Design without being a crypto-creationist? Judging from the nearly violent reception given to Ben Stein's Expelled, I guess not. Blogs loaded up with long diatribes against Creationism by people who refused to even watch the movie. There was a scientist named Shapiro who talked about a 'dialog of the deaf' as he saw defects in Darwinism but found no logic in Creationism and argued that we need a Third Way, that fits the facts. Perhaps Asian tradition would serve us better with their concept of the Tao.
Re: [Vo]:Science Set Free
Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote: There was a scientist named Shapiro who talked about a 'dialog of the deaf' as he saw defects in Darwinism . . . Everyone sees defects in Darwinism, including Darwin. He wrote some of the sharpest critiques of his own theory. He pointed out many weaknesses, inconsistencies and incomplete points. The theory has been revised and expanded since he wrote it. It will continue to be revised for as long as people do biology. No theory is ever complete. There is never a last word in science. As Fleischmann said, when you hear people say this field is mature you can be sure it is poised for an unexpected breakthrough. Darwinism is the best overall answer we have at present. I do not expect a better one to emerge, but you never know. Creationism is not a theory in any sense. It cannot be tested for falsified. Proposed replacement scientific theories such as neo-Lamarkianism are interesting and have some merit, but I do not think they answer as many questions as elegantly as Darwinism does. - Jed
[Vo]:Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer Sheds Light on Dark Matter
But you'll have to wait see what it found. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/science/mit-physicists-experiment-pulls-dark-matter-into-the-spotlight/article8783097/ Now Dr. Ting has let drop that his experiment has revealed something significant about dark matter, the invisible stuff that accounts for most of the mass in the universe. Exactly what he has found, he won’t say, but today in a hushed room packed with journalists at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Dr. Ting promised to reveal all with the first publication of AMS results in the coming two or three weeks. more Doh! I hate it when they do that!
Re: [Vo]:Strategy Principles
Axil, Again I find myself on nearly the same page [snip] But then I contemplated; how would I do what I wanted others to do; that is, to produce the optimum particle configuration? This is a congenital problem that the theorists have. That is, understanding the practical challenges that the experimentalists face. A crack and a whisker are identically the same topologically. We can create cracks by manufacturing whiskers on or nanorods coating the surface of a micro-particle. [/snip] The assembly of skeletal cats is inherently a two step procedure where the harder metal with a higher melting temp has another metal chemically leached out of the alloy to form Casimir geometry - trying to form molten nickel in this geometry is self defeating because stiction forces will either seal the molten cavities or draw shorting whiskers perpendicular to the geometry to reduce the suppression force. Nano powders with whisker geometries can be pre-formed with little suppression geometry but then become activated as the particles are drawn together and compressed into bulk formations. All active environments/geometries are fragile - even tungsten can melt in the presence of recombining h1 as revealed by Langmuir with atomic welding. This means that in addition to figting stiction forces during assembly The environment manufacturer must also protect the end product against immediate burn out of the most energetic geometry from reaction with the ambient gases present in the assembly area - those gases need to be eliminated or replaced with non reactive noble gas. My posit is that these geometries happen all the time in nature but simply self destruct during assembly on a time scale so small that it is simply overlooked. In a previous thread you mentioned filtering out both the over and under sized nano particles which is a valuable insight to produce a uniform environment without hot spots.. I also think the science will grow to learn how to better control and exploit the more extreme geometries without self destructing..perhaps a mix of noble and reactive gases to meter the reaction such that an extremely pyrophoric catalyst can be created and well heat sunk while changing the mix of mostly noble gas more reactive to generate heat. I suspect that Naudin's MAHG device may have fell victim to this self destruction of geometry which has hounded researchers in this field by making replication difficult and experiments less and less robust each time they are repeated using the same material. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:17 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Strategy Principles Commenting on the content of the Nasa patent as follows: 'The material system may comprise a metal hydride. The electrically-conductive material may be in a form selected from the group consisting of particles and whiskers.' Clearly the theory that this revelation implies is apparent. Nasa even uses the word Polarition in its patent; what can be more obvious? I was about to castigate an eminent LENR researcher and experimentalist for not seeing the truth in this insight from Nasa and configure an experiment to validate this concept. Then a rare attack of prudence came over me; before I asked others to do something, how would I go about doing it myself? First, the answer to the LENR puzzle is centralized in the formation of micro-particles with whiskers on them. But then I contemplated; how would I do what I wanted others to do; that is, to produce the optimum particle configuration? This is a congenital problem that the theorists have. That is, understanding the practical challenges that the experimentalists face. A crack and a whisker are identically the same topologically. We can create cracks by manufacturing whiskers on or nanorods coating the surface of a micro-particle. Between the whiskers, cracks are formed. It seems that everybody is about cracks as the active agent in LENR. I just don't understand why the experimentalists do not have the imagination to modify their experimental concepts to produce cracks using micro-particles with whiskers. This failure of imagination was beyond me. Just run the experiment using hairy micro-particles instead of producing cracks. But how do we laymen without the required skills in this nano-engineering art produce such a product that our theory requires. I personally do not have the required knowledge or background in this nano-engineering art to fabricate such a precision product to the tolerances required. Such a task is reserved to a few very experienced companies with years of related practical expertize. My experience in systems engineering told me that one approach that might bear fruit is to write a specification for the production of the micro-particle and submit it to the leaders in the appropriate industry as a request for quote
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
RE: [Vo]:better video of alleged meteor shoot down
At 06:37 PM 2/17/2013, Jones Beene wrote: Here is an explanation for the amazing projectile form which is seen in the video exiting the meteor at high speed in the forward vector - Michel Julian once called this type of tubular compression/acceleration the sphincter effect... Interesting In the second video the object coming from behind looks as if it could have passed in front of the main head : a trick of perspective -- if it broke off earlier it could be much closer than the main body, with a larger angular velocity and apparently overtaking it. The ejection of fragments from the main head would have to be coincidental : maybe one TOO many coincidences (asteroid,meteor,breakup).
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man’s technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
Has anyone tried producing this geometry via shattering of ultracold lattice material, ie immersing nickel in LNO and then confining the bulk while delivering an anvil blow? Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:58 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man's technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.commailto:hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.commailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.commailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Quantum teleportation and more
Too much like Keshe. Where's the details? From: fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:44 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Fwd: Quantum teleportation and more -Original Message- From: Lewan Mats mats.le...@nyteknik.se To: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com Sent: Mon, Feb 18, 2013 8:41 am Subject: Quantum teleportation and more Hi Frank, As I'm not a member of Vortex I wonder of you could help me post a link there. It's from a Swedish guy who has been experimenting with some kind of advanced form of biofuels, and in this research he claims to have stumbled on unprecedented levels of entanglement and quantum teleportation. Thought it might be something for the folks at Vortex to have a look at. Here's the main page: http://fractal-lenr.com/ and here's the section on Breakthroughs beyond prediction http://fractal-lenr.com/breakthroghs-beyond-prediction/ Kind Regards Mats --- Mats Lewanhttp://www.matslewan.se/, Managing Editor Next Magasinhttp://www.nextmagasin.se/, Senior staff writer Ny Teknikhttp://www.nyteknik.se/. Phone: +46-8-796 64 10, Cellular: +46-70-590 72 52, Twitter: matslewhttp://twitter.com/matslew
Re: [Vo]:better video of alleged meteor shoot down
How about an energetic nuclei that is weakly interacting and feels no friction. It would take off like a bat out of hell once it sheds its baryonic skin. A baby comet so to speak. On Monday, February 18, 2013, Alan Fletcher wrote: At 06:37 PM 2/17/2013, Jones Beene wrote: Here is an explanation for the amazing projectile form which is seen in the video exiting the meteor at high speed in the forward vector - Michel Julian once called this type of tubular compression/acceleration the sphincter effect... Interesting In the second video the object coming from behind looks as if it could have passed in front of the main head : a trick of perspective -- if it broke off earlier it could be much closer than the main body, with a larger angular velocity and apparently overtaking it. The ejection of fragments from the main head would have to be coincidental : maybe one TOO many coincidences (asteroid,meteor,breakup).
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
If you have ever looked at a DVD or blue ray disk after it has been recorded, you will notice that it reflects the light in rainbow colors. The small pits produced by the recording laser burner in the aluminum substrate beneath the .1 mm protective polycarbonate surface. Using this simple and inexpensive technology, I wonder is nano-engineering and nano-photonics may be made available to the poor man. Our computers can be programed to write data sequences to files burned onto a CD or blue ray disk as required for the sizes of the nano-structures we are interested in producing. We may then have the ability to build quantity cracks consistently every time. These cracks could be modified for experiments by simply by reconfiguring the data file that has generated them. Whereas DVD uses a 650-nanometer red laser to read information from a disc, the Blu-ray Disc format uses a shorter-wavelength, 405-nanometer blue laser. With Blu-ray, data is packed more tightly: The pinpoint focusing precision of Blu-ray's shorter-wavelength beam and the special lens allow data to be recorded into pits and marks that are less than half the size of those on DVD (a 0.32-micron track pitch, defined as the gap between tracks, for Blu-ray versus 0.74 microns for DVD). Another area of efficiency for Blu-ray lies in the short length of the data marks written to disc: about 111 nanometers on Blu-ray, and about 267 nanometers on DVD. Nickel or palladium may be sputtered on polished aluminum or with glass as a more robust substrate to replace the polycarbonate. The laser may produce micro-particles using the pits as a negative form with consistent characteristics when the glass is sputtered by our homemade magnetron. Cheers: Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man’s technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers:Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be replicated, or maybe Celani. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will. This ability would attract funding.
Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community
Dr. Storms, would you be able to identify the difference between a NAE sample and a failing sample? If so, you could ask researchers to send you samples of both failures and successes and maybe you can find the signature that leads to replication at will. That would make you the most valuable LENR human on the planet, heh heh... ;-) Kevin O On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the field. Ed
Re: [Vo]:Dark matter soon to be exposed
I hope so, they spent $2B plus on that magnetometer. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Virtual particle annihilation to provide a handle on the character of dark matter, and soon. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21495800 The smoking gun signature in the positron to electron ratio is a rise and then a dramatic fall. That is the key signature for the dark matter annihilation in our galaxy's halo, observed Prof Michael Turner from the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago. Prof Turner is not part of the AMS Collaboration.
