Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Axil Axil]

More:

It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
other along a line axial to the magnet pair.


On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
>
> search for slides starting at
>
> The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
>
> An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction
> of their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.
>
> In the slide titled: The CME in heavy-ion collisions (II)
>
> Note that the Up quarks are flowing in a current in the opposite direction
> from the Down quarks because the momentum vectors are flipped by the
> magnetic field line. These various quark types are separated and moving in
> a group,
>
> This effect is shown with regards to quark plasma, but CME must be the
> same in stable subatomic particles in LENR because The Chiral Magnetic
> Effect (CME) acts on quarks in the same way as a universally applicable
>  electrical process(without exception).
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[John Berry]

I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?


On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> More:
>
> It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
> its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
> other along a line axial to the magnet pair.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
>>
>> search for slides starting at
>>
>> The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
>>
>> An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction
>> of their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.
>>
>> In the slide titled: The CME in heavy-ion collisions (II)
>>
>> Note that the Up quarks are flowing in a current in the opposite
>> direction from the Down quarks because the momentum vectors are flipped by
>> the magnetic field line. These various quark types are separated and moving
>> in a group,
>>
>> This effect is shown with regards to quark plasma, but CME must be the
>> same in stable subatomic particles in LENR because The Chiral Magnetic
>> Effect (CME) acts on quarks in the same way as a universally applicable
>>  electrical process(without exception).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Ron Kita]

Greetings Vortex-l,

Not sure IF the Vortex-l spam oddities have been resolved.

>From Alain Coetmeur of Paris and his Scoop.it+ .. website
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917

Also...Not sure why some of my "most important" messages have
wound up in SPAM. Especially from one sender sources.
Is our Government..."a foot"

 In the mid 1990 s I could
not send out the word "Podkletnov" without  my carrier  being
 terminated.

Ad Astra,
Ron Kita
"I once had KP at Fort George Meade".

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Axil Axil]

Quark separation causes a quark plasma. When two heavy ions of lead atoms
collide in a ion collision, a quark plasma is produced. If the collision is
off center, a strong magnetic field is generated from the vortex motion
induced in the quark plasma.

The results of these kinds of collisions are studied at the large hadron
collider(LRC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE:_A_Large_Ion_Collider_Experiment


"ALICE is optimized to study heavy-ion
(Pb-Pb
nuclei ) collisions at a centre
of mass  energy of 2.76
TeVper
nucleon  pair. The resulting
temperature and energy density are expected to be high enough to
produce quark–gluon
plasma , a state
of matter wherein quarks  and
gluonsare freed. Similar
conditions are believed to existed a fraction of the
second after the Big Bang before quarks and gluons bound together to form
hadrons  and heavier particles.

ALICE is focusing on the physics of strongly interacting matter at extreme
energy densities. The existence of the quark–gluon
plasmaand its
properties are key issues in Quantum
Chromodynamics  for
understanding Color
confinementand Chiral
symmetry  restoration.
Recreating this primordial form of matter and understanding how it evolves
is expected to shed light on questions about how matter is organized, the
mechanism that confines quarks and gluons and the nature of strong
interactions and how they result in generating the bulk of the mass of
ordinary matter.

Quantum chromodynamics
(QCD) predicts
that at sufficiently high energy densities there will be a
phase transition from conventional hadronic matter, where quarks are locked
inside nuclear particles, to a plasma of deconfined quarks and gluons. The
reverse of this transition is believed to have taken place when the
universe was just 10−6 sec old, and may still play a role today in the
hearts of collapsing neutron stars or other astrophysical objects"

What is amazing is that Letts and Cravens have shown that a magnetic field
can produce nuclear disruption at very low levels of magnetic fields. Letts
has produced a empirical theory that relates the amount of excess heat
produced in LENR to the strength of the magnetic field applied even if that
field is relatively weak.
In quantum mechanics, their is a probability that anything including the
Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) can happen even if the effect is very small
and its probability is very low.



On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:48 AM, John Berry  wrote:

> I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> More:
>>
>> It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction
>> as its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel
>> each other along a line axial to the magnet pair.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
>>>
>>> search for slides starting at
>>>
>>> The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
>>>
>>> An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction
>>> of their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.
>>>
>>> In the slide titled: The CME in heavy-ion collisions (II)
>>>
>>> Note that the Up quarks are flowing in a current in the opposite
>>> direction from the Down quarks because the momentum vectors are flipped by
>>> the magnetic field line. These various quark types are separated and moving
>>> in a group,
>>>
>>> This effect is shown with regards to quark plasma, but CME must be the
>>> same in stable subatomic particles in LENR because The Chiral Magnetic
>>> Effect (CME) acts on quarks in the same way as a universally applicable
>>>  electrical process(without exception).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Axil Axil]

In simple terms, I now understand how a magnetic field can produce
subatomic particles out of the vacuum.

When virtual particles are produced by uncertainty from the vacuum, they
are created in a particle and antiparticle set to conserve vacuum energy.

The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) changes the nature of the quarks in that
particle/antiparticle set through quark disruption within that set to favor
either the particle or the antiparticle. The original pair can no longer
annihilate each other to give back the energy that they borrowed from the
vacuum. And the distorted pair produced by CME stays in existence since
particle/antiparticle paring is broken by CME.

As in Letts theory, the probability that a disrupted mismatched particle
pair will be produced is directly proportional to the strength of the
magnetic field applied to the vacuum.




On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> Quark separation causes a quark plasma. When two heavy ions of lead atoms
> collide in a ion collision, a quark plasma is produced. If the collision is
> off center, a strong magnetic field is generated from the vortex motion
> induced in the quark plasma.
>
> The results of these kinds of collisions are studied at the large hadron
> collider(LRC)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE:_A_Large_Ion_Collider_Experiment
>
>
> "ALICE is optimized to study heavy-ion 
> (Pb-Pb
> nuclei ) collisions at a centre
> of mass  energy of 2.76 
> TeVper
> nucleon  pair. The resulting
> temperature and energy density are expected to be high enough to produce 
> quark–gluon
> plasma , a state
> of matter wherein quarks  and 
> gluonsare freed. Similar conditions are 
> believed to existed a fraction of the
> second after the Big Bang before quarks and gluons bound together to form
> hadrons  and heavier particles.
>
> ALICE is focusing on the physics of strongly interacting matter at extreme
> energy densities. The existence of the quark–gluon 
> plasmaand its 
> properties are key issues in Quantum
> Chromodynamics  for
> understanding Color 
> confinementand Chiral
> symmetry  restoration.
> Recreating this primordial form of matter and understanding how it evolves
> is expected to shed light on questions about how matter is organized, the
> mechanism that confines quarks and gluons and the nature of strong
> interactions and how they result in generating the bulk of the mass of
> ordinary matter.
>
> Quantum 
> chromodynamics(QCD) 
> predicts that at sufficiently high energy densities there will be a
> phase transition from conventional hadronic matter, where quarks are locked
> inside nuclear particles, to a plasma of deconfined quarks and gluons. The
> reverse of this transition is believed to have taken place when the
> universe was just 10−6 sec old, and may still play a role today in the
> hearts of collapsing neutron stars or other astrophysical objects"
>
> What is amazing is that Letts and Cravens have shown that a magnetic field
> can produce nuclear disruption at very low levels of magnetic fields. Letts
> has produced a empirical theory that relates the amount of excess heat
> produced in LENR to the strength of the magnetic field applied even if that
> field is relatively weak.
> In quantum mechanics, their is a probability that anything including the
> Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) can happen even if the effect is very small
> and its probability is very low.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:48 AM, John Berry wrote:
>
>> I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> More:
>>>
>>> It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction
>>> as its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel
>>> each other along a line axial to the magnet pair.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>>
 http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf

 search for slides starting at

 The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)

 An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the
 direction of their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.

 In the slide titled: The CME in heavy-ion collisions (II)

 Note that the Up quarks are flowing in a current in the opposite
 direction from the Down quarks because 

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Terry Blanton]

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Ron Kita  wrote:

> Is our Government..."a foot"

"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.

RE: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Jones Beene]

-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton 

Ron Kita wrote:

> Is our Government..."a foot"

"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.


Also - Piantelli admits to using uranium, thorium and plutonium in some kind of 
activation process. No wonder he sees transmutation when no one else does !  

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Bob Cook]

Axil--

That's a much better presentation than the other one.  I now understand the 
charge separation in the quark soup along a line.  

In the solid state, the local effects of the magnetic fields that result from 
SPP AND SP  conditions would seem to cause CME also at the location.  With 
quarks coming loose and superconductivity  who know what reactions may be 
taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.   

Bob 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:01 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!


  More:


  It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as 
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each other 
along a line axial to the magnet pair.



  On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf


search for slides starting at
The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)

An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction of 
their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.

In the slide titled: The CME in heavy-ion collisions (II)

Note that the Up quarks are flowing in a current in the opposite direction 
from the Down quarks because the momentum vectors are flipped by the magnetic 
field line. These various quark types are separated and moving in a group,

This effect is shown with regards to quark plasma, but CME must be the same 
in stable subatomic particles in LENR because The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) 
acts on quarks in the same way as a universally applicable  electrical 
process(without exception).

[Vo]:Gmail continuing to mark some Vortex messages as spam

[Eric Walker]

Just a heads up that Gmail continues to move some Vortex messages to the
spam folder.  If you use Gmail, an easy way to find them is to go to the
spam folder and search for Vortex.  Nearly everything in the results will
be legitimate Vortex mail.

I suspect the filter they're using to send messages to the spam folder is
the degree to which pseudoscience is promoted.  If you wish to avoid the
hassle of people looking for your message in the spam folder, you should
discuss only orthodox science.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Axil Axil]

With quarks coming loose and superconductivity  who know what reactions may
> be taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.
>
>
One reason why LENR is go confusing is the vast number of nuclear reactions
that can occur when the strong force that holds matter together is
disrupted.

There is also a vast number of LENR reactor types that can be configured to
produce power. This is why it is important to understand the ultimate
underling cause of LENR to understand what is happing in each LENR systems
on a individual basis.

Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!

[Bob Cook]

The patent pub (see the link below)  that Alain sent through has a number of 
reactions listed that make up the vast number you are talking about.  Its an 
interesting document.

http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917

Bob
  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!







With quarks coming loose and superconductivity  who know what reactions may 
be taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.   




  One reason why LENR is go confusing is the vast number of nuclear reactions 
that can occur when the strong force that holds matter together is disrupted.  


  There is also a vast number of LENR reactor types that can be configured to 
produce power. This is why it is important to understand the ultimate underling 
cause of LENR to understand what is happing in each LENR systems on a 
individual basis.

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Bob Cook]

I think Piantelli is only looking to compete with the Japanese and 
identifying a transmutaion reaction that takes care of some depleted 
Uranium.  It would be a real head ache for somebody to add those fissile 
materials to a clean lenr reactor.  It would become an NRC target.


Piantelli has identified a lot of other reactions that seem to be a better 
bet for making energy.  The Li-7/H+ reaction seems like the best he has 
identified in his patent publication in addition to the Ni isotope 
reactions.The outside boron shield is intended to take care of stray 
neutrons.   Hf would be better or a good addition.


Bob
- Original Message - 
From: "Jones Beene" 

To: 
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:51 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application


-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton

Ron Kita wrote:


Is our Government..."a foot"


"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.


Also - Piantelli admits to using uranium, thorium and plutonium in some kind 
of activation process. No wonder he sees transmutation when no one else does 
!

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Axil Axil]

The primary Piantelli reaction is exclusively based on hydrogen/nickel to
copper. This is a weak reaction as far as LENR goes. This is also how Rossi
started out, but I think Rossi has increased his LENR power level to move
on to more energetic reaction channels. But it is hard to tell what
Rossi is doing lately.

Piantelli produces a high energy 6.7 MeV proton as a reaction product
and needs to convert that proton via additional secondary reactions using a
secondary material to get his power production up to industrial level
strength.

I suspect that Robert Godes , founder of Brillouin Energy is having the
same weak power production issues as Piantelli is having.

He would be wise to avoid the use of tranuranic material to avoid NRC
interference and licening which is a multi billon dollar cost factor.

But the fission of transuranic material will produce a lot of power.  Too
bad about the NRC.







On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Bob Cook  wrote:

> I think Piantelli is only looking to compete with the Japanese and
> identifying a transmutaion reaction that takes care of some depleted
> Uranium.  It would be a real head ache for somebody to add those fissile
> materials to a clean lenr reactor.  It would become an NRC target.
>
> Piantelli has identified a lot of other reactions that seem to be a better
> bet for making energy.  The Li-7/H+ reaction seems like the best he has
> identified in his patent publication in addition to the Ni isotope
> reactions.The outside boron shield is intended to take care of stray
> neutrons.   Hf would be better or a good addition.
>
> Bob
> - Original Message - From: "Jones Beene" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 8:51 AM
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton
>
> Ron Kita wrote:
>
>  Is our Government..."a foot"
>>
>
> "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by
> incompetence.
>
>
> Also - Piantelli admits to using uranium, thorium and plutonium in some
> kind of activation process. No wonder he sees transmutation when no one
> else does !
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application

[Bob Cook]

It seems that the patent pub that Alain has identified is Piantelli's attempt 
to add a shield for neutrons with boron and  add lead for gammas to the nano Ni 
reactor.   
  - Original Message - 
  From: Ron Kita 
  To: vortex-l 
  Cc: ron kita 
  Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 4:31 AM
  Subject: [Vo]:Piantelli April 2014 LENR Application


  Greetings Vortex-l, 


  Not sure IF the Vortex-l spam oddities have been resolved.


  From Alain Coetmeur of Paris and his Scoop.it+ .. website
  http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917

Re: [Vo]:thermoelectric conversion

[mixent]

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:33:33 -0400:
Hi,


I don't think you need the rectenna at all. According to the wiki page the
actual rectification is done by a diode anyway. Solar cells are also diodes.
The primary difference between the rectenna and the solar cell is that the
rectennna is tuned to a specific frequency.
However x-rays will ionize atoms and produce energetic electrons just fine,
without any resonance effect.
In short, all you need is the equivalent of a solar cell.
 
This concept is already embodied in the beta-voltaic
battery(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betavoltaics).


>For thermoelectric conversion, I would estimate that Nantenna technology
>would be a good first step in converting x-rays to DC power.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantenna
>
>In the DGT reactor, there is a nickel foam support the is in the zone for
>maximum x-ray production.
>
>This foam can support 1 to 2 nanometer nantenna structures imbedded in the
>foam fibers that can receive this x-ray radiation and convert it to DC
>current. The nickel fibers can also support the DC current transport
>network to the outside of the reactor.
>
>The individual nantenna could be fashioned as a wide band fractal EMF
>antenna nanostructure with a maximum performance range for receiving x-rays
>in the wavelength size range that corresponds to the NAE.
>
>Because of the high energy content of x-rays and their corresponding
>blackbody temperature association, high Carnot efficiency in the 90% range
>might be possible.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

[Vo]:World of Warcraft Macros

[Blaze Spinnaker]

So I'm a programmer, and you're all probably wondering what this has to do
with Vortex and LENR.

Well.. I have done a lot of work in second life and I actually created a
lot of virtual items and their underlying scripts that brought them to life
by interacting with the physics engine.

I am also somewhat religious in that I believe our universe is actually a
simulation.

so what are you guys?  You guys are just programmers (like me) trying to
interact with the physics engine of this simulation.

Anyways, today I just discovered the programming language (lua) for WOW.
 And I realized that I can create functional products (inventions) for WOW
by using the programming language.

Sort of what you guys are doing, and rossi is doing, by using the
programming language for our universal physics engine to create LENR.

Of course, I get a specification of the programming language which makes my
life easier.

You guys have to reverse engineer the specification.

RE: [Vo]:World of Warcraft Macros

[OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson]

Greetings, Blaze,

 

What a pleasant surprise to discover you do other things besides betting - for 
a living. Or have I got that wrong?

 

Regarding LUA:

 

LUA is an interesting programming language. Reminds me of C++, and C#. I 
programmed in LUA extensively on and off for a number of years when I was, in 
the evenings, performing simulation work with an open source software package 
called FEMM, (Finite Element Method Magnetics), created by David Meeker. It's a 
free 2-D magnetic modeling simulator for determining forces, torque and what 
not. 

 

For the curious you can download the free software here:

 

http://www.femm.info/wiki/HomePage

 

Give it a whirl. It can be fun!

 

While using LUA I was trying to discern configurations that might reveal an 
over unity in certain torque configurations brought on by magnetic forces. I 
was trying to create one of those mythical magnetic motors configurations you 
hear about every now and then on Vortex. Initially, I created several magnetic 
simulations that seemed to show definite over unity. For a while I was on cloud 
9, believing I had come up with something that would save the world. It is 
difficult to describe what a horrible responsibility it is to acquire a belief 
that something you think you've personally discovered could save the world - 
but more on that later.

 

Fortunately for me, my efforts failed. Unbeknownst to me at the time, I was 
using the FEMM s/w package in a way that accentuated internal flaws, due to no 
fault of its own I might add. I was using FEMM in ways that accentuated and 
compounded tiny flaws in the constant iteration of calculations. As they say 
GIGO, garbage in, garbage out. Strange as it might seem for me to say this, it 
one of the most fascinating, educational, and worthwhile experiences in my 
life. While my ultimate goal of discovering a magnetic motor (to save the 
planet, I might add) failed miserably I ended up learning so many other 
priceless things that I wouldn't have traded this tragic failure of mine for 
anything. Not only did I learn fascinating things about the properties of 
magnetic fields, I learned far more valuable things about myself - what makes 
me tick. In the end I was relieved to learn that my failure to create a 
magnetic motor meant I was no longer personally responsible for saving the 
entire world. The demotion helped me get back to a more sensible goal of simply 
trying to improve a smaller and more intimate portion of the grand simulation 
we all participate in. Just trying to improve a few local domains, well... 
that's enuf for me.

 

And now, on to something of a much more personal nature. This is a subject that 
might possibly annoy a few Vorts with conservative leanings. If so, I don't 
care. Stop reading on if it offends you so.

 

I'm making tenative plans to retire soon. I have worked for the state of 
Wisconsin for over 36 years. The last couple of years, under the stewardship of 
an ultra-conservative Wisconsin governor, my supreme employer, a boss which I 
can assure everyone on this list most state employees didn't vote for, has made 
it abundantly clear to me that it's time for me to move on to greener pastures. 
I have no interest in participating in a brave new work environment where 
management seems to be becoming more and more enthralled in an aphrodisiac of 
reducing the value of state employees into collections of metrics... statistics 
loaded into Excel Spread sheets, as if they have finally found the Holy Grail 
of measuring the ultimate worth of workers. Having worked for state for more 
than three decades... all I can say is that this is the third iteration I've 
personally experienced of a self-improvement campaign hell-bent on transforming 
the entire employee work-force into efficient worker bees for minimum cost. Of 
course, the current administration thinks they are the first visionaries to 
have ever thought of implementing something like this. Forgive them, father. 
They know not what they do. They are enthralled in the rapture of fulfilling 
the 2nd coming of their own corporate ideology.

 

To be honest, coming to this realization has been a good thing for me. It has 
given me impetus to get out, and to get on with my real life's work. And what 
might my real life's work be? Not telling... not quite yet. Embarrassingly, I 
have made many promises on this list of things I was going to create and/or 
publish over the last couple of years. Sadly, I have not made good on damned 
near any of my grandiose promises. Just a few posted hints here and there is 
about all that I can point others to. The last couple of years working under 
the ideology of ultra-conservative fiscally retentive administrators has not 
been pleasant for me nor for many of my colleagues. The battle just to survive 
annual performance evaluations, such as where two years ago a former supervisor 
who had only been hired about nine months prior had essentially placed me on 
prob

[Vo]:Re: World of Warcraft Macros

[Blaze Spinnaker]

Yeah I work for the second largest enterprise  software company.  Tbh,  I
see my betting as a higher contribution than my software.  Providing odds
for critical events allows people to plan for the future .. something we
all sorely need.   For example, saying that LENR has a 50% of occurring
allows energy and budget  planners to intelligently allocate their
investments an ensure that mass resources are not working irrelevanty.
This is a suble concept which unfortunately is not  being adopted widely.





On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Blaze Spinnaker 
wrote:

> So I'm a programmer, and you're all probably wondering what this has to do
> with Vortex and LENR.
>
> Well.. I have done a lot of work in second life and I actually created a
> lot of virtual items and their underlying scripts that brought them to life
> by interacting with the physics engine.
>
> I am also somewhat religious in that I believe our universe is actually a
> simulation.
>
> so what are you guys?  You guys are just programmers (like me) trying to
> interact with the physics engine of this simulation.
>
> Anyways, today I just discovered the programming language (lua) for WOW.
>  And I realized that I can create functional products (inventions) for WOW
> by using the programming language.
>
> Sort of what you guys are doing, and rossi is doing, by using the
> programming language for our universal physics engine to create LENR.
>
> Of course, I get a specification of the programming language which makes
> my life easier.
>
> You guys have to reverse engineer the specification.
>
>
>