Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business because it is nuclear. since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough incompetent and crook to support the deliria of taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com: And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
The man difference: HTSC was discovered too early in the good place.; CF was discovered also too early but in the worst place wet electrochemical system- where it is inherently unmanageable irreproducible and can not grow up. A scientific tragedy. Peter On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business because it is nuclear. since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough incompetent and crook to support the deliria of taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com: And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K) -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
There could be something in torsion as a factor in gravitation. It seems that spin can effect gravitation, specifically rotating magnetic fields. Spin gives rise to torsion. Maybe the effects of torsion on gravitation are not as small as Einstein thought. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote: My only problem with the ECE theory so far is that I do not understand it. Dr. Myron Evans http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ Thoughts on Science, History, Poetry and Politics « Seventeenth Quarterly Archive of www.aias.us http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2014/06/10/seventeenth-quarterly-archive-of-www-aias-us/ 263(2): Calculation of Light Deflection due to Gravitation http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2014/06/10/2632-calculation-of-light-deflection-due-to-gravitation/ » Principles of ECE Theory This is M .W. Evans, H. Eckardt, D. W. Lindstrom and S. J. Crothers, “Principles of ECE Theory” (Open source www.aias.us publications section, in prep.). The manuscript containing my contribution only to date has been archived at the British Library from the National Library of Wales, and has started its run as I am in the habit of writing, i.e. it is beginning to be read worldwide as I can see from feedback. Currently it is being typeset and the other authors are preparing their contributions, then it will be published in book and ipod formats just for some friends and colleagues, and some copyright and local libraries, because the tremendous power of open source publishing off www.aias.us means that books will not be sold in large numbers. However for those who like books, they are available. For example my autobiography volume one (see home page of www.aias.us for all details of how to purchase the books). Open source is free of charge, so obviously only a few liberophiles will buy the book. A liberophile is not a rare and nasty kind of amoeba, it is a mixture of Latin and Geek for someone who likes books rather than computers. A computer can sometimes drive a saint into Dante’s inferno. “Beginning its run” comes from the four man bobsleigh at the winter olympics. The feedback shows exactly how every single item is being received internationally, and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive since inception of ECE in March 2003. That is why AIAS has its own intellectual authority. That is a healthy thing for physics in my own opinion. There have been some exceedingly polite and mild differences of opinion with some dogmatists who shall be nameless. Similarly, Turner’s work was called soot and whitewash, Balzac caused a riot, Stravinsky caused another riot, and so it goes on, human nature as usual. I think we are now entering the phase: “ECE is obvious, I knew it all along”. In any case ECE is completely unstoppable as per Victor Hugo, “one cannot stop the march of ideas”. False Dawns http://crackpotwatch.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/false-dawns/ June 4, 2014 “I waited a quarter century before accepting that LENR is reproducible and repeatable, and in the new book “Principles of ECE Theory” (publications section of www.aias.us) a chapter is devoted to Alex Hill’s energy devices and to LENR. “ *We can remember when a certain Stanley Meyer was in the ascendant: he was ‘inserted’ into a BBC documentary on cold fusion, his car-that-runs-on water was verified by three professors (including a Professor M.A.Laughton of London) and he was invited to present his invention to a special-interest group at the House of Lords (probably at the insistence of an energy-from-water crank who also happened to be a former comptroller [sic] of the British Navy). Unfortunately, Meyer never made it to the Lords, because he was indicted for fraud. And then he dropped dead; lying must be so stressful. Sic transit fraudatio mundi. We wonder how Hill feels about Rossi: how many perpetual-motion machines does the world need? Ron should check his loyalties: Hill is hand-in-glove with Ron, but Rossi seems to have nothing good to say about Ron. * Recent Conceptual Advance in Orbit Theory http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/recent-conceptual-advance-in-orbit-theory/ June 14, 2014 This is the realization that the angular velocity is the spin connection of Cartan, a spin connection that describes the rotating axes of the plane polar coordinate system, a geometry to which Cartan geometry reduces in well defined limits. So the Cartan spin connection is responsible for the orbital velocity, the centrifugal and Coriolis forces and so on. The spin connection is responsible for the planar orbit itself. The precession of orbits and light deflection due to gravitation are due to ECE theory and not to Einstein theory. The Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory is intended to be an improvement over the original Einstein theory, and it succeeds precisely. The accuracy of ECE theory is one part in ten power seventeen because ECE
RE: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
There is a pre-theory of formative hypothesis which explains some of the mechanism of HTSC from physical observations. Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his site as “PWD theory”. http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm Notably - the superconductivity originates in the oxygen layers. Never mind that oxygen is not a conductor – what is needed at the early stage is not conductivity per se, but “paired electrons” or at least a heavy electron. These odd electrons must form in the interfacial region. This oddity may also imply that the active electrons are not valence electrons ! (meaning that they derive from “somewhere else”). Could the Cooper pair be two electrons in 3-space, held together by a positron in reciprocal space (1-space)? Which becomes the detail which could invoke Dirac and his “sea”. That is important to know, since oxides normally form dielectrics, except when they are in a resonant compressive mode. QUOTE: Ergo, there absolutely MUST be a difference in mass on opposite sides of the oxygen layer for superconductivity to occur. No periodic compression = no superconductivity. If there is a lesson here for LENR (which there could be since there are some similarities between the two in the appearance of heavy electrons, which could be paired in LENR or simply heavy), it would be that the active material needs to be nanostructured with planar oxygen layers, having two oscillators of different frequencies on either side of an oxide layer. There is a semi-precedent here - in the work of Arata, Ahern and others - with specialty material in which there is a micron-sized sphere of oxide material, such as zirconia, in which nanoparticles of active metal are embedded like the raisins in Panettone. It is possible that the oxygen from zirconia forms into layers in the spin-casting and that layer provides heavy electrons and perhaps positrons. Very interesting…. From: Kevin O'Malley And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. Axil Axil wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
Evans is a narcissistic crackpot. He makes elementary conceptual mistakes. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:47 PM Subject: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory? My only problem with the ECE theory so far is that I do not understand it.
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
Such a theory is reducible. Reducible theories are always wrong. It is sometimes said that the Einstein-Cartan theory is the same as GR, but it is not. Every new theory provides a new context which is a permanent addition to physics. For GR, it is the idea of background independence, that the metrical properties of spacetime are dynamical. So EC is not GR, and spin-2 is not GR. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 9:12 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory? There could be something in torsion as a factor in gravitation. It seems that spin can effect gravitation, specifically rotating magnetic fields. Spin gives rise to torsion. Maybe the effects of torsion on gravitation are not as small as Einstein thought.
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607186 --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:47 PM Subject: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory? My only problem with the ECE theory so far is that I do not understand it.
Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Joe Eck, who is the Jed Rothwell of HTSC - has this theory listed on his site as “PWD theory”. http://www.superconductors.org/pwtheory.htm I suspect he's not the Jed Rothwell of HTSC, but instead perhaps the John Rohner of HTSC. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
Yes, a major difference was that LENR was discovered when there was an established, entrenched group which stood to lose out of their public feeding trough if it were true. That was not the case with HTSC. No one lost their funding or ruined their career when they investigated HTSC. On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business because it is nuclear. since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough incompetent and crook to support the deliria of taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com: And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
It is impossible to resist the intuition that HTSC and LENR are closely related. In both cases a mechanism that makes bosons from fermion pairs remains to be theoretically explained. It is very thrilling, because the existing model of matter has been exhausted of explanatory power. --- I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductors up to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K) Yes, a major difference was that LENR was discovered when there was an established, entrenched group which stood to lose out of their public feeding trough if it were true. That was not the case with HTSC. No one lost their funding or ruined their career when they investigated HTSC. On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business because it is nuclear. since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough incompetent and crook to support the deliria of taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com: And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K)
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
One of the results of ECE theory as noted in a summary of the theory at http://www.aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageByTitlepageTitle=Overview_of_ECE_Theory is the following relative tospin coupling: “ Paper 121 gives the conservation theorems of ECE and paper 116 the continuity theorems. The most important result is that spin connection resonance obeys the theorems, so electric power from spacetime can be obtained without violation of any basic conservation or continuity theorem. Spin connection resonance (SCR) is a Bernoulli Euler resonance which does not violate any basic theorem.” I am try to understand ECE which seems to be more real than the Dirac Sea of virtual particles and virtual particles which we cannot address experimentally. I still consider spin coupling in LENR is the key to fractionation mass energy to a metal lattice. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Kevin O'Malley Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 7:47 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com My only problem with the ECE theory so far is that I do not understand it. Dr. Myron Evans Thoughts on Science, History, Poetry and Politics « Seventeenth Quarterly Archive of www.aias.us 263(2): Calculation of Light Deflection due to Gravitation » Principles of ECE Theory This is M .W. Evans, H. Eckardt, D. W. Lindstrom and S. J. Crothers, “Principles of ECE Theory” (Open source www.aias.us publications section, in prep.). The manuscript containing my contribution only to date has been archived at the British Library from the National Library of Wales, and has started its run as I am in the habit of writing, i.e. it is beginning to be read worldwide as I can see from feedback. Currently it is being typeset and the other authors are preparing their contributions, then it will be published in book and ipod formats just for some friends and colleagues, and some copyright and local libraries, because the tremendous power of open source publishing off www.aias.us means that books will not be sold in large numbers. However for those who like books, they are available. For example my autobiography volume one (see home page of www.aias.us for all details of how to purchase the books). Open source is free of charge, so obviously only a few liberophiles will buy the book. A liberophile is not a rare and nasty kind of amoeba, it is a mixture of Latin and Geek for someone who likes books rather than computers. A computer can sometimes drive a saint into Dante’s inferno. “Beginning its run” comes from the four man bobsleigh at the winter olympics. The feedback shows exactly how every single item is being received internationally, and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive since inception of ECE in March 2003. That is why AIAS has its own intellectual authority. That is a healthy thing for physics in my own opinion. There have been some exceedingly polite and mild differences of opinion with some dogmatists who shall be nameless. Similarly, Turner’s work was called soot and whitewash, Balzac caused a riot, Stravinsky caused another riot, and so it goes on, human nature as usual. I think we are now entering the phase: “ECE is obvious, I knew it all along”. In any case ECE is completely unstoppable as per Victor Hugo, “one cannot stop the march of ideas”. False Dawns June 4, 2014 “I waited a quarter century before accepting that LENR is reproducible and repeatable, and in the new book “Principles of ECE Theory” (publications section of www.aias.us) a chapter is devoted to Alex Hill’s energy devices and to LENR. “ We can remember when a certain Stanley Meyer was in the ascendant: he was ‘inserted’ into a BBC documentary on cold fusion, his car-that-runs-on water was verified by three professors (including a Professor M.A.Laughton of London) and he was invited to present his invention to a special-interest group at the House of Lords (probably at the insistence of an energy-from-water crank who also happened to be a former comptroller [sic] of the British Navy). Unfortunately, Meyer never made it to the Lords, because he was indicted for fraud. And then he dropped dead; lying must be so stressful. Sic transit fraudatio mundi. We wonder how Hill feels about Rossi: how many perpetual-motion machines does the world need? Ron should check his loyalties: Hill is hand-in-glove with Ron, but Rossi seems to have nothing good to say about Ron. Recent Conceptual Advance in Orbit Theory June 14, 2014 This is the realization that the angular velocity is the spin connection of Cartan, a spin connection that describes the rotating axes of the plane polar coordinate system, a geometry to which Cartan geometry reduces in well defined limits. So the Cartan spin connection is responsible for the orbital velocity, the centrifugal and Coriolis forces and so on. The spin connection is responsible for the planar orbit itself. The precession of orbits and
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
It's not Lorentz invariant even as a limit of a wider transformation group. Evans made an elementary error. Forget about it. -drl -- On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 7:41 PM CDT Bob Cook wrote: One of the results of ECE theory as noted in a summary of the theory at http://www.aias.us/index.php?goto=showPageByTitlepageTitle=Overview_of_ECE_Theory is the following relative tospin coupling: “ Paper 121 gives the conservation theorems of ECE and paper 116 the continuity theorems. The most important result is that spin connection resonance obeys the theorems, so electric power from spacetime can be obtained without violation of any basic conservation or continuity theorem. Spin connection resonance (SCR) is a Bernoulli Euler resonance which does not violate any basic theorem.” I am try to understand ECE which seems to be more real than the Dirac Sea of virtual particles and virtual particles which we cannot address experimentally. I still consider spin coupling in LENR is the key to fractionation mass energy to a metal lattice. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Kevin O'Malley Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 7:47 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com My only problem with the ECE theory so far is that I do not understand it. Dr. Myron Evans Thoughts on Science, History, Poetry and Politics « Seventeenth Quarterly Archive of www.aias.us 263(2): Calculation of Light Deflection due to Gravitation » Principles of ECE Theory This is M .W. Evans, H. Eckardt, D. W. Lindstrom and S. J. Crothers, “Principles of ECE Theory” (Open source www.aias.us publications section, in prep.). The manuscript containing my contribution only to date has been archived at the British Library from the National Library of Wales, and has started its run as I am in the habit of writing, i.e. it is beginning to be read worldwide as I can see from feedback. Currently it is being typeset and the other authors are preparing their contributions, then it will be published in book and ipod formats just for some friends and colleagues, and some copyright and local libraries, because the tremendous power of open source publishing off www.aias.us means that books will not be sold in large numbers. However for those who like books, they are available. For example my autobiography volume one (see home page of www.aias.us for all details of how to purchase the books). Open source is free of charge, so obviously only a few liberophiles will buy the book. A liberophile is not a rare and nasty kind of amoeba, it is a mixture of Latin and Geek for someone who likes books rather than computers. A computer can sometimes drive a saint into Dante’s inferno. “Beginning its run” comes from the four man bobsleigh at the winter olympics. The feedback shows exactly how every single item is being received internationally, and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive since inception of ECE in March 2003. That is why AIAS has its own intellectual authority. That is a healthy thing for physics in my own opinion. There have been some exceedingly polite and mild differences of opinion with some dogmatists who shall be nameless. Similarly, Turner’s work was called soot and whitewash, Balzac caused a riot, Stravinsky caused another riot, and so it goes on, human nature as usual. I think we are now entering the phase: “ECE is obvious, I knew it all along”. In any case ECE is completely unstoppable as per Victor Hugo, “one cannot stop the march of ideas”. False Dawns June 4, 2014 “I waited a quarter century before accepting that LENR is reproducible and repeatable, and in the new book “Principles of ECE Theory” (publications section of www.aias.us) a chapter is devoted to Alex Hill’s energy devices and to LENR. “ We can remember when a certain Stanley Meyer was in the ascendant: he was ‘inserted’ into a BBC documentary on cold fusion, his car-that-runs-on water was verified by three professors (including a Professor M.A.Laughton of London) and he was invited to present his invention to a special-interest group at the House of Lords (probably at the insistence of an energy-from-water crank who also happened to be a former comptroller [sic] of the British Navy). Unfortunately, Meyer never made it to the Lords, because he was indicted for fraud. And then he dropped dead; lying must be so stressful. Sic transit fraudatio mundi. We wonder how Hill feels about Rossi: how many perpetual-motion machines does the world need? Ron should check his loyalties: Hill is hand-in-glove with Ron, but Rossi seems to have nothing good to say about Ron. Recent Conceptual Advance in Orbit Theory June 14, 2014 This is the realization that the angular velocity is the spin connection of Cartan, a spin connection that describes the rotating axes of the plane polar coordinate system, a geometry to which Cartan geometry reduces in well defined
Re: [Vo]:Update on the ECE theory?
Shipov's vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyyENvwJ4L8
[Vo]:nickel hydride SC
There is a paper- First Principles study of Electronic structure, structural Properties and superconductivity of Nickel Hydride with the following relevant information: Our result conclude, a non occurrence of superconductivity in NiH. But, due to the addition of hydrogen atom we observe superconductivity in NiH2 and NiH3. The estimated Tc values for NiH2 and NiH3 are 5.5K and 10K respectively. Also, it is found that as the pressure increases, the Tc value also increases http://wjst.wu.ac.th/index.php/wjst/article/downloadSuppFile/231/27 In Ahern's work for EPRI, based loosely on Arata's work, he achieved hydrogen loading of 4:1 in an alloy of Ni(95%)-Pd(5%). However, this alloy was not his best performer for thermal gain, but it did load -by far- the most hydrogen. The gain was much better than with Pd-H or Ni-H. Curiously nickel alone does not load well. Details like this are what is so annoying (devilish) about LENR, where the common belief is that hydrogen loading correlates with gain. There is evidence of this correlation with deuterium, but not with hydrogen. Otherwise the best advice which could be given to Mizuno would be to add 5% Pd to his nickel. BTW ... although NiH4 would not be superconductive at temperatures where excess heat is triggered, at least not in the normal sense, there is a mounting suspicion that materials which are superconductive at low temperature may retain something unusual at high temps ... and it involves magnetism and nano. That something can be labeled as local superconductivity. Local superconductivity would look a lot like spintronics in nanoparticles. The Meissner effect would then itself be local and would cause extreme antiferromagnetic ordering in nanoparticles (which are relatively mobile). Note: many experts do not yet fully recognize antiferromagnetism as another kind of ordering ... but it can be, especially in the extreme case. And the interesting thing is that antiferromagnetism can emerge from a state of increasing disorder. At least in a philosophical sense, when there is anti-entropic oscillation between ordered and disordered states, there exists the potential for an energy anomaly. attachment: winmail.dat
