[Vo]:Photon chain reaction powered by DCE
Another thought experiment . Here is a video an oscillating mirror which creates photons. and this has actually been proved in experiments at low power. Moving the mirror requires energy input which makes the free photon production less than overunity, of course... at least for now. The mirror in this case is a planar metallic surface fabricated at nano-geometry using the same lithography techniques of the semiconductor industry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDzqqsTFywk The goal of this thought experiment is persistent light, not to be confused with the biological term. This is a form of overunity, and thus is technically impossible without an outside source of energy, which is to be the DCE, or dynamical Casimir effect. If DCE moves the mirror then net gain will be possible in the form of persistent light and a photon chain reaction. Now, Imagine a hollow sphere as a mirror. Obviously light can be reflected by a sphere, both internally and externally. If the sphere wall is thin enough, the sphere will naturally pulsate at the blackbody rate. If the pulsation is in step with a multiple of the wave length of light being reflected, and have created photons in the hollow sphere, then on paper at least, DCE would be the proximate source of gain for persistent light. With phonons and photons resonantly vibrating - if the spheres are translucent - we have a material which glows and tends to lock adjoining spheres into harmony. The phonon pulsation would be at an IR frequency and the photons would be visible and either coherent of superradiant. The ratio of the two wavelengths cannot be too great, or any kind of resonant coupling would be lost. An interesting starting point is to start with photon input from a low-pressure sodium lamp, which naturally gives only monochromatic yellow light at 589 nm. Once near coherence is reached the lamp is shut off. If the glowing material is a dielectric, like titania, we have what is known as a dielectric mirror (aka Bragg reflector). In short, this experiment proposes that a photonic chain reaction (defined as extreme persistent luminescence) follows from a variation of the Bragg reflector, made of translucent titania nanospheres, which are commercially available and will benefit from added created photons from the internal vibrating mirrors. Losses can be extremely low, since 99.99% of incident light is reflected, so the DCE photon creation only needs to make up a few ppm of losses. The trick is to tailor everything together at stepped resonance. The most extreme ratio where coupling occurs is not known, but probably would benefit from a third medium in the middle, since IR wavelengths are so much longer than visible light. IR Triple coherency could be possible in this context, if a another reflective and electrically conductive material were interspersed with the titania. This could result in mutual resonance for photons, phonons and electrons (the matter wave of the electron if the conductor was an exciton). Here is a step one: start with photospheres of a chosen cavity size (to match an IR wavelength) which have cavities in the Casimir range of geometry. http://www.cospheric.com/TiO2_titanium_dioxide_coated_glass_spheres.htm which are rather pricey, so this proposal will await a sponsor to move into the Lab, but as they say in the MasterCard ads, the result could be priceless. At one time, it looked like a AC frequency could work as the 3rd system to be made coherent, but static charge is a better bet- in the sense of a local field. Thus, the next step is to mix excitons into the titania in the form of QSI nanospheres. An IR photon with a wavelength of 9.4 microns is a ratio of 16x the monochromatic emission of sodium and has an energy of less than .2 eV. That IR photon would be paired with an electron with a kinetic energy of .0002 eV. The associated DeBroglie wavelength is about the same as the photon, but that is rather cold. In effect this is a static free electron with an oscillating exciton hole, and that the entire structure with intermixed titania is semi-coherent and translucent. Persistent light or the photon chain reaction would be a form of overunity which has enormous appeal, since it is self-powered in a most obvious way that cannot be denied - and can in principle be powered by DCE. The devil is in the details, however, and as you can see, I am not there yet on getting the details to line up for triple coherency. This is an invitation for anyone who has been thinking along these lines to propose their own version of persistent light, even if it requires LENR instead of DCE. The holy grail is a stand-alone system with no outside power input after startup, such as Dennis Cravens almost demonstrated at NI Week. So close but so far away. Self-power in one form or another is where the skeptics will have to put-up or shut-up, as they say.
Re: [Vo]:Photon chain reaction powered by DCE
Here's a link to the science daily article on the experiment: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/18133050.htm --On Friday, November 14, 2014 7:29 AM -0800 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Another thought experiment … Here is a video an oscillating mirror which creates photons… and this has actually been proved in experiments at low power. Moving the mirror requires energy input which makes the free photon production less than overunity, of course... at least for now. The mirror in this case is a planar metallic surface fabricated at nano-geometry using the same lithography techniques of the semiconductor industry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDzqqsTFywk The goal of this thought experiment is persistent light, not to be confused with the biological term. This is a form of overunity, and thus is technically impossible without an outside source of energy, which is to be the DCE, or dynamical Casimir effect. If DCE moves the mirror then net gain will be possible in the form of persistent light and a photon chain reaction. Now, Imagine a hollow sphere as a mirror. Obviously light can be reflected by a sphere, both internally and externally. If the sphere wall is thin enough, the sphere will naturally pulsate at the blackbody rate. If the pulsation is in step with a multiple of the wave length of light being reflected, and have created photons in the hollow sphere, then on paper at least, DCE would be the proximate source of gain for persistent light. With phonons and photons resonantly vibrating - if the spheres are translucent - we have a material which glows and tends to lock adjoining spheres into harmony. The phonon pulsation would be at an IR frequency and the photons would be visible and either coherent of superradiant. The ratio of the two wavelengths cannot be too great, or any kind of resonant coupling would be lost. An interesting starting point is to start with photon input from a low-pressure sodium lamp, which naturally gives only monochromatic yellow light at 589 nm. Once near coherence is reached the lamp is shut off. If the glowing material is a dielectric, like titania, we have what is known as a dielectric mirror (aka Bragg reflector). In short, this experiment proposes that a photonic chain reaction (defined as extreme persistent luminescence) follows from a variation of the Bragg reflector, made of translucent titania nanospheres, which are commercially available and will benefit from added created photons from the internal vibrating mirrors. Losses can be extremely low, since 99.99% of incident light is reflected, so the DCE photon creation only needs to make up a few ppm of losses. The trick is to tailor everything together at stepped resonance. The most extreme ratio where coupling occurs is not known, but probably would benefit from a third medium in the middle, since IR wavelengths are so much longer than visible light. IR Triple coherency could be possible in this context, if a another reflective and electrically conductive material were interspersed with the titania. This could result in mutual resonance for photons, phonons and electrons (the matter wave of the electron if the conductor was an exciton). Here is a step one: start with photospheres of a chosen cavity size (to match an IR wavelength) which have cavities in the Casimir range of geometry. http://www.cospheric.com/TiO2_titanium_dioxide_coated_glass_spheres.htm which are rather pricey, so this proposal will await a sponsor to move into the Lab, but as they say in the MasterCard ads, the result could be priceless… At one time, it looked like a AC frequency could work as the 3rd system to be made coherent, but static charge is a better bet- in the sense of a local field. Thus, the next step is to mix excitons into the titania in the form of QSI nanospheres. An IR photon with a wavelength of 9.4 microns is a ratio of 16x the monochromatic emission of sodium and has an energy of less than .2 eV. That IR photon would be paired with an electron with a kinetic energy of .0002 eV. The associated DeBroglie wavelength is about the same as the photon, but that is rather cold. In effect this is a static free electron with an oscillating exciton hole, and that the entire structure with intermixed titania is semi-coherent and translucent. Persistent light or the photon chain reaction would be a form of overunity which has enormous appeal, since it is self-powered in a most obvious way that cannot be denied - and can in principle be powered by DCE. The devil is in the details, however, and as you can see, I am not there yet on getting the details to line up for triple coherency. This is an invitation for anyone who has been thinking along these lines to propose their own version of persistent light, even if it requires LENR instead of DCE. The holy grail is a stand-alone system with no outside power input after startup, such as Dennis Cravens almost demonstrated at NI
Re: [Vo]:Photon chain reaction powered by DCE
Jones trumps Joe Shea!!
[Vo]:Seen This?
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/08/russian-nuclear-physicist-vitaly-uzikov-on-the-e-cat-the-train-has-left/
[Vo]:Bill Gates (MS) LENR Cold Fusion- Italy meeting
Greetings Vortex-l, The pics and the video of Bill Gates (MS) are real: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/14/bill-gates-addressed-at-enea-by-lenr-research-coordinator-what-does-he-know-about-lenr/ Ad Astra, Ron Kita, Chiralex
Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates (MS) LENR Cold Fusion- Italy meeting
All it would take is a press announcement from Gates to unleash LENR. I doubt he has the courage. On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-l, The pics and the video of Bill Gates (MS) are real: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/14/bill-gates-addressed-at-enea-by-lenr-research-coordinator-what-does-he-know-about-lenr/ Ad Astra, Ron Kita, Chiralex
[Vo]:Paper about Mizuno's calorimetry
See: Rothwell, J., *Report on Mizuno's adiabatic calorimetry*. 2014, LENR-CANR.org. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf This describes the calorimetry Mizuno is now using in his nanoparticle experiments. He reported on these experiments at ICCF18, and Yoshino described them at MIT. The calorimetry has been improved in recent months. I think it is pretty good. The data for the five tests described in this paper can be downloaded here: http://lenr-canr.org/Mizuno/ - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates (MS) LENR Cold Fusion- Italy meeting
The article says: My guess it is highly likely that Professor Violante would have at least mentioned something about LENR in this meeting. What else would he talk about? Anyway, the poster is from ICCF15 so that's the subject. If anyone can make a good impression, Vittorio can. - Jed
RE: [Vo]:Paper about Mizuno's calorimetry
Nicely done paper, but it raises many questions. You say “nanoparticles” but the active electrode appears to be wire and much less wire than before. Are you saying the wire treatment amounts to nanoparticles? Why so little active material compare to the earlier presentation? Why not space the pulses closer together? Is nuclear data available? This almost looks like a preliminary paper to one where parameters are optimized and other data, including nuclear data is presented, as well as a comparison of active materials. From: Jed Rothwell See: Rothwell, J., Report on Mizuno's adiabatic calorimetry. 2014, LENR-CANR.org. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf This describes the calorimetry Mizuno is now using in his nanoparticle experiments. He reported on these experiments at ICCF18, and Yoshino described them at MIT. The calorimetry has been improved in recent months. I think it is pretty good. The data for the five tests described in this paper can be downloaded here: http://lenr-canr.org/Mizuno/ - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Paper about Mizuno's calorimetry
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Nicely done paper, but it raises many questions. You say “nanoparticles” but the active electrode appears to be wire and much less wire than before. There is more wire, I think. In Ref. 1 he used 1 m. This is 3 m. Are you saying the wire treatment amounts to nanoparticles? The wire treatment produces nanoparticles. See Ref. 1. Which is: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTmethodofco.pdf See also: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTposterform.pdf Why so little active material compare to the earlier presentation? Why not space the pulses closer together? For the reason stated in the paper: to keep the noise from input power and input heat to a minimum. I asked him to do that. This is not the only way to conduct tests with this system. As I said, previously he ran input power constantly, for days on end. I was looking for a clear-cut result with a high signal to noise ratio, which in this case -- with this system -- is not the same as the most anomalous power or the best input/output ratio. Is nuclear data available? Nope. I don't understand it enough to comment. Mizuno may present it at ICCF19. - Jed
