[Vo]:Nickel for artificial photosynthesis

2015-08-17 Thread Patrick Ellul
  Artificial leaf could soon fuel the planet, Melbourne researchers say -
ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-17/27artificial-leaf27-an-untapped-fuel-source/6703364


[Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Bob Cook
Mill in liquid O with Haynes 25 cobalt alloy-very, very hard stuff-and you will 
probably get it as fine as you want, keeping the Ni exposed to O only.  The 
high local pressure that you get in the milling process may cause oxide 
accumulation on bare Ni particles and produce the rarer Ni oxides.

Bob 

From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 7:30 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

Bob - There are some exceptional recent papers on superatomic nickel as a 
molecular catalyst. It could be a huge breakthrough in LENR if there is a 
cross-connection to its catalytic properties and its ability to densify 
hydrogen. 

 

The structure is intriguing in the context of fractional hydrogen, since both 
Ni and O are Mills catalysts, but – in contrast to normal nickel oxides, there 
could be a major advantage in the superatomic spacing which is completely 
different from the natural oxides. 

 

Surprisingly (since nickel is hexavalent) there are only two main natural 
varieties of nickel oxide: Nickel(II) oxide, NiO, green in color and 
Nickel(III) oxide, Ni2O3, which is black. 

 

Nickel Dioxide, NiO2 is rarer in nature as is the tetroxide NiO4. 
Nickelo-nickelic Oxide is the chemical name of Ni3O4. 

 

I am wondering if one could take Ni2O3 along with nickel powder and grind in 
high speed ball mill for an extended time to arrive at a decent percentage of 
the superatomic version?

 

From: Bob Cook 

 

The superatoms of Ni and O may many have inner shell electrons that are 
captured more easily (electron capture) than happens with regular Ni atoms.  It 
would be nice to know, if the superatoms that are like Pd have the same ability 
to absorb H or D and to confine them in a lattice structure better suited to a 
fusion or other nuclear reaction involving mass energy transition to phonic 
energy.

 

I wonder what the magnetic properties of the superatoms are?

 

Bob Cook

 

From: Bob Cook 

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 5:31 PM

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 

Subject: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

 

Hafnium is refined with Zr from ocean sands, I think.  It has been used as 
reactor control rod with a large cross section for neutrons.  I do not think it 
is too expensive.

 

Bob ook

 

From: Jones Beene 

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 3:05 PM

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 

Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

 

It wasn’t mentioned, but recently Rossi has been claiming to see anomalous heat 
from nickel  - at higher temperature than the melting point of nickel – say in 
the range of 1500 C.

 

If this is found to be true, then it could be evidence of superatomic nickel, 
which has the formula of Ni2O2 – as opposed to NiO or NiO2. Rossi may have 
formed superatomic nickel inadvertently, since he does not mention that this 
was deliberate. In fact he doesn’t mention superatomic at all. Nickel powder is 
known to oxidize in contact with alumina, so in addition to some of it melting 
at 1500C, some of it would oxidize. The superatom thus could from in situ.

 

The reason for the superatom formula being Ni2O2 instead of NiO is in the Wiki 
entry. And it is worth noting that the normal oxide of nickel has a melting 
point which is a whopping 500 degrees C higher than the metal, so this fits the 
circumstances. BTW – the Russians are laying claim to the nickel superatom, as 
well (not sure if Peter mentioned this):

 

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/russian-scientists-discover-new-kind-superatomic-nickel-1450987

 

I cannot find a reference for the m.p. of the nickel superatom, but it is 
probably in the range of 2000C like the other oxides – so yes, Rossi could be 
right for the wrong reason… in that he thinks the catalyst is still only nickel 
which has melted - when instead the active part is the nickel superatom Ni2O2 
which by the way, mimics hafnium.

 

Hafnium has been called a “supercatalyst” but is toxic and extremely expensive. 
It is mentioned in several LENR patents including that of the German mystery 
company PURRATIO AG.

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

 

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

 

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric 
configurations of their valence electrons. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

 

Element replacements

 

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

 

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

 

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

 

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.

This is it:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html


 

Peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 


Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Bob Cook
The superatoms of Ni and O may many have inner shell electrons that are 
captured more easily (electron capture) than happens with regular Ni atoms.  It 
would be nice to know, if the superatoms that are like Pd have the same ability 
to absorb H or D and to confine them in a lattice structure better suited to a 
fusion or other nuclear reaction involving mass energy transition to phonic 
energy.

I wonder what the magnetic properties of the superatoms are?

Bob Cook

From: Bob Cook 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 5:31 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

Hafnium is refined with Zr from ocean sands, I think.  It has been used as 
reactor control rod with a large cross section for neutrons.  I do not think it 
is too expensive.

Bob ook

From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 3:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

It wasn’t mentioned, but recently Rossi has been claiming to see anomalous heat 
from nickel  - at higher temperature than the melting point of nickel – say in 
the range of 1500 C.

 

If this is found to be true, then it could be evidence of superatomic nickel, 
which has the formula of Ni2O2 – as opposed to NiO or NiO2. Rossi may have 
formed superatomic nickel inadvertently, since he does not mention that this 
was deliberate. In fact he doesn’t mention superatomic at all. Nickel powder is 
known to oxidize in contact with alumina, so in addition to some of it melting 
at 1500C, some of it would oxidize. The superatom thus could from in situ.

 

The reason for the superatom formula being Ni2O2 instead of NiO is in the Wiki 
entry. And it is worth noting that the normal oxide of nickel has a melting 
point which is a whopping 500 degrees C higher than the metal, so this fits the 
circumstances. BTW – the Russians are laying claim to the nickel superatom, as 
well (not sure if Peter mentioned this):

 

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/russian-scientists-discover-new-kind-superatomic-nickel-1450987

 

I cannot find a reference for the m.p. of the nickel superatom, but it is 
probably in the range of 2000C like the other oxides – so yes, Rossi could be 
right for the wrong reason… in that he thinks the catalyst is still only nickel 
which has melted - when instead the active part is the nickel superatom Ni2O2 
which by the way, mimics hafnium.

 

Hafnium has been called a “supercatalyst” but is toxic and extremely expensive. 
It is mentioned in several LENR patents including that of the German mystery 
company PURRATIO AG.

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

 

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

 

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric 
configurations of their valence electrons. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

 

Element replacements

 

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

 

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

 

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

 

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.

This is it:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html


 

Peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 


RE: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Jones Beene
It wasn’t mentioned, but recently Rossi has been claiming to see anomalous heat 
from nickel  - at higher temperature than the melting point of nickel – say in 
the range of 1500 C.

 

If this is found to be true, then it could be evidence of superatomic nickel, 
which has the formula of Ni2O2 – as opposed to NiO or NiO2. Rossi may have 
formed superatomic nickel inadvertently, since he does not mention that this 
was deliberate. In fact he doesn’t mention superatomic at all. Nickel powder is 
known to oxidize in contact with alumina, so in addition to some of it melting 
at 1500C, some of it would oxidize. The superatom thus could from in situ.

 

The reason for the superatom formula being Ni2O2 instead of NiO is in the Wiki 
entry. And it is worth noting that the normal oxide of nickel has a melting 
point which is a whopping 500 degrees C higher than the metal, so this fits the 
circumstances. BTW – the Russians are laying claim to the nickel superatom, as 
well (not sure if Peter mentioned this):

 

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/russian-scientists-discover-new-kind-superatomic-nickel-1450987

 

I cannot find a reference for the m.p. of the nickel superatom, but it is 
probably in the range of 2000C like the other oxides – so yes, Rossi could be 
right for the wrong reason… in that he thinks the catalyst is still only nickel 
which has melted - when instead the active part is the nickel superatom Ni2O2 
which by the way, mimics hafnium.

 

Hafnium has been called a “supercatalyst” but is toxic and extremely expensive. 
It is mentioned in several LENR patents including that of the German mystery 
company PURRATIO AG.

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

 

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

 

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric 
configurations of their valence electrons. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

 

Element replacements

 

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

 

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

 

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

 

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.

This is it:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html


 

Peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 



[Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Bob Cook
Hafnium is refined with Zr from ocean sands, I think.  It has been used as 
reactor control rod with a large cross section for neutrons.  I do not think it 
is too expensive.

Bob ook

From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 3:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

It wasn’t mentioned, but recently Rossi has been claiming to see anomalous heat 
from nickel  - at higher temperature than the melting point of nickel – say in 
the range of 1500 C.

 

If this is found to be true, then it could be evidence of superatomic nickel, 
which has the formula of Ni2O2 – as opposed to NiO or NiO2. Rossi may have 
formed superatomic nickel inadvertently, since he does not mention that this 
was deliberate. In fact he doesn’t mention superatomic at all. Nickel powder is 
known to oxidize in contact with alumina, so in addition to some of it melting 
at 1500C, some of it would oxidize. The superatom thus could from in situ.

 

The reason for the superatom formula being Ni2O2 instead of NiO is in the Wiki 
entry. And it is worth noting that the normal oxide of nickel has a melting 
point which is a whopping 500 degrees C higher than the metal, so this fits the 
circumstances. BTW – the Russians are laying claim to the nickel superatom, as 
well (not sure if Peter mentioned this):

 

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/russian-scientists-discover-new-kind-superatomic-nickel-1450987

 

I cannot find a reference for the m.p. of the nickel superatom, but it is 
probably in the range of 2000C like the other oxides – so yes, Rossi could be 
right for the wrong reason… in that he thinks the catalyst is still only nickel 
which has melted - when instead the active part is the nickel superatom Ni2O2 
which by the way, mimics hafnium.

 

Hafnium has been called a “supercatalyst” but is toxic and extremely expensive. 
It is mentioned in several LENR patents including that of the German mystery 
company PURRATIO AG.

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

 

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

 

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric 
configurations of their valence electrons. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

 

Element replacements

 

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

 

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

 

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

 

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.

This is it:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html


 

Peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 


RE: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Jones Beene
Bob - There are some exceptional recent papers on superatomic nickel as a 
molecular catalyst. It could be a huge breakthrough in LENR if there is a 
cross-connection to its catalytic properties and its ability to densify 
hydrogen. 

 

The structure is intriguing in the context of fractional hydrogen, since both 
Ni and O are Mills catalysts, but – in contrast to normal nickel oxides, there 
could be a major advantage in the superatomic spacing which is completely 
different from the natural oxides. 

 

Surprisingly (since nickel is hexavalent) there are only two main natural 
varieties of nickel oxide: Nickel(II) oxide, NiO, green in color and 
Nickel(III) oxide, Ni2O3, which is black. 

 

Nickel Dioxide, NiO2 is rarer in nature as is the tetroxide NiO4. 
Nickelo-nickelic Oxide is the chemical name of Ni3O4. 

 

I am wondering if one could take Ni2O3 along with nickel powder and grind in 
high speed ball mill for an extended time to arrive at a decent percentage of 
the superatomic version?

 

From: Bob Cook 

 

The superatoms of Ni and O may many have inner shell electrons that are 
captured more easily (electron capture) than happens with regular Ni atoms.  It 
would be nice to know, if the superatoms that are like Pd have the same ability 
to absorb H or D and to confine them in a lattice structure better suited to a 
fusion or other nuclear reaction involving mass energy transition to phonic 
energy.

 

I wonder what the magnetic properties of the superatoms are?

 

Bob Cook

 

From: Bob Cook mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com  

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 5:31 PM

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 

Subject: [Vo]:Re: LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

 

Hafnium is refined with Zr from ocean sands, I think.  It has been used as 
reactor control rod with a large cross section for neutrons.  I do not think it 
is too expensive.

 

Bob ook

 

From: Jones Beene mailto:jone...@pacbell.net  

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 3:05 PM

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 

Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

 

It wasn’t mentioned, but recently Rossi has been claiming to see anomalous heat 
from nickel  - at higher temperature than the melting point of nickel – say in 
the range of 1500 C.

 

If this is found to be true, then it could be evidence of superatomic nickel, 
which has the formula of Ni2O2 – as opposed to NiO or NiO2. Rossi may have 
formed superatomic nickel inadvertently, since he does not mention that this 
was deliberate. In fact he doesn’t mention superatomic at all. Nickel powder is 
known to oxidize in contact with alumina, so in addition to some of it melting 
at 1500C, some of it would oxidize. The superatom thus could from in situ.

 

The reason for the superatom formula being Ni2O2 instead of NiO is in the Wiki 
entry. And it is worth noting that the normal oxide of nickel has a melting 
point which is a whopping 500 degrees C higher than the metal, so this fits the 
circumstances. BTW – the Russians are laying claim to the nickel superatom, as 
well (not sure if Peter mentioned this):

 

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/russian-scientists-discover-new-kind-superatomic-nickel-1450987

 

I cannot find a reference for the m.p. of the nickel superatom, but it is 
probably in the range of 2000C like the other oxides – so yes, Rossi could be 
right for the wrong reason… in that he thinks the catalyst is still only nickel 
which has melted - when instead the active part is the nickel superatom Ni2O2 
which by the way, mimics hafnium.

 

Hafnium has been called a “supercatalyst” but is toxic and extremely expensive. 
It is mentioned in several LENR patents including that of the German mystery 
company PURRATIO AG.

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

 

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

 

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric 
configurations of their valence electrons. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

 

Element replacements

 

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

 

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

 

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

 

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.

This is it:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html


 

Peter

-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

 



Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.

2015-08-17 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:


 deflation is natural and sane in economies where there is growth of
 productivity.
 This is a good way to increase wages.


You seem to be describing not deflation but the lowering of the prices of
specific commodities due to price pressure arising from increases in
productivity.  I'm going to hazard a guess that economists don't think of
this kind of downward price pressure as deflation, especially of the kind
seen in the Great Depression.  Deflation in that instance was across the
board.  If you held on to your money, it would be worth even more a week
later.  There was an incentive to refrain from spending and to keep your
money in a can under your mattress.

In a healthy economy, you might want to wait for two or three months to
purchase that television or stereo system or car, because the price might
be about to come down; but while you wait your money would become worth a
little less overall because of a slight amount of inflation.  If you did
not intend to spend it you would want to put it to some other good use --
in an investment account or a savings account.

Eric


Re: [Vo]:Listening to gravity

2015-08-17 Thread James Bowery
I've heard the hum in the mountains outside of Waushougal, WA but cannot
necessarily attribute it to that location as I've also heard it other
places.

My working hypothesis I'm suffering from occasional venous hum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venous_hum (not really suffering as it
isn't annoying when it happens -- just curious).

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 In the past, the phenomenon of “the hum” has been reported on here.

 One location where it is heard is Taos, NM. Not everyone can hear it, and
 those that can are so annoyed by it that they usually move somewhere else.
 There are dozens of sites around the globe where a small percentage of
 people can hear “the hum”.

 The source of this is unexplained… until now J

 The hum is most likely the holographic noise made by gravity waves. This
 noise was discovered in the LIGO/Gravity wave experiments which is ongoing
 . The noise is in the 40 – 130 Hz range. A good slide show on this is 
 “Holographic
 Noise” by Craig Hogan of Fermilab.

 *http://astro.fnal.gov/Retreat/Retreat0409/hogan.pdf*
 http://astro.fnal.gov/Retreat/Retreat0409/hogan.pdf

 These guys go so far as to suggest that our Universe is a 2-D hologram…
 which kinda fits the theme that comes up from time-to-time here – that our
 reality is essentially nothing more than a VR computer program, with some
 imperfections (ala several cult films).




[Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Peter Gluck
Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.
This is it:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html

Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


[Vo]:FYI: MiHsC theory (Emdrive, dark matter anomaly, MOND...) deletion on Wikipedia

2015-08-17 Thread Alain Sepeda
https://twitter.com/memcculloch/status/633231917157064704

Michael McCulloch just report that the Wikipedia page on his theory of
Quantized inertia, MiHsC, is currently being deleted by anonymous mindquards

if some can help or gather evidences.


Re: [Vo]:LENR question (one) and info- for Aug. 17, 2015

2015-08-17 Thread Axil Axil
In May 2008 Japanese researcher Yoshiaki Arata (Osaka University)
demonstrated an experiment that produced heat when deuterium gas was
introduced into a cell containing a mixture of palladium and zirconium
oxide. In an August 2009 peer reviewed paper Akira Kitamura (Kobe
University) et al. reported about replication of this experiment.
Replication of earlier work by Arata had been claimed by McKubre at SRI.

Miley’s device, does not require an external heat source, relying on the
chemical reactions within it to produce the heat energy needed to run the
unit. The fuel is ZrO2 (zirconium dioxide) and deuterium pressurized to 413
kilo pascals (60 psi).

Why do these compounds work as a LENR catalysts?

http://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=803

Superatoms are clusters of atoms that mimic elements through isoelectric
configurations of their valence electrons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superatom

Element replacements

Titanium monoxide (TiO) = nickel

Zirconium oxide (ZrO) =  palladium

Tungsten carbide(WC) =  Platinum

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:


 Week starts, things happen or become known- the rest is communication.
 This is it:

 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-aa-burning-question-and-some-info.html

 Peter
 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com