[Vo]:The antenna wire (company)

[Frank Znidarsic]

I put an amplified antenna into a friends attic.  One station PBS was 45 miles 
away and only coming in now and then for short bursts.  I made an antenna wire 
as show in the picture.




http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/antenna.jpg




The wire boosted the signal and PBS now comes in solid.  It attaches to the 
screw on the back of the square plastic antenna.
This is such a simple idea, a bent wire.  I have a vendor page at Amazon.  I 
wonder if it would be worth while making antenna wires
for sale,  They would be tuned to one specific UHF channel.  They are small as 
the UHF frequencies are high.  They offer a gain of about 6db.  I could have  
the agency for the blind make them if they sold well.  That would help them 
out.  I am not sure if a simple thing like this has any market potential.


http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/antenna.jpg


While working on my Radiola III  I picked up marijuana grow lights in the 
neighborhood.  Why was the Radiola tuned radio freq set and the regen set so 
sensitive to this radiation?  It appears that the have a broad band reception 
pattern and pick up a little across the entire mid range radio band.  I could 
make a loop of wire with a low Q that capitalize on this effect.  It would have 
a simple diode detector followed by a filter that would let through 120 hz 
signals.  An LED would light when it picked up the grow light signal.  I could 
market these to the police.


I find ideas under every rock now.  Soon or later I will return to on topic.


Frank Z

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

Thinking about how to determine how the aforementioned magnetic bubble
behaves as follows:

The boundary of the boarder of the bubble as described in my last post
should be determined through experimentation in order to understand,
visualize, and maximize the operation of the output pickup coil. To do this
experimentally, we must determine how the border of the bubble(BB) behaves
in response to the adjustments applied quantum tuning parameter (QTP): it
might expand or contract while still centered in place, it might move
horizontally and/or vertically with this movement including the bubble
center, and finally the boarder of the bubble might grow and decrease
periodically in strength.

In order for these aforementioned bubble movements to be visualized in
Magnetic Viewing Film (MVF) as seen in the Bendini video, the frequency of
the activation coil pulses would need to limited to under 10 CPS so that
bubble movement can be seen with our eyes..

As an experimental equipment requirement, a sensitive signal wave generator
that can handle very low frequencies together with sub cycle fine tuning is
required to drive the activation coil.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> Getting back to the John Bendini video again:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOJ_sFy6BQU
>
> At 8:12 into the video, John Bendini shows how the conditioning of the
> magnet using a coil that wraps around the side of the magnetic billet will
> produce a magnetic pole structure that has one pole located in the center
> and another pole surrounding the center pole located on the exterior edge
> of the billet.
>
> The edge coil produces magnetic field lines which conditions the billet
> that pass orthogonal to the surface of the billet. After conditioning, all
> the magnetic boundaries are standing vertical to the surface of the billet.
> This orientation of the conditioning field lines direct the magnetic
> domains to reorient themselves to all assume the polarization of  one pole
> directed vertically from the surface. As a reaction to edge concentration
> of polarity, at the center of the billet, magnetic domains of the
> opposite polarity will concentrate forming a centralized  magnetic bubble.
>
> All magnetic field lines rise vertically from the surface of the billet.
> This is why the needle seen in page 6 of the slide show reference below
> points up vertically from the center of the billet.
>
> https://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/ahern-manelas-device.pdf
>
> I beleive that this magnetic bubble is made to vibrate when a triggering
> magnetic field is applied to the billet. John Bendini  states that the
> bubble moves around easily when a magnet is placed next to it.  This is
> why the metal tappers shake during the determination of the quantum
> critical point seen in the Sweet video. We will look at that video in a
> future post.
>
> It can be seen in the plastic magnetic sensor viewer that the edge of the
> bubble is highly magnetized.  The output pickup coil must utilize these
> magnetic field lines emanating from this  bubble edge boundary to induce
> the output current produced by the VTA system.
>
> In short, the vibrating bubble must produce the output current.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> More...
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a video that shows how the Barium ferrite magnet is prepared.
>> Starting at 4:20,there is a section of this video showing that the surface
>> of the barium ferrite magnet is NOT conductive on its surface (2d
>> topological insulator) but the strontium ferrite magnet is conductive. John
>> Bendini has made a few errors here that I will get into a bit later.
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOJ_sFy6BQU
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> *More...*
>>>
>>> *Floyd Sweet has reported that when the Vacuum Triode Amplifier is in
>>> operation, it loses weight. The reason for this may be due to the
>>> thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force produced when a coherent
>>> system oscillates repeatedly through disorder. This process in the EMDrive
>>> may produce a reaction force as microwaves create and destroy coherence in
>>> the vacuum thus producing negative vacuum energy.*
>>>
>>> *The magnons inside of a ferrite magnet could mimic the
>>> virtual particles in the vacuum but be far more concentrated and forceful.
>>> As the magnons oscillate through thermodynamic coherence a
>>> negative vacuum energy state might be created inside the magnet and a
>>> resultant **Adiabatic reaction force produced orthogonal to the surface
>>> of the magnet. I would dearly want to build one of these vacuum triodes to
>>> see if I could get my car to float down the street. That might be
>>> something that could turn heads.*
>>>
>>> *Here is a lecture that explains how a thermodynamically based **Adiabatic
>>> reaction force is produced. *
>>>
>>> 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

Getting back to the John Bendini video again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOJ_sFy6BQU

At 8:12 into the video, John Bendini shows how the conditioning of the
magnet using a coil that wraps around the side of the magnetic billet will
produce a magnetic pole structure that has one pole located in the center
and another pole surrounding the center pole located on the exterior edge
of the billet.

The edge coil produces magnetic field lines which conditions the billet
that pass orthogonal to the surface of the billet. After conditioning, all
the magnetic boundaries are standing vertical to the surface of the billet.
This orientation of the conditioning field lines direct the magnetic
domains to reorient themselves to all assume the polarization of  one pole
directed vertically from the surface. As a reaction to edge concentration
of polarity, at the center of the billet, magnetic domains of the
opposite polarity will concentrate forming a centralized  magnetic bubble.

All magnetic field lines rise vertically from the surface of the billet.
This is why the needle seen in page 6 of the slide show reference below
points up vertically from the center of the billet.

https://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/ahern-manelas-device.pdf

I beleive that this magnetic bubble is made to vibrate when a triggering
magnetic field is applied to the billet. John Bendini  states that the
bubble moves around easily when a magnet is placed next to it.  This is why
the metal tappers shake during the determination of the quantum critical
point seen in the Sweet video. We will look at that video in a future post.

It can be seen in the plastic magnetic sensor viewer that the edge of the
bubble is highly magnetized.  The output pickup coil must utilize these
magnetic field lines emanating from this  bubble edge boundary to induce
the output current produced by the VTA system.

In short, the vibrating bubble must produce the output current.



On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> More...
>
>
>
> Here is a video that shows how the Barium ferrite magnet is prepared.
> Starting at 4:20,there is a section of this video showing that the surface
> of the barium ferrite magnet is NOT conductive on its surface (2d
> topological insulator) but the strontium ferrite magnet is conductive. John
> Bendini has made a few errors here that I will get into a bit later.
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOJ_sFy6BQU
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> *More...*
>>
>> *Floyd Sweet has reported that when the Vacuum Triode Amplifier is in
>> operation, it loses weight. The reason for this may be due to the
>> thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force produced when a coherent
>> system oscillates repeatedly through disorder. This process in the EMDrive
>> may produce a reaction force as microwaves create and destroy coherence in
>> the vacuum thus producing negative vacuum energy.*
>>
>> *The magnons inside of a ferrite magnet could mimic the virtual particles
>> in the vacuum but be far more concentrated and forceful.  As the magnons
>> oscillate through thermodynamic coherence a negative vacuum energy state
>> might be created inside the magnet and a resultant **Adiabatic reaction
>> force produced orthogonal to the surface of the magnet. I would dearly want
>> to build one of these vacuum triodes to see if I could get my car to float
>> down the street. That might be something that could turn heads.*
>>
>> *Here is a lecture that explains how a thermodynamically based **Adiabatic
>> reaction force is produced. *
>>
>> *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1rxAhUl5BE
>> *
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> Barium Ferrite is wonderful stuff. First, it is both a topological
>>> insulator, and an electrical insulator which tightly locks in the atomic
>>> magnetic dipole induced magnetic domain  where electron flow is non
>>> existent and does not weaken the magnetic domain through electron band
>>> filling.
>>>
>>> The key to all this is unpaired electrons. A quantum mechanical property
>>> called spin gives every electron a magnetic field. Electrons like to pair
>>> up is a way that negates their spin. You can think of each one as a tiny
>>> bar magnet with the usual north and south poles. Generally, electrons come
>>> in pairs. And when you pair up two electrons, their magnetic fields (sort
>>> of ) cancel each other out. The orbital containing the pair becomes
>>> magnetically the same from all directions.  Electron pairing is not good
>>> for us.
>>>
>>> But in some systems, electrons must go unpaired, leading to interesting
>>> magnetic properties. When you put an magnetocaloric (MC) material into an
>>> external magnetic field, the dipoles associated with the unpaired electrons
>>> tend to align with the field and - importantly - the temperature of the
>>> 

[Vo]:Re: Amazon Appstore – Parrot Teacher is Published

[Frank Znidarsic]

 A friend of mine has one of those square UHF HD TV amplified antennas.  We 
moved it into the attic and got 17 channels.  We really wanted PBS.  Its about 
45 miles away in Clearfield PA.  PBS would only come in pixellated for a brief 
moments.  I bent a #10 copper wire a quarter wavelength this way and that.  I 
found that the at the far end of the range the HD TV signal comes in vertically 
polarized.  I made a wire after several tries that works well.  It resonates at 
the frequency of UHF channel 18.  It has 3 elements and is about 1.5 feet long. 
 I glued it to the square UHF antenna and pointed the arrangement towards 
Clearfield.   I worked like a charm.  PBS is coming in solid most of the time.  
The antenna looks something like below.  It receives the signal through the 
roof in the attic.  Could this be a new product, a bent wire tuned for various 
UHF channels?  It would only work to bring in one marginal channel better.

|















|   |   |





|


I am thinking about this one.  Maybe another friend Howard may be able to help 
with this one.




Frank Z

[Vo]:LENR, Axiom and paradox of thorny mimosas

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-26-2017-lenr-and-thorny-mimosa.html

peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:On this date ... in 2017?

[Jones Beene]

Looks like Brian has had an equipment failure with the runaway experiment.

Hopefully it can be repaired easily. This is a setback, not a null result.

The experiment looks relatively simple on paper. The devil is in the 
details.

[Vo]:Re: Amazon Appstore – Parrot Teacher is Published

[Frank Znidarsic]

I am glad I took a break from cold fusion to try other things.  Petco may be 
coming out with a product of mine.  It will be a surprise.  I will let you know 
when and if it happens.  Then the next product in my sights is a solar powered 
chirper for a singing birdhouse.  It's for the arts and crafts set.


If Jed and Jones would have redirected there efforts for a short while who 
knows what they would have some up with.  Robert Vargo's IQ is also though the 
roof, he will do it too.






Frank

[Vo]:Fwd: Amazon Appstore – Parrot Teacher is Published

[Frank Znidarsic]

Amazon gave me a URL.   


amazon.com/author/frank_znidarsic




With Amazon, Google, and Barns and Noble helping me, what could be better!  
That was nice of them.  Cold Fusion is promoted on this URL.   If I gave this 
material away for free this would not have happened.  "Rewards in a 
capitalistic system go to those who take a product to market."  Robert Vargo - 
genius















Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

More...



Here is a video that shows how the Barium ferrite magnet is prepared.
Starting at 4:20,there is a section of this video showing that the surface
of the barium ferrite magnet is NOT conductive on its surface (2d
topological insulator) but the strontium ferrite magnet is conductive. John
Bendini has made a few errors here that I will get into a bit later.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOJ_sFy6BQU


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> *More...*
>
> *Floyd Sweet has reported that when the Vacuum Triode Amplifier is in
> operation, it loses weight. The reason for this may be due to the
> thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force produced when a coherent
> system oscillates repeatedly through disorder. This process in the EMDrive
> may produce a reaction force as microwaves create and destroy coherence in
> the vacuum thus producing negative vacuum energy.*
>
> *The magnons inside of a ferrite magnet could mimic the virtual particles
> in the vacuum but be far more concentrated and forceful.  As the magnons
> oscillate through thermodynamic coherence a negative vacuum energy state
> might be created inside the magnet and a resultant **Adiabatic reaction
> force produced orthogonal to the surface of the magnet. I would dearly want
> to build one of these vacuum triodes to see if I could get my car to float
> down the street. That might be something that could turn heads.*
>
> *Here is a lecture that explains how a thermodynamically based **Adiabatic
> reaction force is produced. *
>
> *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1rxAhUl5BE
> *
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> Barium Ferrite is wonderful stuff. First, it is both a topological
>> insulator, and an electrical insulator which tightly locks in the atomic
>> magnetic dipole induced magnetic domain  where electron flow is non
>> existent and does not weaken the magnetic domain through electron band
>> filling.
>>
>> The key to all this is unpaired electrons. A quantum mechanical property
>> called spin gives every electron a magnetic field. Electrons like to pair
>> up is a way that negates their spin. You can think of each one as a tiny
>> bar magnet with the usual north and south poles. Generally, electrons come
>> in pairs. And when you pair up two electrons, their magnetic fields (sort
>> of ) cancel each other out. The orbital containing the pair becomes
>> magnetically the same from all directions.  Electron pairing is not good
>> for us.
>>
>> But in some systems, electrons must go unpaired, leading to interesting
>> magnetic properties. When you put an magnetocaloric (MC) material into an
>> external magnetic field, the dipoles associated with the unpaired electrons
>> tend to align with the field and - importantly - the temperature of the
>> material increases. Why does the temperature increase? The magnetic field
>> forces the spins into a thermodynamically lower energy state, and the
>> result of this is that thermal energy - heat - is expelled. When you take
>> the material out of the field it cools down. Thermal energy is absorbed by
>> the system to return the dipoles to a more disordered state. A good example
>> of an MC material is gadolinium, which has seven unpaired electrons in its
>> 4f orbitals, giving it an enormous magnetic moment.
>>
>> Scientists have known about the effect for decades. It was first
>> described in 1881 by German physicist Emil Warburg, who noted that the
>> temperature of a sample of iron increased when he put it into a magnetic
>> field. And it wasn’t long before engineers were thinking about how it might
>> be harnessed to create a heat pump, a device that shifts heat from one
>> place to another against the gradient.
>>
>> Barium Ferrite does not allow electron flow to degrade these unpaired
>> electron orbitals. Strontium ferrite is not a topological insulator but it
>> is still as good an electrical insulator as barium ferrite. Strontium
>> ferrite allows a limited number of electrons to flow which weakens the MC
>> effect and the generation of magnon coherence. Strontium ferrite will do
>> the job but not a good a job as Barium Ferrite, the job being "producing
>> magnon coherence".
>>
>> Both types of these ferrets can be made magnetically anisotropic.
>> Anisotropic magnetism is a requirement for magnetic triode success.
>> Ferrite magnets may be isotropic or anisotropic. In anisotropic qualities,
>> during the pressing process, a magnetic field is applied. This process
>> lines up the particles in one direction, obtaining better magnetic
>> features. Through sintering, (thermal processing at high temperatures),
>> pieces in their definite shape and solidity are obtained,
>>
>> Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity.  It also has a
>> characteristic  known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This
>> situation originates from the inherent 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

*More...*

*Floyd Sweet has reported that when the Vacuum Triode Amplifier is in
operation, it loses weight. The reason for this may be due to the
thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force produced when a coherent
system oscillates repeatedly through disorder. This process in the EMDrive
may produce a reaction force as microwaves create and destroy coherence in
the vacuum thus producing negative vacuum energy.*

*The magnons inside of a ferrite magnet could mimic the virtual particles
in the vacuum but be far more concentrated and forceful.  As the magnons
oscillate through thermodynamic coherence a negative vacuum energy state
might be created inside the magnet and a resultant **Adiabatic reaction
force produced orthogonal to the surface of the magnet. I would dearly want
to build one of these vacuum triodes to see if I could get my car to float
down the street. That might be something that could turn heads.*

*Here is a lecture that explains how a thermodynamically based **Adiabatic
reaction force is produced. *

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1rxAhUl5BE
*


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> Barium Ferrite is wonderful stuff. First, it is both a topological
> insulator, and an electrical insulator which tightly locks in the atomic
> magnetic dipole induced magnetic domain  where electron flow is non
> existent and does not weaken the magnetic domain through electron band
> filling.
>
> The key to all this is unpaired electrons. A quantum mechanical property
> called spin gives every electron a magnetic field. Electrons like to pair
> up is a way that negates their spin. You can think of each one as a tiny
> bar magnet with the usual north and south poles. Generally, electrons come
> in pairs. And when you pair up two electrons, their magnetic fields (sort
> of ) cancel each other out. The orbital containing the pair becomes
> magnetically the same from all directions.  Electron pairing is not good
> for us.
>
> But in some systems, electrons must go unpaired, leading to interesting
> magnetic properties. When you put an magnetocaloric (MC) material into an
> external magnetic field, the dipoles associated with the unpaired electrons
> tend to align with the field and - importantly - the temperature of the
> material increases. Why does the temperature increase? The magnetic field
> forces the spins into a thermodynamically lower energy state, and the
> result of this is that thermal energy - heat - is expelled. When you take
> the material out of the field it cools down. Thermal energy is absorbed by
> the system to return the dipoles to a more disordered state. A good example
> of an MC material is gadolinium, which has seven unpaired electrons in its
> 4f orbitals, giving it an enormous magnetic moment.
>
> Scientists have known about the effect for decades. It was first described
> in 1881 by German physicist Emil Warburg, who noted that the temperature of
> a sample of iron increased when he put it into a magnetic field. And it
> wasn’t long before engineers were thinking about how it might be harnessed
> to create a heat pump, a device that shifts heat from one place to another
> against the gradient.
>
> Barium Ferrite does not allow electron flow to degrade these unpaired
> electron orbitals. Strontium ferrite is not a topological insulator but it
> is still as good an electrical insulator as barium ferrite. Strontium
> ferrite allows a limited number of electrons to flow which weakens the MC
> effect and the generation of magnon coherence. Strontium ferrite will do
> the job but not a good a job as Barium Ferrite, the job being "producing
> magnon coherence".
>
> Both types of these ferrets can be made magnetically anisotropic.
> Anisotropic magnetism is a requirement for magnetic triode success.
> Ferrite magnets may be isotropic or anisotropic. In anisotropic qualities,
> during the pressing process, a magnetic field is applied. This process
> lines up the particles in one direction, obtaining better magnetic
> features. Through sintering, (thermal processing at high temperatures),
> pieces in their definite shape and solidity are obtained,
>
> Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity.  It also has a characteristic
>  known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This situation
> originates from the inherent magneto-crystalline anisotropy of the
> insulator and not the interfacial anisotropy in other situations.  As a
> Mott insulator, it possesses strong spin orbit coupling. This
> characteristic produces a log jam of electrons that stops current from
> flowing. We don't want any electrons to move.
>
> A wet pressed process where magnetic particles can move when placed in a
> magnetic field makes for the strongest magnets before sintering with high
> heat can make that magnetic ordering permanent.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Bob Higgins 
> wrote:
>
>> 

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

Barium Ferrite is wonderful stuff. First, it is both a topological
insulator, and an electrical insulator which tightly locks in the atomic
magnetic dipole induced magnetic domain  where electron flow is non
existent and does not weaken the magnetic domain through electron band
filling.

The key to all this is unpaired electrons. A quantum mechanical property
called spin gives every electron a magnetic field. Electrons like to pair
up is a way that negates their spin. You can think of each one as a tiny
bar magnet with the usual north and south poles. Generally, electrons come
in pairs. And when you pair up two electrons, their magnetic fields (sort
of ) cancel each other out. The orbital containing the pair becomes
magnetically the same from all directions.  Electron pairing is not good
for us.

But in some systems, electrons must go unpaired, leading to interesting
magnetic properties. When you put an magnetocaloric (MC) material into an
external magnetic field, the dipoles associated with the unpaired electrons
tend to align with the field and - importantly - the temperature of the
material increases. Why does the temperature increase? The magnetic field
forces the spins into a thermodynamically lower energy state, and the
result of this is that thermal energy - heat - is expelled. When you take
the material out of the field it cools down. Thermal energy is absorbed by
the system to return the dipoles to a more disordered state. A good example
of an MC material is gadolinium, which has seven unpaired electrons in its
4f orbitals, giving it an enormous magnetic moment.

Scientists have known about the effect for decades. It was first described
in 1881 by German physicist Emil Warburg, who noted that the temperature of
a sample of iron increased when he put it into a magnetic field. And it
wasn’t long before engineers were thinking about how it might be harnessed
to create a heat pump, a device that shifts heat from one place to another
against the gradient.

Barium Ferrite does not allow electron flow to degrade these unpaired
electron orbitals. Strontium ferrite is not a topological insulator but it
is still as good an electrical insulator as barium ferrite. Strontium
ferrite allows a limited number of electrons to flow which weakens the MC
effect and the generation of magnon coherence. Strontium ferrite will do
the job but not a good a job as Barium Ferrite, the job being "producing
magnon coherence".

Both types of these ferrets can be made magnetically anisotropic.
Anisotropic magnetism is a requirement for magnetic triode success.
Ferrite magnets may be isotropic or anisotropic. In anisotropic qualities,
during the pressing process, a magnetic field is applied. This process
lines up the particles in one direction, obtaining better magnetic
features. Through sintering, (thermal processing at high temperatures),
pieces in their definite shape and solidity are obtained,

Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity.  It also has a characteristic
 known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This situation
originates from the inherent magneto-crystalline anisotropy of the
insulator and not the interfacial anisotropy in other situations.  As a
Mott insulator, it possesses strong spin orbit coupling. This
characteristic produces a log jam of electrons that stops current from
flowing. We don't want any electrons to move.

A wet pressed process where magnetic particles can move when placed in a
magnetic field makes for the strongest magnets before sintering with high
heat can make that magnetic ordering permanent.


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Bob Higgins 
wrote:

> Note that these ferrites have substantially different properties in the
> small signal than they do for large scale magnetic excursions.  An RF
> engineer would shoot you for bringing a magnet near his ferrites because
> the high magnetic field can bias the material away from the desirable high
> permeability small signal linear operating point in the B-H curve of the
> material.  When you begin putting really large signals into a ferrite the
> material behaviors become complicated because, not only is the B-H curve
> nonlinear, but it also has hysteresis.  There is plenty of room for odd
> behavior in such a complicated material.  Sometimes when I look at the B-H
> curves for large signal excitation of a ferrite it reminds me of the
> temperature-entropy diagram.
>
> Regarding the magnetocaloric effect (MCE)... the field has centered around
> magnetic refrigeration and the materials that dominate the field are those
> exhibiting the "giant magnetocaloric effect" which include primarily
> materials made with gadolinium.  So, ferrite materials may exhibit some
> MCE, but are not optimized for it.  This suggests that MCE may be just a
> side effect in the ferrite during the Manelas device operation, rather than
> a primary component of the effect.  Otherwise, why wouldn't you use a
> material with the giant 

[Vo]:Cheap plastic film cools whatever it touches up to 10°C | Science | AAAS

[Jack Cole]

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/cheap-plastic-film-cools-whatever-it-touches-10-c

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Bob Higgins]

Note that these ferrites have substantially different properties in the
small signal than they do for large scale magnetic excursions.  An RF
engineer would shoot you for bringing a magnet near his ferrites because
the high magnetic field can bias the material away from the desirable high
permeability small signal linear operating point in the B-H curve of the
material.  When you begin putting really large signals into a ferrite the
material behaviors become complicated because, not only is the B-H curve
nonlinear, but it also has hysteresis.  There is plenty of room for odd
behavior in such a complicated material.  Sometimes when I look at the B-H
curves for large signal excitation of a ferrite it reminds me of the
temperature-entropy diagram.

Regarding the magnetocaloric effect (MCE)... the field has centered around
magnetic refrigeration and the materials that dominate the field are those
exhibiting the "giant magnetocaloric effect" which include primarily
materials made with gadolinium.  So, ferrite materials may exhibit some
MCE, but are not optimized for it.  This suggests that MCE may be just a
side effect in the ferrite during the Manelas device operation, rather than
a primary component of the effect.  Otherwise, why wouldn't you use a
material with the giant MCE?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 7:47 AM,  wrote:

> Axil—
>
>
>
> IMHO you have finally got the picture at least with respect to LENR.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From: *Axil Axil 
> *Sent: *Friday, February 24, 2017 3:47 PM
> *To: *vortex-l 
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
>
>
>
> Whenever we can get the spin of an atom to move: whenever we can get a
> spin to lose OR gain energy, that energy can be transferred to an electron
> with high efficiency.  There are a number of ways that atomic spin can be
> excited: *magnetocaloric *where heat energy is transferred to the spin of
> an atom embedded in a lattice through metal lattice phonons of that lattice
> or quantum mechanical vibrations that are inherent in the heisenberg
> uncertainty principle. The key is to amplify this naturally occurring spin
> movements enough to move electrons strong enough to generate usable
> voltages and currents. That amplification mechanism might be done by
> setting up a coherence boundary condition that involves a change of state
> between coherence and incoherence where a slight external magnetic
> perturbation triggers this change of state.
>
>
>
> Barium ferrite might be a magnetic current superconductor where magnetic
> currents flow inside its lattice.
>
>
>
> An example of this  magnetic current superconductor might be a magnet that
> allows magnetic flux lines to pass through it or not based on an
> external parameter: may be temperature or an external magnetic
> perturbation as an example.
>
>
>
> See (Barium ferrite is a magnetic insulator)
>
>
>
> http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v16/n3/full/nmat4812.html
>
>
> Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator
>
>
>
> The spin Hall effect in heavy metals converts charge current into pure
> spin current, which can be injected into an adjacent ferromagnet to exert a
> torque. This spin–orbit torque (SOT) has been widely used to manipulate the
> magnetization in metallic ferromagnets. In the case of magnetic insulators
> (MIs), although charge currents cannot flow, spin currents can propagate,
> but current-induced control of the magnetization in a MI has so far
> remained elusive. Here we demonstrate spin-current-induced switching of a
> perpendicularly magnetized thulium iron garnet film driven by charge
> current in a Pt overlayer. We estimate a relatively large spin-mixing
> conductance and damping-like SOT through spin Hall magnetoresistance and
> harmonic Hall measurements, respectively, indicating considerable spin
> transparency at the Pt/MI interface. We show that spin currents injected
> across this interface lead to deterministic magnetization reversal at low
> current densities, paving the road towards ultralow-dissipation
> spintronic devices based on MIs.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:
>
> Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent source
> of excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which seem to
> rear their ugly heads.
>
> This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the
> nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific validity
> and usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:
>
> 1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy,
> vacuum energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)
> 2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
> 2) neutrinos
> 4) Schumann resonance
> 5) Fair weather field
> 6) Magnetic field of earth
> 7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
> 8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
> 9) Anti-gravity 

RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[bobcook39923]

Axil—

IMHO you have finally got the picture at least with respect to LENR.

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 3:47 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

Whenever we can get the spin of an atom to move: whenever we can get a spin to 
lose OR gain energy, that energy can be transferred to an electron with high 
efficiency.  There are a number of ways that atomic spin can be excited: 
magnetocaloric where heat energy is transferred to the spin of an atom embedded 
in a lattice through metal lattice phonons of that lattice or quantum 
mechanical vibrations that are inherent in the heisenberg uncertainty 
principle. The key is to amplify this naturally occurring spin movements enough 
to move electrons strong enough to generate usable voltages and currents. That 
amplification mechanism might be done by setting up a coherence boundary 
condition that involves a change of state between coherence and incoherence 
where a slight external magnetic perturbation triggers this change of state. 

Barium ferrite might be a magnetic current superconductor where magnetic 
currents flow inside its lattice.

An example of this  magnetic current superconductor might be a magnet that 
allows magnetic flux lines to pass through it or not based on an external 
parameter: may be temperature or an external magnetic perturbation as an 
example.  

See (Barium ferrite is a magnetic insulator)

http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v16/n3/full/nmat4812.html

Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator

The spin Hall effect in heavy metals converts charge current into pure spin 
current, which can be injected into an adjacent ferromagnet to exert a torque. 
This spin–orbit torque (SOT) has been widely used to manipulate the 
magnetization in metallic ferromagnets. In the case of magnetic insulators 
(MIs), although charge currents cannot flow, spin currents can propagate, but 
current-induced control of the magnetization in a MI has so far remained 
elusive. Here we demonstrate spin-current-induced switching of a 
perpendicularly magnetized thulium iron garnet film driven by charge current in 
a Pt overlayer. We estimate a relatively large spin-mixing conductance and 
damping-like SOT through spin Hall magnetoresistance and harmonic Hall 
measurements, respectively, indicating considerable spin transparency at the 
Pt/MI interface. We show that spin currents injected across this interface lead 
to deterministic magnetization reversal at low current densities, paving the 
road towards ultralow-dissipation spintronic devices based on MIs.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:
Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent source of 
excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which seem to rear 
their ugly heads.

This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the 
nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific validity and 
usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:

1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy, vacuum 
energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)
2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
2) neutrinos
4) Schumann resonance
5) Fair weather field
6) Magnetic field of earth
7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
9) Anti-gravity effect

There are more but they tend to be different wording or combinations of the 
above ... and even more incredulous. Many combinations are possible.

The main reason for bringing this up is that recently CMB has been estimated to 
be slightly more robust than once thought and with new ways to couple to it. 
The CMB is probably a subset of ZPE but the energy density of space in terms of 
the microwave-only spectrum is the equivalent of 0.261 eV per cubic cm, though 
the actual temperature of 2.7 K is much less than that would indicate - and the 
peak of the spectrum is at a frequency of 160.4 GHz. ZPE as a whole may be more 
robust, but CMB is adequate for many uses.

The peak intensity of the background is about... ta ad.. a whopping 385 MJy/Sr 
(that's MegaJanskys per Steradian (I kid you not) which is a candidate for the 
oddest metric in all of free energy, maybe all of physics ... along with 
furlongs per fortnight).

At any rate, if one could invent the way to couple to CMB easily, it would be 
possible to see an effective temperature equivalent in an excellent range for 
thermionics, for instance. The ~2 mm wavelength is interesting too. There have 
been fringe reports of anomalies with 13 gauge wire but anything with the 
number 13 is going to bring out the worst ...