Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread CB Sites 
Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks.  They do have to find a way to pay
for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute
ones.  But annoying as heck, I agree with.

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 2:23 PM ROGER ANDERTON 
wrote:

> I think the way out of it is -> the government has this little known right
> to change the constitution -> thus if they scrap the bill of rights -> they
> can stop presenting the illusion that there is freedom of speech under
> their fasicist dictatorship
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
> YouTube ads
>
> As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with
> big tech to censor -->
>
>
>
> The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to
> flag ‘problematic’ posts “that spread disinformation on Covid-19” on the
> Internet. George Orwell would call such activity propaganda. Historians
> characterize such a close working relationship between government and big
> business, as fascism
> .
> To the Biden administration, it’s merely cleaning up “misinformation
> 
> ”.
>
>
> https://www.reformthekakistocracy.com/wh-admits-censoring-legal-implications/
>
>
> since we live in a fasicist state -> corporations and govenment are the
> same thing
>
>
> so your point that government not allowed to censor and big tech allowed
> to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
> YouTube ads
>
> It is not their constitutional right to censor.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jed Rothwell" 
> To: "Vortex" 
> Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
> YouTube ads
>
> AM ROGER ANDERTON  wrote:
>
>> shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
>>
> Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot
> pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX
> News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech as much
> as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from a cold
> fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can delete any
> post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. It is entirely
> up to them. The government cannot interfere with their decision because
> freedom of speech includes the right to not publish something. They cannot
> be forced to publish a statement.
>
> If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their
> business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for Facebook
> and their users to decide. The government has no role and their decision to
> delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with constitutional free
> speech.
>
>
>> 2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html
>> 
>>
>>
> I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their
> constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they
> do, but I am not keeping track.
>
>

[Vo]:Smith's linear magnetic compression wave science in the Discloser's portfolio of weird

2021-09-19 Thread Don 


 File:Scalar flux coupler 365x437.jpg


My friend of a few years needed for me to understand a brain child of 
his.  His understanding sourced from someplace mysterious, and didn't 
make a lot of sense in the big picture until years later.


This file linked next resulted from our collaboration.  This was an 
early and successful cooperation between myself and my autistic friend 
with a bent for high-weirdness in the natural physics of reality.  Later 
in life this friend disclosed  his mysterious life as a telepathic in 
June of 2013.  He recovered from a cerebral stroke and coma, and when 
strong enough was able to contact me for to open the book of his life, 
and mind, and connection with an ancient orb of light.


   https://groupkos.com/dev/index.php?title=File:Scalar_flux_coupler_365x437.jpg
   


   This was created from a fellow troubled of mind with paranoia about
   sharing information.  He was able to describe, though, this image.

   Each component has significance in the creation of a scalar-wave,
   per se, on the axis of the conically hollow iron pyramids that
   function as magnetic plates and also as capacitor plates at resonant
   oscillation --simultaneously.  As explained by the savant, a
   quadrature pattern of corner-magnetization --and the reversal of
   radial-magnetization around the inside rim of the inner hole, would
   ripple the length of the pyramid, and repeat with each
   reverse-charging cycle of the pyramidal iron capacitor plates.  The
   small bismuth octagons are suspended in an iron sphere, and as a
   diamagnetic, the bismuth interacted in some fashion with the beam. 
   It seems as if the bismuth is a node in the sequence of resonance,
   by appearance.


Do any within this singularly significant Vortex People List --what for 
the depth of the mind-pool here-- see a parallel of 1) Wilbert Smith's 
copper Caduceus winding on hollow ferrite sealed inside a brass tube 
with 2) a re-magnetization ripple suggested (using visual imagination) 
in the illustration of the pyramidal iron capacitor plate linked at the 
link above.


I'm collecting information and documenting as my bandwidth allows, about 
Wilbert Smith's tensor beam tech.


Anyone with information beyond what's available through google on Smith 
and his devices and his explanations, I would be blushingly appreciative 
should you share.  I will beg and hold out for bribes.  Thanks!



Warm regards Vortex People,

DonEM

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread ROGER ANDERTON 


I think the way out of it is -> the government has this little known 
right to change the constitution -> thus if they scrap the bill of 
rights -> they can stop presenting the illusion that there is freedom of 
speech under their fasicist dictatorship


-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership 
with big tech to censor -->




The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech 
“…to flag ‘problematic’ posts “that spread disinformation on Covid-19” 
on the Internet. George Orwell would call such activity propaganda. 
Historians characterize such a close working relationship between 
government and big business, as fascism 
 
. To the Biden administration, it’s merely cleaning up “misinformation 
 
”.

https://www.reformthekakistocracy.com/wh-admits-censoring-legal-implications/

since we live in a fasicist state -> corporations and govenment are the 
same thing


so your point that government not allowed to censor and big tech allowed 
to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing.






-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


It is not their constitutional right to censor.

-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" 
To: "Vortex" 
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


AM ROGER ANDERTON  > wrote:



shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech

Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot 
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, 
FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech 
as much as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from 
a cold fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can 
delete any post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. 
It is entirely up to them. The government cannot interfere with their 
decision because freedom of speech includes the right to not publish 
something. They cannot be forced to publish a statement.



If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their 
business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for 
Facebook and their users to decide. The government has no role and their 
decision to delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with 
constitutional free speech.




2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html 





I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their 
constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they 
do, but I am not keeping track.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread ROGER ANDERTON 


As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership 
with big tech to censor -->




The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech 
“…to flag ‘problematic’ posts “that spread disinformation on Covid-19” 
on the Internet. George Orwell would call such activity propaganda. 
Historians characterize such a close working relationship between 
government and big business, as fascism 
 
. To the Biden administration, it’s merely cleaning up “misinformation 
 
”.

https://www.reformthekakistocracy.com/wh-admits-censoring-legal-implications/

since we live in a fasicist state -> corporations and govenment are the 
same thing


so your point that government not allowed to censor and big tech allowed 
to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing.






-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


It is not their constitutional right to censor.

-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" 
To: "Vortex" 
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


AM ROGER ANDERTON  > wrote:



shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech

Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot 
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, 
FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech 
as much as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from 
a cold fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can 
delete any post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. 
It is entirely up to them. The government cannot interfere with their 
decision because freedom of speech includes the right to not publish 
something. They cannot be forced to publish a statement.



If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their 
business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for 
Facebook and their users to decide. The government has no role and their 
decision to delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with 
constitutional free speech.




2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html 





I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their 
constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they 
do, but I am not keeping track.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread ROGER ANDERTON 


It is not their constitutional right to censor.

-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" 
To: "Vortex" 
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


AM ROGER ANDERTON  > wrote:



shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech

Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot 
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, 
FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech 
as much as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from 
a cold fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can 
delete any post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. 
It is entirely up to them. The government cannot interfere with their 
decision because freedom of speech includes the right to not publish 
something. They cannot be forced to publish a statement.



If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their 
business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for 
Facebook and their users to decide. The government has no role and their 
decision to delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with 
constitutional free speech.




2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html 





I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their 
constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they 
do, but I am not keeping track.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread Jed Rothwell 
AM ROGER ANDERTON  wrote:

> shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
>
Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX
News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech as much
as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from a cold
fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can delete any
post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. It is entirely
up to them. The government cannot interfere with their decision because
freedom of speech includes the right to not publish something. They cannot
be forced to publish a statement.

If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their business.
People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for Facebook and their
users to decide. The government has no role and their decision to delete
messages or ban people has nothing to do with constitutional free speech.

2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html
> 
>
>
I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their
constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they
do, but I am not keeping track.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread ROGER ANDERTON 


It is a privately owned business after all. They can censor anything 
they want. The decision has to be left to them. You don't want the 
government telling them what they must allow or cannot allow.<<



shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
as for "dangerous" -> as per Manhattan project -> parts of physics is 
deemed "dangerous" and has to be censored.






-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 02:03
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


Censorship is increasing anything can be classified as "pornography, 
revenge or dangerous"



Youtube censorship ->
Big Tech censored anyone who predicted a Biden vaccine mandate 
https://youtubecensorship.com/2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html


etc.


-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" 
To: "Vortex" 
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 01:47
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without 
YouTube ads


ROGER ANDERTON  > wrote:




Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was 
not censored,  can you/we expect them not to eventually censor




YouTube never said it would not be censored. They said from the start 
they would not allow pornography, revenge or dangerous vids.



It is a privately owned business after all. They can censor anything 
they want. The decision has to be left to them. You don't want the 
government telling them what they must allow or cannot allow.



If you don't want to pay to see the ads deleted, don't pay. Go 
elsewhere. I seldom watch YouTube so the ads don't bother me. I believe 
there are other sources of vids on the internet. I haven't looked.



If you have a video they do not want to host, you can put it on your own 
website. As I did. It is now embedded.



https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618