Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks. They do have to find a way to pay for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute ones. But annoying as heck, I agree with.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 2:23 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: > I think the way out of it is -> the government has this little known right > to change the constitution -> thus if they scrap the bill of rights -> they > can stop presenting the illusion that there is freedom of speech under > their fasicist dictatorship > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "ROGER ANDERTON" <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without > YouTube ads > > As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with > big tech to censor --> > > > > The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to > flag ‘problematic’ posts “that spread disinformation on Covid-19” on the > Internet. George Orwell would call such activity propaganda. Historians > characterize such a close working relationship between government and big > business, as fascism > <https://www.thebalance.com/fascism-definition-examples-pros-cons-4145419>. > To the Biden administration, it’s merely cleaning up “misinformation > <https://www.foxnews.com/media/critics-slam-psaki-white-houseconsulting-facebook-flag-misinformation> > ”. > > > https://www.reformthekakistocracy.com/wh-admits-censoring-legal-implications/ > > > since we live in a fasicist state -> corporations and govenment are the > same thing > > > so your point that government not allowed to censor and big tech allowed > to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing. > > > > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "ROGER ANDERTON" <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without > YouTube ads > > It is not their constitutional right to censor. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > To: "Vortex" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without > YouTube ads > > AM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech >> > Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot > pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX > News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech as much > as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from a cold > fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can delete any > post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason. It is entirely > up to them. The government cannot interfere with their decision because > freedom of speech includes the right to not publish something. They cannot > be forced to publish a statement. > > If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their > business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for Facebook > and their users to decide. The government has no role and their decision to > delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with constitutional free > speech. > > >> 2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html >> <https://youtubecensorship.com/2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html> >> >> > I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their > constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they > do, but I am not keeping track. > >
