Re: SMOT

2005-05-10 Thread Hank Scudder
Stephen,
   I respectfully disagree with your analysis. The rotation of the ball 
comes from friction with the track as the ball is attracted by the magnet. 
No friction, the ball would just slide along the track. The magnet doesn't 
have anything to do with the angular momentum directly.

Hank
- Original Message - 
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: SMOT



Terry Blanton wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't understand this then you need to brush up on your physics.
Let's talk about the physics.  A magnetic gradient pulls the ball up a 
ramp.  Suddenly there's a hole in the ramp and gravity pulls the ball 
through the hole.  The ball is still spinning when it falls.  What 
imparted the angular momentum?

Here's a quick picture showing some of the most important forces (nb -- 
those black force arrows on the ramp have somewhat arbitrary directions):

http://physicsinsights.net/images/ball-rolling-up-ramp.png
From the point of view of the ball, as it accelerated up the ramp, the 
ramp itself applied a tangential force to the surface of the ball which 
caused it to spin; thence came the angular momentum (in the frame of 
reference of the ball).

Angular momentum must be measured at a particular point in space.  It only 
makes sense to talk about it with regard to a particular origin.  In 
particular, it's conserved, but that statement only makes sense in a 
situation where you've chosen one point about which to measure the total 
value of L.  So let's say we measure it at the point the ball lands on 
when it hits the ground after falling through the hole.  From that POV, as 
the ball moves up the ramp, the ball gains angular momentum both because 
of its spin and because of the motion of its center of mass along a line 
which doesn't pass through the point we have (arbitrarily) chosen as the 
center of our coordinate system.  At the same time, the RAMP gains angular 
momentum which is equal and opposite to the angular momentum of the spin 
of the ball, as a result of the force the BALL exerts on the ramp as it 
spins up.  Finally, the MAGNET gains angular momentum which is equal and 
opposite to the angular momentum due to the motion of the ball's center of 
mass along a line which doesn't pass through the origin.

Now, the ramp is not accelerating in these coordinates, despite the force 
the ball exerts on it.  So, the ramp is also being acted on by other 
forces (it's attached to the apparatus which is attached to the floor 
which is attached to the ground) and the L gained by the ramp is actually 
passed to the environment.  Similarly, the magnet doesn't accelerate; its 
L value is also passed to the environment.  But what is the environment? 
It's the Earth itself, which is so massive that we don't normally notice 
tiny changes in its angular momentum due to things like balls rolling up 
ramps.  In other words, the Earth itself provides an essentially infinite 
source/sink for L, which is one reason why it's not always apparent that L 
is really conserved in real-world situations.





New battery technology

2005-03-29 Thread Hank Scudder



Vortex-ians
 I was a regular member of this 
group three years ago, when I lived in LA and I commuted regularly with an 
electric car. I was in grad school at CSUN at the time, and lived eight miles 
from the school. In the morning I would unplug the car from my driveway, drive 
to school, park at the school parking lot which had a free plug, charge all day, 
at about 10 amps average, drive home at night, and plug in again overnight at 
home, The car used 12-6 volt batteries, Pb-acid type such as in golf carts. The 
batteries would last about three years with this loading. I had a very steep one 
mile long hill just before I arrived at home, and the car would pull 600 amps 
during the climb. It was quite practical, and I commuted forsix years this 
way
.
 These new batteries would 
be great, if I could afford them. I still have the car, stored on my daughters 
farm near the Canadian Border. She uses it in the summertime to commute to the 
school she works at. The car has no top, (a roadster), so its not ideal in the 
NE, but was fine in LA

 A picture of the car is at http://www.getmsm.com/ev/tropica/default.htm


Hank Scudder


Re: Big CF breakthrough reported

2005-03-02 Thread Hank Scudder



Jed,
 Just for the heck of it I did a 
google on Hyunik Yang and got a large number 
of responses. He has reported on nanowires of Gallium Nitride and Gallium 
Phosphide, as well as jointly with some russians on an ”Experimental Study of Peculiarities of Electric Explosion ... 
web.pdx.edu/~pdx00210/News/CFRLEngNews/CFRLEN44.htm 

It might be worth your while to look him up a little. There is also a bunch 
of stuff from this new Company.

Hank