Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads
I see they don't mention using deuterium, (heavy hydrogen,) and micro-cluster palladium as a source, which is the easiest and most cost effective. On Monday, September 20, 2021, 08:29:46 AM PDT, Jed Rothwell wrote: ROGER ANDERTON wrote: government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate didn't vote for that No vote is needed. The government and big tech both have the right of free speech, and the right to do whatever they like as long as it is legal. The electorate cannot take away their right to cooperate with one another, or to collaborate. The electorate cannot vote to close down LENR-CANR.org or forbid me from uploading documents from NASA, which I did recently. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BushnellDfrontierso.pdf wel its all about boiling the frog, take small steps in increasing what the frog has to tolerate until kill it There is nothing remotely wrong with the government and publishers working together. The government has been working with publishers for the benefit of the public since colonial times. In some cases, the government and publishers worked together for nefarious purposes, but they both have the right to do that. If you, or some other member of the public, or the electorate as a whole moved to stop that cooperation -- or forbid it -- that would be a far greater threat to freedom than cooperation between publishers and the government. It would be as much of a threat as the Biden administration trying to stop FOX News from lying about the vaccines. Anyone who knows the difference between DNA and RNA can see that FOX News is lying about the vaccines. I am sure the management at FOX has high school level knowledge of biology. So they are lying. But it would violate the constitution to order them to shut up. The administration has every right to point out they are lying, and to ask them to stop. It should do that! But it cannot order them to stop publishing lies. By the way, that meme about frogs in hot water is a myth. It is not a bit true. As soon as water gets uncomfortably hot, the frog will jump out.
Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain
It is referred to as 5th density; not 5th dimension. Torsion, (or toroidal,) fields were actually expounded upon by Russian scientist, (Shipov, Heim, Kozarev, etc.) who did EXTENSIVE research and experimentation on torsion fields. This throws string theory out the window and explains the function of gravity, spin, electromagnetics and quantum geometric fields with quantum black holes at their vertices. No protons, neutrons or electrons in this model and gives a unified theory of everything. TORSION FIELDS - Theory of Physical Vacuum - Shipov and Heim - JustPaste.it | | | | || | | | | | TORSION FIELDS - Theory of Physical Vacuum - Shipov and Heim - JustPaste.it | | | | Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:30 AM, CB Sites wrote: Interesting references. It reminded me of something I recalled from one of my EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that adding a 5th Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity and the basis for a theory of everything. Later learning that it was Kaluza-Klien theory and it's been around since the early 1900s. So as a quick background, a wikipedia reference may help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluz-Klein_theory. Recently there was a proposal that the dark matter problem could be solved by the introduction of a 5th dimension, and there have been other cosmological hints of a 5th dimension and an elegant model of black-holes can be built in 5 dimensions. So maybe there is something to the addition of a higher dimension when dealing with EM. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:29 AM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their mind or what they are able to see. The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than 4. As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S3 : https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf. But you must go to SO(4) (S5 for rotations) to get the true picture of the basic static relation between source charge and EM fields, what leads to the stable nucleus. So everything you today read about black holes etc. is outrageous nonsense, as today's accepted.. physics has no clue about the structure of mass. By the way: Toroidal fields first were investigated by Tesla --> Tesla coils. All EM waves basically are toroidal but we try to make them as spherical as possible. In the far field the toroidal field components can be (most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some terms I gave. J.W. On 18.03.2021 11:32, William Beaty wrote: Cosmic strings in a garage-lab? The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or "smoke rings." They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM fields. Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but b-fields are not EM Torsion. Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about pulsed coils which launch ring-vorticies rather than EM waves. (Where would he get such an idea?) Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally produced by sharp-pulsed circuitry? If one hits you in the face, would you feel anything? (Obviously the signature to watch for is odd EM pulses which travel far *slower* than lightspeed. If coils don't detect them, maybe an NE-2 bulb might respond? Try to persuade one to coast to a halt. (Seal it in an argon-filled Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?) RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston, has this too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to figure out someday, found on his old site "Cartan's Corner." http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/ New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm Also, large article pdf collection: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/ Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf list of papers: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-M-Kiehn-2024567949 http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Robert_M_Kiehn Kiehn 2017, Photons, propogating topological singularities https://tinyurl.com/kiehnsphotons (Nature of light: what is a photon?) https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Light-What-Photon/dp/0367387107/ --- Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider: the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Don wrote: Tutor wanted: An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and provide contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free web-conferencing software. (( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))) William J. Beaty
Re: [Vo]:How the Holmlid mechanism works
They are more like geometric vibrations from the quantum vacuum fluctuations with miniature black holes at the vortices. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:20 PM, Robin wrote: In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49 +0100: Hi, [snip] >All particles we know are resonances of the proton. Don't you think a free electron is a bit light weight to be a proton resonance? Maybe structures other than protons are also possible?
Re: [Vo]:Sodium Ion Batteries
I am not on these threads very often so I am not up to date; does anyone know where science and the development of cold fusion is at currently? Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:30 PM, Robin wrote: In reply to Michael Foster's message of Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:02:10 + (UTC): Hi, BTW there is much research going on in all areas of battery design. Also check out both Magnesium and Fluoride battery development.
Re: [Vo]:Acoustic demonstration of beats
I must've missed a few classes; are you talking about creating or removing heat in a general sense, starting an atomic nuclear reaction, or simply producing energy? I joined the group last night and, obviously, missed a few emails, too. Just curious.Bob Lee Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:56 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: The nonlinearity must be attached to the cathode itself because a THz signal will not go through even 1 micron of electrolyte. In the Letts-Cravens-Hagelstein experiment, a tiny amount of gold was added to the cathode to produce the nonlinearity. Did it work because it formed a diode junction? Was the nonlinearity plasmon related? That is presently unknown - but it was produced directly on the cathode, which is the target. On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 1:50 PM Sean Logan wrote: Sounds fascinating. May I ask: what are you using as your non-linear element, to cause the two laser beams to heterodyne? Is it the target they shine on, itself? On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 15:19 Bob Higgins wrote: Sean, What you are describing is entirely possible. Also, diode lasers can be driven into modes that produce sidebands just at the threshold of ordinary output - but it is hard to control the sidebands without an expensive "loop" receiver and some kind of lock-in control. Using 2 lasers is pretty easy. I am presently working on a dual laser experiment with 2 tunable diode lasers combined optically onto a single fiber. The wavelength separation (determines the beat frequency) is continuously monitored in a high resolution fiber spectrometer. We are nearly ready to run experiments with this hardware. On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:10 PM Sean Logan wrote: Could you use an Optical Parametric Amplifier to create your desired sidebands? Using one laser as the "signal input" and the other as the "pump" should give you an output containing sum and difference frequencies (sidebands, or heterodynes). On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 12:29 H LV wrote: In my estimation Rumford's theory is the seed of an alternate theory of radiation. It could still grow and blossom into a well developed mathematical theory of heat. I am interested in beat theory because it resonants (pun intended) with Rumford`s theory of hot and cold radiation, sinceboth involve _differences_. A beat frequency is given by the difference of two frequencies and in Rumford`s theory two types of differences are important.The first is that the relative difference in temperature between two bodies determines which body is producing more hot or more cold radiation. The second is that the sign and magnitude of the difference between the received frequency and the oscillator's frequency determines whether the radiation increases or decreases the energy of the oscillator. Harry On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:21 PM JonesBeene wrote: The beat frequency they were after was in the THz range and this was in order to fit Hagelstein’s theory of optical phonons – … and yes - small gain was seen. However, in the earlier similar work without beat frequencies – single laser only - much higher gain (order of magnitude more) has been reported by Letts/Cravens. The reproducibility was apparently better in the later experiments - but I do not think the lower result with the beat frequency is leading anywhere. From: H LV Beat frequencies of two lasers irradiating a surface appear in _Stimulation of Optical Phonons in Deuterated Palladium_ by Dennis Letts and Peter Hagelstein https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LettsDstimulatio.pdf Harry
